宁夏城市建设用地节约集约利用与高质量发展耦合协调研究

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.562

Abstract

Abstract:

China is in a phase of high-quality development, where addressing the challenges posed by extensive land use due to rapid urban expansion is crucial for the sustainable growth of cities. While existing research predominantly focuses on the economical and intensive use of urban construction land or the status of high-quality development, the interplay and coordination between these aspects are seldom discussed. This study targets the Ningxia of China, establishing multidimensional index systems to assess the level of economical and intensive use of urban construction land and the status of high-quality development across 22 districts and counties in 2018. Through the analysis of coupling coordination degree, relative development degree, and influence coordination force, the study explores the coupling coordination relationship between these elements. The findings reveal the following: (1) The economical and intensive use level of urban construction land exhibits a pattern of being “low in the central region and high in the northern and southern areas”, whereas the high-quality development level is characterized by a “high in the northwest and low in the southeast” spatial pattern in Ningxia in 2018. (2) The coupling coordination degree of the two systems shows a “low in the central region and high in the northern and southern areas” spatial distribution, with most districts and counties in Ningxia achieving a basic state of coordination, indicating a virtuous cycle in the relationship between the two systems. (3) The innovation and security subsystems tend to negatively impact the coupling coordination of the systems, while the green and coordination subsystems generally contribute positively. These results provide an empirical foundation for promoting the economical and intensive use of construction land within the context of high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: economical and intensive utilization of urban construction land, high-quality development, coupling coordination degree, relative development degree, Ningxia

CAO Jialin, LIU Yanfang, ZHAO Jinmei, AN Rui, HU Yichuan, SUN Wenjie, XIN Gege. Coupling and coordination of economical and intensive utilization of urban construction land and high-quality development in Ningxia[J].Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(5): 872-884.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

High-quality development evaluation index system"

指数	指数权重	分指数	指标	性质	指标权重
创新	0.17	创新投入产出	科学研究和技术服务业固定资产投入比例	+	0.24
			科教文卫用地占比	+	0.06
			高新技术行业企业数量/所	+	0.16
		创新环境	普通高等院校数量/所	+	0.08
			科学研究和技术服务业平均工资/元·a^-1	+	0.24
			每万人中大学生数量/人·（10⁴人）^-1	+	0.22
协调	0.17	城乡统筹	城乡人均生产总值比	-	0.16
			城乡人均可支配收入比	-	0.11
			城乡人均生活消费支出比	-	0.08
			城乡就业人口偏离度	-	0.09
			城乡人均建设用地面积比	-	0.07
		结构高效	国土空间开发强度	+	0.08
			商住工业用地耦合协调度	+	0.20
			土地利用混合度	+	0.21
绿色	0.17	生态保护	人均公园绿地面积/m²·人^-1	+	0.10
			生态源地面积/km²	+	0.06
			生态廊道长度/km	+	0.06
			生态用地面积净变化率	-	0.06
			城市建设用地扩张占用生态用地面积/km²	-	0.08
		绿色生产	每万元GDP地耗/m²·(10⁴元)^-1	-	0.05
			工业用地地均增加值/10⁸元·km^-2	+	0.08
			每万元GDP 能耗/tce	-	0.05
			每万元GDP 废气排放量/10⁸ m³·(10⁴元)^-1	-	0.05
			工业废气处理率	+	0.03
			工业废水处理率	+	0.03
		绿色生活	城镇生活污水处理率	+	0.06
			城镇人均生活污水排放量/10⁴ t·人^-1	-	0.06
			城镇人均生活废气排放量/t·人^-1	-	0.07
			年均PM_2.5	-	0.05
			人均年用水量/m³·人^-1	-	0.11
开放	0.17	网络连通	道路网密度/km·km^-2	+	0.09
			道路网络临近中心性	+	0.17
			交叉口密度/个·km^-2	+	0.09
			公交站点密度/个·km^-2	$+$	0.11
		旅游开放	距飞机场平均距离/km	-	0.11
			距火车站平均距离/km	-	0.11
			距高速路口平均距离/km	-	0.11
			旅游景点可达性/km	-	0.21
共享	0.16	宜居	公园绿地、广场车行15 min覆盖人口比例	+	0.06
			社区卫生医疗设施步行15 min覆盖人口比例	+	0.06
			社区中小学步行15 min覆盖人口比例	+	0.06
			社区体育设施步行15 min覆盖人口比例	+	0.06
			基础设施固定资产投资比例	+	0.06
			人均可支配收入/元·人^-1	+	0.04
		宜养	每千人口执业助理医师数/人·（10³人）^-1	+	0.10
			每千人口拥有卫生机构床位数/张·（10³人）^-1	+	0.09
			每一就业劳动力负担系数	-	0.14
		宜业	人均地方财政收入/元·人^-1	+	0.06
			人均地区生产总值/元·人^-1	+	0.05
			常住人口就业率	+	0.13
			工业固定资产投入比例	+	0.09
安全	0.16	底线管控	人均耕地面积/hm²·人^-1	+	0.05
			耕地面积净变化率	-	0.03
			城市建设用地扩张占用耕地面积/km²	-	0.08
		生态安全	森林覆盖率	+	0.02
			生态阻力值	-	0.02
			生境质量	+	0.04
			水土保持量/t	+	0.05
			水源涵养量/mm	+	0.05
			碳储量/t	+	0.04
			废气污染物排放总量/t	+	0.02
			危险废物综合利用率	+	0.02
		水安全	城市可用水资源总量/10⁸ m³	+	0.02
			污水排放污染物含量/t	-	0.04
			自然岸线1 km缓冲区内建设用地面积比例	+	0.08
		文化安全	历史文化风貌保护面积/km²	+	0.04
			文化产业机构数/个	+	0.05
			文化产业从业人数/人	+	0.05
			文化服务设施15 min覆盖率	+	0.10
		防灾减灾	急救中心5 min覆盖率	+	0.08
			消防救援5 min覆盖率	+	0.06
			紧急避难场所5 min覆盖率	+	0.06

