兵地旅游经济网络结构及共生发展研究

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.223

干旱区地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 2086-2097.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.223

兵地旅游经济网络结构及共生发展研究

白洋^1,²(),吴剑²(),窦开龙³,路雯²,谭李娜²,哈丽旦·巴克⁴

1.新疆大学新疆历史文化旅游可持续发展重点实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐 830046
2.新疆大学旅游学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830046
3.新疆大学马克思主义学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830046
4.伊犁职业技术学院经济管理学院，新疆伊宁 835000

收稿日期:2023-05-14 修回日期:2023-08-27 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2024-01-05
通讯作者: 吴剑（1999-），男，硕士研究生，主要从事旅游经济研究. E-mail: 1289527241@qq.com
作者简介:白洋（1982-），男，博士，副教授，主要从事旅游经济研究. E-mail: baiyang@xju.edu.cn
基金资助:
新疆大学哲学社会科学校内培育项目青年教师培养项目(22CPY148);国家社会科学基金项目(22XMZ047);新疆维吾尔自治区社会科学基金项目(22BJY029)

Network structure and symbiotic development of tourism economy in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and local government

BAI Yang^1,²(),WU Jian²(),DOU Kailong³,LU Wen²,TAN Li’na²,Halidan BAKE⁴

1. Key Laboratory for Sustainable Development of Historical and Cultural Tourism, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China
2. School of Tourism, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China
3. School of Marxism, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China
4. School of Economics and Management, Yili Vocational Technical College, Yining 835000, Xinjiang, China

Received:2023-05-14 Revised:2023-08-27 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2024-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

兵地旅游融合发展是实现兵地经济社会高质量发展的内在要求与有效途径。为促进兵地旅游系统的要素合理流动与资源优化配置，基于共生理论，运用可达性模型、旅游经济联系强度模型、核密度估计、平均最近邻分析、泰森多边形等方法研究兵地旅游的资源共生演化、经济联系变化、网络结构特征，探究兵地旅游共生发展的模式、格局与机制。结果表明：（1）兵地旅游资源空间集聚特征不断增强，资源开发处于偏利共生关系。（2）兵地旅游资源非均衡共生特征明显，呈现“兵团依附地方、弱势依托强势”共生分布特征，形成“中央一心多点→外围多心多点”共生演化格局。（3）可达性呈现中心→外围圈层递减结构，依托旅游交通网络形成偏利共生纽带。（4）旅游经济联系具有距离衰减、南北差异、兵地差距、同城效应特征。（5）归纳兵地旅游“间歇寄生、间歇偏利共生、互惠共生”的区域共生模式，文化共生、资源共生、产业共生主次递进和主客互动的要素共生维度，“一核三点八心两圈三带”的共生发展格局与“各美其美→美美与共→和合同美”的共生发展机制。

关键词: 旅游经济, 网络结构, 共生发展, 新疆生产建设兵团, 新疆

Abstract:

Achieving high-quality development for both the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) and the local government of Xinjiang, China necessitates integrated tourism development. This paper, grounded in the theory of symbiosis, utilized tourism resources and economic data from XPCC and Xinjiang. Employing methodologies such as the accessibility model, tourism economic linkage strength model, kernel density estimation, average nearest neighbor analysis, and Tyson polygon, it investigates the symbiotic evolution of tourism resources, economic contact changes, and network structure characteristics within XPCC and Xinjiang. The study aims to uncover the tourism symbiotic development pattern, structure, and mechanism between the two entities. The findings revealed the following key insights: (1) Spatial agglomeration characteristics of tourism resources between XPCC and the local government are consistently strengthening, with resource exploitation showcasing a partial-benefit symbiotic relationship. (2) Pronounced unbalanced symbiotic characteristics exist in tourism resources between XPCC and Xinjiang, illustrating a distribution pattern where “XPCC relies on Xinjiang, the weak depends on the strong”. This distribution pattern manifests as a symbiotic evolution of “one heart in the center with multiple points around→multiple hearts with multiple points on the periphery”. (3) Accessibility, relying on the tourism transportation network to establish a more beneficial symbiotic link, exhibits an attenuating structure from the central to outer sphere. (4) Tourism economic connections exhibit characteristics of distance attenuation, north-south differences, gaps between XPCC and the local government, and coupling effects among neighboring cities. (5) The paper introduces a regional symbiosis model encompassing “intermittent parasitic, intermittent symbiosis, and mutualism”, and traces the progression of cultural symbiosis from primary to secondary stages, along with dimensions such as resource symbiosis and industrial symbiosis in host-guest interactions. The study concludes by summarizing the symbiotic development structure of “one core, three points, eight centers, two circles, and three belts”, alongside the symbiotic development mechanism of “respective development→cooperative development→mutual development”.

