关中平原城市群韧性空间关联网络及其影响因素研究

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2023.104

Abstract

Abstract:

This study constructed an urban resilience evaluation index system that included four dimensions: economy, society, ecological environment, and infrastructure. Based on the entropy method, the resilience comprehensive evaluation index of 11 cities in the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration, northwest China from 2011 to 2020 was measured, and the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of their resilience were analyzed, and moreover, the social network analysis method was used to analyze the structural and functional connections between cities in the resilience network of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration. Furthermore, the quadratic assignment procedure was used to explore the comprehensive factors that affected the resilience network structure of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration. The results indicated the following. (1) The overall resilience of each city in the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration was on the rise, and the resilience level showed a decreasing trend from provincial capital to the periphery. (2) The resilience network structure of urban agglomerations had become more complex and robust; however, the resilience connections between regions exhibited strong hierarchical characteristics and cities had not yet fully achieved interconnectivity. (3) Xi’an, Xianyang, and Tongchuan had strong centrality and could generate significant resource spillovers to surrounding or peripheral cities. The “core-edge” structure of urban agglomerations was obvious. (4) The level of economic development, openness, government financial support, scientific and technological development, differences in transport infrastructure, and geographical proximity all significantly affected changes in the resilient spatial network structure of the urban agglomeration. Therefore, to enhance the resilience of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration and the connection between cities, one must first build an intercity digital management and exchange platform and promote the diffusion of resource elements from high- to low-agglomeration areas. Second, the construction of transportation networks must be strengthened, investment in scientific and technological innovation must be increased, and foreign trade and economic cooperation must be strengthened in the construction of “the Belt and Road”. This study reveals the position and role of each city in the resilience development process in the spatial association network of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration, analyzes the spatial spillover effect of resilience development in the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration, and provides a new perspective on the study of urban resilience development from a geographically spatial perspective.

Key words: urban resilience, spatial correlation network, social network analysis, Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration

SHI Yufang, NIU Yu. Resilience spatial correlation network and its influencing factors in Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration[J].Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(2): 270-280.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