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

References 37

[1]	杨俊, 黄贤金, 王占岐, 等. 新时代中国城市土地集约利用若干问题的再认识[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(11): 31-37.
	[Yang Jun, Huang Xianjin, Wang Zhanqi, et al. Re-understanding of some issues in urban land intensive use of China in the new era[J]. Chinese Land Science, 2020, 34(11): 31-37. ]
[2]	胡业翠, 郑新奇. 生态文明理念下的建设用地节约集约利用[J]. 中国土地, 2019(6): 13-14.
	[Hu Yecui, Zheng Xinqi. Economical and intensive utilization of construction land under the concept of ecological civilization[J]. China Land, 2019(6): 13-14. ]
[3]	张文忠, 许婧雪, 马仁锋, 等. 中国城市高质量发展内涵、现状及发展导向——基于居民调查视角[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(11): 13-19.
	[Zhang Wenzhong, Xu Jingxue, Ma Renfeng, et al. Basic connotation, current situation, and development orientation of high-quality development of Chinese cities: Based on the survey of residents[J]. Urban Planning, 2019, 43(11): 13-19. ]
[4]	孙平军, 吕飞, 修春亮, 等. 新型城镇化下中国城市土地节约集约利用的基本认知与评价[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(8): 178-183.
	[Sun Pingjun, Lü Fei, Xiu Chunliang, et al. Basic cognition and evaluation of urban economical and intensive land use under the new urbanization[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(8): 178-183. ]
[5]	汪雄, 周国华, 唐承丽, 等. 转型发展背景下的开发区土地集约利用评价指标体系优化[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2020, 43(1): 8-14.
	[Wang Xiong, Zhou Guohua, Tang Chengli, et al. Optimal evaluation index system for the land intensive use in development zones in the era of transformation and development[J]. Journal of Natural Sciences of Hunan Normal University, 2020, 43(1): 8-14. ]
[6]	张姣, 张光宏. 生态文明建设目标下的广东省城市土地集约利用时空演变分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(3): 233-238.
	[Zhang Jiao, Zhang Guanghong. Spatiotemporal evolution of urban land intensive utilization in Guangdong Province aiming at ecological civilization construction[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Bulletin, 2022, 42(3): 233-238. ]
[7]	马国庆, 赵金梅, 冯丽媛, 等. 基于宗地尺度的建设用地节约集约利用评价和潜力规模测算——以宁夏吴忠市利通区为例[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 44(1): 89-95.
	[Ma Guoqing, Zhao Jinmei, Feng Liyuan, et al. Evaluation of the economical and intensive use of construction land and estimations of potential scale on the basis of the plot scale: Taking Litong District, Wuzhong City, Ningxia as an example[J]. Journal of Ningxia University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 44(1): 89-95. ]
[8]	吴双, 陈文波, 郑蕉. 基于分层线性模型的开发区工业用地集约利用影响因素研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(1): 53-60.
	[Wu Shuang, Chen Wenbo, Zheng Jiao. Study on factors affecting industrial land use intensity of development zones based on hierarchical linear model[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(1): 53-60. ]
[9]	Wang J Y, Sun K S, Ni J P, et al. Evaluation and factor analysis of the intensive use of urban land based on technical efficiency measurement: A case study of 38 districts and counties in Chongqing, China[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(20): 8623, doi: 10.3390/su12208623.
[10]	汪侠, 徐晓红. 长江经济带经济高质量发展的时空演变与区域差距[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(3): 5-15.
	[Wang Xia, Xu Xiaohong. Spatial-temporal evolution and regional disparity of economic high-quality development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(3): 5-15. ]
[11]	陈诗一, 陈登科. 雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(2): 20-34.
	[Chen Shiyi, Chen Dengke. Air pollution, government regulations and high-quality economic development[J]. Economic Research, 2018, 53(2): 20-34. ]
[12]	汪增洋, 张学良. 后工业化时期中国小城镇高质量发展的路径选择[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(1): 62-80.
	[Wang Zengyang, Zhang Xueliang. The path selection for high quality development of China’s small towns in post-industrialization period[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2019(1): 62-80. ]
