黄河流域城市旅游业高质量发展水平测度与空间格局特征

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.103

Abstract

Abstract:

The high-quality development of tourism is the core theme of China’s tourism development during the current period and the longer-term future. Thus, an accurate grasp of the connotation and characteristics of high-quality development of tourism and scientific measurement of the high-quality development level of tourism must form the basis for the exploration of its development path. Drawing on the essential attributes of tourism and the new development concept, this paper constructs an evaluation index system for the high-quality development of tourism and uses the entropy value method and exploratory spatial analysis to measure the high-quality development of tourism and the characteristics of spatial patterns in the Yellow River Basin that were prevailing in 2019. The study shows the following results: (1) In terms of subdimensions, the overall level of high-quality development of the tourism industry in the Yellow River Basin is low, with the proportion of high-value zones ranging from 11% to 40%, the proportion of low-value zones ranging from 30% to 72%, and the proportion of high-value zones in the subdimensions of smoothness-efficient, fairness-shared, and innovation-driven being less than 10%. In terms of comprehensiveness, the high-quality level of development of the tourism industry in the cities of the Yellow River Basin is relatively low, with a low to medium level accounting for 71.67% and a high-value area of 28.33%. (2) There are significant features of spatial differentiation in both the subdimension and the composite dimension. In the composite dimension, the high-quality development level of the tourism industry as a whole decreases from the downstream to the upstream gradient; in the subdimension, the stable and efficient levels are high in the west, low in the middle, and medium in the east; the levels of green and sustainable are high upstream, medium in the middle, and low downstream and, finally, the trend of the differentiation across the remaining dimensions is the same as those of the composite dimension. (3) There is a significant spatial dependence effect in the dimensions stable and efficient, green and sustainable, coordinated development, culture and tourism integration, and comprehensive. The spatial agglomeration characteristics of the subdimension and the comprehensive dimension differ. However, all characteristics exhibit spatial polarization featuring high- and low-value differentiated agglomeration.

Key words: high-quality development of tourism, measurement, spatial pattern, Yellow River Basin

TIAN Xiaobo. Measurement and spatial pattern characteristics of tourism high-quality development level of urbans in the Yellow River Basin[J].Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1660-1671.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Measurement results of tourism high-quality development level of urbans in the Yellow River Basin"

