农村公共服务与乡村旅游耦合协调度及其乡村振兴影响效应——基于西部地区的实证

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.170

Abstract

Abstract:

While the synergistic development of rural public services and rural tourism is critical for advancing rural revitalization, academic research focusing on coupling coordinated development between these two domains remains notably scarce. This study analyzes coupling coordination between rural public services and rural tourism and its impact on rural revitalization, This study uses methods including the coupling coordination degree model, the gravity center and standard deviation ellipse model, and spatial econometric models to quantitatively measure the spatiotemporal characteristics of the coupling coordination degree between the two in western China from 2010 to 2023, as well as their impacts and spatial spillover effects on rural revitalization. The findings reveal that the coupling coordination between rural public services and rural tourism in western China has increased year by year, with the overall level shifting from extreme disorder to intermediate coordination, and presenting a spatial differentiation pattern of high coupling coordination in the south and northwest, and low in the northeast. The gravity center of the coupling coordination degree exhibited a southwestward migration trend, while the standard deviation ellipse consistently maintained a northwest-southeast orientation, demonstrating a trend of first clustering and then dispersing. Furthermore, the degree of coupling coordination has a significant positive impact on rural revitalization and exhibits spatial spillover effects. The research findings can provide a theoretical basis and policy recommendations for the coordinated development of the two aspects and the region’s overall rural revitalization.

Key words: rural public services, rural tourism, rural revitalization, coupling coordination degree, spatial spillover effect, western China

OU Kaihang, FANG Shiqiao, CHENG Qian, ZHOU Xufan. Coupling coordination degree of rural public services and rural tourism and its rural revitalization influence effect: Based on the empirical evidence in western China[J].Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(2): 404-415.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