[13]	张涛. 高质量发展的理论阐释及测度方法研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, 37(5): 23-43.
	[Zhang Tao. Theoretical interpretation and measurement methods of high-quality development in China[J]. Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, 2020, 37(5): 23-43. ]
[14]	李金昌, 史龙梅, 徐蔼婷. 高质量发展评价指标体系探讨[J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(1): 4-14.
	[Li Jinchang, Shi Longmei, Xu Aiting. Discussion on the high-quality development evaluation index system[J]. Statistical Research, 2019, 36(1): 4-14. ]
[15]	李强, 魏建飞. 皖江城市带国土空间利用效率与高质量发展的时空耦合[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(11): 2867-2883. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221108
	[Li Qiang, Wei Jianfei. Spatio-temporal coupling relationship between territory spatial utilization efficiency and high-quality development in Wanjiang City Belt[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(11): 2867-2883. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221108
[16]	陈景华, 陈姚, 陈敏敏. 中国经济高质量发展水平、区域差异及分布动态演进[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, 37(12): 108-126.
	[Chen Jinghua, Chen Yao, Chen Minmin. China’s high-quality economic development level, regional differences and dynamic evolution of distribution[J]. Quantitative Economics and Technological Economics Research, 2020, 37(12): 108-126. ]
[17]	白洋, 谭李娜, 陈春燕, 等. 城际列车对新疆旅游经济高质量发展的影响效应及驱动机制[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(4): 658-666.
	[Bai Yang, Tan Lina, Chen Chunyan, et al. Influence effect and driving mechanism of intercity trains on high-quality development of tourism economy in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(4): 658-666. ]
[18]	Shang Y P, Xu J L, Zhao X. Urban intensive land use and enterprise emission reduction: New micro-evidence from China towards COP26 targets[J]. Resources Policy, 2022, 79: 103158, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103158.
[19]	白玉娟, 洪增林, 薛旭平, 等. 关中平原城市群土地集约利用与生态文明建设耦合性研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3): 272-280.
	[Bai Yujuan, Hong Zenglin, Xue Xuping, et al. Research on coupling of intensive land use and ecological civilization construction of urban agglomeration in the Guanzhong Plain[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2021, 28(3): 272-280. ]
[20]	刘彦花, 贾莉, 叶国华. 广西北部湾经济区土地资源利用与经济增长脱钩分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(6): 267-274.
	[Liu Yanhua, Jia Li, Ye Guohua. Decoupling between land resource utilization and economic growth in Beibu Gulf Economic Zone of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Bulletin, 2019, 39(6): 267-274. ]
[21]	刘善开, 韦素琼, 高月华, 等. 基于耦合模型的城市土地集约利用与城市化协调发展研究——以福建省9个设区市为例[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 31(2): 96-105.
	[Liu Shankai, Wei Suqiong, Gao Yuehua, et al. Study on the coordinative development between urban land intensive utilization and urbanization based on coupling model: A case study of 9 cities divided into districts in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 31(2): 96-105. ]
[22]	赵剑波, 史丹, 邓洲. 高质量发展的内涵研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2019, 40(11): 15-31.
	[Zhao Jianbo, Shi Dan, Deng Zhou. A framework of China’s high-quality economic development[J]. Economic and Management Research, 2019, 40(11): 15-31. ]
[23]	金碚. 关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(4): 5-18.
	[Jin Bei. Study on the “high-quality development” economics[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2018(4): 5-18. ]
[24]	李梦欣, 任保平. 新时代中国高质量发展的综合评价及其路径选择[J]. 财经科学, 2019(5): 26-40.
	[Li Mengxin, Ren Baoping. Comprehensive evaluation and path choice of China’s high-quality development in the new era[J]. Financial Science, 2019(5): 26-40. ]
[25]	马庆斌, 袁惊柱, 王婧. 推动区域经济协调是高质量发展的需要[J]. 质量与认证, 2019(9): 33-34.
	[Ma Qingbin, Yuan Jingzhu, Wang Jing. Promoting regional economic coordination is the need for high-quality development[J]. Quality and Certification, 2019(9): 33-34. ]
