塔里木河下游生态输水对荒漠河岸林生态恢复力的影响

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.03.03

Abstract

Abstract:

The Tarim River is an important inland river with simple species composition and nutrient structure in southern Xinjiang, China. In the past few decades, with the intensification of human activities, the intensity of the water resources development and use has increased, seriously squeezing the ecological water consumption. As a consequence, the river stopped flowing and the vegetation of the desert riparian forests in the lower reaches of Tarim River decayed. To save the seriously declining desert riparian forests, an ecological water conveyance project has been carried out in the lower reaches of Tarim River since 2000. However, the status of ecosystem resilience after water conveyance has not been deeply and systematically studied yet. Ecological resilience refers to the ability of an ecosystem to restore itself to its pre-damaged state through self-regulation under external disturbance. This study provides a theoretical basis for effectively dealing with the threat of external disturbance to the ecosystem. Based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and meteorological factors data in the past 20 years, the net primary productivity (NPP) of vegetation was calculated using the Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach model. The mean value, ecosystem resistance, stability, and resilience for the NPP of vegetation in four periods (2001—2005, 2006—2010, 2011—2015, and 2016—2019) in the lower reaches of the Tarim River were studied and the ecosystem restoration status in different river sections and distinct periods was obtained. The ecosystem stability was reflected by analyzing the average NPP change, NPP range, variance, and coefficient of variation in the four periods. Smaller NPP range, variance, coefficient of variation, and FW slope in a certain period led to higher stability of the ecosystem. The ecosystem resistance was comprehensively reflected on the probability analysis of the NPP reduction based on frequency distribution and the prediction of minimum NPP based on the environmental index (EI). A larger NPP mean, stability, resistance, and maximum NPP are related to greater ecosystem resilience. The results revealed that: (1) in 2016—2019, the NPP exhibited the maximum mean and maximum value and the ecosystem recovery ability was larger compared with that of 2006—2015, but slightly smaller compared with that of 2001—2005. This behavior is probably related to the significant rise of groundwater depth and the increase of surface vegetation cover in the early stage of ecological water conveyance. (2) The resilience was the greatest for the upper section in 2011—2015 and middle and lower sections in 2016—2019. The lowest resilience for the upper, middle, and lower sections was observed in 2006—2010, which is probably related to the persistently low ecological water delivery in 2006—2010. (3) After 20 years of ecological water conveyance, the restoration of the ecosystem upper segment was better than that of the middle and lower segments. (4) The ecological restoration was related to a certain state, and the ecological resilience of the first 10 years after ecological water conveyance was relatively low, demonstrating the difficulty to restore the ecosystem to the non-degraded state, while the ecological resilience of the last 10 years was relatively high, indicating that the ecosystem is getting closer to the undegraded condition. Moreover, the overall vegetation growth is improving, suggesting that the area of receiving water in the desert riparian forest could be enlarged and the ecological benefit of water conveyance could be improved by branching the braided river in the future.

Key words: ecosystem resilience, stability, resistance, desert riparian forests, the lower reaches of Tarim River

FU Aihong,CHENG Yong,LI Weihong,ZHU Chenggang,CHEN Yapeng. Effects of ecological water conveyance on ecological resilience of desert riparian forests in the lower reaches of Tarim River[J].Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 620-628.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 3