References 32

[1]	Marzo-Navarro M, Pedraja-Iglesias M, Vinzón L. Key variables for developing integrated rural tourism[J]. Tourism Geographies, 2017, 19(4): 575-594. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2017.1336785
[2]	胡玉洁, 蒋凯伦, 陈准, 等. 山区县域旅游资源空间结构及其交通可达性分析——以河南栾川县为例[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2023, 44(5): 869-880.
	[Hu Yujie, Jiang Kailun, Chen Zhun, et al. Analysis of the spatial structure of tourism resources and traffic accessibility in mountainous counties: Taking Luanchuan County, Henan Province as an example[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2023, 44(5): 869-880.]
[3]	李国英. 乡村振兴战略视角下现代乡村产业体系构建路径[J]. 当代经济管理, 2019, 41(10): 34-40.
	[Li Guoying. The path of constructing a modern rural industrial system from the perspective of rural revitalization strategy[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2019, 41(10): 34-40.]
[4]	陶俊, 杨敏红. 农村公共文化服务体系与乡村旅游的融合发展——以浙江德清总分馆改革为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(2): 45-55.
	[Tao Jun, Yang Minhong. Integrated development of rural public cultural services and rural tourism: Taking the reform practice of Deqing county’s general-and-branch library system for example[J]. Library Tribune, 2022, 42(2): 45-55.]
[5]	谭俊峰. 乡村旅游助推乡村振兴路径[J]. 社会科学家, 2021(3): 58-63.
	[Tan Junfeng. Rural tourism promotes rural revitalization[J]. Social Scientist, 2021(3): 58-63.]
[6]	黄祖辉, 宋文豪, 成威松, 等. 休闲农业与乡村旅游发展促进农民增收了吗?——来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(5): 213-222. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.05.022
	[Huang Zuhui, Song Wenhao, Cheng Weisong, et al. Has the development of leisure agriculture and rural tourism promoted the increase of farmers’ income: An evidence from quasi-natural experiment[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(5): 213-222.]
[7]	Ćurčić N, Mirković Svitlica A, Brankov J, et al. The role of rural tourism in strengthening the sustainability of rural areas: The case of Zlakusa Village[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(12): 6747, doi: 10.3390/su13126747.
[8]	王冠孝, 王伟, 张娟娟. 乡村旅游与农村人居环境的耦合协调关系及障碍因子诊断——以山西省为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(1): 170-180. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2023.271
	[Wang Guanxiao, Wang Wei, Zhang Juanjuan. Coupling coordinative relationship and its obstacle factors between rural tourism and rural human settlement environment: A case of Shanxi Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 170-180.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2023.271
[9]	马永全, 王永红. 乡村教师作为乡村基本公共服务人才: 学理阐释及厚植路径[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 24(3): 93-98.
	[Ma Yongquan, Wang Yonghong. Rural teachers as basic public service personnel: Theoretical explanation and cultivation pathways[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science), 2022, 24(3): 93-98.]
[10]	罗哲, 唐迩丹. 农村公共文化服务的结构转型: 从“城市文化下乡”到“乡村文化振兴”[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 46(5): 129-135.
	[Luo Zhe, Tang Erdan. Structural transformation of rural public cultural services: From “giving urban culture to the countryside directly” to “revitalized local rural culture”[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 46(5): 129-135.]
[11]	徐信贵. 农村公共环境卫生的治理模式演进与“三治融合”理路[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 27(5): 208-216.
	[Xu Xingui. The evolution of governance model of rural public environmental sanitation and the integration path of “three governances”[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2021, 27(5): 208-216.]
[12]	陆林, 任以胜, 朱道才, 等. 乡村旅游引导乡村振兴的研究框架与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 102-118. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180454
	[Lu Lin, Ren Yisheng, Zhu Daocai, et al. The research framework and prospect of rural revitalization led by rural tourism[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 102-118.]
[13]	李志龙. 乡村振兴-乡村旅游系统耦合机制与协调发展研究——以湖南凤凰县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 643-654. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181165
	[Li Zhilong. Research on the coupling mechanism and coordinated development of rural revitalization-rural tourism system: A case study on Fenghuang County in Hunan[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 643-654.]
[14]	高楠, 张新成, 王琳艳. 中国乡村旅游公共服务水平时空格局与形成机理[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(2): 252-260. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.02.008
	[Gao Nan, Zhang Xincheng, Wang Linyan. The spatial-temporal patterns and formation mechanism of rural tourism public service in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(2): 252-260.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.02.008
[15]	李烨. 中国乡村旅游业扶贫效率研究[J]. 农村经济, 2017(5): 72-78.
	[Liu Ye. Study on poverty alleviation efficiency of rural tourism in China[J]. Rural Economy, 2017(5): 72-78.]
[16]	武文霞, 朱建峰. 新时代乡村旅游目的地生态环境治理机制与优化路径研究[J]. 广东社会科学, 2024(6): 36-46.
	[Wu Wenxia, Zhu Jianfeng. Study on eco-environmental governance mechanism and optimization path of rural tourism destinations in the new era[J]. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2024(6): 36-46.]
[17]	Zhang J. Tourism and rural income inequality: Empirical evidence for China[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2023, 26(1): 153-170. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2021.2010674
[18]	黄细嘉, 张科, 王红建, 等. 乡村旅游发展能否缩小城乡收入差距?——来自“全国休闲农业与乡村旅游示范县”的经验证据[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(2): 16-29.
	[Huang Xijia, Zhang Ke, Wang Hongjian, et al. Can rural tourism reduce the urban-rural income gap: Empirical evidence from “national leisure agriculture and rural tourism demonstration counties”[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2023, 38(2): 16-29.]
[19]	张新成, 王琳艳, 高楠. 山西省乡村文化和旅游公共服务融合发展成效评价及驱动路径研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(6): 1036-1046. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.372
	[Zhang Xincheng, Wang Linyan, Gao Nan. Evaluation of effectiveness and pathways for integrated development of rural cultural and tourism public services in Shanxi Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(6): 1036-1046.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.372
[20]	张新成. 中国乡村旅游公共服务水平时空演化及成因分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(11): 26-39.
	[Zhang Xincheng. Spatiotemporal patterns of public service levels in China’s rural tourism and their origins[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(11): 26-39.]
[21]	黄涛, 王艳慧, 关鸿亮, 等. 乡村振兴背景下农村基本公共服务与多维贫困的时空耦合特征研究[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(6): 135-146, 192.
	[Huang Tao, Wang Yanhui, Guan Hongliang, et al. Research on the coupling characteristics of time and space between rural basic public services and multidimensional poverty under the background of rural revitalization[J]. Human Geography, 2021, 36(6): 135-146, 192.]
[22]	范方志. 我国农村公共服务供给效率研究——基于中国省级层面面板数据的实证分析[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2023, 52(5): 42-52.
	[Fan Fangzhi. Research on the efficiency of rural public service supply in China: An empirical analysis based on panel data at the provincial level in China[J]. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University, 2023, 52(5): 42-52.]
[23]	方世巧, 熊静, 滕容梅, 等. 西南喀斯特地区乡村旅游与生态文明建设耦合协调发展研究[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(1): 164-170, 182.
	[Fang Shiqiao, Xiong Jing, Teng Rongmei, et al. Study on the coupling and coordination evaluation of rural tourism and ecological civilization construction in southwest karst region and its influencing factors[J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 39(1): 164-170, 182.] doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00220-8
[24]	李文路, 覃建雄, 张江峰. 乡村旅游发展与石漠化治理、乡村振兴成效耦合协调研究——基于黔南州喀斯特地区的实证[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(7): 282-293.
	[Li Wenlu, Qin Jianxiong, Zhang Jiangfeng. Study on the coupling relationship between rural tourism, rocky desertification control, and rural revitalization: An empirical analysis based on Qiannan karst region[J]. Ecological Economy, 2022, 43(7): 282-293.]
[25]	尹长丰. 乡村旅游高质量发展与乡村振兴耦合协调研究——以安徽省为例[J]. 社会科学家, 2023(1): 57-64.
	[Yin Changfeng. Research on the coupling coordination between high-quality development of rural tourism and rural revitalization: A case study of Anhui Province[J]. Social Scientist, 2023(1): 57-64.]
[26]	何育静, 张炜炜. 中国省域农村基本公共服务与乡村振兴耦合协调发展及影响因素分析——基于农村多维相对贫困视角[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2022(8): 48-68.
	[He Yujing, Zhang Weiwei. Analysis on the coupling and coordinated development of China’s provincial rural basic public services and rural revitalization and its influencing factors: From the perspective of rural multidimensional relative poverty[J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2022(8): 48-68.]
[27]	刘佳, 赵青华. 乡村旅游发展对乡村振兴的影响效应——基于新内源性发展理论的实证检验[J]. 农业技术经济, 2025(3): 126-144.
	[Liu Jia, Zhao Qinghua. The impact of rural tourism development on rural revitalization: Empirical testing based on the new endogenous development theory[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2025(3): 126-144.]
[28]	邓金钱, 蒋云亮. 返乡创业试点政策对乡村振兴的影响研究——来自中国县域面板数据的经验证据[J]. 中国人口科学, 2024, 38(1): 51-66.
	[Deng Jinqian, Jiang Yunliang. Impact of the pilot returning-home entrepreneurship policy on rural revitalization: Empirical evidence from county-level panel data[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2024, 38(1): 51-66.]
[29]	刘钒, 于子淳, 邓明亮. 数字经济发展影响乡村振兴质量的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(12): 47-57.
	[Liu Fan, Yu Zichun, Deng Mingliang. An empirical study on the impact of digital economy development on the quality of rural revitalization[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024, 41(12): 47-57.]
[30]	盖美, 秦冰, 郑秀霞. 经济增长动能转换与绿色发展耦合协调的时空格局演化分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(9): 2572-2590. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200702
	[Gai Mei, Qin Bing, Zheng Xiuxia. The evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of the coupling and coordination between economic growth kinetic energy conversion and green development[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(9): 2572-2590.]
[31]	刘佳, 赵青华, 王慧. 乡村旅游发展促进农村可持续生计的空间效应及机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(2): 490-510. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230214
	[Liu Jia, Zhao Qinghua, Wang Hui. Measurement of high-quality development in western China and its temporal and spatial evolution pattern[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(2): 490-510.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230214
[32]	张博胜, 杨子生. 中国城镇化的农村减贫及其空间溢出效应——基于省级面板数据的空间计量分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1592-1608. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190775
	[Zhang Bosheng, Yang Zisheng. Rural poverty reduction and its spatial spillover effects of Chinese urbanization: Based on the analysis of spatial econometric model with provincial panel data[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7): 1592-1608.]

