黄河流域兰州段生态环境与高质量发展耦合协调关系研究

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.460

Abstract

Abstract:

Environmental protection, as a major strategic initiative to promote the construction of ecological basin civilization systems in China in the era of the new normal, has become an important element in the construction of ecological civilizations by promoting ecological and environmental management in the Yellow River Basin region. By selecting Lanzhou City, the only provincial capital city in the Yellow River Basin that is traversed by the river, as the research object and using data from the Lanzhou section of the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019, an index system for evaluating the ecological environment and high-quality development level of the Lanzhou section is established. Then, a coupling degree model is constructed using the entropy weight method to comprehensively analyze and assess the characteristics of the coupling level of ecological environment and high-quality development. The results indicate that the ecological environment of the Lanzhou section is not great, with a trend of “deterioration-improvement-deterioration-improvement”, whereas the level of high-quality development follows the trend “decline-rise-decline-rise-decline-rise”. Generally, the coordination between the ecological environment and high-quality development in Lanzhou must be strengthened. The overall characteristics of the Yellow River Basin should be fully considered, the principles of environmental protection should be adhered to, the professional integration and transformation and upgrading of industries should be promoted simultaneously, the comprehensive urban governance capacity should be improved, and the layout of urban functions should be optimized on the basis of urban-rural integration development so that the sustainable development of the ecological environment for human living can be achieved.

Key words: Yellow River Basin, ecological environment, high-quality development, coupling relationship, Entropy method, Lanzhou

LI Hongfei,HE Yingru,BI Xiaoli. Coupling coordination relationship between ecological environment and high-quality development in Lanzhou section of Yellow River Basin[J].Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(4): 1244-1253.

