水循环视角下黄河流域城市包容性绿色发展效率测度与分析

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.098

Abstract

Abstract:

The assessment of inclusive green development efficiency (IGDE) using a water cycle perspective is pivotal for the promotion of ecological sustainability and high-quality growth in the Yellow River Basin. This study addresses regional water scarcity challenges, incorporating indicators of the water cycle into an IGDE evaluation framework, relying on a super-efficiency slacks-based measure model to analyze IGDE's spatiotemporal evolution across 77 cities from 2013 to 2022. Methods of spatial autocorrelation and geographically temporally weighted regression were used to identify regional disparities and dynamic mechanisms of influence. Key findings include the following: (1) IGDE demonstrated a persistent upward trajectory, including accelerated growth, following the implementation of a national strategy for basin development, highlighting the role that policy interventions play. (2) Significant spatial heterogeneity emerged, revealing efficiency gaps between upper-basin and middle-lower basin regions. (3) High-efficiency clusters centered on economically advanced cities exhibited weakening spatial dependency over time. (4) Urbanization, natural resource endowments, institutional governance, and social innovation were identified as core drivers, and their impacts displayed distinct spatiotemporal variabilities. Theoretically, the research in this study advances sustainability science by integrating water cycle dynamics into green development metrics in a way that addresses limitations in conventional efficiency assessments. Methodologically, it establishes a novel spatiotemporal analytical framework that combines the measurement of efficiency, spatial econometrics, and regression modeling to decipher complex regional interactions. In a practical perspective, the findings provide actionable insight to optimize resource allocation, enhancing cross-regional governance and formulating adaptive policies tailored to basin-specific conditions. Bridging ecological objectives and socioeconomic inclusivity, this study offers empirical evidence that supports the coordinated management of water resources and green development in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: water resources, inclusive green development efficiency, ultra-efficiency SBM model, GTWR model, Yellow River Basin

MENG Wangsheng, LIU Weilin, LIU Huazhen. Measurement and analysis of inclusive green development efficiency in the Yellow River Basin cities from the perspective of water cycle[J].Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(10): 1841-1854.

