收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2021, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1489-1499.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.05.29

• 区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

新疆阿克苏河流域生态承载力监测及安全格局构建

杨振民(),刘新平()   

  1. 新疆农业大学管理学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-18 修回日期:2021-04-12 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-09-22
  • 通讯作者: 刘新平
  • 作者简介:杨振民(1997-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土地利用与土地生态研究. E-mail: yangzhenmin12@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    新疆农业大学研究生科研创新项目(XJAUGRI2019031);国家自然科学基金(71663051)

Ecological carrying capacity monitoring and security pattern construction in the Aksu River Basin, Xinjiang

YANG Zhenmin(),LIU Xinping()   

  1. College of Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2020-08-18 Revised:2021-04-12 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-09-22
  • Contact: Xinping LIU

摘要:

阿克苏河流域作为西北干旱区内陆河,生态环境极为脆弱,研究其生态安全格局对优化区域国土空间开发保护格局,推动生产生活方式向绿色转型,促进人与自然和谐共生具有重要战略意义。基于研究区本底特征,运用空间主成分分析法(SPCA)对阿克苏河流域1980-2018年生态承载力时空演变进行评估监测,利用最小累积阻力(MCR)模型提取生态廊道及生态节点,构建生态安全格局。研究表明:(1) 阿克苏河流域生态承载力空间差异明显,以中等承载为主,生态承载优势区呈现由中东部向西部转移趋势。(2) 阿克苏河流域生态承载力呈增长趋势。近40 a阿克苏河流域整体生态承载力呈上升趋势,强承载区面积不断增加,弱承载区面积呈现波动下降趋势,表明流域环境有所改善。(3) 生态源地占整体面积较少,分布较为集中。根据生态承载力评估结果,提取生态源地23465.21 km2,约占研究区面积的35.61%。生态源地集中分布于流域中部地区,北部高山地区与西南部盆地、沙漠地区分布较少。(4) 利用MCR模型及遥感影像,将阿克苏河流域划分为16个生态安全格局分区,提取生态廊道67条,识别生态节点71处,并结合生态承载力评估结果,对流域生态空间结构提出优化建议。

关键词: 生态承载力, 时空演变, 生态安全格局, 优化, 阿克苏河流域

Abstract:

As an inland river in the northwest arid zone, the Aksu River Basin hosts a fragile ecological environment. Studying its ecological security pattern is of great strategic significance for optimizing the national territory development and protection pattern, promoting the green transformation of production and lifestyle, and promoting the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. On the basis of the background characteristics of the study area, a spatial principal component analysis was undertaken to evaluate and monitor the temporal and spatial evolution of the ecological carrying capacity of the Aksu River Basin in Xinjiang, China in 1980, 2000, 2006, 2012, and 2018; the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) mode was used to extract ecological corridors and ecological nodes in order to construct a comprehensive pattern of ecological security. The research results show that (1) the ecological carrying capacity of the river basin has significant spatial variations. The ecological carrying capacity of the Aksu River Basin is, for the most part, classified as being of medium carrying capacity, and the area with the highest ecological carrying capacity shows a trend of shifting from the central and eastern regions toward the west. The areas of strongest carrying capacity are predominantly located in the middle of the river basin and are distributed along the river in a zigzag pattern. The ecological carrying capacity of the upper and lower reaches of the river is relatively weak. The strong load-bearing areas are mainly distributed along the Toshigan River, Kumarak River, and the alluvial plains of the Aksu River; weak load-bearing areas are predominantly distributed on the northwestern edge of the Taklimakan Desert, the Tarim Basin, and the southern part of the Tianshan Mountains. (2) The ecological carrying capacity of the basin has shown an increase over time: In the past 40 years, the overall ecological carrying capacity of the Aksu River Basin has shown an upward trend, the acreage of strong carrying areas has been increasing, and the acreage of weak carrying areas has shown a fluctuating downward trend. These trends indicate that the basin environment has improved. The ecological carrying capacities of Akqi County, Wensu County, Wushi County, and Aksu City have showed an upward trend, whereas that of Alar City has showed a downward trend, and that of Awati County has remained roughly unchanged. (3) The ecological source area occupies a relatively small area, and the distribution is relatively concentrated. Through the assessment of the ecological carrying capacity of the Aksu River Basin, 23465.21 km2 of ecological source area was finally extracted, accounting for approximately 35.61% of the study area. The ecological sources are concentrated in the central area of the basin, whereas they are less concentrated in the northern alpine areas, southwestern basins, and desert areas. (4) The ecological corridors are unevenly distributed, and the ecological nodes are relatively fragile. Using the MCR model and remote sensing images, the author divided the Aksu River Basin into 16 ecological security pattern zones, extracted 67 ecological corridors in the basin, and found that the ecological corridors are distributed around the river and predominantly concentrated in the central and eastern regions, with a small number present in the western region. The author also used commercial software to identify 71 ecological nodes, of which 20 are located between ecological sources, 16 are located in river flow areas, and 35 are located in mountain or piedmont areas. This work will make suggestions for optimizing the ecological spatial structure of the basin on the basis of the results of the evaluation of the ecological carrying capacity.

Key words: ecological carrying capacity, spatial and temporal evolution, ecological security pattern, optimization, Aksu River Basin