基于改进价值当量法的内蒙古生态系统服务价值与区内生态补偿研究

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.564

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the value equivalent method modified by three coefficients of “spatial heterogeneity, socio-economic factors, and resource scarcity”, this study assesses the ecosystem service value (ESV) of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2000 to 2022. Using the 2022 gross domestic product of each city and prefecture, this study identifies the ecological compensation space, calculates the priority of compensation subjects and beneficiaries, and proposes a horizontal ecological compensation strategy suitable for the local area. The study reveals the following: (1) The land use types in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region are mainly grassland and desert, with the main characteristics of change being the mutual transformation between grassland and farmland, as well as between grassland and desert. (2) From 2000 to 2022, the ESV of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region has experienced an increasing trend, from 6346.03×10⁸ yuan in 2000 to 10582.23×10⁸ yuan in 2022, with an increase of 66.75%. The contribution of grassland to the total ESV has always been the highest, accounting for more than 57.00%. Regulating services contribute the most to the ESV of the study area (66.79% to 67.16%). Climate regulation and hydrological regulation are the most important ecological functions in the study area. The spatial distribution of Inner Mongolia’s ESV is “higher in the east and lower in the west”. (3) Among the 12 cities and prefectures, the priority order of compensation recipients is as follows: Hulunbeir City>Xilin Gol League>Xing’an League>Alxa League>Ulanqab City. Further, the priority order of compensation providers is as follows: Hohhot City>Baotou City>Erdos City>Tongliao City. Bayannur City, Wuhai City, and Chifeng City are the coordinating subjects. This study provides an important theoretical basis and practical reference for improving the scientific decision-making of ecological compensation in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and promoting the coordinated development of regional ecological protection and economy.

Key words: ecosystem service value, improved value equivalence method, ecological compensation, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

ZHANG Qing, A Rong, TONG Baoquan, LI Xiaocan, BAO Wenjie, GE Rileqimuge, XIE Yuanzhi. Value of ecosystem services and intra-regional ecological compensation in Inner Mongolia based on the improved value equivalence method[J].Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(8): 1640-1652.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Fig. 6