References 25

[1]	韩路, 陈家力, 王家强, 等. 塔河源荒漠河岸林群落物种组成、结构与植物区系特征[J]. 植物科学学报, 2019,37(3):324-336.
	[ Han Lu, Chen Jiali, Wang Jiaqiang, et al. Species composition, community structure, and floristic characteristics of desert riparian forest community along the mainstream of the Tarim River[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019,37(3):324-336. ]
[2]	陈亚宁, 李卫红, 陈亚鹏, 等. 荒漠河岸林建群植物的水分利用过程分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018,35(1):130-136.
	[ Chen Yaning, Li Weihong, Chen Yapeng, et al. Water use process of constructive plants in desert riparian forest[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018,35(1):130-136. ]
[3]	李卫红, 郝兴明, 覃新闻, 等. 干旱区内陆河流域荒漠河岸林群落生态过程及水文机制研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008,28(6):1113-1117.
	[ Li Weihong, Hao Xingming, Qin Xinwen, et al. Ecological process of desert riparian forest communities and its hydrological mechanism of inland river basin in arid area[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2008,28(6):1113-1117. ]
[4]	陈永金, 李卫红, 陈亚宁, 等. 塔里木河流域综合治理的生态效应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2007,27(1):24-28.
	[ Chen Yongjin, Li Weihong, Chen Yaning, et al. Ecological effect of synthesized governing in Tarim River valley[J]. China Environmental Science, 2007,27(1):24-28. ]
[5]	李卫红, 陈永金, 陈亚鹏, 等. 新疆塔里木河下游生态输水对地下水位和水质的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2006,28(5):157-163.
	[ Li Weihong, Chen Yongjin, Chen Yapeng, et al. Effects of ecological stream water transfusion on groundwater level and quality in the lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Resources Science, 2006,28(5):157-163. ]
[6]	Chen Y N, Zilliacus H, Li W H, et al. Ground-water lever affects plant species diversity along the lower reaches of the Tarim River, western China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2006,66:231-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.11.009
[7]	刘斌, 赵雅莉, 白洁, 等. 塔里木河下游流域输水工程生态效应评价研究[J]. 地理空间信息, 2020,18(3):112-117.
	[ Liu Bin, Zhao Yali, Bai Jie, et al. Study on ecological effect evaluation of water conveyance project in the lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Geospatial Information, 2020,18(3):112-117. ]
[8]	李均力, 肖昊, 沈占锋, 等. 2013—2018年塔里木河下游植被动态变化及其对生态输水的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(4):985-992.
	[ Li Junli, Xiao Hao, Shen Zhanfeng, et al. Vegetation changes during the 2013—2018 period and its response to ecological water transport in the lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(4):985-992. ]
[9]	Yan H M, Zhan J Y, Zhang T. Resilience of forest ecosystems and its influencing factors[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2011,10:2201-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.345
[10]	Chethika A C, Mikami Y, Matsuda Y, et al. Ecosystem service-based composite indicator for assessing community resilience to floods[J]. Environmental Development, 2018,27:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.08.002
[11]	Frazier A E, Renschler C S, Miles S B. Evaluating post-disaster ecosystem resilience using MODIS GPP data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013,21:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.019
[12]	Ponce C G E, Susan M M, Huete A, et al. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions[J]. Nature, 2013,494:349-353. doi: 10.1038/nature11836
[13]	Song J, Ru J Y, Zheng M M, et al. A global database of plant production and carbon exchange from global change manipulative experiments[J]. Scientific Data, 2020,7:323, doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00661-5. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00661-5
[14]	袁毛宁, 刘焱序, 王曼, 等. 基于“活力-组织力-恢复力-贡献力”框架的广州市生态系统健康评估[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019,38(4):1249-1257.
	[ Yuan Maoning, Liu Yanxu, Wang Man, et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on the framework of vigor, organization, resilience and contribution in Guangzhou City[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019,38(4):1249-1257. ]
[15]	顾康康. 生态承载力的概念及其研究方法[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012,12(2):389-396.
	[ Gu Kangkang. Concepts and assessment methods of ecological carrying capacity[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2012,12(2):389-396. ]
[16]	Li M, Peterson C A, Tautges N E, et al. Yields and resilience outcomes of organic, cover crop, and conventional practices in a Mediterranean climate[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019,9:12283, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48747-4. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48747-4
[17]	廖淑敏, 薛联青, 陈佳澄, 等. 塔里木河生态输水的累积生态响应[J]. 水资源保护, 2019,35(5):120-126.
	[ Liao Shumin, Xue Lianqing, Chen Jiacheng, et al. Cumulative ecological response of ecological water transmission in the Tarim River[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2019,35(5):120-126. ]
[18]	朱成刚, 艾克热木·阿布拉, 李卫红, 等. 塔里木河下游生态输水条件下胡杨林生态系统恢复研究[J/OL]. 干旱区地理. [2021-03-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/65.1103.X.20210328.1831.008.html.
	Zhu Chenggang, Aikeremu Abula, Li Weihong, et al. Ecosystem restoration of Populus euphratica forest under the ecological water conveyance in the lower reaches of Tarim River[J/OL]. Arid Land Geography. [2021-03-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/65.1103.X.20210328.1831.008.html. ]
[19]	李玉朋, 陈亚宁, 叶朝霞, 等. 塔里木河下游输水20 a的生态响应[J/OL]. 干旱区地理. [2021-03-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/65.1103.X.20210328.1831.010.html.
	[ Li Yupeng, Chen Yaning, Ye Zhaoxia, et al. Ecological responses of ecological water conveyance in the lower reaches of Tarim River for the 20 years[J/OL]. Arid Land Geography. [2021-03-29]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/65.1103.X.20210328.1831.010.html. ]
[20]	杨庚, 曹银贵, 罗古拜, 等. 生态系统恢复力评价研究进展[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019,60(3):508-513.
	[ Yang Geng, Cao Yingui, Luo Gubai, et al. Research progress of ecosystem resilience assessment[J]. Zhejiang Agricultural Science, 2019,60(3):508-513. ]
[21]	黎静, 关问文. 生态系统的抵抗力稳定性与恢复力稳定性的辩证关系[J]. 中学生物教学, 2014(5):47-49.
	[ Li Jing, Guan Wenwen. The dialectical relationship between the stability of ecosystem resistance and the stability of resilience[J]. Biology Teaching in Secondary Schools, 2014(5):47-49. ]
[22]	李卫红, 陈永金, 陈亚鹏, 等. 新疆塔里木河下游生态输水对地下水位和水质的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2006,28(5):157-163.
	[ Li Weihong, Chen Yongjin, Chen Yapeng, et al. Effects of ecological stream water transfusion on groundwater level and quality in the lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Resources Science, 2006,28(5):157-163. ]
[23]	Li W H, Zhou H H, Fu A H, et al. Ecological response and hydrological mechanism of desert riparian forest in inland river, northwest of China[J]. Ecohydrology, 2013,6(6):949-955. doi: 10.1002/eco.v6.6
[24]	李丽君, 张小清, 陈长清, 等. 近20 a塔里木河下游输水对生态环境的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018,41(3):238-247.
	[ Li Lijun, Zhang Xiaoqing, Chen Changqing, et al. Ecological effects of water conveyance on the lower reaches of the Tarim River in recent twenty years[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2018,41(3):238-247. ]
[25]	张鹏飞, 古丽·加帕尔, 包安明, 等. 塔里木河流域近期综合治理工程生态成效评估[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017,40(1):156-164.
	[ Zhang Pengfei, Guli Jiapaer, Bao Anming, et al. Ecological effects evaluation for short term planning of the Tarim River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2017,40(1):156-164. ]

