收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2021, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 327-336.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.02.04

• 气候与水文 • 上一篇    下一篇

渭河与泾河流域水沙变化规律及其差异性分析

黄晨璐(),杨勤科()   

  1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,陕西 西安 710127
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-14 修回日期:2020-11-11 出版日期:2021-03-25 发布日期:2021-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 杨勤科
  • 作者简介:黄晨璐(1993-),女,在读博士研究生,研究方向为遥感与水土流失治理. E-mail:nwuhcl@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项子课题资助(XDA20040202)

Runoff and sediment variation rules and differences in Wei River and Jing River Basins

HUANG Chenlu(),YANG Qinke()   

  1. College of Urban and Environment Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2020-04-14 Revised:2020-11-11 Online:2021-03-25 Published:2021-04-14
  • Contact: Qinke YANG

摘要:

依据渭河和泾河流域1956—2016年实测水文资料、水利水保统计数据、TerraClimate年平均温度和Landsat地表反射率数据集,分析了流域水文要素、气温及植被覆盖度的历年变化规律,采用双累积值曲线法、累积距平法、有序聚类法、Lee-Heghinan法、秩和检验法等数理统计方法,确定了流域年径流量和年输沙量变化的突变年份,分析了降水和人类活动的减水减沙效应。结果表明:(1) 渭河和泾河流域历年降水量、径流量、输沙量、含沙量均呈显著减少趋势,渭河流域的降水和径流比泾河流域减少较多,泾河流域的泥沙比渭河流域减少较多。(2) 人类活动对2个流域径流泥沙量的影响均大于降水量对其的影响,且泾河流域受人类活动影响较渭河流域明显。(3) 2个流域的水沙特征差异性较大,渭河的年径流量、年径流深、径流系数是泾河流域的2.0~2.4倍,渭河的年输沙量、年输沙模数、年均含沙量仅是泾河流域的1/2~1/5。2个相邻流域水沙特征差异性较大的主要原因是,流域气温、降水等气候条件不同,植被覆盖度等下垫面条件存在差异,水利水保措施、水资源开发利用程度等人类活动的影响所致。

关键词: 径流, 泥沙, 减水减沙效应, 渭河, 泾河

Abstract:

Based on hydrological data, water conservancy and conservation statistical data, annual average temperatures, and Landsat surface reflectance data from 1956 to 2016 in the Wei (upper Xianyang Hydrological Station on the main stream of the Wei River) and Jing (upper Zhangjiashan Hydrological Station) River Basins, northwest China, historical changes in the hydrological elements, temperature, and vegetation in the basins were analyzed. Mathematical statistical methods, such as double cumulative values, correlation curve method, cumulative anomaly method, ordered clustering method, Lee-Heghinan method, and rank sum test method, were used to determine the abrupt year of annual runoff and annual sediment load and the effect of precipitation and human activities on runoff and sediment reduction. The results show that (1) precipitation, runoff, sediment load, and sediment concentration in the Wei and Jing River Basins decreased significantly from 1956 to 2016. Specifically, annual precipitation in the Wei and Jing River Basins decreased by 1.41 mm·a-1and 0.85 mm·a-1, annual runoff decreased by 0.711×108 m3·a-1 and 0.217×108 m3·a-1, annual sediment load decreased by 0.037 t·a-1 and 0.042×108 t·a-1, and annual average sediment concentration decreased by 0. 586 kg·m-3·a-1 and 0. 905 kg·m-3·a-1, respectively precipitation and runoff in the Wei River Basin was reduced about 2 to 3 times more than the Jing River Basin, and sediment load was reduced in the Jing River Basin was reduced by 1.1 to 1.5 times more than the Wei River Basin. (2) The measured annual runoff at Xianyang Station on the Wei River decreased from 60.16×108 m3 in the baseline period (1956—1970) to 38.67×108 m3 (1971—1994) and 22.38×108 m3 (1995—2016). Additionally, during the two latter time periods, the runoff reduction effects due to human activity was 74.7% and 67.1%, respectively, and the runoff reduction effects of precipitation were 25.3% and 32.9%, respectively. The annual sediment load at Xianyang Station decreased from 1.937×108 t in the baseline period (1956—1973) to 0.865×108 t (1974—1994) and 0.233×108 t (1995—2016). The sediment reduction effects due to human activity in the two study periods were 71.7% and 64.4%, respectively, and the sediment reduction effects due to precipitation were 28.3% and 35.6%, respectively. The measured annual runoff and the annual sediment load of the Zhangjiashan Station on the Jing River decreased from 17.43×108 m3 and 2.556×108 t in the baseline period (1956—1997) to 10.36×108 m3 and 0.975×108 t in the treatment period (1998—2016). The impact of human activity on runoff and sediment reduction was 94.2% and 72.6%, respectively, and the impact of precipitation on runoff and sediment reduction was 5.8% and 27.4%, respectively. (3) The runoff and sediment characteristics of the two river basins were quite different. The annual runoff, annual runoff depth, and runoff coefficient of the Wei River Basin were 2.0 to 2.4 times higher than those of the Jing River Basin. The annual sediment load, annual sediment transport modulus, and annual average sediment concentration in the Wei River Basin was only 1/2-1/5 of that in the Jing River Basin. The main reasons for these large differences in runoff and sediment characteristics between these two adjacent river basins are attributed to differences in climatic conditions (temperature and precipitation) between the river basins, and differences in vegetation coverage, and human activity such as soil and water conservation measures undertaken. The analysis of the differences in runoff and sediment between Wei and Jing River Basins clarifies the explanation people mistakenly believe that the phenomenon of a “distinct Jing and Wei” is because “Wei water is more turbid than Jing water”.

Key words: runoff, sediment, the reduction effect of runoff and sediment, Wei River Basin, Jing River Basin