Figures/Tables 12

Tab. 1

Fig. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

Fig. 5

References 33

[1]	王修华, 彭德荣, 李万利. 以新质生产力发展推进中国式现代化——第二届“中国式现代化经济发展前沿论坛”研讨会综述[J]. 中国农村经济, 2024(10): 174-184.
	[Wang Xiuhua, Peng Derong, Li Wanli. Advancing Chinese modernization through the development of new quality productive forces: A summary of the 2^nd frontier forum on Chinese modernization and economic development[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2024(10): 174-184.]
[2]	周小亮, 吴武林, 廖达颖. 我国区域包容性绿色增长测度与差异研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(6): 42-49. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2017060419
	[Zhou Xiaoliang, Wu Wulin, Liao Daying. Research on the measurement and difference of regional inclusive green growth in China[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2018, 35(6): 42-49.]
[3]	周小亮, 吴武林. 中国包容性绿色增长的测度及分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2018, 35(8): 3-20.
	[Zhou Xiaoliang, Wu Wulin. The measurement and analysis of the inclusive green growth in China[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2018, 35(8): 3-20.]
[4]	吴武林, 罗世华, 刘祥官. 长江经济带包容性绿色发展的测度评价、动态分布与收敛趋势[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2022(6): 13-28.
	[Wu Wulin, Luo Shihua, Liu Xiangguan. Measurement evaluation, dynamic distribution and convergent tendency of the inclusive green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2022(6): 13-28.]
[5]	王宇昕, 余兴厚, 黄玲. 长江经济带市域包容性绿色增长的空间格局分布与演变特征[J]. 技术经济, 2019, 38(6): 80-89.
	[Wang Yuxin, Yu Xinghou, Huang Ling. Spatial pattern distribution and evolution characteristics of inclusive green growth in urban areas of Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 2019, 38(6): 80-89.]
[6]	李清, 贾庆洲, 汪福庆. 中国包容性绿色发展协同演进及空间收敛性分析[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(10): 156-164.
	[Li Qing, Jia Qingzhou, Wang Fuqing. Analysis of inclusive green growth, synergy evolution, and spatial convergence in China[J]. Ecological Economy, 2024, 40(10): 156-164.]
[7]	周锐波, 吴云峰, 宋佳晞. 共生共荣: 工业智能化发展与包容性绿色增长[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(5): 162-174.
	[Zhou Ruibo, Wu Yunfeng, Song Jiaxi. Symbiosis and co-prosperity: Industrial intelligence development and inclusive green growth[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2024, 34(5): 162-174.]
[8]	李波, 徐奥辉, 甘天琦. 信息基础设施赋能包容性绿色增长的效应与机制[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(16): 73-78.
	[Li Bo, Xu Aohui, Gan Tianqi. Effects and mechanisms of information infrastructure empowering inclusive green growth[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2024, 40(16): 73-78.]
[9]	李华, 董艳玲. 中国经济高质量发展水平及差异探源——基于包容性绿色全要素生产率视角的考察[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(8): 4-18.
	[Li Hua, Dong Yanling. China's high-quality economic development level and the source of differences: Based on the inclusive green TFP perspective[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2021, 47(8): 4-18.]
[10]	孟望生. 黄河流域地级市经济绿色增长效率的测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(1): 113-117.
	[Meng Wangsheng. Measurement of economic green growth efficiency in prefecture-level cities of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2022, 38(1): 113-117.]
[11]	谷魁英, 孙慧. 中国城市包容性绿色增长指数测度与分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(8): 100-104.
	[Gu Kuiying, Sun Hui. Measurement and analysis of inclusive green growth index in cities of China[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2022, 38(8): 100-104.]
[12]	曹姗姗, 何昭丽, 徐力璇, 等. 区域旅游发展对水资源绿色效率的影响及其时空分异[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(7): 215-224. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.07.021
	[Cao Shanshan, He Zhaoli, Xu Lixuan, et al. The impact of tourism development on green efficiency of water resources in China and its spatiotemporal differentiation[J]. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(7): 215-224.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.07.021
[13]	赵林, 高晓彤, 刘焱序, 等. 中国包容性绿色效率空间关联网络结构演变特征分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(9): 69-78, 90. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.09.008
	[Zhao Lin, Gao Xiaotong, Liu Yanxu, et al. Evolution characteristics of spatial correlation network of inclusive green efficiency in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(9): 69-78, 90.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.09.008
[14]	吴雨阳, 曹煜玲, 朱悦, 等. 中国包容性绿色发展的空间关联网络与区域分异及收敛性研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(2): 436-458. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250210
	[Wu Yuyang, Cao Yuling, Zhu Yue, et al. Spatial correlation network, regional differentiation and convergence of inclusive green development in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(2): 436-458.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250210
[15]	吴洋宏, 林栋, 周小亮. 调整财政支出结构推进中国式现代化: 基于包容性绿色增长目标的理论模型与实证检验[J]. 中国环境管理, 2025, 17(1): 40-53.
	[Wu Yanghong, Lin Dong, Zhou Xiaoliang. Adjusting fiscal expenditure structure to advance Chinese modernization: A theoretical model and empirical analysis based on inclusive green growth goals[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 17(1): 40-53.]
[16]	马玉林, 马运鹏. 数字经济对城市包容性绿色增长的影响研究[J/OL]. 科研管理. [2025-03-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1567.G3.20250107.0909.002.html.
	[Ma Yulin, Ma Yunpeng. The effects of digital economy on urban inclusive green growth[J/OL]. Science Research Management. [2025-03-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1567.G3.20250107.0909.002.html.]
