“人-地-业”视角下新疆城乡融合发展的多维评价与时空演化

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.638

Abstract

Abstract:

Counties are crucial entry points for urban-rural integration development. They form the primary arenas for implementing the rural revitalization strategy and advancing urban-rural integration development. This study takes 83 counties in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region as the research subjects and constructs a three-dimensional indicator system that encompasses “people-land-industry”. We employ the entropy weight method for the measurement of the level of urban-rural integration development in Xinjiang’s counties from 2001 to 2021. Kernel density analysis and transition matrices are adopted to explore the characteristics of the evolution of this development level. A coupling coordination degree model is used to investigate the coordination and constraints across the different dimensions. The results indicate that: (1) From 2001 to 2021, all of the dimensions and the comprehensive level of urban-rural integration in Xinjiang counties improved significantly, exhibiting a pattern of “higher in the north and lower in the south”, with distinct evolutionary characteristics. The degree of “people integration” shifted from “low across all regions” to a “gradient differentiation” pattern; the “land integration” level improved relatively slowly, showing a significant gap between northern and southern Xinjiang. The disparity in the level of “industrial integration” among counties has narrowed, and spatial clustering in regions that have higher values intensified; the comprehensive level gap between northern and southern Xinjiang exhibits a trend of “first expanding, then narrowing”. (2) The urban-rural integration development in Xinjiang counties from 2001 to 2021 can be divided into three stages: A “slow development phase (2001—2006)”, a “transition stage (2006—2016)”, and a “rapid development stage (2016—2021)”. (3) From 2001 to 2021, the coordination level of “people-land-industry” continued to improve, exhibiting a spatial pattern that is “higher in the north and lower in the south”. The systemic coordination structure has significantly improved, which is reflected in: The elimination of severely imbalanced counties, a sharp decrease in moderately imbalanced counties, and the emergence of well-coordinated counties. From this, it is recommended to precisely identify the development gaps and lagging dimensions in weaker regions, promote targeted resource allocation, and foster all of the dimensions that coordinate development. Simultaneously, regional growth poles should be cultivated and urban-rural integration development should be “driven by a point-to-area approach”.

Key words: county territory, Xinjiang, urban-rural integration, “people-land-industry”, coupling coordination degree

LU Zhiqiu, LYU Mingyang, LI Zhihui, XU Liping. Multi-dimensional evaluation and temporal evolution of urban-rural integration development in Xinjiang from the perspective of “people-land-industry”[J].Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(8): 1750-1763.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

