中国城市生态韧性时空特征及影响因素分析

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.379

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 系统分析城市生态韧性影响因素、提高城市生态韧性水平对于实现城市可持续发展、建设“韧性城市”至关重要。基于2005—2021年中国281个地级市的面板数据，从抵抗力、适应力和恢复力3个维度构建评价指标，刻画了城市生态韧性的时空演变特征，并综合运用时空地理加权回归模型及全局趋势分析对中国城市生态韧性影响因素及时空异质性进行探究。结果表明：（1） 2005—2021年中国城市生态韧性水平由0.0207上升至0.0248，年平均增长率为1.140%，生态韧性重心由东北向西南方向迁移，生态韧性水平差异呈先扩大后缩小的趋势。（2）经济发展、产业结构、地形因素、环境规制及人力资本对城市生态韧性具有正向促进作用，但各因素的影响存在明显的时空异质性，不同区域生态韧性影响因素的作用大小和方向不同。（3）各影响因素对城市生态韧性的影响在东西方向的变化趋势大于南北方向，产业结构水平对城市生态韧性的影响在东西方向上最敏感，环境规制对城市生态韧性的影响在南北方向最敏感。

关键词: 城市生态韧性, 时空地理加权回归模型, 影响因素, 时空异质性

Abstract:

The systematic analysis of the factors influencing urban ecological resilience and improvement in its levels are essential for achieving sustainable urban development and fostering “resilient cities”. Based on panel data from 281 prefecture-level cities of China collected between 2005 and 2021, this study constructed evaluation indexes across three dimensions: resistance, adaptability, and resilience. The spatial and temporal evolution of urban ecological resilience were characterized, and spatial and temporal geographically weighted regression models were applied. In addition, a global trend analysis was conducted to explore the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of influencing factors. The results showed the following. (1) From 2005 to 2021, the ecological resilience level of Chinese cities increased from 0.0207 to 0.0248, with an average annual growth rate of 1.140%. Over this period, the center of gravity for ecological resilience shifted along a northeast-southwest direction. The difference in ecological resilience levels initially expanded but then narrowed. (2) Economic development, industrial structure, topographical factors, environmental regulations, and human capital demonstrated positive effects on urban ecological resilience. However, the influence of these factors exhibited obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity, with their effects varying significantly in terms of magnitude and direction across different regions. (3) The impact of influencing factors on urban ecological resilience exhibited a greater variation along the east-west direction compared to the north-south direction. The ecological resilience was observed to be most sensitive to changes in industrial structure along the east-west direction, while environmental regulation had the greatest sensitivity along the north-south direction.

Key words: urban ecological resilience, spatiotemporal geographically weighted regression model, influencing factors, spatiotemporal heterogeneity

王立奇, 李国柱. 中国城市生态韧性时空特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025, 48(5): 893-904.

WANG Liqi, LI Guozhu. Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological resilience in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(5): 893-904.