市（州/盟）	稳定高效水平	公平共享水平	绿色持续水平	创新驱动水平	协调发展水平	文旅融合水平	旅游业高质量发展水平
西宁市	4.70	7.44	21.12	1.42	4.38	5.65	44.71
海东市	6.37	2.46	17.59	0.37	1.93	3.40	32.13
海北州	17.74	2.68	14.61	0.11	7.76	1.87	44.77
黄南州	8.40	5.39	15.58	0.03	3.49	0.85	33.74
海南州	16.76	0.16	17.35	0.08	3.18	1.53	39.06
果洛州	5.08	6.08	18.35	0.02	0.29	0.16	29.98
玉树州	6.45	3.46	25.91	0.04	2.08	0.70	38.64
阿坝州	5.62	2.39	25.33	0.83	13.08	5.43	52.67
兰州市	9.41	7.51	19.49	17.84	2.25	8.56	65.06
白银市	13.46	3.50	24.04	0.76	1.68	3.78	47.23
天水市	10.61	5.57	25.46	2.63	4.64	6.16	55.07
平凉市	11.01	3.04	25.11	0.40	3.51	4.82	47.89
庆阳市	7.77	2.99	22.63	0.36	0.27	4.51	38.53
定西市	10.09	2.75	21.86	0.23	0.56	4.53	40.03
临夏州	16.04	1.83	22.24	0.33	4.18	5.09	49.70
甘南州	8.66	6.70	25.24	0.23	3.05	4.96	48.83
银川市	4.99	10.61	29.49	2.58	2.39	8.99	59.05
石嘴山市	2.70	15.25	37.23	0.62	0.63	3.83	60.25
吴忠市	8.99	3.67	26.70	0.52	2.84	4.58	47.30
固原市	12.36	8.45	25.80	0.57	4.57	4.47	56.23
中卫市	9.69	8.74	29.42	0.56	3.86	4.29	56.56
呼和浩特市	9.04	13.01	21.61	3.56	4.01	8.61	59.83
包头市	9.48	6.45	25.83	1.01	2.14	6.27	51.16
乌海市	11.09	4.76	24.31	0.12	1.08	3.12	44.49
鄂尔多斯市	9.79	5.16	26.32	0.69	0.99	8.67	51.61
巴彦淖尔市	9.52	7.27	22.06	0.17	0.33	4.47	43.83
阿拉善盟	20.87	4.19	22.87	0.35	8.43	4.01	60.72
太原市	6.32	13.37	16.91	6.93	1.34	10.03	54.90
长治市	7.91	8.03	19.56	1.56	2.30	7.75	47.10
晋城市	8.67	6.59	15.10	0.94	2.84	6.31	40.46
朔州市	9.16	5.77	20.05	0.37	1.39	4.88	41.62
晋中市	10.16	9.42	14.82	1.91	5.29	8.22	49.81
运城市	10.22	9.06	13.62	2.33	3.15	7.79	46.17
忻州市	9.15	6.05	18.06	1.35	3.78	6.65	45.05
临汾市	10.75	7.24	11.70	1.22	3.12	7.64	41.67
吕梁市	10.20	6.35	20.84	0.74	2.12	6.61	46.84
西安市	12.44	29.84	15.59	30.76	3.41	14.48	106.52
铜川市	7.00	5.04	18.87	1.22	4.94	3.74	40.81
宝鸡市	10.26	8.99	19.98	3.76	4.46	7.67	55.11
咸阳市	4.56	7.45	11.43	2.62	1.88	6.51	34.45
渭南市	6.17	17.22	13.93	4.73	3.40	5.20	50.66
延安市	9.76	6.73	24.04	3.49	2.90	6.91	53.84
榆林市	8.45	17.11	21.83	1.61	0.12	6.02	55.14
商洛市	7.97	8.35	22.68	3.06	4.88	4.78	51.72
郑州市	4.39	25.85	14.13	33.84	6.16	13.29	97.66
开封市	14.59	11.03	15.51	5.66	14.48	7.95	69.22
洛阳市	9.11	21.12	11.85	19.07	12.48	11.97	85.61
新乡市	7.61	6.79	14.34	5.48	5.50	7.02	46.75
焦作市	8.50	13.14	12.73	5.18	7.99	6.48	54.01
濮阳市	12.98	4.08	16.34	0.71	0.43	5.29	39.83
三门峡市	11.00	7.43	15.39	4.14	14.38	5.87	58.20
济南市	5.01	24.61	15.23	46.08	2.23	11.21	104.38
淄博市	6.15	20.82	15.07	13.73	3.98	9.05	68.79
东营市	4.66	12.27	16.52	4.37	0.75	5.73	44.30
济宁市	6.74	19.04	13.35	10.02	3.67	9.48	62.30
泰安市	9.12	16.77	15.08	13.33	6.74	8.20	69.24
德州市	4.23	12.53	14.25	5.56	0.85	6.08	43.49
聊城市	6.27	11.93	13.89	4.82	1.57	5.65	44.13
滨州市	5.60	12.20	18.01	4.37	0.96	6.04	47.17
菏泽市	6.97	14.11	14.28	2.14	0.62	6.07	44.18