References 23

[1]	魏冶, 修春亮. 城市网络韧性的概念与分析框架探析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 488-502. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.03.013
	[ Wei Ye, Xiu Chunliang. Study on the concept and analytical framework of city network resilience[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(3): 488-502. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.03.013
[2]	李彦军, 马港, 宋舒雅. 长江中游城市群城市韧性的空间分异及演进[J]. 区域经济评论, 2022, 56(2): 88-96.
	[ Li Yanjun, Ma Gang, Song Shuya. Spatio-temporal differentiation of urban resilience in the Mid-Yangtze River urban agglomerations[J]. Regional Economic Review, 2022, 56(2): 88-96. ]
[3]	贺山峰, 梁爽, 吴绍洪, 等. 长三角地区城市洪涝灾害韧性时空演变及其关联性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(9): 1988-1999.
	[ He Shanfeng, Liang Shuang, Wu Shaohong, et al. Analysis on spatio-temporal evolution and relevance of urban flood disaster resilience in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(9): 1988-1999. ]
[4]	Lu H, Zhang C, Jiao L D, et al. Analysis on the spatial-temporal evolution of urban agglomeration resilience: A case study in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 79: 103167, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167.
[5]	陈晓红, 娄金男, 王颖. 哈长城市群城市韧性的时空格局演变及动态模拟研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2000-2009. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.12.006
	[ Chen Xiaohong, Lou Jinnan, Wang Ying. Evolution and dynamic simulation of the temporal-spatial pattern of urban resilience in Harbin-Changchun urban group[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 2000-2009. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.12.006
[6]	张鹏, 于伟, 张延伟. 山东省城市韧性的时空分异及其影响因素[J]. 城市问题, 2018(9): 27-34.
	[ Zhang Peng, Yu Wei, Zhang Yanwei. Spatial-temporal differentiation and its influencing factors of Shandong Province’s urban resilience[J]. Urban Problems, 2018(9): 27-34. ]
[7]	宁静, 朱冉, 张馨元, 等. 内蒙古区县城市韧性评价与分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1217-1226.
	[ Ning Jing, Zhu Ran, Zhang Xinyuan, et al. Evaluation and analysis of urban resilience of districts and counties in Inner Mongolia[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(7): 1217-1226. ]
[8]	Li L, Zhang P, Wang C. What affects the economic resilience of China’s Yellow River Basin amid economic crisis: From the perspective of spatial heterogeneity[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19: 9024, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159024.
[9]	Khan M, Wu Q, Yan S Q, et al. Factors affecting urban resilience and sustainability: Case of slum dwellers in Islamabad, Pakistan[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2021, 147(4): 04021053, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000749.
[10]	Shi J, Wang X, Wang C, et al. Evaluation and influencing factors of network resilience in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A structural perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 8005, doi: 10.3390/su14138005.
[11]	蒋辉. 中国农业经济韧性的空间网络效应分析[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2022(8): 151-159.
	[ Jiang Hui. Analysis of the spatial network effect of China’s agricultural economic resilience[J]. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2022(8): 151-159. ]
[12]	谢会强, 杨丹, 张宽. 中国城市经济韧性的时空演化及网络结构研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2022, 36(11): 64-74.
	[ Xie Huiqiang, Yang Dan, Zhang Kuan. Spatio-temporal evolution and network structure of urban economic resilience in China[J]. East China Economic Management, 2022, 36(11): 64-74. ]
[13]	张明斗, 张震. 长三角城市群城市经济韧性的空间关联网络研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2023, 39(1): 69-79.
	[ Zhang Mingdou, Zhang Zhen. Spatial correlation network of urban economic resilience in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2023, 39(1): 69-79. ]
[14]	王璇, 史佳璐, 慈福义. 黄河流域城市群韧性度的时空演化特征[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(5): 70-74.
	[ Wang Xuan, Shi Jialu, Ci Fuyi. The spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of resilience of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2022, 38(5): 70-74. ]
[15]	王世亮. 内蒙古城市韧性评价及其提升策略研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2022.
	[ Wang Shiliang. Research on urban resilience and improvement methods of Inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Normal University, 2022. ]
[16]	郝辑, 张少杰. 基于熵值法的我国省际生态数据评价研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(1): 157-162.
	[ Hao Ji, Zhang Shaojie. Evaluation of inter-provincial ecological data in China based on entropy method[J]. Information Science, 2021, 39(1): 157-162. ]
[17]	孙中瑞, 樊杰, 孙勇, 等. 中国绿色科技创新效率空间关联网络结构特征及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(3): 33-43. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.03.004
	[ Sun Zhongrui, Fan Jie, Sun Yong, et al. Structural characteristics and influencing factors of spatial correlation network of green science and technology innovation efficiency in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(3): 33-43. ] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.03.004
[18]	李南, 李晓东, 刘想, 等. 新疆区域经济联系网络时空格局演变[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(6): 1978-1987.
	[ Li Nan, Li Xiaodong, Liu Xiang, et al. Evolution of spatial and temporal pattern of regional economic connection network in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(6): 1978-1987. ]
[19]	贾建琦, 赵林, 高晓彤, 等. 环渤海地区包容性绿色增长效率的空间关联网络结构及其影响因素[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2021, 37(5): 46-54.
	[ Jia Jianqi, Zhao Lin, Gao Xiaotong, et al. Spatial correlation network structure of inclusive green growth efficiency and its influencing factors in Bohai Rim region[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2021, 37(5): 46-54. ]
[20]	岳立, 雷燕燕. 黄河流域绿色水资源效率空间关联网络构建及其演化因素[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2022, 59(2): 62-74.
	[ Yue Li, Lei Yanyan. Construction of spatially linked network of green water resources efficiency in the Yellow River Basin and its evolutionary factors[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 59(2): 62-74. ]
[21]	石涛. 黄河流域城市韧性发展水平的时空演进及驱动要素分析[J]. 区域经济评论, 2022(1): 139-149.
	[ Shi Tao. The analysis of the spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of urban resilience in Yellow River Basin[J]. Regional Economic Review, 2022(1): 139-149. ]
[22]	高志刚, 丁煜莹. 中国西北地区城市的韧性测度及影响因素[J]. 科技导报, 2021, 39(24): 118-129.
	[ Gao Zhigang, Ding Yuying. Measurement of urban resilience and its influencing factors of cities in northwest China[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2021, 39(24): 118-129. ]
[23]	张筱娟, 汤琪凤, 张镇. 黄河流域城市韧性空间分异特征及其影响因素识别[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(6): 48-54.
	[ Zhang Xiaojuan, Tang Qifeng, Zhang Zhen. Spatial differentiation characteristics and its influencing factors of urban resilience in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2022, 41(6): 48-54. ]