Figures/Tables 8

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Fig. 1

Tab. 5

Fig. 2

Tab. 6

References 39

[1]	任保平, 付雅梅, 杨羽宸. 黄河流域九省区经济高质量发展的评价及路径选择[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2022, 37(1): 89-99.
	[ Ren Baoping, Fu Yamei, Yang Yuchen. Measurement and improvement path of high quality development level in Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Statistics and Information, 2022, 37(1): 89-99. ]
[2]	任保平, 文丰安. 新时代中国高质量发展的判断标准、决定因素与实现途径[J]. 改革, 2018, 31(4): 5-16.
	[ Ren Baoping, Wen Feng’an. The criteria, determinants and ways to achieve high quality development in China in the new era[J]. Reform, 2018, 31(4): 5-16. ]
[3]	赵剑波, 史丹, 邓洲. 高质量发展的内涵研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2019, 40(11): 15-31.
	[ Zhao Jianbo, Shi Dan, Deng Zhou. A framework of China’s high-quality economic development[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2019, 40(11): 15-31. ]
[4]	金碚. 关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, 35(4): 5-18.
	[ Jin Bei. Study on the “high-quality development” economics[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018, 35(4): 5-18. ]
[5]	王永昌, 尹江燕. 论经济高质量发展的基本内涵及趋向[J]. 浙江学刊, 2019, 57(1): 91-95.
	[ Wang Yongchang, Yin Jiangyan. On the basic connotation and tendency of high-quality economic development[J]. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2019, 57(1): 91-95. ]
[6]	凌连新, 阳国亮. 粤港澳大湾区经济高质量发展的评价与靶向路径研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2021, 36(6): 120-128.
	[ Ling Lianxin, Yang Guoliang. Study on the measurement and targeting path for the economic high-quality development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater bay area[J]. Journal of Statistics and Information, 2021, 36(6): 120-128. ]
[7]	马茹, 罗晖, 王宏伟, 等. 中国区域经济高质量发展评价指标体系及测度研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2019, 34(7): 60-67.
	[ Ma Ru, Luo Hui, Wang Hongwei, et al. Study of evaluating high-quality economic development in Chinese regions[J]. China Soft Science, 2019, 34(7): 60-67. ]
[8]	李金昌, 史龙梅, 徐蔼婷. 高质量发展评价指标体系探讨[J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(1): 4-14.
	[ Li Jinchang, Shi Longmei, Xu Aiting. Probe into the assessment indicator system on high-quality development[J]. Statistical Research, 2019, 36(1): 4-14. ]
[9]	张震, 刘雪梦. 新时代我国15个副省级城市经济高质量发展评价体系构建与测度[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019, 40(6): 20-31, 70.
	[ Zhang Zhen, Liu Xuemeng. Construction and measurement of the evaluation system for high-quality economic development of 15 sub-provincial cities in China in the new era[J]. Inquiry Into Economic Issues, 2019, 40(6): 20-31, 70. ]
[10]	曾浩, 邓宏兵. 武汉市城市化与生态环境协调发展定量评价与分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 46(5): 611-615.
	[ Zeng Hao, Deng Hongbing. Quantitative evaluation and analysis on the coordinated development of the urbanization and ecological environment system in Wuhan City[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences Editon), 2012, 46(5): 611-615. ]
[11]	马利邦, 牛叔文, 李怡欣. 甘肃省城市化与生态环境耦合的量化分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(5): 52-58.
	[ Ma Libang, Niu Shuwen, Li Yixin. Quantitative analysis of coupling between urbanization and ecological environment in Gansu Province[J]. Urban Studies, 2010, 17(5): 52-58. ]
[12]	赵金龙, 赵慧. 基于DMSP-OLS和MODIS数据的宁夏城市化与生态环境耦合协调分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 67(10): 9-14, 27.
	[ Zhao Jinlong, Zhao Hui. Coupling coordination analysis of urbanization and eco-environment in Ningxia based on DMSP-OLS and MODIS data[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 67(10): 9-14, 27. ]
[13]	刘耀彬, 宋学锋. 城市化与生态环境耦合模式及判别[J]. 地理科学, 2005, 25(4): 26-32.
	[ Liu Yaobin, Song Xuefeng. Model and criterion of urbanization and ecological environment coupling[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(4): 26-32. ]
[14]	崔木花. 中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(7): 72-78.
	[ Cui Muhua. The relationship of coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological environment: A case of urban cluster in the Central Plains[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(7): 72-78. ]
[15]	周正柱, 王俊龙. 长江经济带城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关联性研究[J]. 城市问题, 2020, 39(4): 21-32.
	[ Zhou Zhengzhu, Wang Junlong. Study on the coupling and coordination of urbanization and ecological environment in Yangtze River economic zone[J]. Urban Problems, 2020, 39(4): 21-32. ]
[16]	康玲芬, 李明涛, 李开明. 城市生态-经济-社会复合系统协调发展研究--以兰州市为例[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 45(2): 168-172.
	[ Kang Lingfen, Li Mingtao, Li Kaiming. Coordinated development of urban ecology-economy-society compound system: A case study of Lanzhou[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 45(2): 168-172. ]
[17]	王睿, 杨国靖. 库布齐沙漠生态治理的生态经济系统耦合分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(5): 1391-1400.
	[ Wang Rui, Yang Guojing. Coupling analysis of eco-economic system for ecological management in the Hobq Desert[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(5): 1391-1400. ]
[18]	张仲伍, 畅田颖, 高鑫. 黄河流域生态经济协调发展研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(3): 25-30, 36.
	[ Zhang Zhongwu, Chang Tianying, Gao Xin. Analysis of eco-economic coordination of Yellow River Basin[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2021, 40(3): 25-30, 36. ]
[19]	杜本峰, 穆跃瑄, 刘悦雅. 生态健康、健康生态与黄河流域高质量发展[J]. 中州学刊, 2021, 43(5): 86-93.
	[ Du Benfeng, Mu Yuexuan, Liu Yueya. Ecological health, healthy ecology and high quality development of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2021, 43(5): 86-93. ]
[20]	王睿, 洪菊花, 骆华松, 等. 典型生态脆弱区生态环境与贫困耦合分析--以四川省藏区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(3): 125-132.
	[ Wang Rui, Hong Juhua, Luo Huasong, et al. Coupling analysis of ecological environment and poverty in typical ecologically fragile area: A case study in Tibetan area, Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletion of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 125-132. ]
[21]	陆大道, 孙东琪. 黄河流域的综合治理与可持续发展[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2431-2436. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912001