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

References 29

[1]	Ouyang Z Y, Song C S, Zheng H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 117(25): 14593-14601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911439117
[2]	Börner J, Baylis K, Corbera E, et al. The effectiveness of payments for environmental services[J]. World Development, 2017, 96: 359-374. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020
[3]	Norgaard R B, Jin L. Trade and the governance of ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66(4): 638-652. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.026
[4]	Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. Applying value transfer method for eco-service valuation in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010, 1(1): 51-59.
[5]	赵志刚, 余德, 王凯荣, 等. 赣西地区生态系统服务价值与生态补偿策略[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7507-7518.
	[Zhao Zhigang, Yu De, Wang Kairong, et al. Ecosystem services value evaluation and strategies of payment for ecosystem service in western Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 7507-7518.]
[6]	王女杰, 刘建, 吴大千, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿——以山东省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653.
	[Wang Nüjie, Liu Jian, Wu Daqian, et al. Regional eco-compensation based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study of Shandong Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653.]
[7]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
	[Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
[8]	Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[9]	魏之首, 关燕宁, 蔡丹路, 等. 基于改进型遥感生态指数的生态系统服务价值评估方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2024, 26(7): 1763-1778. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2024.240111
	[Wei Zhishou, Guan Yanning, Cai Danlu, et al. Assessing ecosystem services value with modified remote sensing ecological index[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2024, 26(7): 1763-1778.]
[10]	马婷婷, 王希义, 张磊. 基于价值当量因子法的山岳型旅游区生态系统服务价值评估——以山东泰山为例[J]. 泰山学院学报, 2024, 46(2): 14-21.
	[Ma Tingting, Wang Xiyi, Zhang Lei. Evaluation of ecosystem service value in mountainous tourism areas based on value equivalent factor methods: A case study of Mount Tai in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Taishan University, 2024, 46(2): 14-21.]
[11]	周渝, 邓伟, 刘婷, 等. 重庆都市区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动力[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 249-256.
	[Zhou Yu, Deng Wei, Liu Ting, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving force of ecosystem service value in Chongqing metropolitan area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 249-256.]
[12]	李红清, 张琳, 覃昕, 等. 内蒙古干旱半干旱草原煤电开发区域生态承载力评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 522-532.
	[Li Hongqing, Zhang Lin, Qin Xin, et al. Assessment of regional ecological carrying capacity of the coal-electricity development area in arid and semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43(2): 522-532.] doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202402.033
[13]	胡娟娟, 张心灵, 刘宇晨. 内蒙古城镇居民对草原生态补偿支付意愿及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(7): 112-122.
	[Hu Juanjuan, Zhang Xinling, Liu Yuchen. Urban residents’ willingness to pay for grassland ecological compensation in Inner Mongolia: Exploring influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2024, 46(7): 112-122.]
[14]	王天雁, 马晓青. 生态保护与牧民生计: 牧区草原生态保护补助奖励政策实施状况调查[J]. 青海民族大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 48(2): 57-69.
	[Wang Tianyan, Ma Xiaoqing. Ecological protection and pastoralist livelihoods: Investigation on the implementation of grassland ecological protection subsidy and reward policy in pastoral areas[J]. Journal of Qinghai Nationalities University (Social Science Edition), 2022, 48(2): 57-69.]
[15]	黄敏云. 基于内蒙古森林碳汇核算的生态补偿机制分析[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2022.
	[Huang Minyun. Analysis of the ecological compensation mechanism based on the forest carbon sink accounting in Inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2022.]
[16]	马文琪. 高质量发展目标下基于内蒙古森林碳汇核算的生态补偿机制研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古财经大学, 2024.
	[Ma Wenqi. Research on the ecological compensation mechanism based on the value of forest carbon sink in Inner Mongolia under the background of high quality[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, 2024.]
[17]	刘晨, 田漾帆, 牛先楚. 基于主体功能区的生态补偿与生态功能区发展的机会成本比较研究——基于山西省(2008—2015)的实证分析[J]. 现代城市研究, 2022(3): 14-20.
	[Liu Chen, Tian Yangfan, Niu Xianchu. A comparative study between the opportunity cost of ecological compensation and the development of ecological functional areas based on major function oriented zoning: An empirical analysis based on Shanxi Province (2008—2015)[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2022(3): 14-20.]
[18]	安文举, 鱼亦凡, 郝姗姗, 等. 基于土地利用变化的陕北多沙粗沙区生境质量演变及响应分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 474-484. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.385
	[An Wenju, Yu Yifan, Hao Shanshan, et al. Evolution and response analysis of habitat quality in more sediments and coarse sediments region of northern Shaanxi based on land use change[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 474-484.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.385
[19]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.
	[Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Changshun, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.]
[20]	张志强, 陈鹏飞, 申维. 长武县土地利用/覆被演变规律及其影响下生态服务价值变化研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(4): 219-226, 233.
	[Zhang Zhiqiang, Chen Pengfei, Shen Wei. Study on land use/cover change and its impact on ecosystem services in Changwu County[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(4): 219-226, 233.]
[21]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
	[Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Leiming, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[22]	刘勇, 李晋昌, 杨永刚. 基于生物量因子的山西省森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(9): 2699-2706.
	[Liu Yong, Li Jinchang, Yang Yonggang. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services based on biomass in Shanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(9): 2699-2706.] doi: 10.5846/stxb
[23]	刘倩, 李葛, 张超, 等. 基于系数修正的青龙县生态系统服务价值动态变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(6): 971-980.
	[Liu Qian, Li Ge, Zhang Chao, et al. Study on dynamic changes in ecosystem service values in Qinglong County based on coefficient correction[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(6): 971-980.]
[24]	罗永忠, 成自勇, 郭小芹. 近40 a甘肃省气候生产潜力时空变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(1): 221-229.
	[Luo Yongzhong, Cheng Ziyong, Guo Xiaoqin. The changing characteristics of potential climate productivity in Gansu Province during nearly 40 years[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 221-229.]
[25]	欧名豪, 宗臻铃, 董元华, 等. 区域生态重建的经济补偿办法探讨——以长江上游地区为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2000(4): 109-112.
	[Ou Minghao, Zong Zhenling, Dong Yuanhua, et al. Economic compensation for regional eco-reconstruction: A case of the upper basin of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2000(4): 109-112.]
[26]	Xing L, Xue M G, Wang X Y. Spatial correction of ecosystem service value and the evaluation of eco-efficiency: A case for China’s provincial level[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 95: 841-850. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.033
[27]	何楠. 基于土地利用变化的湖北省生态系统服务价值评估研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2020.
	[He Nan. Study on the evaluation of ecosystem service value in Hubei Province based on land use change[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2020.]
[28]	胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯. 土地生态系统服务功能价值动态估算模型的改进与应用——以福州市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(1): 30-41.
	[Hu Xisheng, Hong Wei, Wu Chengzhen. An improved dynamic evaluation model and land ecosystem service values for Fuzhou City[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(1): 30-41.]
[29]	Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 333-346. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00250-6