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

References 33

[1]	杨永春, 穆焱杰, 张薇. 黄河流域高质量发展的基本条件与核心策略[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(3): 409-423. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.03.01
	[Yang Yongchun, Mu Yanjie, Zhang Wei. Basic conditions core strategies of high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 409-423.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.03.01
[2]	方创琳. 黄河流域城市群形成发育的空间组织格局与高质量发展[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(6): 1-8. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.06.001
	[Fang Chuanglin. Spatial organization pattern and high-quality development of urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(6): 1-8.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.06.001
[3]	马海涛, 徐楦钫. 黄河流域城市群高质量发展评估与空间格局分异[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(4): 11-18. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.002
	[Ma Haitao, Xu Xuanfang. High-quality development assessment and spatial heterogeneity of urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4): 11-18.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.002
[4]	陆大道, 孙东琪. 黄河流域的综合治理与可持续发展[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2431-2436. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912001
	[Lu Dadao, Sun Dongqi. Development and management tasks of the Yellow River Basin: A preliminary understanding and suggestion[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2431-2436.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912001
[5]	李小建, 文玉钊, 李元征, 等. 黄河流域高质量发展:人地协调与空间协调[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(4): 1-10. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.001
	[Li Xiaojian, Wen Yuzhao, Li Yuanzheng, et al. High-quality development of the Yellow River Basin from a perspective of economic geography: Man-land and spatial coordination[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4): 1-10.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.001
[6]	李达, 林龙圳, 林震, 等. 黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展的EKC检验[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 3965-3974.
	[Li Da, Lin Longzhen, Lin Zhen, et al. EKC test of ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 3965-3974.]
[7]	石培华, 翟燕霞. 文旅融合视野下文物保护利用与创新路径研究——以黄河流域为例[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 57(4): 114-128.
	[Shi Peihua, Zhai Yanxia. Research on the innovative path of cultural relics protection and utilization from the perspective of an integration of culture and tourism: A case study of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 114-128.]
[8]	樊杰, 王亚飞, 王怡轩. 基于地理单元的区域高质量发展研究——兼论黄河流域同长江流域发展的条件差异及重点[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(1): 1-11. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.01.001
	[Fan Jie, Wang Yafei, Wang Yixuan. High quality regional development research based on geographical units: Discuss on the difference in development conditions and priorities of the Yellow River Basin compared to the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(1): 1-11.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.01.001
[9]	张朝枝, 杨继荣. 基于可持续发展理论的旅游高质量发展分析框架[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(1): 43-50.
	[Zhang Chaozhi, Yang Jirong. An analysis framework of high-quality tourism development based on sustainable theory[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 56(1): 43-50.]
[10]	于法稳, 黄鑫, 岳会. 乡村旅游高质量发展:内涵特征、关键问题及对策建议[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(8): 27-39.
	[Yu Fawen, Huang Xin, Yue Hui. The high-quality development of rural tourism: Connotative features, key issues and countermeasures[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(8): 27-39.]
[11]	何建民. 新时代我国旅游业高质量发展系统与战略研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(10): 9-11.
	[He Jianmin. Research on the system and strategy of high-quality development of China’s tourism industry in the new era[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(10): 9-11.]
[12]	阎友兵, 胡欢欢. 中国旅游业高质量发展水平的测度及时空演化分析[J]. 湖南财政经济学院学报, 2021, 37(1): 5-18.
	[Yan Youbing, Hu Huanhuan. Analysis on the measurement of China’s inter-provincial high-quality development tourism level and spatial-temporal evolution[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics, 2021, 37(1): 5-18.]
[13]	马慧强, 燕明琪, 李岚, 等. 我国旅游公共服务质量时空演化及形成机理分析[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(3): 190-199. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.03.024
	[Ma Huiqiang, Yan Mingqi, Li Lan, et al. The spatio-temporal evolution and formation mechanism of tourism public service in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(3): 190-199.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.03.024
[14]	刘雨婧, 唐健雄. 长江经济带旅游业发展质量评价及其时空演变[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(4): 209-219. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.04.023
	[Liu Yujing, Tang Jianxiong. Evaluation and spatial-temporal evolution of the quality of tourism development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(4): 209-219.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.04.023
[15]	田小波, 胡静, 贾垚焱, 等. 高质量发展阶段旅游业发展水平空间分异成因探测——基于因素分解的黄河流域实证[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(3): 460-470. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.293
	[Tian Xiaobo, Hu Jing, Jia Yaoyan, et al. Exploring the causes of spatial differentiation of tourism development level in the high-quality development stage: Empirical evidence of Yellow River Basin based on factor decomposition[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 460-470.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.293
[16]	时朋飞, 曹钰晗, 龙荟冰, 等. 我国旅游业高质量发展水平测度、空间分异及障碍因子诊断[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(2): 201-210. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.02.021
	[Shi Pengfei, Cao Yuhan, Long Huibing, et al. Level measurement, spatial variation and obstacle factor diagnosis of tourism high-quality development in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(2): 201-210.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.02.021
[17]	张洪昌. 新时代旅游业高质量发展的治理逻辑与制度创新[J]. 当代经济管理, 2019, 41(9): 60-66.
	[Zhang Hongchang. The governance logic and system innovation for the high-quality development of tourism in the new era[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2019, 41(9): 60-66.]
[18]	唐任伍, 徐道明. 新时代高质量旅游业发展的动力和路径[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(10): 11-13.
	[Tang Renwu, Xu Daoming. Dynamics and paths of high-quality tourism development in the new era[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(10): 11-13.]
[19]	王雄青, 胡长生. 文旅融合背景下红色文化旅游高质量发展路径研究——基于江西的视角[J]. 企业经济, 2020, 39(11): 100-107.
	[Wang Xiongqing, Hu Changsheng. Research on the path of high-quality development of red cultural tourism in the context of cultural and tourism integration: Based on the perspective of Jiangxi[J]. Enterprise Economy, 2020, 39(11): 100-107.]
[20]	宋子千. 科技引领“十四五”旅游业高质量发展[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(6): 10-12.
	[Song Ziqian. Science and technology lead the high-quality development of tourism in the 14^th five-year plan[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(6): 10-12.]
[21]	张新成, 梁学成, 宋晓, 等. 黄河流域旅游产业高质量发展的失配度时空格局及成因分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(12): 201-208.
	[Zhang Xincheng, Liang Xuecheng, Song Xiao, et al. Spatial pattern of the mismatch degrees of the high-quality development of tourism industry in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(12): 201-208.]
[22]	李冬花, 张晓瑶, 陆林, 等. 黄河流域高级别旅游景区空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(5): 70-80. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.05.008
	[Li Donghua, Zhang Xiaoyao, Lu Lin, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of high-level tourist attractions in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(5): 70-80.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.05.008
[23]	王胜鹏, 乔花芳, 冯娟, 等. 黄河流域旅游生态效率时空演化及其与旅游经济互动响应[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(5): 81-89. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.05.009
	[Wang Shengpeng, Qiao Huafang, Feng Juan, et al. The spatio-temporal evolution of tourism eco-efficiency in the Yellow River Basin and its interactive response with tourism economy development level[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(5): 81-89.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.05.009
[24]	李丽, 徐佳. 中国文旅产业融合发展水平测度及其驱动因素分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(20): 49-52.
	[Li Li, Xu Jia. Measurement of the integration development level of China’s culture and tourism industry and analysis of its driving factors[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2020, 36(20): 49-52.]
[25]	殷为华, 刘楠楠, 鲁飞宇. 长江经济带文旅产业融合发展水平测度及空间演化研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(5): 1009-1020. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.05.2020691
	[Yin Weihua, Liu Nannan, Lu Feiyu. Cultural industry and tourism’s integrated development and its spatial evolution in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(5): 1009-1020.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.05.2020691
[26]	曹诗图, 郑宇飞, 黄其新. 基于旅游属性与本质的中国旅游起源探析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2013, 29(6): 95-99.
	[Cao Shitu, Zheng Yufei, Huang Qixin. Discussion on origin of Chinese tourism based on property and essence of tour[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2013, 29(6): 95-99.]
[27]	李天元. 旅游学概论[M]. 第七版. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 2014.
	[Li Tianyuan. Introduction to tourism[M]. 7^th ed. Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 2014.]
[28]	马慧强, 廉倩文, 论宇超, 等. 基于BP神经网络的旅游经济系统脆弱性省际空间分异[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(12): 2248-2261. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.12.09
	[Ma Huiqiang, Lian Qianwen, Long Yuchao, et al. Spatial differentiation of tourism economic system vulnerability based on BP neural network in different provinces of China[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2248-2261.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.12.09
[29]	胡静, 贾垚焱, 谢鸿璟. 旅游业高质量发展的核心要义与推进方向[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 9(4): 1-11.
	[Hu Jing, Jia Yaoyan, Xie Hongjing. Coreessentials of high-quality development of tourism industry and its promotion direction[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 9(4): 1-11.]
[30]	宋志伟, 刘鲁, 郭秋琪, 等. 中国旅游高质量发展与社会福祉——2020《旅游学刊》中国旅游研究年会会议综述[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(12): 136-141.
	[Song Zhiwei, Liu Lu, Guo Qiuqi, et al. High-quality tourism development and social well-being in China: Conference overview of the 2020 tourism tribune annual conference on tourism research in China[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(12): 136-141.]
[31]	石燕, 詹国辉. 文旅融合高质量发展的指数建构、影响因素与提升策略——以江苏为例[J]. 南京社会科学, 2021(7): 165-172.
	[Shi Yan, Zhan Guohui. Index construction, influencing factors and promotion strategies of high-quality development of cultural and tourism industry’s integration: A case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Science, 2021(7): 165-172.]
[32]	任保平, 文丰安. 新时代中国高质量发展的判断标准、决定因素与实现途径[J]. 改革, 2018(4): 5-16.
	[Ren Baoping, Wen Feng’an. The criteria, determinants and ways to achieve high quality development in China in the new era[J]. Reform, 2018(4): 5-16.]
[33]	刘晓静, 梁留科. 旅游社会公平及其评价指标体系研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(4): 438-443.
	[Liu Xiaojing, Liang Liuke. Research on tourism social equity and its evaluation index system[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2015, 17(4): 438-443.]

