收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 1420-1430.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.030

• 区域发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

陕西省新型城镇化与乡村振兴耦合性实证研究

刘苗苗(), 吴卫东()   

  1. 延安大学政法与公共管理学院,陕西 延安 716000
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-15 修回日期:2024-02-29 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 吴卫东(1966-),男,教授,主要从事电子政务与政府质量管理研究等方面的研究. E-mail: wuweidong@yau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘苗苗(2000-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事新型城镇化与区域治理等方面的研究. E-mail: heptacosa789@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省哲学社会科学重大理论与现实问题研究项目(2022HZ0888)

Empirical study of the coupling of new urbanization and rural revitalization in Shaanxi Province

LIU Miaomiao(), WU Weidong()   

  1. School of Political Science, Law and Public Administration, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2024-01-15 Revised:2024-02-29 Published:2024-08-25 Online:2024-09-02

摘要:

新型城镇化带动乡村振兴,乡村振兴反哺新型城镇化,新型城镇化与乡村振兴相互促进、相互协调,共同推动中国式现代化的建设和发展。以陕西省10个地级市为研究对象,分别建立新型城镇化与乡村振兴发展水平测度指标体系,采用熵值法分别测算2010—2021年两者发展水平,利用耦合协调模型测算分析耦合性,并在此基础上提出有针对性的对策建议。结果表明:(1) 2010—2021年陕西省各地级市新型城镇化与乡村振兴发展水平综合得分均呈递增趋势。(2) 2021年陕西省各地级市新型城镇化发展水平综合得分排名前三的是西安市、榆林市、宝鸡市,排名后三位的分别是汉中市、铜川市、安康市;乡村振兴发展水平综合得分排名前三的是:榆林市、商洛市、渭南市,排名后三位的分别是:铜川市、咸阳市、宝鸡市。(3) 2021年全省耦合协调度指数达到了较高程度耦合标准,实现基本协调。此外,西安市和榆林市达到了高度耦合,实现高度协调。

关键词: 新型城镇化, 乡村振兴, 耦合性, 陕西省

Abstract:

New urbanization drives rural revitalization, and in turn, rural revitalization enhances new urbanization. These processes are interdependent, mutually reinforcing, and crucial to China’s modernization and development. This study selects ten cities in Shaanxi Province to investigate the development levels of new urbanization and rural revitalization from 2010 to 2021. Utilizing the entropy weight method, the project measures the development levels of these phenomena and employs a coupling-collaboration model to assess their interrelationship. Moreover, it proposes appropriate policies and measures. The results indicate a consistent upward trend in the comprehensive scores of new urbanization and rural revitalization across the studied cities during this period. In 2021, Xi’an City, Yulin City, and Baoji City ranked the highest in new urbanization development, while Hanzhong City, Tongchuan City, and Ankang City ranked the lowest. Conversely, Yulin City, Shangluo City, and Weinan City achieved the top scores in rural revitalization, whereas Tongchuan City, Xianyang City, and Baoji City had the lowest scores. The coupling degree and coordination across the province generally met the criteria for a high coupling degree in 2021, with Xi’an City and Yulin City exhibiting a strong degree of coupling and collaboration.

Key words: new urbanization, rural revitalization, coupling, Shaanxi Province