Key words: tourism economy, network structure, symbiotic development, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Xinjiang

白洋, 吴剑, 窦开龙, 路雯, 谭李娜, 哈丽旦·巴克. 兵地旅游经济网络结构及共生发展研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 2086-2097.

BAI Yang, WU Jian, DOU Kailong, LU Wen, TAN Li’na, Halidan BAKE. Network structure and symbiotic development of tourism economy in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and local government[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(12): 2086-2097.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 33

[1]	毕玉中, 王雪迎. 新疆兵团党委举行兵地融合发展工作推进会[N]. 中国青年报, 2015-12-29(5).
	[Bi Yuzhong, Wang Xueying. The Xinjiang Corps Party Committee held a promotion meeting for the integration and development of XPCC and Xinjiang[N]. China Youth Daily, 2015-12-29(5).]
[2]	Stringer P F, Pearce P L. Toward a symbiosis of social psychology and tourism studies[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1984, 11(1): 5-17. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(84)90093-8
[3]	Wong E, Mistilis N, Dwyer L. A model of Asean collaboration in tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3): 882-899. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2010.12.008
[4]	陆相林, 孙中伟, 马世猛. 京津冀区域城市旅游共生关系分析与协同发展对策[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(4): 181-187.
	[Lu Xianglin, Sun Zhongwei, Ma Shimeng. The symbiotic relationship and the polycentric cooperative development countermeasures of urban tourism in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(4): 181-187.]
[5]	曹华盛. 试论忠县旅游与长江三峡旅游的共生发展[J]. 人文地理, 2002, 17(3): 47-49.
	[Cao Huasheng. About the cooperative development of tourism of Zhongxian County and the Three Gorges region of Yangtze River[J]. Human Geography, 2002, 17(3): 47-49.]
[6]	Lu C Y, Wang S S, Wang K, et al. Uncovering the benefits of integrating industrial symbiosis and urban symbiosis targeting a resource-dependent city: A case study of Yongcheng, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 255: 120210, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120210.
[7]	Viken A. Tourism, research, and governance on Svalbard: A symbiotic relationship[J]. Polar Record, 2011, 47(243): 335-347. doi: 10.1017/S0032247410000604
[8]	王维艳, 林锦屏, 沈琼. 跨界民族文化景区核心利益相关者的共生整合机制——以泸沽湖景区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 673-684.
	[Wang Weiyan, Lin Jinping, Shen Qiong. A study on the symbiotic integrative mechanism of key stakeholders in the transboundary ethnic cultural scenic spot: A case of the scenic spots in Lugu Lake area of Yunnan Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2007, 26(4): 673-684.]
[9]	Prayag G. Symbiotic relationship or not? Understanding resilience and crisis management in tourism[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2018, 25: 133-135. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.012
[10]	Fennell D, Weaver B D. The ecotourism concept and tourism-conservation symbiosis[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2005, 13(4): 373-390. doi: 10.1080/09669580508668563
[11]	袁宏瑞, 王群. 旅游与生态共生演进模式与生态安全判定——以国家重点生态功能区安徽省黄山区为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(12): 25-38.
	[Yuan Hongrui, Wang Qun. The evolution model of the tourism-ecology symbiosis and the determination of ecological security: A case study of Huangshan District, Anhui Province, a key ecological functional zone of China[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(12): 25-38.]
[12]	Shi F F, Weaver B D, Zhao Y Z, et al. Toward an ecological civilization: Mass comprehensive ecotourism indications among domestic visitors to a Chinese wetland protected area[J]. Tourism Management, 2019, 70: 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.07.011
[13]	马国强, 汪慧玲, 许倩. 西北地区旅游经济与交通业共生发展[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(10): 223-230.
	[Ma Guoqiang, Wang Huiling, Xu Qian. The symbiotic development of tourism economy and transportation industry in northwest China[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(10): 223-230.]
[14]	白长虹, 张植奎, 杨明静. “旅游·酒店·餐饮” 创新教育联盟建设探究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2018, 28(增刊1): 17-21.
	[Bai Changhong, Zhang Zhikui, Yang Mingjing. Research on the construction of innovation education alliance of “tourism, hotel and catering”[J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2018, 28 (Suppl.1): 17-21.]
[15]	Koutsouris A, Gidarakou I, Grava F, et al. The phantom of (agri) tourism and agriculture symbiosis? A Greek case study[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2014, 12: 94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2014.09.001
[16]	熊海峰, 祁吟墨. 基于共生理论的文化和旅游融合发展策略研究——以大运河文化带建设为例[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 31(1): 40-48.
	[Xiong Haifeng, Qi Yinmo. A research on the development strategy of integration of culture and tourism from the perspective of symbiosis theory taking the construction of the grand canal cultural belt as an example[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 31(1): 40-48.]