评价维度	准则层	指标层（代码）	指标属性	指标计算
稳定高效	稳定性	近5 a旅游收入增长波动（X₁）	负向	旅游总收入增长率变动的绝对值
稳定高效	效率水平	旅游业全员劳动生产率（X₂）	正向	旅游业总收入与旅游业从业人员的比值
公平共享	公平发展	居民旅游收入弹性（X₃）	正向	当地居民收入增长率与当地旅游收入增长率的比值
	社会效益	免费开放的博物馆数量（X₄）	正向	直接获取
	社会效益	建成区公园绿地面积（X₅）	正向	直接获取
绿色持续	资源消耗	单位旅游收入能耗（X₆）	负向	能源消费总量与地区旅游综合收入的比值
	环境治理	空气优良天数（X₇）	正向	直接获取
	生态保护	建成区绿化覆盖率（X₈）	正向	直接获取
创新驱动	创新投入	旅游业研发经费投入（X₉）	正向	全社会研发经费数额乘以旅游业产值占经济生产总值的比值
	创新投入	旅游业研发人员数量（X₁₀）	正向	全社会研发人员数乘以旅游业从业人员占地区就业总人数的比值
	创新产出	旅游业科技专利发明数量（X₁₁）	正向	通过Innojoy专利搜索引擎检索整理
	创新产出	旅游学术论文发表（X₁₂）	正向	在CNKI以“旅游”为主题，“地区”为作者机构检索获取
协调发展	产业结构协调度	旅游产业结构合理化（X₁₃）	正向	K=(e_i_j/e_j)/(E_i/E)
文旅融合	文旅产业融合发展水平	文旅产业耦合协调度（X₁₄）	正向	耦合协调度模型