[17]	邓淇中, 秦燕丝, 何晓慧. 长江经济带包容性绿色发展时空异质特征及影响因素识别[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 15(6): 1-9.
	[Deng Qizhong, Qin Yansi, He Xiaohui. Recognition of the spatio-temporal heterogeneity characteristics and influencing factors about inclusive green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Science Edition), 2021, 15(6): 1-9.]
[18]	岳立, 薛丹. 黄河流域沿线城市绿色发展效率时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(12): 2274-2284. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.12.02
	[Yue Li, Xue Dan. Spatiotemporal change of urban green development efficiency in the Yellow River Basin and influencing factors[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2274-2284.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.12.02
[19]	柴国荣, 李佳音, 付文昊. 黄河流域城市群生态安全能级: 区域差异、动态演化及提升路径[J]. 经济地理, 2025, 45(2): 69-79. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2025.02.007
	[Chai Guorong, Li Jiayin, Fu Wenhao. Ecological security level of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin: Regional difference, dynamic evolution and improvement path[J]. Economic Geography, 2025, 45(2): 69-79.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2025.02.007
[20]	李新越, 班凤梅, 毕旭, 等. 黄河流域减污降碳协同效应的时空特征及影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(12): 2610-2621.
	[Li Xinyue, Ban Fengmei, Bi Xu, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the synergistic effects of pollution and carbon emission reduction in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(12): 2610-2621.]
[21]	岳立, 任婉瑜. 黄河流域城市能源综合效率时空分异与影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2024, 44(4): 630-639. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.20220667
	[Yue Li, Ren Wanyu. Spatio-temporal distribution and influencing factors of urban comprehensive energy efficiency in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Geographical Science, 2024, 44(4): 630-639.]
[22]	Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(1): 32-41.
[23]	Huang B, Wu B, Barry M. Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(3): 383-401.
[24]	王浩, 牛存稳, 赵勇. 流域“自然-社会”二元水循环与水资源研究[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(7): 1599-1607. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202307002
	[Wang Hao, Niu Cunwen, Zhao Yong. Natural-artificial dualistic water cycle in river basins and water resources research[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(7): 1599-1607.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202307002
[25]	孟望生, 刘华桢, 张扬. 黄河流域七大城市群绿色发展效率测度及特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 846-856. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.401
	[Meng Wangsheng, Liu Huazhen, Zhang Yang. Measurement and characterization of green development efficiency in seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 846-856.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.401
[26]	徐辉, 武彦青. 可持续发展目标下全球包容性绿色增长指数测度研究[J/OL]. 经济地理. [2025-02-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1126.k.20241022.0925.002.html.
	[Xu Hui, Wu Yanqing. Study of the measurement of the global inclusive green growth index under the sustainable development goals[J/OL]. Economic Geography. [2025-02-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1126.k.20241022.0925.002.html.]
[27]	吴洋宏, 周小亮. 推动高质量发展的《资本论》逻辑基础与拓展分析——基于包容性绿色增长视角[J]. 当代经济管理, 2022, 44(7): 17-23.
	[Wu Yanghong, Zhou Xiaoliang. Logical basis and expansion analysis of capital to promote high-quality development: From the perspective of inclusive green growth[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2022, 44(7): 17-23.]
[28]	周小亮. 包容性绿色发展: 理论阐释与制度支撑体系[J]. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(11): 41-54.
	[Zhou Xiaoliang. Inclusive green development: Theoretical interpretation and institutional support system[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 41-54.]
[29]	史献芝, 王新建. 包容性绿色发展: 构建人类命运共同体的着力点[J]. 理论探讨, 2018(5): 52-58.
	[Shi Xianzhi, Wang Xinjian. Inclusive green development: The pivot for building a community of human destiny[J]. Theoretical Investigation, 2018(5): 52-58.]
[30]	张昊, 韩增林, 乔国荣, 等. 黄河流域城市间旅游经济联系格局及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.570
	[Zhang Hao, Han Zenglin, Qiao Guorong, et al. Patterns and influencing factors of tourism economic linkages between cities in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.570
[31]	张明斗, 任衍婷, 周亮. 黄河流域城市生态韧性时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 445-454. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.381
	[Zhang Mingdou, Ren Yanting, Zhou Liang. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 445-454.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.381
[32]	方颖, 白秀叶. 城市空间形态、公共服务空间均等化与居民满意度[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022, 22(4): 1405-1424.
	[Fang Ying, Bai Xiuye. Urban geometric shape, spatial equalization of public service and residents' satisfaction[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2022, 22(4): 1405-1424.]
[33]	申婧, 文清, 张敏, 等. 考虑河长代际责任的城市内河生态可持续治理机制研究[J/OL]. 中国环境科学. [2025-02-25]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20241030.001.
	[Shen Jing, Wen Qing, Zhang Min, et al. Research on the mechanism of ecologically sustainable governance of urban inland rivers with consideration of river chiefs' inter-generational responsibility[J/OL]. China Environmental Science. [2025-02-25]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.is-sn1000-6923.20241030.001.]