	[ Lu Dadao, Sun Dongqi. Development and management tasks of the Yellow River Basin: A preliminary understanding and suggestion[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2431-2436. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912001
[22]	梁静波. 协同治理视阈下黄河流域绿色发展的困境与破解[J]. 青海社会科学, 2020, 41(4): 36-41.
	[ Liang Jingbo. The dilemma and solution of green development in the Yellow River Basin in the context of collaborative governance[J]. Qinghai Social Sciences, 2020, 41(4): 36-41. ]
[23]	王玉玺, 刘晓煌, 李通国, 等. 黄河流域甘肃段自然资源要素综合调查与动态观测、监测系统建设研究[J]. 甘肃地质, 2019, 28(增刊2): 1-10.
	[ Wang Yuxi, Liu Xiaohuang, Li Tongguo, et al. Investigation of natural resource elements and construction of dynamic observing and monitoring system in Gansu section of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Gansu Geology, 2019, 28(Suppl. 2): 1-10. ]
[24]	张保华, 陶宝先, 曹建荣, 等. 黄河下游冲积平原潮土土壤孔隙微形态特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(3): 687-693.
	[ Zhang Baohua, Tao Baoxian, Cao Jianrong, et al. Micromorphological characteristics of soil voids of fluvo-aquic soil in the alluvial plain of the lower Yellow River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(3): 687-693. ]
[25]	金凤君, 马丽, 许堞. 黄河流域产业发展对生态环境的胁迫诊断与优化路径识别[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(1): 127-136. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.01.13
	[ Jin Fengjun, Ma Li, Xu Die. Environmental stress and optimized path of industrial development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 127-136. ] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.01.13
[26]	孟望生, 邵芳琴. 黄河流域环境规制和产业结构对绿色经济增长效率的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2020, 36(6): 24-30.
	[ Meng Wangsheng, Shao Fangqin. Influence of environmental regulation and industrial structure on the growth efficiency of green economy in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2020, 36(6): 24-30. ]
[27]	侯庆丰, 蒋志荣. 精准扶贫对黄河上游地区农牧民可持续生计的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(3): 858-866.
	[ Hou Qingfeng, Jiang Zhirong. Effects of targeted poverty alleviation on the sustainable livelihood of farmers and herdsmen in the upper reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 858-866. ]
[28]	刘小鹏, 马存霞, 魏丽, 等. 黄河上游地区减贫转向与高质量发展[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(1): 197-205. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.01.19
	[ Liu Xiaopeng, Ma Cunxia, Wei Li, et al. Poverty reduction turn and high-quality development in the upper reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 197-205. ] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.01.19
[29]	马海涛, 徐楦钫. 黄河流域城市群高质量发展评估与空间格局分异[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(4): 11-18.
	[ Ma Haitao, Xu Xuanfang. High-quality development assessment and spatial heterogeneity of urban agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4): 11-18. ]
[30]	杨永春, 穆焱杰, 张薇. 黄河流域高质量发展的基本条件与核心策略[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(3): 409-423. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.03.01
	[ Yang Yongchun, Mu Yanjie, Zhang Wei. Basic conditions and core strategies of high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 409-423. ] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.03.01
[31]	安树伟, 李瑞鹏. 黄河流域高质量发展的内涵与推进方略[J]. 改革, 2020, 33(1): 76-86.
	[ An Shuwei, Li Ruipeng. Intension and promotion strategy of high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Reform, 2020, 33(1): 76-86. ]
[32]	刘琳轲, 梁流涛, 高攀, 等. 黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展的耦合关系及交互响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 176-195. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210112
	[ Liu Linke, Liang Liutao, Gao Pan, et al. Coupling relationship and interactive response between ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(1): 176-195. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210112
[33]	李鸿飞. 传统地域文化背景下的城市滨水生态空间色彩研究--以兰州市为例[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(5): 223-229. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00190-7
	[ Li Hongfei. Study on the spatial color of urban waterfront landscape under the background of traditional regional culture: Taking Lanzhou City as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(5): 223-229. ] doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00190-7
[34]	李铭, 董志海, 张敬赛. 复杂地理条件下兰州城市空间发展逻辑与规划应对[J]. 规划师, 2021, 37(8): 61-67.
	[ Li Ming, Dong Zhihai, Zhang Jingsai. Urban spatial development logic and planning response of Lanzhou under complex geographical conditions[J]. Planners, 2021, 37(8): 61-67. ]
[35]	张军扩, 侯永志, 刘培林, 等. 高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(7): 1-7.
	[ Zhang Junkuo, Hou Yongzhi, Liu Peilin, et al. The target requirements and strategic path of high quality development[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(7): 1-7. ]
[36]	潘桔, 郑红玲. 区域经济高质量发展水平的测度与差异分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(23): 102-106.
	[ Pan Ju, Zhen Hongling. Measurement and variance analysis of regional economic quality development level[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2020, 36(23): 102-106. ]
[37]	毕国华, 杨庆媛, 刘苏. 中国省域生态文明建设与城市化的耦合协调发展[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(1): 50-58.
	[ Bi Guohua, Yang Qingyuan, Liu Su. Coupling coordination development between ecological civilization construction and urbanization in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(1): 50-58. ]
[38]	李同昇, 陈谢扬, 芮旸, 等. 西北地区生态保护与高质量发展协同推进的策略和路径[J]. 经济地理, 2021 41(10): 154-164.
	[ Li Tongsheng, Chen Xieyang, Rui Yang, et al. Strategy and path of cooperative promotion of ecological protection and high-quality development in northwest China[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10): 154-164. ]
[39]	张中良, 牛木川. 长江、黄河流域高质量发展的测算与比较研究[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(2): 59-66, 74. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00295-0
	[ Zhang Zhongliang, Niu Muchuan. Calculation and comparison of high-quality development in Yangtze River and Yellow River basins[J]. Ecological Economy, 2022, 38(2): 59-66, 74. ] doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00295-0

