黄河流域城市生态韧性与效率时空演化特征及协调发展分析

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.633

干旱区地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 1514-1523.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.633

黄河流域城市生态韧性与效率时空演化特征及协调发展分析

周成¹(),赵亚玲¹,张旭红²(),周霖³,任敏敏¹

1.山西财经大学文化旅游与新闻艺术学院，山西太原 030006
2.西安理工大学经济与管理学院，陕西西安 710054
3.西北师范大学旅游学院，甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2022-12-01 修回日期:2022-12-31 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-09-28
通讯作者: 张旭红（1996-），女，博士研究生，主要从事黄河流域经济地理研究. E-mail: zxhhao85@163.com
作者简介:周成（1989-），男，博士，副教授，主要从事黄河流域经济地理研究. E-mail: zhoutravel@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金项目(20YJC890050);山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目(2021W048);山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目(J2021298);山西社会主义学院2023年度科研课题(sxsyzbkt093)

Spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics and coordinated development of urban ecological resilience and efficiency in the Yellow River Basin

ZHOU Cheng¹(),ZHAO Yaling¹,ZHANG Xuhong²(),ZHOU Lin³,REN Minmin¹

1. Faculty of Culture, Tourism, Journalism and Art, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
2. School of Economic and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, Shannxi, China
3. Tourism College, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China

Received:2022-12-01 Revised:2022-12-31 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

提升城市生态韧性和生态效率，促进二者间协同发展是实现黄河流域生态治理的重要目标。以黄河流域57个城市为研究靶区，运用加权求和法、SBM模型研究了2009—2018年黄河流域生态韧性与效率时空演化特征，并运用耦合协调模型分析了流域城市生态韧性与效率的协调发展关系。结果表明：（1） 2009—2018年，黄河流域城市生态韧性总体上处于波动下降态势，面临较大的生态威胁和环保压力。西安市、郑州市和济南市3个省会城市生态韧性较高，而固原市、定西市、海东市、吕梁市等城市韧性较低。（2）黄河流域城市生态效率呈先降后升高的“U”形演化特征。定西市、陇南市、庆阳市、鄂尔多斯市、固原市和洛阳市为生态效率高等类型，生态效率低等类型主要位于中、下游的山西省、河南省和山东省内的城市。（3）生态韧性与效率协调关系与生态效率子系统相似，由不断下滑转向逐步回升。良好协调、中度协调型城市数量有所增加，勉强协调型城市有所减少，黄河流域城市生态韧性与效率协调发展势头显现，但短期内经济发展与环境保护间的矛盾仍较突出。研究结果可为黄河流域城市生态政策制定、生态韧性和效率提高提供理论参考。

关键词: 生态韧性, 生态效率, 协调发展, 城市, 黄河流域

Abstract:

Improving urban ecological resilience and efficiency, and promoting coordinated development between these two systems are the primary objectives of ecological governance in the Yellow River Basin, China. Considering 57 cities in the Yellow River Basin as the research target, this study analyzed the spatial and temporal evolutionary characteristics of urban ecological resilience and efficiency based on the weighted summation method and the slacks-based measurement (SBM) model for the period from 2009 to 2018. Furthermore, a coupled coordination model was employed to analyze the coordinated development of urban ecological resilience and efficiency in cities along the Yellow River Basin. The study results showed the following: (1) During the study period, the urban ecological resilience of cities along the Yellow River Basin had a fluctuating declining trend overall, and these cities faced greater ecological threats and environmental pressures. Xi’an, Zhengzhou, and Jinan City are three provincial capitals that show high urban ecological resilience, whereas Guyuan, Dingxi, Haidong, and Lüliang City showed low urban ecological resilience. (2) The urban ecological efficiency of cities along the Yellow River Basin was generally characterized by a “U”-shaped evolution; in other words, the efficiency first decreased and subsequently increased. Dingxi, Longnan, Qingyang, Ordos, Guyuan, and Luoyang City showed a high level of urban ecological efficiency, while cities with low urban ecological efficiency were mainly located in Shanxi, Henan, and Shandong provinces in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. (3) The coordination relationship between ecological resilience and efficiency is similar to that of the ecological efficiency subsystem, which changed from a continuous decline to a gradual recovery. During the study period, the number of cities with good and moderate coordination between urban ecological resilience and efficiency increased, while the number of cities with poor coordination decreased. Furthermore, while the coordinated development momentum of ecological resilience and efficiency of cities in the basin is apparent, the contradiction between economic development and environmental protection continues to be prominent in the short term. Thus, results of this study contribute to the knowledge base regarding the formulation of ecological policies, improvement of urban ecological resilience, and promotion of urban ecological efficiency in cities in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: ecological resilience, ecological efficiency, coordinated development, urban, Yellow River Basin

周成, 赵亚玲, 张旭红, 周霖, 任敏敏. 黄河流域城市生态韧性与效率时空演化特征及协调发展分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1514-1523.