区域	包含城市
上游	白银市、定西市、嘉峪关市、金昌市、酒泉市、兰州市、平凉市、庆阳市、天水市、武威市、西宁市、张掖市
中游	安康市、安阳市、巴彦淖尔市、包头市、宝鸡市、大同市、鄂尔多斯市、汉中市、鹤壁市、呼和浩特市、焦作市、晋城市、晋中市、开封市、临汾市、洛阳市、漯河市、吕梁市、南阳市、平顶山市、濮阳市、三门峡市、商洛市、商丘市、石嘴山市、朔州市、太原市、铜川市、渭南市、乌海市、乌兰察布市、吴忠市、西安市、咸阳市、忻州市、新乡市、信阳市、许昌市、延安市、阳泉市、银川市、榆林市、运城市、长治市、郑州市、中卫市、周口市、驻马店市、固原市、晋中市
下游	滨州市、德州市、东营市、菏泽市、济南市、济宁市、聊城市、临沂市、青岛市、日照市、泰安市、威海市、潍坊市、烟台市、枣庄市、淄博市

类别	指标	衡量方式
投入	资本	固定资产投资/10⁴元
	劳动	城镇从业人员数/10⁴人
	能源	全社会用电量/10 MWh
	水资源	城市供水总量/10⁴ m³
期望产出	经济产出	实际生产总值/10⁴元
	社会福利	社会福利指数（运用RAGA-PPC模型将每万人医疗床位、中小学师生比、养老保险覆盖率综合成社会福利指数）
	水资源重复利用	城市用水重复利用率/%
非期望产出（环境污染）	空气污染	空气污染指数（运用RAGA-PPC模型将空气质量体系指标群中各子指标值（PM_2.5、PM₁₀、SO₂、NO₂、CO、O₃）与CO₂值综合成空气污染指数）
非期望产出（环境污染）	水污染	污水排放量/10⁴ t
非期望产出（社会不公）	城乡居民收入差距	城镇居民可支配收入/农村居民可支配收入
非期望产出（社会不公）	失业	失业率/%

年份	全局莫兰指数	期望莫兰指数	莫兰指数标准差	Z统计量	P值
2013	0.235	-0.013	0.069	3.597	0.000
2014	0.241	-0.013	0.069	3.692	0.000
2015	0.274	-0.013	0.069	4.168	0.000
2016	0.254	-0.013	0.069	3.876	0.000
2017	0.188	-0.013	0.069	2.911	0.002
2018	0.147	-0.013	0.069	2.318	0.010
2019	0.115	-0.013	0.069	1.866	0.031
2020	0.157	-0.013	0.069	2.480	0.007
2021	0.229	-0.013	0.068	3.561	0.000
2022	0.075	-0.013	0.068	1.285	0.099

年份	总基尼系数	地区内基尼系数			贡献率/%
年份	总基尼系数	上游	中游	下游	地区内	地区间	超变密度
2013	0.125	0.173	0.117	0.043	46.304	37.644	16.052
2014	0.110	0.165	0.098	0.034	44.560	40.554	14.886
2015	0.103	0.165	0.089	0.037	43.891	39.996	16.113
2016	0.103	0.150	0.091	0.040	44.446	39.621	15.933
2017	0.105	0.146	0.098	0.039	46.183	37.323	16.494
2018	0.101	0.140	0.094	0.047	46.660	34.390	18.951
2019	0.092	0.133	0.091	0.027	48.739	30.303	20.958
2020	0.086	0.132	0.082	0.028	47.160	30.161	22.678
2021	0.077	0.132	0.070	0.029	45.988	31.097	22.914
2022	0.096	0.151	0.088	0.055	46.817	26.912	26.272