图/表 10

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

表3

表4

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 35

[1]	Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1-23.
[2]	Holling C S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience[C]// Schulze P E. Engineering within Ecological Constraints. Washington: National Academy Press, 1996: 31-43.
[3]	Bristow G. Resilient regions: Replacing regional competitiveness[J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010, 3(1): 153-167.
[4]	王少剑, 崔子恬, 林靖杰, 等. 珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
	[Wang Shaojian, Cui Zitian, Lin Jingjie, et al. Coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
[5]	Hollnagel E. Resilience engineering and the built environment[J]. Building Research & Information, 2013, 42(2): 221-228.
[6]	Meerow S, Newell J P, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: A review[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 147: 38-49.
[7]	Li G Z, Wang L Q. Study of regional variations and convergence in ecological resilience of Chinese cities[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110667, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110667.
[8]	Aldrich D P, Meyer M A. Social capital and community resilience[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2015, 59(2): 254-269.
[9]	岳俞余, 高璟. 基于社会生态系统视角的乡村聚落韧性评价——以河南省汤阴县为例[J]. 小城镇建设, 2019, 37(1): 5-14.
	[Yue Yuyu, Gao Jing. Revaluation of rural settlement toughness based on social ecosystem perspective: Taking Tangyin County Henan Province as an example[J]. Development of Small Cities & Towns, 2019, 37(1): 5-14. ]
[10]	王婷, 邹紫涵, 周国华, 等. 高质量发展下城市生态韧性的测度框架[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2022, 45(5): 33-40.
	[Wang Ting, Zou Zihan, Zhou Guohua, et al. A framework for measuring urban ecological resilience under high-quality development[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2022, 45(5): 33-40. ]
[11]	李苏, 刘浩南. 干旱区城市化与生态韧性耦合协调的时空格局演化分析——以宁夏为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(4): 1281-1290. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.563
	[Li Su, Liu Haonan. Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological resilience in arid region: A case of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(4): 1281-1290. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.563
[12]	Zhou Y, Chen Y, Li Z L, et al. Ecological resilience assessment of an emerging urban agglomeration: A case study of Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle, China[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2022, 31(3): 2381-2395.
[13]	Pickett S T A, McGrath B, Cadenasso M L, et al. Ecological resilience and resilient cities[J]. Building Research & Information, 2014, 42(2): 143-157.
[14]	王松茂, 牛金兰. 山东半岛城市群城市生态韧性的动态演化及障碍因子分析[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(8): 51-61. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.08.006
	[Wang Songmao, Niu Jinlan. Dynamic evolution and obstacle factors of urban ecological resilience in Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(8): 51-61. ] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.08.006
[15]	刘玒玒, 刘书芳. 黄河流域城市群生态韧性时空演化及提升路径研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(7): 1534-1545.
	[Liu Honghong, Liu Shufang. Research on spatiotemporal evolution and improvement paths of ecological resilience in Yellow River Basin urban agglomerations[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(7): 1534-1545. ]
[16]	杨丽莎, 陈妍, 谢会强. 黄河流域城市群生态韧性的时空格局与驱动因素分析[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(2): 99-108.
	[Yang Lisha, Chen Yan, Xie Huiqiang. Spatio-temporal patterns and driving factors of ecological resilience in urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Ecological Economy, 2024, 40(2): 99-108. ]
[17]	张明斗, 任衍婷, 周亮. 黄河流域城市生态韧性时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 445-454. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.381
	[Zhang Mingdou, Ren Yanting, Zhou Liang, Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 445-454. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.381
[18]	王松茂, 宁文萍, 牛金兰, 等. 黄河流域城市生态韧性时空分异及收敛研究——基于七大城市群61个城市的实证分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(1): 93-103. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.323
	[Wang Songmao, Ning Wenping, Niu Jinlan, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and convergence of urban ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin: An empirical analysis based on 61 cities in seven major urban agglomerations[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 93-103. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.323
[19]	阎晓, 涂建军. 黄河流域资源型城市生态效率时空演变及驱动因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 223-239. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210115
	[Yan Xiao, Tu Jianjun. The spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of eco-efficiency of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(1): 223-239. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210115
[20]	吕添贵, 胡晗, 付舒斐, 等. 长三角地区城市生态韧性时空分异特征及影响因素[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2023, 42(1): 54-60.
	[Lü Tiangui, Hu Han, Fu Shufei, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of urban ecological resilience in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2023, 42(1): 54-60. ]
[21]	张傲翔, 苗成林, 陈峥妍. 黄河流域城市生态韧性、社会网络及其影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025, 48(1): 130-142. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.101
	[Zhang Aoxiang, Miao Chenglin, Chen Zhengyan. Urban ecological resilience, social networks and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(1): 130-142. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.101
[22]	赵远飞, 关皓明, 王士君, 等. “中心-外围”视角下东北地区市域经济韧性及影响因素分析[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2023, 39(7): 835-843.
	[Zhao Yuanfei, Guan Haoming, Wang Shijun, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of economic resilience in northeast China from the perspective of “central-cities and outer-suburbs”[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2023, 39(7): 835-843. ]
[23]	任洪杰, 李辉尚. 中国乡村生态韧性的时空演变特征及影响因素探究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(11): 1915-1923. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.707
	[Ren Hongjie, Li Huishang. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of rural ecological resilience in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(11): 1915-1923. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.707
[24]	陶洁怡, 董平, 陆玉麒. 长三角地区生态韧性时空变化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(9): 1975-1987.
	[Tao Jieyi, Dong Ping, Lu Yuqi. Spatial-temporal analysis and influencing factors of ecological resilience in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(9): 1975-1987. ]
[25]	李志远, 冯学钢, 何静, 等. 中国旅游生态韧性空间关联网络结构及其驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2024, 43(5): 1146-1165. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020230737
	[Li Zhiyuan, Feng Xuegang, He Jing, et al. Spatial correlation network structure and driving factors of tourism ecological resilience in China[J]. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(5): 1146-1165. ]
[26]	封志明, 唐焰, 杨艳昭, 等. 中国地形起伏度及其与人口分布的相关性[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 74(10): 1073-1082.
	[Feng Zhiming, Tang Yan, Yang Yanzhao, et al. The relief degree of land surface in China and its correlation with population distribution[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 74(10): 1073-1082. ]
[27]	Brunsdon C E, Fotheringham A S, Charlton M E. Some notes on parametric significance test for geographically weighted regression[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 1999, 39(3): 497-524.
[28]	Dietz T, Rosa E A. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology[J]. Human Ecology Review, 1994, 1(2): 277-300.
[29]	白瑞雪, 白暴力. 新时代中国特色社会主义生态经济思想研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2023(4): 5-14.
	[Bai Ruixue, Bai Baoli. Research on socialist ecological economic thought with Chinese characteristics in the new era[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2023(4): 5-14. ]
[30]	王菲, 董锁成, 毛琦梁, 等. 宁蒙沿黄地带产业结构的环境污染特征演变分析[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(3): 620-631.
	[Wang Fei, Dong Suocheng, Mao Qiliang, et al. Analysis of the environment-pollution bias of industrial structure in areas along the Yellow River in Ningxia and Inner Mongolia[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(3): 620-631. ]
[31]	焦士兴, 林璐霜, 王安周, 等. 黄河流域9省区经济发展、产业结构与环境污染的关系[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45(5): 22-30, 37.
	[Jiao Shixing, Lin Lushuang, Wang Anzhou, et al. Relationship among the economic development, industrial structure and environmental pollution in the nine provincial regions of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 45(5): 22-30, 37. ]
[32]	农兰萍, 王金亮, 玉院和. 基于改进型遥感生态指数(MRSEI)模型的滇中地区生态环境质量研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(8): 972-982.
	[Nong Lanping, Wang Jinliang, Yu Yuanhe. Research on ecological environment quality in central Yunnan based on MRSEI model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021, 37(8): 972-982. ]
[33]	石彩霞, 贺小荣. 环境规制对城市生态韧性的影响效应: 以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(6): 56-71. doi: 10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2023130
	[Shi Caixia, He Xiaorong. Influence of environmental regulation on urban ecological resilience: A case study of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(6): 56-71. ]
[34]	郑洁. 人力资本结构与环境污染: 新结构经济学视角的理论初探[J]. 经济评论, 2022(6): 36-52.
	[Zheng Jie. Human capital structure and environmental pollution: A theoretical exploration from the perspective of new structural economics[J]. Economic Review, 2022(6): 36-52. ]
[35]	张自豪, 余斌, 郭新伟, 等. 基于GTWR模型的长江中游城市群碳排放时空异质性分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 58(3): 324-338.
	[Zhang Zihao, Yu Bin, Guo Xinwei, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal heterogeneity of carbon emissionsin the middle reaches of Yangtze River urban agglomeration based on GTWR model[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 58(3): 324-338. ]

