收藏 ｜ 设为首页 广告服务 ｜ 联系我们 ｜ 在线留言
高级检索

干旱区地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 625-635.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.278

• 区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国研学实践基地空间格局的多尺度特征及影响机理研究

朱磊1,2,3(),李燕楠1,胡静2,3(),田小波2,徐佳慧1,卿琪1   

  1. 1.安庆师范大学资源环境学院，安徽 安庆 246133
    2.华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院，湖北 武汉 430079
    3.中国旅游研究院武汉分院，湖北 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-11 修回日期:2022-08-23 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 胡静（1963-），女，博士，教授，主要从事旅游资源与环境、旅游与区域发展等方面的研究. E-mail: huj@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱磊（1986-），男，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事旅游资源与环境、旅游与区域发展等方面的研究. E-mail: aqdxzl@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省哲学社科规划项目(AHSKQ2021D24);安徽省社会科学创新发展研究项目(2021CX100);安徽高校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2020A0518);安徽省高校优秀青年人才重点项目(gxyqZD2022060);安徽省智库项目(ZK2021A004)

Multi-scale characteristics and influencing mechanism of spatial pattern on research and practice bases in China

ZHU Lei1,2,3(),LI Yannan1,HU Jing2,3(),TIAN Xiaobo2,XU Jiahui1,QING Qi1   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Environment, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, Anhui, China
    2. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China
    3. Wuhan Branch of China Tourism Academy, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China
  • Received:2022-06-11 Revised:2022-08-23 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-28

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

89

赞

摘要：

中国研学实践基地是我国研学旅游的重要载体。综合运用地理空间分析方法系统探究其不同空间尺度下的空间分布规律及其影响因素。结果表明：（1）从全国尺度来看，研学基地整体上呈现出“东北—西南”的空间分布态势，不同类型均表现出显著的集聚特征，主要形成了以京津冀和长三角为核心的高密度区。（2）从区域尺度来看，研学基地在三大地带间呈现出“东西多、中部少”态势，在八大区域间呈现出从沿海地区到长江中下游再到西北内陆地区递减的分布规律。（3）从省域尺度来看，研学基地分布具有明显空间自相关特征，热点区呈现“L”型带状分布，冷点区呈现“V”型片状分布格局。（4）从市域尺度来看，研学基地集中分布在我国的Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型大城市，热点区集中在我国的长三角和京津冀都市圈周围。（5）区域经济发展水平、潜在客源市场、旅游产业规模和政策支持力度对研学基地空间分布具有重要影响，其中经济发展水平影响较大，且各因素影响强度呈现出一定的空间异质性。研究结果对优化我国研学基地的空间布局，助推研学旅游地的高质量发展具有参考意义。

关键词: 研学实践基地, 空间格局, 成因分析, 地理探测器, 中国

Abstract:

China’s research and practice bases is a major source of research tourism in China. Comprehensive use of geospatial analysis methods to systematically explore the spatial distribution and influencing factors of China’s research and practice bases at different spatial scales show the following results: (1) On the national scale, the research and practice bases demonstrate a spatial distribution trend from “northeast to southwest”, and different types of research and practice bases demonstrate substantial agglomeration characteristics, forming a high-density area with the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the Yangtze River Delta as the core. (2) On the regional scale, the research and practice bases demonstrate a pattern of “more in the east and west, less in the middle” among the three major zones and a decreasing distribution pattern from the coastal areas to the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and then to the northwest inland areas among the eight regions. (3) On the provincial scale, the distribution of research and practice bases has substantial spatial autocorrelation characteristics. The hot spots are distributed in an “L-shaped” belt pattern, whereas the cold spots are distributed in a “V-shaped” piece pattern. (4) On the city scale, the research and practice bases are concentrated in type I and II metropolitan areas, and the hot spots are concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area. (5) Regional economic development level, potential tourist market, tourism industry scale, and policy support all have a considerable impact on the spatial distribution of research and practice bases, with the economic development level having the greatest impact, and the influence intensity of each factor exhibiting some spatial heterogeneity. The research results have considerable references for optimizing the spatial layout of research and practice bases in China and promoting the high-quality development of research tourism destinations.

Key words: research and practice bases, spatial pattern, cause analysis, geographic detector, China