系统层	子系统层	具体指标	权重	属性
农村公共服务	基础设施	每万人农村卫生厕所数/个	0.079	+
		人均道路面积/m²	0.067	+
		农村供水普及率/%	0.027	+
	基础教育	农村小学师生比/%	0.055	+
	基础教育	农村初中师生比/%	0.040	+
	医疗卫生	每万人农村卫生人员数/个	0.037	+
	医疗卫生	每万人农村卫生室数/个	0.022	+
	环境保护	农村生活垃圾处理投入占比/%	0.081	+
		农村绿地率/%	0.058	+
		农村污水处理投入占比/%	0.161	+
	娱乐文化	每万人农村文化站数/个	0.016	+
		每万人农村文艺活动次数/次	0.071	+
		每万人农村举办展览次数/次	0.040	+
	社会保障	农村居民最低生活保障平均标准/元	0.052	+
	社会保障	参加社会养老保险农村居民人数/10⁴人	0.075	+
	数字化	每万人农村宽带接入用户数/户	0.105	+
	数字化	农村居民家庭平均每百户移动电话拥有量/部	0.014	+
乡村旅游	发展水平	国内旅游收入/10⁸元	0.157	+
		国内旅游人次/10⁸人	0.136	+
		乡村居民人均收入/元	0.065	+
	资源基础	A级景区/个	0.075	+
		中国美丽休闲乡村/个	0.182	+
		国家“一村一品”示范村镇/个	0.099	+
	支撑条件	旅行社数/个	0.061	+
		旅游从业人员数/人	0.126	+
		公路旅客周转量/10⁸人·km^-1	0.099	+

