塔里木河下游垦区绿洲生态系统服务的价值

doi:10.13826/j.cnki.cn65-1103/x.2003.03.003

Abstract

Abstract: Ecosystem services refers to the ecosystem goods and services, which represent the benefits that human population demand, directly and indirectly, from ecosystem functions. There are the life-support system for all of the life on the earth, and are the key natural capital of humanity. It is of great significance to estimate ecosystem services value. Continuous existence of the services of ecological systems is taken for granted, never before have human action so threatened their provision, most of them are public goods and not traded in markets, and thus resulted in the continuous decrease of ecosystem services and the deterioration of ecosystem functions that generate them. The valuation of ecosystem services has been becoming one of the focuses of sustainable development, environmental economics and ecology. Various attempts have been made to calculate the value of global and regional ecosystem services. The valuation of ecosystem services isessential to the integrated accounting of environment and economics. This paper based on the data of 1:100000 Landsat TM in the Tarim River Basin in 1986, 1990 and 2000, and analyzed the land use and land coverage changes. It is found that the land use and land cover in the Tarim River Basin has changed greatly during the past 14 a, because of human's irrational development and utilization of water resources and ecosystems. By using method proposed by Constaza et al (1997) and others, the result shows that the annual value of the ecosystem services in the Tarim River Basin was 77. 84×106＄ (646.07×106 ￥RMB) in 1986; and 105.93×106＄ (879. 22×106￥RMB) in 1990; and 183.77×106＄ (1525.29×106 ￥RMB) in 2000.Because of the reservoir area is increased steady, the total annual increase value of the ecosystem services in the this study area. Taking into account that such ecosystems as permanent snow and glaciers, construction land, salt lick, and desert and gravel desert also have ecosystem services value, this value of the ecosystem services in the Tarim River Basin is a conservative estimation.

Key words: Tarim River Basin, ecosystem services, sustainable development

CLC Number:

X171.1

XU Ying-qin, WU Shi-xin, LU Zhao-xia, YAN Xin-hua, Maier. Value of the Oasis Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reach of Tarim River Basin[J].Arid Land Geography, 2003, 26(3): 208-216.

References

[1] 蔡晓明. 生态系统生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000. 39~56.
[2] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 王仰麟. 景观生态学原理及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. 149~166.
[3] Constanza R, Rudolf de Groot, el al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natureal capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253~260.
[4] Cairns [J]. Protecting the delivery of ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Health, 1997, 3(3): 185~194.
[5] Westman W. How much are nature's services worth[J]？Science, 1997, 197: 960~964.
[6] Carson, R. Silent Spring[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962. 1~9.
[7] Daily G C. Nature's Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997. 1~10.
[8] 张志强, 徐中民, 王建, 程国栋. 黑河流域生态系统服务的价值[J]. 冰川冻土, 2001, 23(4): 360~367.
[9] 阎水玉, 王祥荣. 生态系统服务研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 21(5): 61~66.
[10] 张志强, 徐中民, 陈国栋. 生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(11): 1918~1925.
[11] 徐中民, 张志强, 陈国栋, 等. 额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1): 107~117.
[12] 陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1): 17~23.
[13] 钟全林, 曹建华, 王红英. 生态公益林价值核算研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(6): 537~542.
[14] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607~613.
[15] 蒋延玲, 周广胜. 中国主要森林生态系统公益的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(5): 426~432.
[16] 谢高地, 张钇锂, 鲁春霞, 等. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 47~53.
[17] 宗跃光, 周尚意, 温良, 等. 区域生态系统可持续发展的生态价值评价——以宁夏灵武市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(10): 1573~1580.
[18] 鲁春霞, 谢高地, 成升魁. 河流生态系统的休闲娱乐功能及其价值评估[J]. 资源科学, 2001, 23(5): 77~81
[19] 李香云, 张蓬涛, 章予舒. 塔里木河下游绿色走廊特点及衰败成因分析[J] 。干旱区研究, 2001, 18(4)26~30.
[20] 许鹏. 正确把握塔里木河干流治理的指导原则[M]. 塔里木河中下游实地踏勘报告. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2000, 203~207.
[21] 毛德华, 韩德麟, 张发旺, 张小雷. 塔里木河流域水资源、环境与管理[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1998, 5~8.
[22] 宋郁东, 樊自立, 雷志栋, 张发旺. 中国塔里木河水资源与生态问题研究[M]. 新疆人民出版社, 2001, 1~5.
[23] 李新, 杨德刚. 塔里木河水资源利用的效益与生态损失[J]. 干旱区地理, 2001, 24(4): 325~331.
[24] 张捷斌, 刘玉芸. 塔里木河流域水资源统一管理问题及对策研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25(2): 101~107.
[25] 李海涛. 新疆生态经济系统的能值分析与可持续发展研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2001, 24(4): 289~298.
[26] 许英勤, 胡玉昆, 马彦华. 塔里木河中下游区域开发对生态环境的影响及生态环境恢复与重建对策[J]. 干旱区地理, 2001, 24(4): 342~346.
[27] 郭英杰, 许英勤, 马彦华. 新疆塔里木河下游应急输水的生态效益[M]. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25(3): 239~241.
[28] 李海涛, 严茂超, 沈文清, 等. 新疆生态经济系统的能值分析与可持续发展研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2001, 24(4): 289~296.
[29] 杨青, 何清. 塔里木河下游的气候变化与生态环境[J]. 新疆气象, 2000, 23(3): 11~14.