一级分类	二级分类	农田	森林	草地	湿地	荒漠	水域
供给服务	食物生产	2125.420	485.673	448.807	980.963	9.617	769.383
	原料生产	471.247	1115.605	660.387	961.728	28.852	221.198
	水资源供给	-2510.111	577.037	365.457	4981.753	19.235	10050.062
调节服务	气体调节	1711.877	3668.994	2320.971	3654.568	125.025	913.642
	气候调节	894.407	10978.130	6135.827	6924.444	96.173	2721.691
	净化环境	259.667	3216.981	2026.041	6924.444	394.309	5491.469
	水文调节	2875.568	7184.111	4494.477	46605.358	230.815	105184.235
支持服务	土壤保持	1000.198	4467.228	2827.481	4443.185	144.259	894.407
	维持养分循环	298.136	341.414	217.992	346.222	9.617	67.321
	生物多样性	326.988	4068.111	2571.021	15137.605	134.642	2462.025
文化服务	美学景观	144.259	1784.006	1134.840	9097.951	57.704	1904.222

修正系数	2000年	2005年	2010年	2015年	2020年	2022年
社会经济系数	0.96	1.11	1.15	1.18	1.08	1.28
资源稀缺性系数	0.61	0.61	0.62	0.61	0.60	0.60
空间异质性系数	0.49	0.48	0.54	0.63	0.66	0.62

年份	农田	森林	草地	水域	荒漠	建设用地	湿地
2000	1398.32	1739.71	5457.19	60.57	2748.72	53.18	0.98
2005	1323.92	1770.89	5545.94	50.61	2704.43	62.23	0.64
2010	1316.06	1783.10	5556.96	47.28	2676.60	78.20	0.46
2015	1379.30	1793.48	5483.45	52.10	2657.61	92.20	0.51
2020	1340.68	1809.92	5475.98	51.69	2674.69	105.37	0.34
2022	1372.54	1805.92	5427.39	51.84	2688.82	111.09	1.06
2000—2022	-25.78	66.21	-29.80	-8.73	-59.90	57.92	0.08

一级分类	二级分类	2000年	2005年	2010年	2015年	2020年	2022年
供给服务	食物生产	183.123	203.582	239.395	287.523	271.187	303.740
	原料生产	180.942	206.685	244.051	287.630	274.454	304.238
	水资源供给	14.675	19.079	21.556	20.807	24.035	22.230
调节服务	气体调节	627.340	716.271	845.642	996.634	950.717	1053.999
	气候调节	1558.962	1791.120	2116.787	2485.157	2377.306	2629.058
	净化环境	537.703	613.518	723.205	850.625	813.499	900.318
	水文调节	1537.905	1690.930	1970.601	2364.187	2252.774	2500.954
支持服务	土壤保持	719.950	825.039	974.513	1145.362	1094.326	1211.327
	维持养分循环	64.094	72.803	85.899	101.634	96.727	107.470
	生物多样性	637.875	731.426	863.675	1014.082	969.746	1072.815
文化服务	美学景观	283.457	324.490	382.948	449.971	430.241	476.077

一级分类	二级分类	2000—2005年	2005—2010年	2010—2015年	2015—2020年	2020—2022年
供给服务	食物生产	20.459	35.813	48.128	-16.336	32.553
	原料生产	25.743	37.367	43.578	-13.175	29.784
	水资源供给	4.403	2.478	-0.749	3.227	-1.804
调节服务	气体调节	88.931	129.372	150.991	-45.917	103.282
	气候调节	232.158	325.666	368.370	-107.851	251.752
	净化环境	75.816	109.686	127.420	-37.126	86.819
	水文调节	153.024	279.671	393.587	-111.413	248.180
支持服务	土壤保持	105.089	149.474	170.850	-51.036	117.001
	维持养分循环	8.709	13.095	15.736	-4.907	10.743
	生物多样性	93.551	132.249	150.406	-44.336	103.069
文化服务	美学景观	41.033	58.458	67.023	-19.730	45.836

Value of ecosystem services and intra-regional ecological compensation in Inner Mongolia based on the improved value equivalence method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 29

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

年份	农田	森林	草地	湿地	荒漠	水域
2000	0.0480	0.2978	0.5721	0.0004	0.0155	0.0661
2005	0.0454	0.3029	0.5810	0.0003	0.0153	0.0552
2010	0.0452	0.3053	0.5827	0.0002	0.0151	0.0516
2015	0.0473	0.3066	0.5741	0.0002	0.0150	0.0568
2020	0.0459	0.3093	0.5732	0.0002	0.0151	0.0563
2022	0.0472	0.3099	0.5704	0.0005	0.0152	0.0567