目标层	系统层	指标层	单位	指标性质
生态韧性	抵抗力	人口密度	人·km^-2	负向
		单位GDP工业废水排放量	t·元^-1	负向
		单位GDP工业烟粉尘排放量	t·元^-1	负向
		单位面积工业SO₂排放量	t·km^-2	负向
		人均建成区面积	km²·人^-1	负向
	适应力	生活垃圾无害化处理率	%	正向
		生活污水处理率	%	正向
		一般工业固体废物综合利用率	%	正向
	恢复力	建成区绿化覆盖率	%	正向
		人均公园绿地面积	km²·人^-1	正向
		人均水资源占有量	m³·人^-1	正向
		人均土地面积	km²·人^-1	正向

影响因素	指标	方差膨胀因子
经济发展	人均GDP/元	1.73
产业结构	第三产业增加值/第二产业增加值/%	1.04
地形因素	地形起伏度/(°)	1.06
环境规制	环保词频数占比/%	1.75
人力资本	普通高等学校在校学生数/人	1.39

模型	最小二乘法模型（OLS）	时空地理加权回归模型（GTWR）
校正赤池信息准测（AICc）	3500.289	846.076
拟合优度（R²）	0.190	0.550

变量	最小值	1/4分位数	3/4分位数	最大值	均值	显著性占比/%
经济发展	-0.061	0.133	0.202	0.410	0.171	99.288
产业结构	-4.975	0.444	1.169	4.617	0.603	97.111
地形因素	-0.643	0.010	0.023	0.277	0.010	93.992
环境规制	-0.040	0.009	0.035	0.128	0.025	79.715
人力资本	-0.141	-0.001	0.038	0.176	0.018	91.710