Value of the Oasis Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reach of Tarim River Basin

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Yubo, ZHAO Shanchao, WANG Yapei, MA Xiaoli, CHEN Yuwen, HUANG Xuansheng, WANG Weixia. Quantification and spatial differentiation of ecosystem service value of Picea schrenkiana forest in the central Tianshan Mountains [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1396-1405.
[2]	WANG Jiawei, DONG Guotao, JIANG Xiaohui, NIE Tong, LI Yuehong. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and driving forces of ecosystem services in the Heihe River Basin under the context of ecological water conveyance [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1406-1420.
[3]	XU Mingjing, DUAN Baoling, FENG Qiang, LYU Meng. Ecological services and their trade-offs/synergistic relationships in multi-scenario simulations: A case of the Shanxi section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1206-1219.
[4]	LI Zhi, SU Yang, SHU Qin. Static-dynamic matching of ecosystem service supply and demand and ecological management zoning in northwest China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1115-1126.
[5]	ZOU Xiang, ZHANG Yuting, XU Lu. Spatio-temporal patterns of vegetation cover and its responses to climatic factors in Hulun Buir from 2000 to 2022 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 963-972.
[6]	LI Bingkun, ZHANG Xiaoke, LUO Zhanbin, MA Jing, YANG Yongjun, CHEN Fu. Matching between supply and demand of ecosystem services based on the “water-energy-food” nexus: A case of the urban agglomeration on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(4): 571-585.
[7]	LI Xiaofei, GONG Jian, YE Jing, FANG Hongjia, ZHANG Shizhen, LIN Jiasheng. Optimization of ecological function zoning in Gansu Province under the trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(3): 467-479.
[8]	LIU Wenjun, HU Keke, SU Litan, JIN Lei. Characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural water consumption in the Tarim River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(11): 1951-1960.
[9]	CHU Wenxi, YANG Xinjun, LI Runyang. Coupling coordination relationship and influencing factors between urban resilience and ecosystem services in the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(11): 2005-2018.
[10]	CHAO Bao, ZHAO Yuanyuan, WU Haiyan, LI Yuan, SU Ning. Ecosystem services and its response to climate factors in the Mongolian Plateau from 2000 to 2020 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(9): 1577-1586.
[11]	FU Wei, XIA Wenhao, FAN Tongsheng, ZOU Zhen, HUO Yu. Scenario projection analysis of ecosystem carbon stocks in the Tarim River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(4): 634-647.
[12]	ZHANG Yan, LI Junnan, PAN Bohua. Evaluation and multi-scenario prediction of ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin based on PLUS model: A case of Shaanxi section [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(11): 1935-1946.
[13]	SHI Jinli, XU Liping, LI Xiaohang, GAO Zhiyu, XI Yunyun, LI Zhihui. Evaluation of ecological-economic harmony and sustainable development zoning in counties of southern Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(10): 1794-1804.
[14]	ZHANG Qifei, CHEN Yaning, SUN Congjian, XIANG Yanyun, HAO Haichao. Changes in terrestrial water storage and evaluation of oasis ecological security in the Tarim River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 1-14.
[15]	DONG Li, WANG Manwang, DONG Mei. Sustainable development capability of Ningxia ecological migration area based on ecological footprint method [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(6): 1004-1012.