目标层	准则层	指标层	指标属性	权重
城市韧性	经济韧性	人均GDP/元	正	0.034
		第三产业GDP占比/%	正	0.025
		城镇居民人均可支配收入/农村居民人均可支配收入/%	负	0.017
		人均固定资产投资额/元	正	0.054
		人均社会消费品零售总额/元	正	0.051
		职工平均工资/元	正	0.031
		进出口贸易额占GDP比重/%	正	0.138
	社会韧性	人口自然增长率/%	正	0.025
		社会保障和就业支出占财政支出比重/%	正	0.015
		城市教育支出占财政支出比重/%	正	0.022
		公共管理、社会保障和社会组织从业人员占比/%	正	0.025
		每万人普通高校在校生人数/人	正	0.119
		每万人卫生技术人员人数/人	正	0.034
		失业率/%	负	0.025
	生态环境韧性	建成区绿地覆盖率/%	正	0.009
		人均园林绿地面积/m²	正	0.012
		工业废水排放量/GDP/t·(10⁴元)^-1	负	0.003
		工业SO₂排放量/GDP/t·(10⁸元)^-1	负	0.004
		生活垃圾无害化处理率/%	正	0.006
		城市污水处理率/%	正	0.014
		固体废弃物综合利用率/%	正	0.046
	基础设施韧性	公路线网密度/km·km^-2	正	0.024
		每万人公共汽车数/辆	正	0.080
		每万人拥有公共厕所/座	正	0.093
		每万人医院病床数/张	正	0.024
		燃气普及率/%	正	0.009
		建成区排水管道密度/km·km^-2	正	0.024
		互联网普及率/%	正	0.038

城市	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	2018年	2019年	2020年	平均值
西安市	0.5346	0.5525	0.5905	0.6251	0.6491	0.6536	0.6488	0.6995	0.7115	0.7002	0.6365
宝鸡市	0.2005	0.2216	0.2490	0.2673	0.3051	0.3379	0.3678	0.4010	0.4282	0.4449	0.3219
铜川市	0.2311	0.2558	0.2709	0.2955	0.3183	0.3652	0.3447	0.3807	0.4436	0.4801	0.3386
渭南市	0.1440	0.1721	0.1769	0.1888	0.2066	0.2452	0.2664	0.2984	0.3303	0.3451	0.2374
商洛市	0.1334	0.1423	0.1399	0.1609	0.1706	0.1698	0.2150	0.2317	0.2639	0.2872	0.1915
咸阳市	0.2125	0.2389	0.2507	0.2688	0.2928	0.3195	0.3515	0.3714	0.3937	0.4199	0.3120
天水市	0.1608	0.1618	0.1769	0.1845	0.2031	0.2242	0.2410	0.2536	0.2624	0.2903	0.2159
平凉市	0.1397	0.1550	0.1682	0.1772	0.1934	0.2069	0.2225	0.2485	0.2658	0.3026	0.2080
庆阳市	0.1436	0.1644	0.1780	0.1957	0.2122	0.2333	0.2223	0.2372	0.2357	0.2422	0.2064
运城市	0.2128	0.2174	0.2613	0.2557	0.2510	0.2669	0.2816	0.2737	0.3000	0.2929	0.2613
临汾市	0.1875	0.1980	0.2060	0.2107	0.2260	0.2342	0.2400	0.2527	0.2689	0.2779	0.2302
平均值	0.2091	0.2254	0.2426	0.2573	0.2753	0.2961	0.3092	0.3317	0.3549	0.3712	0.2873