References 55

[1]	Zhang C, Fan Y P, Fang C L. Orderly and synergistic development of urban-rural integration based on evolutionary game model: A case study in the Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2024, 146: 107331, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107331.
[2]	秦昕, 涂维亮. 湖北省城乡融合发展的水平测度、区域差异及影响因素[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(4): 211-217.
	[Qin Xin, Tu Weiliang. Level measurement, regional differences and influencing factors of urban-rural integration in Hubei Province[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 64(4): 211-217.]
[3]	钱文荣, 仇焕广, 司伟, 等. 深化经济体制改革, 促进城乡融合发展——学习贯彻党的二十届三中全会精神笔谈[J]. 中国农村观察, 2024(5): 2-18.
	[Qian Wenrong, Qiu Huanguang, Si Wei, et al. Deepening the reform of the economic system and promoting the integrated development of urban and rural areas: Study and practice the spirit of the third plenary session of the 20^th CPC Central Committee[J]. China Rural Survey, 2024(5): 2-18.]
[4]	崔树强, 周国华, 李晓青, 等. “人-地-业”协调视角下长株潭城市群城乡融合发展仿真模拟[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43(7): 1337-1354. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2024.07.006
	[Cui Shuqiang, Zhou Guohua, Li Xiaoqing, et al. Simulation of urban-rural integration development of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration from the perspective of “human-land-industry” coordination[J]. Progress in Geography, 2024, 43(7): 1337-1354.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2024.07.006
[5]	Yang Y Y, Liu Y S, Li Y R, et al. Measure of urban-rural transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the new millennium: Population-land-industry perspective[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79: 595-608. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.005
[6]	Shan B Y, Zhang Q, Ren Q X, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of urban-rural integration and its influencing factors in Shandong Province of China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 14317, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18424-0.
[7]	Zhang S, Chen W, Li Q, et al. Evaluation and development strategy of urban-rural integration under ecological protection in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(40): 92674-92691. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28950-7
[8]	牛志勇. 城乡融合背景下人口双向流动与融合制度体系构建[J]. 农业经济, 2023(3): 96-98.
	[Niu Zhiyong. Bidirectional population mobility and the construction of an integration system framework in the context of urban-rural integration[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2023(3): 96-98.]
[9]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
	[Long Hualou, Chen Kunqiu. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
[10]	邹利林, 林程, 王建英, 等. 中国城乡土地利用公平测评及时空跃迁与优化路径[J]. 地理学报, 2025, 80(11): 2847-2868. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202511001
	[Zou Lilin, Lin Cheng, Wang Jianying, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and optimization path of land use equity between urban and rural areas in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2025, 80(11): 2847-2868.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202511001
[11]	方创琳, 孙彪. 新质生产力的地理学内涵及驱动城乡融合发展的重点方向[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(6): 1357-1370. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202406001
	[Fang Chuanglin, Sun Biao. The connotation of new quality productive forces and research priorities for driving urban-rural integrated development from the geographical perspective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(6): 1357-1370.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202406001
[12]	刘肖, 金浩. 产业协同集聚与城镇化耦合的经济增长效应[J]. 西北人口, 2021, 42(5): 16-29.
	[Liu Xiao, Jin Hao. Economic growth effect of co-agglomeration and urbanization coupling interaction[J]. Northwest Population Journal, 2021, 42(5): 16-29.]
[13]	Tian J, Ma J Q, Zeng S P, et al. Characteristics and driving factors of the spatial and temporal evolution of county urban-rural integration-evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China[J]. Land, 2025, 14(8): 1563, doi: 10.3390/land14081563.
[14]	Muga G B, Hu S G, Wang Z L, et al. The efficiency of urban-rural integration in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and its optimization[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(3): 2419, doi: 10.3390/su15032419.
[15]	Xu J, Zeng Z J, Xi Z H, et al. Research on sustainable urban-rural integration development: Measuring levels, influencing factors, and exploring driving mechanisms-taking eight cities in the Greater Bay Area as examples[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(8): 3357, doi: 10.3390/su16083357.
[16]	王武林, 罗婉璐, 周伟健. 福建省县域城乡融合时空演变与跃迁机制[J]. 人文地理, 2025, 40(1): 113-123.
	[Wang Wulin, Luo Wanlu, Zhou Weijian. Spatio-temporal evolution and transition mechanism of urban-rural integration in county territory of Fujian Province[J]. Human Geography, 2025, 40(1): 113-123.]
[17]	Yang Y Y, Bao W K, Wang Y S, et al. Measurement of urban-rural integration level and its spatial differentiation in China in the new century[J]. Habitat International, 2021, 117: 102420, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102420.
[18]	He Y H, Zhou G H, Tang C L, et al. The spatial organization pattern of urban-rural integration in urban agglomerations in China: An agglomeration-diffusion analysis of the population and firms[J]. Habitat International, 2019, 87: 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.04.003
[19]	Liu N N, Chen Y Y, Su F. Research on the spatial differences and influencing factors of integrated urban-rural development in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2023, 4: 1077653, doi: 10.3389/frsc.2022.1077653.