盟市	GDP/10⁸元	排序	NESV/10⁸元	排序	G	空间识别	ECPS	排序
呼伦贝尔市	1536.00	6	2789.17	1	G>0	受偿主体	1.82	1
锡林郭勒盟	1148.70	7	1499.00	2	G>0	受偿主体	1.31	2
兴安盟	681.50	11	417.72	5	G>0	受偿主体	0.61	3
阿拉善盟	407.30	12	205.81	9	G>0	受偿主体	0.51	4
乌兰察布市	1017.90	9	369.24	6	G>0	受偿主体	0.36	5
赤峰市	2148.40	4	594.28	3	G=0	协调主体	0.28	-
巴彦淖尔市	1084.60	8	283.99	8	G=0	协调主体	0.26	-
乌海市	803.30	10	12.62	12	G=0	协调主体	0.02	-
呼和浩特市	3329.10	3	102.39	11	G<0	补偿主体	0.03	1
包头市	3749.90	2	192.58	10	G<0	补偿主体	0.05	2
鄂尔多斯市	5613.40	1	560.52	4	G<0	补偿主体	0.10	3
通辽市	1561.80	5	316.59	7	G<0	补偿主体	0.20	4

[1]	NING Yaxuan, YIN Hao, LI Jinnuo. Coupling analysis of new-type urbanization and agricultural ecosystem services in the middle section of the northern agro-pastoral ecotone in China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(7): 1457-1469.
[2]	ZENG Yong, BI Yu, ZHANG Hongbin, SHI Fengzhi, WANG Peng. Dynamic changes of ecosystem service value and land use in the Tarim River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(2): 265-274.
[3]	SUN Yubo, ZHAO Shanchao, WANG Yapei, MA Xiaoli, CHEN Yuwen, HUANG Xuansheng, WANG Weixia. Quantification and spatial differentiation of ecosystem service value of Picea schrenkiana forest in the central Tianshan Mountains [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1396-1405.
[4]	MENG Xianwen, CAO Jun, XUE Zhanjin. Spatiotemporal changes of the ecosystem service value for mining area in Loess Plateau: A case of Pingshuo mining area [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 455-464.
[5]	SHI Jinli, XU Liping, LI Xiaohang, GAO Zhiyu, XI Yunyun, LI Zhihui. Evaluation of ecological-economic harmony and sustainable development zoning in counties of southern Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(10): 1794-1804.
[6]	PENG Ya, WANG Juanjuan, WANG Shanshan, TIAN Liulan, LIU Jie, WU Zhaopeng. Spatiotemporal pattern evolution of land use conflict in Urumqi City from the perspective of ecological security [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 81-92.
[7]	SUI Lu, PU Chunling, LIU Zhiyou, BAI Pengfei, LIU Tao. Trade-off synergy of ecosystem service value in Urumqi City based on PLUS model [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(1): 159-168.
[8]	ZHANG Kaili,FENG Rongrong,LIU Tan,ZHANG Zhicheng,HAN Jianing,LIU Kang. Coordination and obstacle factors of urbanization and ecosystem service value in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(4): 1254-1267.
[9]	AN Siwen,MA Caihong,YUAN Qianying,HUA Yuqi. Effects of “ecological-production-living” land changes on ecosystem services in ecological migration area: A case of Hongsibu District in Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(6): 1836-1846.
[10]	ZHANG Shuai,WANG Yang,XIA Tingting,CHANG Xue’er,LI Zhi. Effects of land use/cover change on ecosystem service value under the ecological water conveyance of Tarim River [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 739-749.
[11]	SUN Yunfeng,QIU Wei,FAN Jingyun. Spatial selection of ecological compensation in key ecological functional areas of Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(2): 565-573.
[12]	WANG Bo,YANG Taibao. Value evaluation and driving force analysis of ecosystem services in Yinchuan City from 1980 to 2018 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(2): 552-564.
[13]	WANG Yishan,ZHANG Fei,CHEN Rui,QI Yaxiao,LIU Changjiang. Comprehensive ecological security assessment: A case study of Urumqi City [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(2): 427-440.
[14]	SU Fang, SONG Ni-ni, SHANG Hai-yang. Theoretical and practical problems in payments of ecoservice and discussion on the mechanism of ecoworkers [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2): 466-473.
[15]	ZHOU Jun-jun, YANG Mei-ling, FAN Xin-gang, XIAO Cheng-quan, JIA Hong-Li. Farmers’ willingness to participate in ecological compensation based on structural equation model:A case of Yanchi County in Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(5): 1185-1194.