CollectHomepage AdvertisementContact usMessage

Arid Land Geography ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (8): 1626-1639.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2026.151

• Ecology and Environment • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Coupled and coordinated relationships between population, socio-economic, and resource-environment in Xinjiang’s border areas under the background of border security

TONG Yanjun1,2,3(), YUAN Lu1(), LEI Jun4   

  1. 1 School of Economics, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, Xinjiang, China
    2 Research Centre for Population Dynamics and Coordinated Development of Resources and the Environment, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, Xinjiang, China
    3 Centre for New Structural Economics, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, Xinjiang, China
    4 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2026-03-23 Revised:2026-04-17 Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-08-21
  • Contact: YUAN Lu E-mail:geo_tyj@163.com;yuanlu200109@163.com

Abstract:

Frontier security is fundamental to national security, however, frontier regions often face complex demographic, economic, and ecological challenges, particularly in border areas. Analyzing coordination mechanisms among multiple systems provides a valuable perspective for advancing high-quality development in these regions. Drawing on a frontier security perspective and using county-level panel data from 2000 to 2023, this study systematically evaluates the coordination among population, socio-economic, and resource-environment systems in Xinjiang’s border counties. The results reveal the following: (1) Pronounced imbalances in the evolution of the three systems, population fluctuations are relatively minimal, whereas both socio-economic and resource-environment conditions continue to improve. (2) Most counties remain in the antagonistic and adjustment phases of coupling and coordination, with only a few (including Huocheng County), achieving preliminary synergy. (3) Furthermore, the level of coupling and coordination across counties demonstrates a significant negative spatial correlation. (4) Notably, resourc-environment systems contribute positively to coupling and coordination, while socio-economic and population systems exert a countervailing influence. Over the course of study, the comprehensive coupling coordination degree, however, showed a fluctuating upward trend. (5) Population strongly affects resource-environment, while in later stages, socio-economic systems have a greater impact on population than population inertia itself. Conversely, the interaction between population and the other two systems remains relatively weak. To address these challenges, the study recommends improving regional education, healthcare, and housing to support the rational population concentration, developing unique local industries, and designing cooperative mechanisms that integrate population, industry, and ecological development.

Key words: border security, integrated systems, coordination and collaboration, Xinjiang