影响因子	样本量	最小值	最大值	均值	标准误差
城市空间形态紧凑度	770	1.00	1.97	1.23	0.01
城市多中心结构	770	0.00	0.84	0.32	0.01
城市化水平	770	0.15	1.00	0.47	0.01
降水量	770	69.90	1552.51	681.74	9.12
气温	770	4.21	21.92	12.71	0.13
风速	770	5.40	15.64	9.33	0.06
环境规制	770	3.00	139.00	49.01	0.69
政府财政支持	770	0.07	0.92	0.21	0.00
产业结构	770	0.23	2.19	0.82	0.01
对外开放度	770	0.00	0.73	0.11	0.01
技术进步	770	1.79	11.36	7.28	0.06

Measurement and analysis of inclusive green development efficiency in the Yellow River Basin cities from the perspective of water cycle

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

模型	OLS模型	GTWR模型
残差平方和（RSS）	29.019	28.807
拟合优度（R²）	0.013	0.021

[1]	YANG Anle, JIANG Xiaohui, CHEN Xingchi, ZHANG Lin, XU Fangbing. Quantitative research on the impact of coal mining on water resources of the three main coalfields in northern Shaanxi [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1521-1530.
[2]	XU Jianbin, CAO Xiaoshu. Coupling characteristics and influencing factors of water and soil resources at the small watershed scale in Ningxia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1531-1540.
[3]	PENG Wenying, ZHAO Shuang, SHAN Ziyi, CHEN Zeyu. Measurement and obstacle factors of ecological level of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1648-1659.
[4]	TIAN Xiaobo. Measurement and spatial pattern characteristics of tourism high-quality development level of urbans in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1660-1671.
[5]	LI Hui, YAO Xilong. Water-saving potential of hydrogen production from renewable energy in Yellow River Basin from the perspective of water footprint [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1353-1362.
[6]	ZHONG Jiawei, ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Mingyue. How does agricultural socialization service affect grain eco-efficiency: A case study of 71 prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1385-1395.
[7]	CHENG Peng, PENG Haiyang, HOU Dingrong, SUN Mingdong, SONG Xiaowei. Spatial pattern and evolution trend of agricultural grey water footprint intensity in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1185-1197.
[8]	XU Mingjing, DUAN Baoling, FENG Qiang, LYU Meng. Ecological services and their trade-offs/synergistic relationships in multi-scenario simulations: A case of the Shanxi section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1206-1219.
[9]	REN Shiqi, WANG Yongyu. Measurement and spatial convergence of green development level of prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1031-1042.
[10]	WEI Jianfei, YUAN Youran, LI Qiang, DONG Peipei, LIU Jiurong. Spatio-temporal variation and obstacle factors of territorial spatial efficiency in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1055-1066.
[11]	NIE Hanyu, ZHANG Yanhui, LI Hui, ZHENG Yaomin. Spatio-temporal evolution and multi-scale barrier factor analysis of tourism ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1089-1102.
[12]	XIE Yu, XUE Xuandeng. Digital economy empowers green development welfare: Empirical evidence based on resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1127-1139.
[13]	WANG Ruifang, LYU Baoqi, ZHANG Wenjing. Vegetation dynamics and their responses to climate change in the Yellow River Basin: Based on climatic wet and dry zoning scales [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 973-984.
[14]	CHENG Lanhua, YANG Xianming, WU Xinyan. Impact of urban compactness on carbon emission performance in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(5): 838-853.
[15]	LI Mengran, XU Xiaoren, WANG Liang, DUAN Jian, SHI Shuqi, REN Dandan. Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural carbon emissions in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(5): 854-865.