[26]	陈明华, 王哲, 谢琳霄, 等. 中国城市群高质量发展的空间差异及驱动因素[J]. 山东财经大学学报, 2023, 35(6): 60-72.
	[Chen Minghua, Wang Zhe, Xie Linxiao, et al. Spatial differences and driving factor of China urban agglomeration’s high-quality development[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2023, 35(6): 60-72. ]
[27]	刘同舫. 实现宏伟目标必须统筹好发展与安全的关系[J]. 思想理论教育导刊, 2021(1): 10-16.
	[Liu Tongfang. To achieve ambitious goals, we must coordinate the relationship between development and security[J]. Ideological and Theoretical Education Guide, 2021(1): 10-16. ]
[28]	王小华, 杨玉琪, 罗新雨, 等. 中国经济高质量发展的空间关联网络及其作用机制[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(8): 1920-1936. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202208006
	[Wang Xiaohua, Yang Yuqi, Luo Xinyu, et al. The spatial correlation network and formation mechanism of China’s high-quality economic development[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(8): 1920-1936. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202208006
[29]	张文忠, 何炬, 谌丽. 面向高质量发展的中国城市体检方法体系探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.01.001
	[Zhang Wenzhong, He Ju, Chen Li. Method system of urban physical examination for high quality development in China[J]. Geographical Science, 2021, 41(1): 1-12. ]
[30]	单勤琴, 李中. 经济高质量发展水平的地区差异及时空收敛性研究[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(9): 50-58. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.09.006
	[Shan Qinqin, Li Zhong. Regional differences and spatiotemporal convergence of high-quality economic development[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(9): 50-58. ] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.09.006
[31]	曲立, 王璐, 季桓永. 中国区域制造业高质量发展测度分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(9): 45-61.
	[Qu Li, Wang Lu, Ji Huanyong. Research on evaluating high-quality industrial development at regional level in China[J]. Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, 2021, 38(9): 45-61. ]
[32]	于婷婷, 朱华晟, 张舒, 等. 局地“中等收入陷阱”危机下东北地区人力资本与经济发展耦合特征及驱动机制[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(4): 20-31. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.04.003
	[Yu Tingting, Zhu Huasheng, Zhang Shu, et al. Coupling characteristics and driving mechanism of human capital and economic development in northeast China under local middle-income trap crisis[J]. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(4): 20-31. ] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.04.003
[33]	Chen J D, Li Z W, Dong Y Z, et al. Coupling coordination between carbon emissions and the eco-environment in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276: 123848, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123848.
[34]	刘少坤, 王嘉佳, 林树高, 等. 北部湾经济区城市土地集约利用与经济高质量发展耦合协调关系及障碍诊断[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3): 317-326.
	[Liu Shaokun, Wang Jiajia, Lin Shugao, et al. The coupling coordinated relationship and obstacle diagnosis between urban intensive land-use and high-quality economic development in Beihu Gulf Economic Zone[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2022, 29(3): 317-326. ]
[35]	毕国华, 杨庆媛, 刘苏. 中国省域生态文明建设与城市化的耦合协调发展[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(1): 50-58.
	[Bi Guohua, Yang Qingyuan, Liu Su. Coupling coordination development between ecological civilization construction and urbanization in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(1): 50-58. ]
[36]	王少剑, 崔子恬, 林靖杰, 等. 珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
	[Wang Shaojian, Cui Zitian, Lin Jingjie, et al. Coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
[37]	王深红, 李秀霞. 城市土地集约利用与社会经济时空耦合协调发展研究——以吉林省9个地级市为例[J]. 上海国土资源, 2018, 39(2): 21-26.
	[Wang Shenhong, Li Xiuxia. Investigation of the coordinated development of spatio-temporal coupling of urban land use intensity with socio-economic factors: Considering nine levels of cities in the Jilin Province as examples[J]. Shanghai Land and Resources, 2018, 39(2): 21-26. ]