系统层	子系统层	具体指标	权重	属性
乡村振兴	产业兴旺	乡村人均农林牧渔产值/元	0.124	+
	产业兴旺	乡村人均第一产业增加值/元	0.123	+
	生态宜居	化肥使用强度	0.054	-
	生态宜居	绿化覆盖率/%	0.123	+
	乡风文明	乡村消费教育文化娱乐支出占比/%	0.087	+
	乡风文明	乡村15岁以上人口文盲率/%	0.029	-
	治理有效	村庄建设投入/10⁴元	0.223	+
	治理有效	城乡收入差距	0.063	-
	生活富裕	乡村恩格尔系数	0.059	-
	生活富裕	乡村人均消费支出/元	0.115	+

年份	重心坐标	椭圆方位角/(°)	椭圆面积/10⁴ km²	长半轴/km	短半轴/km
2010	103.84°E，33.38°N	150.117	288.73	1132.066	811.890
2014	103.76°E，33.42°N	150.756	283.49	1119.981	805.764
2018	103.79°E，33.26°N	151.404	273.63	1108.168	786.020
2023	103.61°E，33.30°N	150.392	279.89	1122.826	793.502

变量	VIF检验		LLC检验	Hadri LM检验	空间计量模型选择检验	统计量
变量	VIF	1/VIF	统计量	统计量	空间计量模型选择检验	统计量
lnRR	-	-	-3.916^***	8.673^***	莫兰指数	8.705^***
lnD	2.58	0.387267	-1.528^*	10.573^***	空间误差拉格朗日乘数检验	4.589^**
lnFdi	1.97	0.507015	-4.302^***	8.247^***	空间滞后拉格朗日乘数检验	10.069^**
lnIs	1.39	0.719407	-2.388^***	12.888^***	空间误差稳健的拉格朗日乘数检验	11.570^***
lnLand	3.47	0.288280	-2.453^***	12.350^***	空间滞后稳健的拉格朗日乘数检验	17.051^***
VIF均值	2.35	-	-	-	空间误差似然比检验	32.07^***
					空间滞后似然比检验	21.54^***
					空间误差沃尔德检验	7.88^*
					空间误差沃尔德检验	7.80^*
					豪斯曼检验	26.27^**
					个体固定效应检验	14.79^*
					时间固定效应检验	122.43^***

变量/参数	OLS		SEM		SLM		SDM
变量/参数	系数	P值	系数	P值	系数	P值	系数	P值
lnD	0.820^***（9.92）	0.000	0.939^***（11.41）	0.000	0.700^***（7.56）	0.000	0.356^**（2.48）	0.013
lnFdi	-0.054^***（-4.30）	0.000	-0.001（-0.08）	0.938	-0.001（-0.05）	0.961	0.009（0.68）	0.498
lnIs	0.077（0.42）	0.674	-0.041（-0.28）	0.782	-0.225（-1.56）	0.118	-0.485^***（-2.78）	0.005
lnLand	0.100^***（3.09）	0.002	0.124^**（2.35）	0.019	0.087（1.76）	0.078	0.028（0.58）	0.561
W*lnD	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.361^**（1.99）	0.046
W*lnFdi	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.052^**（2.39）	0.017
W*lnIs	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.573^**（2.20）	0.028
W*lnLand	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.093（1.34）	0.179
空间误差回归系数（λ）	-	-	0.190^*（1.94）	0.052	-	-	-	-
空间自回归系数（ρ）	-	-	-	-	0.321^***（3.98）	0.000	0.224^**（2.45）	0.014
拟合优度（R²）	0.716	-	0.879	-	0.885	-	0.901	-
对数似然值（LogL）	-	-	130.314	-	135.577	-	146.347	-