ZHOU Cheng, ZHAO Yaling, ZHANG Xuhong, ZHOU Lin, REN Minmin. Spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics and coordinated development of urban ecological resilience and efficiency in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1514-1523.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 33

[1]	陶洁怡, 董平, 陆玉麒. 长三角地区生态韧性时空变化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(9): 1975-1987.
	[Tao Jieyi, Dong Ping, Lu Yuqi. Spatial-temporal analysis and influencing factors of ecological resilience in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(9): 1975-1987.]
[2]	任梅, 王小敏, 刘忠梅, 等. 中国区域生态效率时空变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019, 33(9): 71-79.
	[Ren Mei, Wang Xiaomin, Liu Zhongmei, et al. Analysis on spatial-temporal change and the influencing factors of regional eco-efficiency of China[J]. East China Economic Management, 2019, 33(9): 71-79.]
[3]	李连刚, 张平宇, 程钰, 等. 黄河流域经济韧性时空演变与影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(4): 557-567. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.04.001
	[Li Liangang, Zhang Pingyu, Cheng Yu, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of economic resilience in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(4): 557-567.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.04.001
[4]	陈明华, 岳海珺, 郝云飞, 等. 黄河流域生态效率的空间差异、动态演进及驱动因素[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(9): 25-44.
	[Chen Minghua, Yue Haijun, Hao Yunfei, et al. The spatial disparity, dynamic evolution and driving factors of ecological efficiency in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2021, 38(9): 25-44.]
[5]	李雪铭, 刘凯强, 田深圳, 等. 基于DPSIR模型的城市人居环境韧性评价——以长三角城市群为例[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(1): 54-62.
	[Li Xueming, Liu Kaiqiang, Tian Shenzhen, et al. Evaluation of urban human settlements resilience based on DPSIR model: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Systems[J]. Human Geography, 2022, 37(1): 54-62.]
[6]	周成, 张旭红, 张倩, 等. 黄河流域“五位一体”综合评价体系建构与空间差异研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(4): 1-11. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00010
	[Zhou Cheng, Zhang Xuhong, Zhang Qian, et al. The construction of “Five in One” comprehensive evaluation system and spatial difference in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 1-11.] doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00010
[7]	中共中央, 国务院. 黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展规划纲要[N]. 人民日报, 2021-10-09(01).
	[Central Committee of Communist Party of China, the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Outline of the planning for ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin[N]. People’s Daily, 2021-10-09(01).]
[8]	孙久文, 孙翔宇. 区域经济韧性研究进展和在中国应用的探索[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(10): 1-9. doi: 10.2307/142031
	[Sun Jiuwen, Sun Xiangyu. Research progress of regional economic resilience and exploration of its application in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(10): 1-9.] doi: 10.2307/142031
[9]	Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1-23.
[10]	Delettre O. Identity of ecological systems and the meaning of resilience[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109(9): 3147-3156. doi: 10.1111/jec.v109.9
[11]	Berkes F, Jolly D. Adapting to climate change: Social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western arctic community[J]. Ecology and Society, 2000, 5(2): 213-218.
[12]	Lebel L. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology & Society, 2006, 11(1): 230-250.
[13]	王松茂, 牛金兰. 山东半岛城市群城市生态韧性的动态演化及障碍因子分析[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(8): 51-61.
	[Wang Songmao, Niu Jinlan. Dynamic evolution and obstacle factors of urban ecological resilience in Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(8): 51-61.]
[14]	夏楚瑜, 董照樱子, 陈彬. 城市生态韧性时空变化及情景模拟研究——以杭州市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1): 116-126.
	[Xia Chuyu, Dong Zhaoyingzi, Chen Bin. Spatio-temporal analysis and simulation of urban ecological resilience: A case study of Hangzhou[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 116-126.]
[15]	杨晓冬, 李紫薇, 张家玉, 等. 可持续发展视角下城市韧性的时空评价[J]. 城市问题, 2021, 40(3): 29-37.
	[Yang Xiaodong, Li Ziwei, Zhang Jiayu, et al. Spatiotemporal evaluation of urban resilience from the perspective of sustainable development[J]. Urban Problems, 2021, 40(3): 29-37.]
[16]	朱金鹤, 孙红雪. 中国三大城市群城市韧性时空演进与影响因素研究[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(2): 72-79.
	[Zhu Jinhe, Sun Hongxue. Research on spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban resilience of China’s three metropolitan agglomerations[J]. Soft Science, 2020, 34(2): 72-79.]