[20]	Niu B, Ge D Z, Sun J W, et al. Multi-scales urban-rural integrated development and land-use transition: The story of China[J]. Habitat International, 2023, 132: 102744, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102744.
[21]	Liu X G, Luo Y X, Zhu Y F, et al. Research on the measurement and effects of urban-rural integration and modernization in national central cities[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2024, 173(3): 827-866. doi: 10.1007/s11205-024-03357-0
[22]	Chen X F, Yu G X. The impact of urban-rural integration on food security: Evidence from provincial panel data in China[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(9): 3815, doi: 10.3390/su16093815.
[23]	Qin Y, Xu J L, Zhang H X, et al. The measurement of the urban-rural integration level of resource-exhausted cities: A case study of Zaozhuang City, China[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(1): 418, doi: 10.3390/su15010418.
[24]	蔡金芳, 王志强. 新疆城乡融合发展水平测度与影响因素研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2024, 35(3): 89-91, 98.
	[Cai Jinfang, Wang Zhiqiang. Research on the measurement and influencing factors of urban-rural integration development in Xinjiang[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2024, 35(3): 89-91, 98.]
[25]	王继伟, 吴文婕. 基于TOPSIS模型的新疆县域城乡融合水平评价[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2024, 35(20): 104-110.
	[Wang Jiwei, Wu Wenjie. Evaluation of urban-rural integration levels in Xinjiang counties using the TOPSIS model[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2024, 35(20): 104-110.]
[26]	高强, 薛洲. 以县域城乡融合发展引领乡村振兴: 战略举措和路径选择[J]. 经济纵横, 2022(12): 17-24.
	[Gao Qiang, Xue Zhou. Leading rural revitalization with county urban-rural integrated development: Strategic measures and path selection[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2022(12): 17-24.]
[27]	龙花楼, 徐雨利, 郑瑜晗, 等. 中国式现代化下的县域城乡融合发展[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(7): 12-19. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.07.002
	[Long Hualou, Xu Yuli, Zheng Yuhan, et al. Urban-rural integrated development at county level under Chinese path to modernization[J]. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(7): 12-19.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.07.002
[28]	Peng L A, Sun N, Jiang Z D, et al. The impact of urban-rural integration on carbon emissions of rural household energy consumption: Evidence from China[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2025, 27(1): 1799-1827. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03944-0
[29]	Niu Y C, Zhao L, Xie J X, et al. Population-land-industry-facility system coupling coordination and influencing factors in Hebei Province[J]. Land, 2025, 14(10): 2043, doi: 10.3390/land1410-20-43.
[30]	Ma L B, Chen M M, Che X L, et al. Research on population-land-industry relationship pattern in underdeveloped regions: Gansu Province of western China as an example[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8): 2434, doi: 10.3390/su11082434.
[31]	陆大道, 郭来喜. 地理学的研究核心—人地关系地域系统——论吴传钧院士的地理学思想与学术贡献[J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(2): 97-105. doi: 10.11821/xb199802001
	[Lu Dadao, Guo Laixi. Man-earth areal system: The core of geographical study: On the geographical thoughts and academic contributions of academician Wu Chuanjun[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(2): 97-105.] doi: 10.11821/xb199802001
[32]	周德, 戚佳玲, 钟文钰. 城乡融合评价研究综述: 内涵辨识、理论认知与体系重构[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2634-2651. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211013
	[Zhou De, Qi Jialing, Zhong Wenyu. Review of urban-rural integration evaluation: Connotation identification, theoretical analysis, and system reconstruction[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(10): 2634-2651.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211013
[33]	Li J T, Yang Y Y, Jiang N. County-rural transformation development from viewpoint of “population-land-industry” in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the background of rapid urbanization[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(9): 1637, doi: 10.3390/su9091637.
[34]	郑万吉, 叶阿忠. 城乡收入差距、产业结构升级与经济增长——基于半参数空间面板VAR模型的研究[J]. 经济学家, 2015(10): 61-67.
	[Zheng Wanji, Ye Azhong. Urban-rural income gap, industrial structure upgrading, and economic growth: An empirical study based on a semi-parametric spatial panel VAR model[J]. Economist, 2015(10): 61-67.]
[35]	杨婕, 戈大专, 孙攀, 等. 基于“人口-土地-资本”要素流动的城乡融合发展机制——以江西省为例[J]. 资源科学, 2025, 47(1): 110-124. doi: 10.18402/resci.2025.01.09
	[Yang Jie, Ge Dazhuan, Sun Pan, et al. The mechanism of urban-rural integrated development based on the “population-land-capital” factor flow: A case study of Jiangxi Province[J]. Resources Science, 2025, 47(1): 110-124.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2025.01.09
[36]	林聚任, 张璐. 流动社会学视角下县域人口要素流动与城乡融合发展[J]. 济南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 35(5): 72-82.
	[Lin Juren, Zhang Lu. Population factor mobility and urban-rural integrated development at the county level: From the perspective of mobility sociology[J]. Journal of University of Jinan (Social Science Edition), 2025, 35(5): 72-82.]
[37]	陈卫强, 笪晓军. 县域城乡融合发展的理论逻辑、现实困境及推进路径——基于“资源-产业-空间”的系统分析框架[J]. 农业经济问题, 2025(5): 94-106.
	[Chen Weiqiang, Da Xiaojun. Theoretical logic, realistic dilemmas, and promotion paths of county-level urban-rural integrated development: A system analysis framework based on “resources-industry-space”[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2025(5): 94-106.]
[38]	Huang L Y, Cao Y K. Review of the integrated development of ecological and cultural forestry[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(11): 6818, doi: 10.3390/su14116818.
[39]	李琳, 黄拓夫, 欧阳晓. 中国县域城乡产业融合水平测度及其时空格局研究[J]. 地理研究, 2025, 44(4): 1119-1142.