Coupling coordination degree of rural public services and rural tourism and its rural revitalization influence effect: Based on the empirical evidence in western China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Guojun, LI Jiayao, WANG Zixuan. Evaluation of the development level of the “digital-cultural-tourism” industries in the Yellow River Basin and analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of its coupling coordination [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 117-127.
[2]	LI Xiaoke, CHEN Qiangqiang. Influence mechanism and spatial effects of the digital economy on the urban-rural income gap in Gansu Province [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(1): 198-210.
[3]	XU Jianbin, CAO Xiaoshu. Coupling characteristics and influencing factors of water and soil resources at the small watershed scale in Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1531-1540.
[4]	LIU Yixin, PEI Tingting, CHEN Ying, XIE Baopeng. Measurement and spatial-temporal differentiation of rural revitalization development level in Gansu Province based on county scale [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1683-1693.
[5]	YUAN Meng, XIE Baopeng, TIAN Limin, CHEN Ying, PEI Tingting. Spatiotemporal coupling relationship between multifunctional land use and multidimensional relative poverty in the Gansu section of Liupanshan [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1304-1316.
[6]	HOU Caixia, ZHANG Yuzhou, YANG Jianping. Coupling coordination and obstacle factors of water-society-ecosystem in the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(4): 717-727.
[7]	LI Mengyuan, PANG Jiapeng, LI Huan. Coordinated development of comprehensive accessibility of provincial typical tourism distribution centers and their spatial relationship: A case of Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(3): 539-548.
[8]	LI Ke, HE Jing, MENG Yangyang, LI Changrui. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of key rural tourism villages in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(11): 2031-2041.
[9]	XU Xiaoliang, LIU Xuyi, GUAN Jingyun, YANG Jingjing, WANG Mingchen, BAO Longfei. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of high-quality development of cultural and tourism integration in border ethnic areas in western China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(9): 1596-1605.
[10]	LIU Miaomiao, WU Weidong. Empirical study of the coupling of new urbanization and rural revitalization in Shaanxi Province [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(8): 1420-1430.
[11]	XIA Wenhao, HUO Yu, LU Yuan, WANG Chaoyi. Spatialtemporal differences and spatial spillover effects of agricultural carbon emissions in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(6): 1084-1096.
[12]	CAO Jialin, LIU Yanfang, ZHAO Jinmei, AN Rui, HU Yichuan, SUN Wenjie, XIN Gege. Coupling and coordination of economical and intensive utilization of urban construction land and high-quality development in Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(5): 872-884.
[13]	LIU Honghong, LIU Shufang. Spatiotemporal evolution and obstacle identification of complex ecosystem resilience in the Qilian Mountain area [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(2): 237-247.
[14]	ZHANG Lixin, ZHANG Jiarui. Coupling and coordinated development of new infrastructure and regional resilience in China: Spatio-temporal differences and evolution trends [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(12): 2164-2176.
[15]	LI Haiyang, YANG Min. “Explicit-implicit” patterns coupling coordination degree of cropland utilization in the farming system of northwest China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(11): 1924-1934.

变量	直接效应		间接效应		总效应
变量	系数	P值	系数	P值	系数	P值
lnD	0.391^***	0.006	0.539^***	0.002	0.930^***	0.000
	（2.75）		（3.10）		（5.65）
lnFdi	0.012	0.344	0.068^**	0.011	0.080^**	0.015
	（0.95）		（2.54）		（2.42）
lnIs	-0.435^***	0.008	0.555^*	0.070	0.120	0.702
	（-2.78）		（1.70）		（0.38）
lnLand	0.035	0.468	0.122	0.150	0.157	0.107
	（0.73）		（1.44）		（1.61）