[17]	臧鑫宇, 焦娇, 王峤. 既有城区生态韧性问题解析与空间优化策略研究[J]. 城市建筑, 2019, 16(15): 34-38.
	[Zang Xinyu, Jiao Jiao, Wang Qiao. Study on the problem of ecological resilience in the existing urban areas and the strategy of spatial optimization[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2019, 16(15): 34-38.]
[18]	沈洁, 李燕, 夏春红, 等. 云南省城市生态韧性测度及时空演变研究[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2021, 39(2): 55-58.
	[Shen Jie, Li Yan, Xia Chunhong, et al. Study on the measure and spatial evolution of urban ecological resilience in Yunnan[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2021, 39(2): 55-58.]
[19]	路兰, 周宏伟, 许清清. 多维关联网络视角下城市韧性的综合评价应用研究[J]. 城市问题, 2020(8): 42-55.
	[Lu Lan, Zhou Hongwei, Xu Qingqing. Application research on comprehensive evaluation of urban resilience from the perspective of multidimensional relational networks[J]. Urban Problems, 2020(8): 42-55.]
[20]	李苏, 刘浩南. 干旱区城市化与生态韧性耦合协调的时空格局演化分析——以宁夏为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(4): 1281-1290.
	[Li Su, Liu Haonan. Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological resilience in arid region: A case of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(4): 1281-1290.]
[21]	王少剑, 崔子恬, 林靖杰, 等. 珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
	[Wang Shaojian, Cui Zitian, Lin Jingjie, et al. Coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 973-991.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
[22]	Côté R, Booth A, Louis B. Eco-efficiency and SMEs in Nova Scotia, Canada[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006, 14(7): 542-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.004
[23]	Kharel G P, Charmondusit K. Eco-efficiency evaluation of iron rod industry in Nepal[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(13): 1379-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.07.004
[24]	Wang S J, Cui Z T, Lin J J, et al. The coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(1): 44-64. doi: 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
[25]	付丽娜, 陈晓红, 冷智花. 基于超效率DEA模型的城市群生态效率研究——以长株潭“3+5”城市群为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(4): 169-175.
	[Fu Lina, Chen Xiaohong, Leng Zhihua. Urban agglomerations eco-efficiency analysis based on super-efficienty DEA model: Case study of Chang-Zhu-Tan “3+5” urban agglomeration[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(4): 169-175.]
[26]	史丹, 王俊杰. 基于生态足迹的中国生态压力与生态效率测度与评价[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016, 33(5): 5-21.
	[Shi Dan, Wang Junjie. Measurement and evaluation of China’s ecological pressure and ecological efficiency based on ecological footprint[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2016, 33(5): 5-21.]
[27]	Moutinho V, Fuinhas J A, Marques A C, et al. Assessing eco-efficiency through the DEA analysis and decoupling index in the Latin America countries[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 205: 512-524. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.322
[28]	Wang X M, Ding H, Liu L. Eco-efficiency measurement of industrial sectors in China: A hybrid super-efficiency DEA analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229: 53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.014
[29]	倪颖, 文传浩. 生态效率测度方法及应用研究综述[J]. 贵州商学院学报, 2019, 32(1): 73-78.
	[Ni Ying, Wen Chuanhao. A summary of research on ecological efficiency measurement methods and applications[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Commerce, 2019, 32(1): 73-78.]
[30]	赵哲, 白羽萍, 胡兆民, 等. 基于超效率DEA的呼伦贝尔地区草牧业生态效率评价及影响因素分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(22): 7968-7978.
	[Zhao Zhe, Bai Yuping, Hu Zhaomin, et al. Evaluation of ecological efficiency and factors influencing grassland animal husbandry in the Hulunbuir region based on a super-efficiency DEA model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(22): 7968-7978.]
[31]	Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Robaina M. The economic and environmental efficiency assessment in EU cross-country: Evidence from DEA and quantile regression approach[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 78(7): 85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.042
[32]	Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
[33]	张筱娟, 汤琪凤, 张镇. 黄河流域城市韧性空间分异特征及其影响因素识别[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(6): 48-54.
	[Zhang Xiaojuan, Tang Qifeng, Zhang Zhen. Spatial differentiation characteristics and its influencing factors of urban resilience in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2022, 41(6): 48-54.]