	[Li Lin, Huang Tuofu, Ouyang Xiao. Research on the measurement of the level and spatial and temporal pattern of urban and rural industrial integration in China[J]. Geographical Research, 2025, 44(4): 1119-1142.]
[40]	Li M M, He B, Guo R Z, et al. Study on population distribution pattern at the county level of China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(10): 3598, doi: 10.3390/su10103598.
[41]	Liu H, Lu G J, Luo K, et al. Measurement and spatio-temporal pattern evolution of urban-rural integration development in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle[J]. Land, 2024, 13(7): 942, doi: 10.3390/land13070942.
[42]	柯新利, 邓洁, 宋钰. 长江经济带耕地利用绿色转型与城乡融合耦合协调发展的时空格局研究[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(13): 5773-5785.
	[Ke Xinli, Deng Jie, Song Yu. Spatial-temporal pattern of coupling coordination between green transition of farmland use and urban-rural integration development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(13): 5773-5785.]
[43]	郑瑜晗, 龙花楼. 中国城乡融合发展测度评价及其时空格局[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(8): 1869-1887. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202308002
	[Zheng Yuhan, Long Hualou. Measurement and spatio-temporal pattern of urban-rural integrated development in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(8): 1869-1887.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202308002
[44]	Xu C Y, Qian C, Yang W C, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern of urban-rural integration development and its driving mechanism analysis in Hangzhou bay urban agglomeration[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(14): 8390, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148390.
[45]	Wei L R, Zhao X J, Lu J X. Measuring the level of urban-rural integration development and analyzing the spatial pattern based on the new development concept: Evidence from cities in the Yellow River Basin[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(1): 15, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010015.
[46]	周德, 戚佳玲, 钟文钰, 等. 城市群城乡融合发展: 测度评价、障碍因素与驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(11): 2914-2939. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020220537
	[Zhou De, Qi Jialing, Zhong Wenyu, et al. Urban and rural integration development in urban agglomerations: Measurement and evaluation, obstacle factors and driving factors[J]. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(11): 2914-2939.]
[47]	于雪霞, 周国华, 吴国华, 等. 中国中部农区城乡融合发展的时空特征及驱动机制[J]. 地理研究, 2025, 44(2): 400-418. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020240420
	[Yu Xuexia, Zhou Guohua, Wu Guohua, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving mechanisms of urban-rural integrated development in rural areas of central China[J]. Geographical Research, 2025, 44(2): 400-418.]
[48]	Massaquoi S M, Mande Z, Ge D D, et al. Does financial credit obtained from financial institutions influence agricultural productivity while balancing economic growth and sustainability? Empirical evidence from Sierra Leone using the VAR approach[J]. SAGE Open, 2025, 15(2): 21582440251342095, doi: 10.1177/2158244-0251342095.
[49]	谭佳欣, 王凯. 武陵山区旅游化对城乡融合发展的影响机制研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(4): 1048-1067. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250411
	[Tan Jiaxin, Wang Kai. The impact mechanism of tourismfication on urban-rural integration development in the Wuling Mountain area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(4): 1048-1067.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250411
[50]	秦趣, 唐晓兵, 文斌. 伊犁地区旅游发展水平与乡村振兴耦合机制及实证研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(6): 1277-1281. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.392
	[Qin Qu, Tang Xiaobing, Wen Bin. Empirical study on the coupling mechanism of tourism development level and rural revitalization in lli region[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(6): 1277-1287.]
[51]	Ma L B, Li J Y, Wang X, et al. Evolution and simulation optimization of rural settlements in urban-rural integration areas from a multi-gradient perspective: A case study of the Lan-Bai urban agglomeration in China[J]. Habitat International, 2024, 153: 103203, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103203.
[52]	Li C X, Wu J Y. Land use transformation and eco-environmental effects based on production-living-ecological spatial synergy: Evidence from Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(27): 41492-41504. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18777-z
[53]	Fang X, Shi X Y, Phillips T K, et al. The coupling coordinated development of urban environment towards sustainable urbanization: An empirical study of Shandong Peninsula, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 129: 107864, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107864.
[54]	王颖, 孙平军, 李诚固, 等. 2003年以来东北地区城乡协调发展的时空演化[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(7): 59-66. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.07.008
	[Wang Ying, Sun Pingjun, Li Chenggu, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution features of urban and rural harmonious in northeast China since 2003[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(7): 59-66.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.07.008
[55]	刘潇, 张新焕, 陈洋, 等. “乡镇-县域-绿洲”视角下新疆城乡融合的空间条件测度研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(5): 1039-1051. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.361
	[Liu Xiao, Zhang Xinhuan, Chen Yang, et al. Measurement of spatial conditions for urban-rural integration in Xinjiang from the perspective of “township-county-oasis”[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(5): 1039-1051.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.361