指数	指数权重	分指数	指标	性质	指标权重
利用强度指数	0.40	人口密度	城乡建设用地人口密度/人·km^-2	+	0.50
		经济强度	建设用地地均固定资产投资/10⁴元·km^-2	+	0.26
		经济强度	建设用地地均地区生产总值/10⁴元·km^-2	+	0.24
增长耗地指数	0.23	人口增长耗地	单位人口增长消耗新増城乡建设用地量/m²·人^-1	-	0.50
		经济增长耗地	单位地区生产总值耗地下降率	+	0.18
			单位地区生产总值增长消耗新增建设用地量/m²·（10⁴元）^-1	-	0.17
			单位固定资产投资消耗新增建设用地量/m²·（10⁴元）^-1	-	0.15
用地弹性指数	0.17	人口用地弹性	人口与城乡建设用地増长弹性系数	+	0.50
用地弹性指数	0.17	经济用地弹性	地区生产总值与建设用地增长弹性系数	+	0.50
管理绩效指数	0.20	用地管理绩效	城市存量土地供应比率	+	0.42
			城市土地闲置比率	-	0.38
			城市批次土地供应比率	+	0.20

耦合协调程度	耦合协调类型	耦合协调度
失调衰退	Ⅰ极度失调类	[0.0, 0.1]
	Ⅱ严重失调类	(0.1, 0.2]
	Ⅲ中度失调类	(0.2, 0.3]
过度类型	Ⅳ轻度失调类	(0.3, 0.4]
过度类型	Ⅴ濒临失调类	(0.4, 0.5]
基本协调	Ⅵ勉强协调类	(0.5, 0.6]
基本协调	Ⅶ初级协调类	(0.6, 0.7]
高度协调	Ⅷ中级协调类	(0.7, 0.8]
	Ⅸ良好协调类	(0.8, 0.9]
	Ⅹ优质协调类	(0.9, 1.0]