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

418

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	2	0	0	416

From	Others	local

Times	248	170
Rate	59%	41%

Abstract

347

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	347

From	Others	local

Times	339	8
Rate	98%	2%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

区段	时段	NPP范围/g C·m^-2	变异系数（CV）	NPP方差/g C·m^-2	FW斜率	排序
大西海子—台特玛湖	2001—2005年	192.13(1)	0.88(2)	217.47(1)	0.06(2)	1.50
	2006—2010年	200.97(3)	0.83(1)	239.12(2)	-0.03(4)	2.50
	2011—2015年	192.90(2)	0.88(2)	305.01(3)	-0.04(3)	2.50
	2016—2019年	212.48(4)	1.00(3)	441.75(4)	0.05(1)	3.00
大西海子—英苏	2001—2005年	180.52(2)	1.00(3)	666.08(1)	0.05(2)	2.00
	2006—2010年	186.27(3)	0.93(2)	687.57(2)	-0.02(4)	2.75
	2011—2015年	180.18(1)	0.91(1)	722.11(3)	-0.04(3)	2.00
	2016—2019年	207.78(4)	1.01(4)	900.89(4)	0.04(1)	3.25
英苏—阿拉干	2001—2005年	60.99(1)	0.37(1)	34.12(1)	0.05(1)	1.00
	2006—2010年	67.96(2)	0.42(2)	54.86(2)	-0.03(3)	2.25
	2011—2015年	146.53(3)	0.66(3)	173.70(3)	-0.05(2)	2.75
	2016—2019年	163.49(4)	0.87(4)	366.95(4)	0.05(1)	3.25
阿拉干—台特玛湖	2001—2005年	39.37(1)	0.36(1)	18.70(1)	0.07(2)	1.25
	2006—2010年	58.25(2)	0.39(2)	26.78(2)	-0.06(3)	2.25
	2011—2015年	74.99(3)	0.48(3)	44.86(3)	-0.05(4)	3.25
	2016—2019年	119.53(4)	0.75(4)	127.86(4)	0.05(1)	3.25