数据	年份	来源以及分辨率
社会经济数据	2001、2006、2011、2016、2021	《中国县域统计年鉴》《新疆统计年鉴》、新疆维吾尔自治区国民经济和社会发展统计公报
PM_2.5浓度	2001、2006、2011、2016、2021	达尔豪斯大学大气成分分析组（https://ghdx.healthdata.org）；1 km
NDVI	2001、2006、2011、2016、2021	中国科学院资源环境科学与数据中心（https://www.resdc.cn）；1 km
矢量行政区划数据	2023	自然资源部地图技术审查中心（https://www.zrzyst.cn）
路网数据	2021	Open Street Map（https://www.openstreetmap.org）
沙漠数据	2000	国家青藏高原科学数据中心（https://data.tpdc.ac.cn）
绿洲数据	2020	干旱区生态与资源科学数据中心（https://data.dcxjegi.cn）

目标层	准则层	指标说明	单位	属性	权重/%	参考文献
人融合	人口密度	人口数量/区域面积	人·km^-2	+	13.23	[7]
	人口城镇化率	城镇人口/总人口×100%	%	+	3.53	[14]
	居民财富状况	人均储蓄存款余额	元·人^-1	+	7.76	[44]
	教育发展水平	义务教育阶段学生数/总人口×100%	%	+	1.87	[39]
	医疗发展水平	医疗、卫生院床位数	张·(10³人)^-1	+	2.14	[13]
	社会保障水平	社会福利收养性单位床位	张·(10³人)^-1	+	6.35	[49]
地融合	地均粮食产量	粮食产量/播种面积	kg·km^-2	+	1.25	[42]
	土地城镇化率	建成区面积/区域面积×100%	%	+	13.27	[13]
	城市空间扩张	建成区面积/耕地面积×100%	%	-	0.28	[43]
	农业面源污染	化肥施用量/播种面积	kg·km^-2	-	0.55	[45]
	空气质量	PM_2.5浓度	μg·m^-3	-	0.69	[41]
	NDVI	区域NDVI均值	无量纲	+	5.13	[43]
业融合	人均GDP	区域生产总值/区域人口	元·人^-1	+	7.70	[41]
	产业结构	（二产产值+三产产值）/一产产值	无量纲	+	9.79	[24]
	农业发展水平	农业机械总动力/播种面积	kW·km^-2	+	9.64	[46]
	工业发展水平	规模以上工业企业数	个	+	7.29	[47]
	金融发展水平	人均年末金融机构贷款余额	元·人^-1	+	9.53	[48]