评价维度		全局Moran’s I	P值	Z值	分布状态
分维度	稳定高效	0.0922	0.0005	3.4602	集聚
	公平共享	0.0330	0.1227	1.5432	随机
	绿色持续	0.4595	0.0000	13.7576	集聚
	创新驱动	-0.0157	0.9625	0.0470	随机
	协调发展	0.0844	0.0042	2.8591	集聚
	文旅融合	0.1872	0.0000	5.4028	集聚
综合维度		0.1096	0.0006	3.3976	集聚

Measurement and spatial pattern characteristics of tourism high-quality development level of urbans in the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	PENG Wenying, ZHAO Shuang, SHAN Ziyi, CHEN Zeyu. Measurement and obstacle factors of ecological level of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1648-1659.
[2]	LI Hui, YAO Xilong. Water-saving potential of hydrogen production from renewable energy in Yellow River Basin from the perspective of water footprint [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1353-1362.
[3]	ZHONG Jiawei, ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Mingyue. How does agricultural socialization service affect grain eco-efficiency: A case study of 71 prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1385-1395.
[4]	SUN Yubo, ZHAO Shanchao, WANG Yapei, MA Xiaoli, CHEN Yuwen, HUANG Xuansheng, WANG Weixia. Quantification and spatial differentiation of ecosystem service value of Picea schrenkiana forest in the central Tianshan Mountains [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1396-1405.
[5]	CHENG Peng, PENG Haiyang, HOU Dingrong, SUN Mingdong, SONG Xiaowei. Spatial pattern and evolution trend of agricultural grey water footprint intensity in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1185-1197.
[6]	XU Mingjing, DUAN Baoling, FENG Qiang, LYU Meng. Ecological services and their trade-offs/synergistic relationships in multi-scenario simulations: A case of the Shanxi section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1206-1219.
[7]	WU Zhiping, JIANG Min, FU Jianxin. Spatial and temporal differences and driving forces for high-quality development of urbanization in the Jiziwan metropolitan area of the Yellow River [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1279-1292.
[8]	REN Shiqi, WANG Yongyu. Measurement and spatial convergence of green development level of prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1031-1042.
[9]	WEI Jianfei, YUAN Youran, LI Qiang, DONG Peipei, LIU Jiurong. Spatio-temporal variation and obstacle factors of territorial spatial efficiency in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1055-1066.
[10]	WANG Peipei, WANG Jiao, CAI Yongmei. Research on the spatial differentiation pattern and driving factors of Chinese ski resorts from a multi-scale perspective [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1080-1088.
[11]	NIE Hanyu, ZHANG Yanhui, LI Hui, ZHENG Yaomin. Spatio-temporal evolution and multi-scale barrier factor analysis of tourism ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1089-1102.
[12]	XIE Yu, XUE Xuandeng. Digital economy empowers green development welfare: Empirical evidence based on resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1127-1139.
[13]	WANG Ruifang, LYU Baoqi, ZHANG Wenjing. Vegetation dynamics and their responses to climate change in the Yellow River Basin: Based on climatic wet and dry zoning scales [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 973-984.
[14]	CHENG Lanhua, YANG Xianming, WU Xinyan. Impact of urban compactness on carbon emission performance in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(5): 838-853.
[15]	LI Mengran, XU Xiaoren, WANG Liang, DUAN Jian, SHI Shuqi, REN Dandan. Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural carbon emissions in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(5): 854-865.