城市	区县	耦合协调度	耦合协调状态	相对发展度	相对发展状态	类型
银川市	兴庆区	0.756	中级协调	1.038	同步型	中级协调同步型
	西夏区	0.669	初级协调	0.893	同步型	初级协调同步型
	金凤区	0.763	中级协调	0.811	同步型	中级协调同步型
	永宁县	0.416	濒临失调	0.732	滞后型	濒临失调滞后型
	贺兰县	0.602	初级协调	0.773	滞后型	初级协调滞后型
	灵武市	0.616	初级协调	0.913	同步型	初级协调同步型
石嘴山市	大武口区	0.628	初级协调	1.038	同步型	初级协调同步型
	惠农区	0.618	初级协调	1.104	同步型	初级协调同步型
	平罗县	0.614	初级协调	0.858	同步型	初级协调同步型
吴忠市	利通区	0.664	初级协调	0.964	同步型	初级协调同步型
	红寺堡区	0.577	勉强协调	1.044	同步型	勉强协调同步型
	盐池县	0.378	轻度失调	0.843	同步型	轻度失调同步型
	同心县	0.603	初级协调	1.120	同步型	初级协调同步型
	青铜峡市	0.622	初级协调	0.964	同步型	初级协调同步型
固原市	原州区	0.642	初级协调	0.971	同步型	初级协调同步型
	西吉县	0.593	勉强协调	0.979	同步型	勉强协调同步型
	隆德县	0.635	初级协调	1.089	同步型	初级协调同步型
	泾源县	0.623	初级协调	1.036	同步型	初级协调同步型
	彭阳县	0.614	初级协调	0.863	同步型	初级协调同步型
中卫市	沙坡头区	0.559	勉强协调	0.857	同步型	勉强协调同步型
	中宁县	0.584	勉强协调	0.894	同步型	勉强协调同步型
	海原县	0.341	轻度失调	1.352	超前型	轻度失调超前型

Coupling and coordination of economical and intensive utilization of urban construction land and high-quality development in Ningxia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 37

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Dai, CUI Yang, WANG Suyan, ZHANG Wen. Interdecadal changes and risk assessment of drought events in Ningxia from 1961 to 2020 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(5): 785-797.
[2]	YUAN Qingwen, LIU Yanfang, ZHAO Jinmei, AN Rui, LIU Yaolin. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics and driving factors of land intensive utilization in development zones of Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(5): 861-871.
[3]	WANG JiaJia, ZHANG Ke. Unevenness and evolutionary trend of high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin from an ecological protection perspective [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(4): 695-706.
[4]	MU Shilei, YANG Yuhuan, Wuritaoketaohu . Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of PM_2.5 in the five urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(4): 707-719.
[5]	LI Junjia, ZHAO Meifeng. Spatial evolution and influencing mechanism of high-quality development in ethnic minority areas of China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 496-505.
[6]	LIU Honghong, LIU Shufang. Spatiotemporal evolution and obstacle identification of complex ecosystem resilience in the Qilian Mountain area [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(2): 237-247.
[7]	DONG Li, WANG Manwang, DONG Mei. Sustainable development capability of Ningxia ecological migration area based on ecological footprint method [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(6): 1004-1012.
[8]	BAI Yang,TAN Li’na,CHEN Chunyan,LI Zhuoyuan. Influence effect and driving mechanism of intercity trains on high-quality development of tourism economy in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(4): 658-666.
[9]	ZHANG Ning,WANG Zichen,YANG Xiao,CHEN Tong,XING Fei. Coupling coordination and spatiotemporal differences between water resources and agriculture cropping system in Xinjiang: A case of grain and cotton cropping systems [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 349-359.
[10]	YANG Yuhuan,HE Jianxiong,ZHANG Xinhong,RUI Yang. Spatial differentiation characteristics and influencing texture of the coupling coordinated development of agro-culture-tourism in China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 448-459.
[11]	TIAN Xiaobo,HU Jing,JIA Yaoyan,ZHU Lei. Exploring the causes of spatial differentiation of tourism development level in the high-quality development stage: Empirical evidence of Yellow River Basin based on factor decomposition [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 460-470.
[12]	REN Haoke, WEI Wei, WANG Kehui. Structural evolution of tourism flow network in Ningxia under the influence of COVID-19 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(2): 316-324.
[13]	JIA Keli,LI Xiaoyu,WEI Huimin,LIU Ruiliang,LI Haoyu,YANG Siyu. Spatial differentiation and risk of land use carbon emissions in county region of Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(11): 1757-1767.
[14]	DONG Youming, QIAO Wenyi, LIU Zemiao, HUANG Xianjin. Characteristics of rural restructuring and problem areas identification in agro-pastoral area of northern China: A case of the Inner Mongolia section in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(11): 1891-1902.
[15]	LI Xuemei, LIU Hehe. Spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of coupled coordination development of Xinjiang land ports and port-counties [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(1): 149-158.