目标层	准则层	次准则层	要素层	指标属性
生态环境水平	资源环境水平	资源禀赋	人均水资源量/m³·人^-1	正
			森林覆盖率/%	正
			人均耕地面积/hm²·人^-1	正
		环境水平	人均工业废水排放量/t·人^-1	负
			人均工业固体废物产生量/t·人^-1	负
			人均工业废气排放量/m³·人^-1	负
	压力水平	资源消耗	单位GDP水资源消耗量/m³·元^-1	负
			工业煤炭消费量/t	负
			工业天然气消费量/m³	负
			工业电力消费量/kWh	负
		资源代价	废水排放强度/t·元^-1	负
			废气排放强度/m³·元^-1	负
			一般工业固体废物产生强度/t·元^-1	负
	抗逆水平	生态改善	荒山荒（沙）地造林面积占辖区面积比重/%	正
			林业投资与GDP比/%	正
			水利管理业投资额与GDP比/%	正
		污染治理	一般工业固体废物综合利用率/%	正
			城镇生活污水处理率/%	正

目标层	准则层	次准则层	要素层	指标属性
高质量发展水平	有效性	经济效率	资本生产率/%	正
			税收占GDP比重/%	正
			全社会劳动生产率/元·人^-1	正
			第二、三产业增加值与GDP比/%	正
	协调性	产业结构	产业结构高级化	正
			第三产业对GDP的贡献率/%	正
			外向结构/%	正
		经济结构	城镇居民与农村居民消费比/%	负
	创新性	技术创新	专利授权率/%	正
			R&D内部经费支出比/%	正
			R&D人员全时当量/人	正
	稳定性	经济稳定性	经济波动率/%	正
			居民消费价格指数	正
		社会稳定性	失业率/%	负
	分享性	收入分配公平均等化	城乡收入比/%	负
			城镇居民家庭恩格尔系数/%	负
		基本公共服务水平	每千人拥有卫生技术人员数/人	正
			每万人口高等学校平均在校生数/人	正
			城乡基本医疗保险参保率/%	正

要素层	要素解释	要素层	要素解释
资本生产率	整个社会固定资产投资/总产值	第三产业贡献率	（第二产值+第三产值）/总产值
全社会劳动生产率	总产值/从业人数	外向结构	进出口总额/总产值
产业结构高级化	第三产业增加值/第二产业增加值	经济波动率	当年GDP增长率/上年GDP增长率