[17]	Garrison S, Wallace D C. Media tourism and its role in sustaining Scotland’s tourism industry[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(11): 6305, doi: 10.3390/su13116305.
[18]	Wang Z Y. Development and integration model of marine tourism resources based on sustainable development[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 103(Suppl. 1): 1030, doi: 10.2112/SI103-214.1.
[19]	赵得成. 基于治沙和旅游互为共生的地域性旅游模式设计[J]. 商业时代, 2012(4): 129-130.
	[Zhao Decheng. Regional tourism model design based on mutual symbiosis of desertification control and tourism[J]. Journal of Commercial Economics, 2012(4): 129-130.]
[20]	许春晓, 唐慧, 孟圆圆, 等. 湖南红色旅游资源的共生势能[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(7): 1718-1733. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210707
	[Xu Chunxiao, Tang Hui, Meng Yuanyuan, et al. Symbiosis potential energy of red tourism resources in Hunan[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(7): 1718-1733.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210707
[21]	吴强. 我国民族传统体育文化资源与旅游资源融合共生的文化空间研究[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2019, 31(1): 56-60.
	[Wu Qiang. Study on the cultural space of the integration and symbiosis of national traditional sports cultural resources and tourism resources in China[J]. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 2019, 31(1): 56-60.]
[22]	Roberto D P. Airports and cities in the context of globalisation: A multidimensional symbiosis in Adolfo Suárez-Madrid Barajas airport[J]. The Geographical Journal, 2019, 109(9): 118-125. doi: 10.2307/1789915
[23]	唐仲霞, 刘梦琳, 向程, 等. 旅游社区治理多主体共生模式研究——基于青海省两个典型社区实例[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(6): 125-131.
	[Tang Zhongxia, Liu Menglin, Xiang Cheng, et al. Analysis of multiple-agents’ symbiotic patterns of tourism community governance: Based on the case of two typical communities of Qinghai Province[J]. Human Geography, 2018, 33(6): 125-131.]
[24]	张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳, 等. 红色旅游高质量发展评价指标体系与培育路径研究——以红色旅游城市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(6): 1927-1937.
	[Zhang Xincheng, Gao Nan, Wang Linyan, et al. Evaluation index system and cultivation path of high-quality development of red tourism: A case of red tourism cities[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(6): 1927-1937.]
[25]	黄明华, 曹慧泉. 由兵地分治走向兵地融合——新疆工作会议背景下的呼图壁城镇体系发展探索[J]. 现代城市研究, 2012, 27(2): 60-66.
	[Huang Minghua, Cao Huiquan. From dividing and conquering to integration of corps and local: A study on urban system development of Hutubi against the background of Xinjiang working conference[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2012, 27(2): 60-66.]
[26]	罗捷, 罗小龙, 顾宗倪, 等. 兵地融合: 对乌鲁木齐都市圈协调发展的探索[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(5): 38-43, 55.
	[Luo Jie, Luo Xiaolong, Gu Zongni, et al. Integration of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and local government: Exploration on coordinated development of Urumqi metropolitan area[J]. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(5): 38-43, 55.]
[27]	李晓霞. 新疆南疆建立各民族嵌入式社会结构和社区环境的可能与路径[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2017(1): 72-78.
	[Li Xiaoxia. The possibility and path of the establishment of embedded social structures and community environment in southern Xinjiang[J]. Social Sciences in Xinjiang, 2017(1): 72-78.]
[28]	岳洋, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 等. 兰新高铁对西北地区可达性及经济联系的影响[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(1): 131-139.
	[Yue Yang, Cao Weidong, Yao Zhaozhao, et al. Study on influence of Lanzhou-Xinjiang high-speed railway on accessibility and economic contact in northwest area[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(1): 131-139.]
[29]	王凯, 王梦晗, 甘畅, 等. 武陵山片区旅游扶贫效率网络结构演化及其驱动机制[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(4): 589-601.
	[Wang Kai, Wang Menghan, Gan Chang, et al. The evolvement and driving mechanism of tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in Wuling Mountain area, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(4): 589-601.]
[30]	袁纯清. 共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(上)[J]. 改革, 1998(2): 100-104.
	[Yuan Chunqing. Symbiosis theory and its application to small economy (I)[J]. Reform, 1998(2): 100-104.]
[31]	袁纯清. 共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(下)[J]. 改革, 1998(3): 75-85.
	[Yuan Chunqing. Symbiosis theory and its application to small economy (II)[J]. Reform, 1998(3): 75-85.]
[32]	孙振杰. 京津冀旅游共生体系统协调演化研究[J]. 商业研究, 2020, 62(11): 11-17.
	[Sun Zhenjie. A study of the coordinated evolution of tourism symbiont system in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei[J]. Commercial Research, 2020, 62(11): 11-17.]
[33]	吴清, 焦义彬, 陈嘉琳, 等. “粤桂画廊” 区域旅游空间结构识别及协同发展模式[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(9): 219-227.
	[Wu Qing, Jiao Yibin, Chen Jialin, et al. Tourism spatial structure recognition and cooperative development model in Guilin-Hezhou-Zhaoqing[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(9): 219-227.]