取值范围	协调等级	取值范围	协调等级
D≤0.2	严重失调	0.5＜D≤0.6	勉强协调
0.2＜D≤0.3	中度失调	0.6＜D≤0.7	初级协调
0.3＜D≤0.4	轻度失调	0.7＜D≤0.8	中级协调
0.4＜D≤0.5	濒临失调	0.8＜D≤0.9	良好协调

Multi-dimensional evaluation and temporal evolution of urban-rural integration development in Xinjiang from the perspective of “people-land-industry”

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 55

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	TONG Yanjun, YUAN Lu, LEI Jun. Coupled and coordinated relationships between population, socio-economic, and resource-environment in Xinjiang’s border areas under the background of border security [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(8): 1626-1639.
[2]	WANG Ziyang, XIA Yong, WANG Fuhong, DING Ning, LYU Yi, SU Zechen. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ecological efficiency of cultivated land use in counties of Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(7): 1385-1394.
[3]	NING Yaxuan, YIN Hao, LI Jinnuo. Coupling analysis of new-type urbanization and agricultural ecosystem services in the middle section of the northern agro-pastoral ecotone in China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(7): 1457-1469.
[4]	LI Wenjun, ZHANG Weimei. Coupling coordination relationship and spatiotemporal evolution trend between digital economy and common prosperity in China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(7): 1481-1492.
[5]	CHEN Yaning, ZHU Chenggang, LI Zhi, FANG Gonghuan. Unlocking the potential of water resources for high-quality development in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(6): 1101-1107.
[6]	LIU Xiao, ZHANG Xinhuan, CHEN Yang, YAN Hailong. Measurement of spatial conditions for urban-rural integration in Xinjiang from the perspective of “township-county-oasis” [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(5): 1039-1051.
[7]	BAI Yang, ZHAO Ping, LI Yongfeng, CHEN Mingzhu, SUN Yiyue. Spatial synergistic zoning of geotourism in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(5): 1074-1086.
[8]	WANG Weijun, LI Juan, LI Hua. Multi-scale spatiotemporal evolution and differentiation mechanisms of tourism-ecology-well-being coupling coordination in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(4): 683-696.
[9]	WANG Huili, LI Niu, LIU Ying, LIU Yonghan. Dynamic coupling and hierarchical obstacle analysis of water resources and ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(3): 569-580.
[10]	OU Kaihang, FANG Shiqiao, CHENG Qian, ZHOU Xufan. Coupling coordination degree of rural public services and rural tourism and its rural revitalization influence effect: Based on the empirical evidence in western China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(2): 404-415.
[11]	SUN Guojun, LI Jiayao, WANG Zixuan. Evaluation of the development level of the “digital-cultural-tourism” industries in the Yellow River Basin and analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of its coupling coordination [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 117-127.
[12]	ZHU Yiting, LIANG Guixian, ZHOU Chunshan, XIN Long, LI Jinxue. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and driving factors of new quality productive forces development of cultural tourism in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 128-139.
[13]	Alim ARKEN, LI Ruqi, Nurzat ABDUKEYUM, Mayra AHAT, Xerinay TILIWALDI. Characteristics of rainfall and extreme rainfall in southern Xinjiang from 1961 to 2022 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 13-22.
[14]	YANG Di, ZOU Jin, MA Xiaofei, ZHANG Xun, ZHOU Rui, LIU Yanchun, SHI Jinlian. Spatial distribution characteristics and sustainable development of sports tourism resources: A case of Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 140-150.
[15]	LIU Quanyu, LIU Xinlu, LI Guizhen, LI Congjuan. Fractal characteristics and driving factors of soil particle size in the surface layer of Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 56-68.