类型	2010年	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	2018年	2019年
生态环境系统综合指数	0.0863	0.0444	0.0414	0.0496	0.0788	0.1021	0.1561	0.1349	0.1357	0.1708
高质量发展系统综合指数	0.1875	0.0552	0.0424	0.0781	0.0914	0.1091	0.0934	0.1112	0.0977	0.1340

类型	2010年	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	2018年	2019年
耦合度	0.9293	0.9941	0.9999	0.9747	0.9972	0.9994	0.9680	0.9954	0.9867	0.9927
协调度	0.3567	0.2225	0.2046	0.2494	0.2913	0.3249	0.3475	0.3499	0.3393	0.3890

Coupling coordination relationship between ecological environment and high-quality development in Lanzhou section of Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 39

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

耦合度	耦合阶段	耦合协调度	耦合协调程度
[0.00, 0.25)	低度耦合	[0.00, 0.20）	严重失调
[0.00, 0.25)	低度耦合	[0.20, 0.31)	中度失调
[0.25, 0.60)	拮抗耦合	[0.31, 0.41)	轻度失调
[0.25, 0.60)	拮抗耦合	[0.41, 0.51)	濒临协调
[0.60, 0.85)	磨合耦合	[0.51, 0.61)	初级协调
[0.60, 0.85)	磨合耦合	[0.61, 0.71)	中级协调
[0.85, 1.00)	高度耦合	[0.71, 0.81)	良好协调
[0.85, 1.00)	高度耦合	[0.81, 1.00)	高级协调

[1]	REN Guixiu, LIU Kai. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of green innovation in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 158-169.
[2]	WANG Songmao, NING Wenping, NIU Jinlan, AN Kang. Spatiotemporal differentiation and convergence of urban ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin: An empirical analysis based on 61 cities in seven major urban agglomerations [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 93-103.
[3]	ZHOU Cheng, ZHAO Yaling, ZHANG Xuhong, ZHOU Lin, REN Minmin. Spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics and coordinated development of urban ecological resilience and efficiency in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1514-1523.
[4]	LI Jianhui, CHEN Lin, DANG Zheng. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of patriotic education bases in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1536-1544.
[5]	ZHANG Hao, HAN Zenglin, QIAO Guorong, WANG Hui, WANG Hongye, DUAN Ye. Patterns and influencing factors of tourism economic linkages between cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354.
[6]	ZHANG Wenbin, ZHANG Zhibin. Residential spatial differentiation based on extended niche theory: A case of Lanzhou City [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1376-1386.
[7]	BAI He, MING Yisen, LIU Qihang, HUANG Chang. Downscaling of GPM satellite precipitation data in the Yellow River Basin based on MGWR model [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(7): 1052-1062.
[8]	SU Hang, GU Jiao, ZHAO Jinli. Spatial structure evolution of urban information network in the Yellow River Basin from multi-scale perspective [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(7): 1206-1216.
[9]	ZHANG Mengyuan, RONG Lihua, LI Yitong, DANG Hui. Land use function transformation in the agro-pastoral ecotone based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: A case of Baotou City [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(6): 958-967.
[10]	DONG Jiefang, ZHANG Kaili, QU Xueshu, RUAN Zheng. Measurement and influencing factors of ecological well-being performance of cities in Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 834-845.
[11]	MENG Wangsheng,LIU Huazhen,ZHANG Yang. Measurement and characterization of green development efficiency in seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 846-856.
[12]	ZOU Yafeng, ZHANG Qian, RAO Yufei, DEND Min, WANG Qi. Evolution of new urbanization of provincial capitals in western China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(4): 636-648.
[13]	BAI Yang,TAN Li’na,CHEN Chunyan,LI Zhuoyuan. Influence effect and driving mechanism of intercity trains on high-quality development of tourism economy in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(4): 658-666.
[14]	XU Xintong,ZHU Li,LYU Xiaoyu,GUO Hao. Applicability evaluation of MSWEP product for meteorological drought monitoring in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 371-384.
[15]	TIAN Xiaobo,HU Jing,JIA Yaoyan,ZHU Lei. Exploring the causes of spatial differentiation of tourism development level in the high-quality development stage: Empirical evidence of Yellow River Basin based on factor decomposition [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 460-470.