年份	区域	平均最近邻距离/m	期望平均最近邻距离/m	最近邻指数	Z值	P值	空间分布类型
2012	兵团	58250.94	61606.65	0.95	-0.52	0.60	不显著随机
	地方	22026.51	45087.58	0.49	-13.52	0.00	显著集聚
	总体	22043.06	42398.13	0.52	-13.50	0.00	显著集聚
2015	兵团	54755.26	62349.92	0.88	-1.30	0.19	不显著随机
	地方	17354.85	36157.25	0.48	-17.14	0.00	显著集聚
	总体	16957.85	34406.20	0.49	-17.57	0.00	显著集聚
2018	兵团	41508.46	56813.97	0.73	-3.46	0.00	显著集聚
	地方	12726.25	31056.02	0.41	-22.67	0.00	显著集聚
	总体	12667.97	29455.02	0.43	-23.08	0.00	显著集聚
2021	兵团	41752.55	65823.95	0.63	-5.85	0.00	显著集聚
	地方	14404.82	45042.56	0.32	-31.18	0.00	显著集聚
	总体	14307.91	42586.12	0.34	-32.24	0.00	显著集聚

兵地旅游经济网络结构及共生发展研究

Network structure and symbiotic development of tourism economy in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and local government

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张昊, 韩增林, 乔国荣, 王辉, 王宏业, 段冶. 黄河流域城市间旅游经济联系格局及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354.
[2]	夏文浩, 王铭扬, 姜磊. 新疆农业碳排放强度时空变化趋势与收敛分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1145-1154.
[3]	姚岚博, 冶建明, 王芸, 朱现伟. 干旱区人居环境系统耦合协调的时空演变及作用机制研究——以新疆为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(6): 1013-1023.
[4]	杨锐, 李建勇, 王宁练, 陈小俊, 杜建峰, 刘剑波, 韩岳婷. 西天山温泉地区全新世沉积物元素地球化学记录及其古环境意义[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(6): 900-910.
[5]	张烈琴, 陆亦农, 龙震, 李庆雷, 王涛. 新疆文化旅游空间分布格局[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 823-833.
[6]	白洋,谭李娜,陈春燕,李卓远. 城际列车对新疆旅游经济高质量发展的影响效应及驱动机制[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(4): 658-666.
[7]	闫新杰, 孙慧, 辛龙. 新疆资源型企业的空间分布与区位选择[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(4): 678-687.
[8]	张宁,汪子晨,杨肖,陈彤,邢飞. 新疆水资源与农业种植系统耦合协调及时空差异研究——以粮食和棉花种植系统为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(3): 349-359.
[9]	马丽娜, 张飞云, 翟玉鑫, 滕伦, 康建国. 1980—2020年新疆土地利用变化下生态系统服务价值时空演变分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(2): 253-263.
[10]	任浩科, 魏伟, 汪克会. 新冠疫情影响下宁夏旅游流网络结构演化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(2): 316-324.
[11]	余其鹰, 胡彩虹, 白云岗, 卢震林, 曹彪, 刘富余, 刘成帅. 新疆洪水预报预警中融雪径流模型应用进展[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 1951-1962.
[12]	王志强, 姜文桓, 卢诗月. 基于生态网络分析的新疆“水-能-碳”耦合系统特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 2005-2016.
[13]	孙宇, 刘维忠, 盛洋. 基于PSR模型的新疆水资源经济生态韧性时空差异及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 2017-2028.
[14]	马文江, 白妙琴, 阿迪力·艾合买提, 张德平, 杨忠娜. “双碳”目标下新疆粮食绿色全要素生产率的时空分异及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 2029-2041.
[15]	蒋磊, 刘小龙, 郭帅, 何亮, 邢建磊, 郭俊杰. 基于Logistic回归分析的土壤盐渍化易发性评价——以新疆南疆塔里木灌区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(11): 1858-1867.