子系统	维度	子维度	具体指标	单位	方向
生态韧性	抵抗力	经济能力	二三产业占GDP比重	%	+
			人均GDP	元	+
			每万人实际外商直接投资	10⁴ USD	+
		社会能力	人口自然增长率	‰	+
			科学技术支出占一般预算支出比	%	+
			高等学校在校生人数	%	+
			每万人医生数	人	+
	恢复力	生态建设	建成区绿化面积	hm²	+
			建成区绿化覆盖率	%	+
			人均绿地面积	hm²	+
		污染治理	工业废物综合利用率	%	+
			污水处理厂集中处理率	%	+
			生活垃圾无害化处理率	%	+
生态效率	投入度	资本性投入	固定资产投资	10⁴元	+
		劳动力投入	从业人员数	10⁴人	+
		资源投入	万元GDP能耗量	m³	-
			万元GDP水耗量	m³	-
			万元GDP电耗量	kW·h	-
	产出度	期望产出	地区生产总值	10⁴元	+
		非期望产出	工业废水排放量	10⁴ t	-
			工业SO₂排放量	t	-
			工业粉尘排放量	t	-

黄河流域城市生态韧性与效率时空演化特征及协调发展分析

Spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics and coordinated development of urban ecological resilience and efficiency in the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	任贵秀, 刘凯. 黄河流域绿色创新的时空演化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(1): 158-169.
[2]	王松茂, 宁文萍, 牛金兰, 安康. 黄河流域城市生态韧性时空分异及收敛研究——基于七大城市群61个城市的实证分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(1): 93-103.
[3]	李建辉, 陈琳, 党争. 黄河流域爱国主义教育基地空间格局及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1536-1544.
[4]	卢北, 曾俊伟, 钱勇生, 魏谞婷, 杨民安, 李海军. 兰州市主城区路网形态对城市活力的影响分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(8): 1333-1343.
[5]	张昊, 韩增林, 乔国荣, 王辉, 王宏业, 段冶. 黄河流域城市间旅游经济联系格局及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354.
[6]	党小虎, 邓铭江, 李鹏, 曹小曙, 隋博洋, 时鹏, 张甜, 艾泽民. 西北“水三线”生态经济体系与调控模式研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(8): 1355-1365.
[7]	柏荷, 明義森, 刘启航, 黄昌. 基于MGWR模型的黄河流域GPM卫星降水数据降尺度研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1052-1062.
[8]	顾朝林, 苏鹤放, 顾江, 高喆, 陈乐琳, 郭力. 论地球科学的新时代[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1176-1195.
[9]	苏航, 谷娇, 赵金丽. 多尺度视角下黄河流域城市信息网络空间结构演化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1206-1216.
[10]	宁静, 朱冉, 张馨元, 陈凯. 内蒙古区县城市韧性评价与分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1217-1226.
[11]	陈淑君,许国昌,吕志平,马铭悦,李晗羽,朱玉岩. 中国植被覆盖度时空演变及其对气候变化和城市化的响应[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 742-752.
[12]	董洁芳, 张凯莉, 屈学书, 阮征. 黄河流域城市生态福利绩效测算及驱动因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 834-845.
[13]	孟望生,刘华桢,张扬. 黄河流域七大城市群绿色发展效率测度及特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 846-856.
[14]	邹亚锋, 张倩, 饶钰飞, 邓敏, 王淇. 中国西部省会城市新型城镇化发展水平演化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(4): 636-648.
[15]	许昕彤,朱丽,吕潇雨,郭浩. MSWEP降水产品在黄河流域气象干旱监测中的适用性评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(3): 371-384.