城市	点度中心度				接近中心度				中介中心度
城市	2011年	2014年	2017年	2020年	2011年	2014年	2017年	2020年	2011年	2014年	2017年	2020年
西安市	10	10	10	10	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	19.81	19.81	17.78	17.78
宝鸡市	6	6	6	6	71.43	71.43	71.43	71.43	1.11	1.11	1.11	1.11
铜川市	9	9	9	9	90.91	90.91	90.91	90.91	13.15	13.15	11.11	11.11
渭南市	5	5	6	6	66.67	66.67	71.43	71.43	0.56	0.56	1.11	1.11
商洛市	4	4	5	5	62.50	62.50	66.67	66.67	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
咸阳市	9	9	9	9	90.91	90.91	90.91	90.91	11.67	11.67	11.11	11.11
天水市	4	4	4	4	62.50	62.50	62.50	62.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
平凉市	6	6	6	6	71.43	71.43	71.43	71.43	1.11	1.11	1.11	1.11
庆阳市	5	5	5	5	66.67	66.67	66.67	66.67	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
运城市	5	5	6	6	66.67	66.67	71.43	71.43	1.48	1.48	1.11	1.11
临汾市	3	3	4	4	58.82	58.82	62.50	62.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

变量名称	非标准化回归系数	标准化回归系数	显著性概率	概率1	概率2
地理空间邻近差异矩阵	0.424	0.406^***	0.000	0.000	1.000
经济发展水平差异矩阵	-0.498	-0.320^**	0.017	0.984	0.017
人口增速差异矩阵	-0.182	-0.093	0.102	0.898	0.102
对外开放度差异矩阵	0.308	0.214^**	0.026	0.026	0.974
政府财政支持差异矩阵	0.482	0.249^**	0.049	0.049	0.951
环境规制差异矩阵	-0.111	-0.055	0.207	0.793	0.207
交通基础设施差异矩阵	-0.239	-0.128^*	0.066	0.934	0.066
科学技术水平差异矩阵	-0.319	-0.105^*	0.053	0.947	0.053

Resilience spatial correlation network and its influencing factors in Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 23

Related Articles 8

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHANG Hao, HAN Zenglin, QIAO Guorong, WANG Hui, WANG Hongye, DUAN Ye. Patterns and influencing factors of tourism economic linkages between cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354.
[2]	LI Jiahui,WU Jinhua,WANG Zhen,BAI Yuxia. Identification of rural residential development types in loess hilly and gully region: A case of Wuqi County [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 397-406.
[3]	LI Nan, LI Xiaodong, LIU Xiang, LIU Bailing. Evolution of spatial and temporal pattern of regional economic connection network in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(6): 1978-1987.
[4]	DA Cheng,ZHANG Futao,QIAN Yongsheng,ZENG Junwei,GUANG Xiaoping. Dynamic evolution characteristics of coordinated development of transportation-industry-environment in Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(3): 955-965.
[5]	YE Shanshan,CAO Mingming,HU Sheng. Evolution of economic connection network structure in the Guanzhong Plain City Cluster and its impact on economic growth [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 277-286.
[6]	WANG Song-mao, XU Xuan-guo, MA Jiang-tao, WANG Yan-wei. Spatial and temporal evolution of the tourism economy network in Xinjiang:Based on modified gravity model and social network analysis [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2): 458-465.
[7]	WANG Tao, WANG Qing-qing, ZHAO Dan, TONG Chao. Problems of industrial diversification in resource based areas:Taking Shanxi Province as an example [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(5): 1221-1228.
[8]	KONG Lingzhang, LI Xiaodong, BAI Yang, JIANG Tong. Spatial effect of longdistance highspeed railway on tourism economic link and role analysis of cities along the railway:A caseof Lanzhou Xinjiang highspeed rail [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(3): 681-688.