区段	不同时段	低NPP的概率/%	高NPP的概率/%	NPP最小值/g C·m^-2	NPP最大值/g C·m^-2
大西海子—台特玛湖	2001—2005年	3.10	1.20	0.18	192.31
	2006—2010年	2.00	2.00	0.25	201.22
	2011—2015年	2.00	4.38	0.16	193.07
	2016—2019年	2.20	2.00	0.10	212.58
大西海子—英苏	2001—2005年	1.00	0.70	0.19	192.31
	2006—2010年	0.80	1.00	0.26	201.22
	2011—2015年	0.60	0.20	0.20	191.96
	2016—2019年	0.80	2.00	0.25	212.58
英苏—阿拉干	2001—2005年	1.80	1.00	5.63	71.57
	2006—2010年	0.80	0	6.75	77.43
	2011—2015年	1.00	1.00	6.25	156.68
	2016—2019年	2.20	1.05	5.12	175.33
阿拉干—台特玛湖	2001—2005年	1.50	1.70	0.55	48.50
	2006—2010年	1.00	0.30	1.17	60.52
	2011—2015年	0.80	2.00	0.16	82.48
	2016—2019年	1.20	2.10	0.11	130.20

Effects of ecological water conveyance on ecological resilience of desert riparian forests in the lower reaches of Tarim River

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LI Hongqing,YANG Yu,ZHANG Junhong. Construction of ecological security pattern in Shannan Wide Valley Basin of Yarlung Zangbo River [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1503-1513.
[2]	TIAN Liulan, WANG Shanshan, WU Zhaopeng. Construction of ecological security pattern in Urumqi based on multi-temporal remote sensing data [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(7): 1155-1165.
[3]	LIU Yuting,ZHANG Qifei,LIU Jingshi,GUAN Hanxiao,MENG Fanxue. Temporal and spatial characteristics of fractional vegetation coverage and its response to climatic factors in southern Xinjiang in recent 20 years: A case of Taxkorgan Tajik Autonomous County [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(5): 1481-1489.
[4]	ZHANG Xiaodong,ZHAO Zhipeng,ZHAO Yinxin,GAO Xuehua,MA Yuxue,LIU Naijing,JI Weibo. Landscape ecological risk assessment and ecological security pattern optimization construction in Yinchuan City [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(5): 1626-1636.
[5]	ZHAI Yongguang,ZHANG Xin,JI Honglan,MOU Xianyou,ZHANG Baosen. Ice-water classification in Inner Mongolia reach of the Yellow River based on remote sensing images [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(3): 763-773.
[6]	SHI Junjie,SUN Mingjing,LYU Xinsheng,ZHANG Junlan,LI Huoqing. Comprehensively analysis of an extreme snowstorm in the west of southern Xinjiang in spring [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 131-140.
[7]	ZHAO Xiaofeng,WANG Jinlin,WANG Shanshan,WANG Quan. Changes of ecological security pattern in Kalamaili region based on MCR models [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(5): 1396-1406.
[8]	CHEN Yapeng,ZHOU Honghua,ZHU Chenggang. A review of water transport processes of Populus euphratica in the lower reaches of Tarim River [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 612-619.
[9]	DI Zhenhua,XIE Zhenghui,CHEN Yaning. Estimation of riparian groundwater table depth in the lower reaches of Tarim River under long-term water conveyance [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 659-669.
[10]	WANG Chuan,LIU Yongchang,LI Zhi. Effects of ecological water conveyance on the spatial pattern of vegetation carbon sources/sinks in the lower reaches of Tarim River [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 729-738.
[11]	YAO Xueling,YANG Guojing,WANG Shuai,GUO Xiujiang. Soil moisture response and stability to rainfall in different depths in Loess Plateau [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(2): 507-513.
[12]	ZHANG Jing-tian, XI Hai-yang. Spatiotemporal dynamics of groundwater levels in a desert riparian forest and its response to surface runoff [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2): 388-397.
[13]	TANG Hao, WANG Xu, CHU Chang-jiang, SUN Ming-jing. Formation mechanism of a southeast gale event in Urumqi urban area: The coupling of gravity wave and ultra-low level jet [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(6): 1229-1238.
[14]	LI Zhenjie, JIN Lili, H E Qing, MIAO Qilong, ALI Mamtimin. Characteristics of atmospheric mixing layer height and atmospheric stability in Urumqi region and their relationship with the atmospheric pollution [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(3): 478-491.
[15]	YUE Hui, Liu Ying. Vegetation spatiotemporal variation and its driving factors of Shaanxi Province in recent 15 years [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(2): 314-323.