1985-2016年民勤地下水位及储变量动态特征分析

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.05.08

Abstract

Abstract:

The Minqin County, Gansu Province is located between two large deserts (the Badain Jaran Desert and Tengger Desert) of northern China. In recent decades, the groundwater level in Minqin has continued to decline, and water resources are severely in short supply. Accordingly, analyzing the process of groundwater development and utilization over the years, as well as the dynamic characteristics of groundwater changes, is particularly important in correctly guiding the rational development and utilization of local groundwater and ecological restoration. Based on the collection and analysis of 138 water level data, this study delineated the groundwater dynamic types of Minqin County and used the Kriging interpolation method to plot year-by-year the groundwater flow field and the water level changes in the Minqin Basin from 1985 to 2016. The grid method was utilized to calculate the multi-year storage variables of groundwater. The influencing factors of the groundwater level in the Minqin Basin were explored; a regression equation was obtained; and the recoverable amount of groundwater was estimated. The results are presented herein. First, the groundwater level in Minqin can be divided into four dynamic types, that is, mining, irrigation infiltration-exploitation, river infiltration-exploitation, and runoff. Second, the overall groundwater level dropped over the years. The irrigation area significantly dropped, with a maximum drop of 22 m. The desert area also slightly dropped. The groundwater suffered a cumulative loss of 24.45×10⁸ m³ over the years. Third, after the comprehensive treatment of the Shiyang River, the water level decline significantly slowed down, and a partial rise was observed. The storage variables were positive in some years. Fourth, the main influencing factors of the groundwater dynamics are extraction volume and surface water diversion volume. The groundwater volume change process is divided into a rapid decline period (1985-2000), a stable decline period (2001-2006), a treatment period (2007-2009), and a steady/increasing period (2010-2016). Lastly, under the current surface water supply, the groundwater recoverable volume in Hongyashan Irrigation District is approximately 0.61×10⁸ m·a^-1.

Key words: groundwater level dynamics, groundwater storage variables, influencing factors, Minqin

WEI Shiyu,GUO Yuntong,CUI Yali,ZHANG Qiulan,SHAO Jingli. Dynamic characteristics of groundwater level and storage variables in Minqin from 1985 to 2016[J].Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(5): 1272-1280.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Tab. 1

Fig. 9

References 29

[1]	李宗礼. 民勤绿洲水资源承载能力初步研究[C]// 王继和. 中国西北荒漠区持续农业与沙漠综合治理国际学术交流会论文集. 兰州:兰州大学出版社, 1998.
	[ Li Zongli. Preliminary study on water resources carrying capacity of Minqin Oasis[C]// Wang Jihe. Proceedings of the International Academic Exchange Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Desert Control in Northwest China.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University Press, 1988. ]
[2]	刘江, 付强. 地下水开采量和水位双控管理模式探讨[J]. 地下水, 2017, 39(3):62-63.
	[ Liu Jiang, Fu Qiang. Discussion on the dual control management mode of groundwater extraction volume and water level[J]. Ground Water, 2017, 39(3):62-63. ]
[3]	曲炜. 节水型社会建设要推进地下水双控管理[J]. 中国水利, 2018(6):27-29.
	[ Qu Wei. Establishment of water-saving society needs to boost dual control for groundwater utilization[J]. China Water Resources, 2018(6):27-29. ]
[4]	李军德. 关于民勤县水资源管理模式的探索[J]. 江西农业, 2017(17):67.
	[ Li Junde. Exploration of water resources management model in Minqin County[J]. Jiangxi Agriculture, 2017(17):67. ]
[5]	李风萍. 关于甘肃省民勤县水资源管理的几点思考[J]. 北京农业, 2015(18):128.
	[ Li Fengping. Some thoughts on water resources management in Minqin County, Gansu Province[J]. Beijing Agriculture, 2015(18):128. ]
[6]	徐青霞. 浅谈民勤县水资源精细化管理模式[J]. 甘肃水利水电技术, 2016, 52(12):11-13.
	[ Xu Qingxia. Talking about the fine management mode of water resources in Minqin County[J]. Gansu Water Resources and Hydropower Technology, 2016, 52(12):11-13. ]
[7]	王红, 石培基. 武威市城镇化与水土资源效益协调性分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(5):963-969.
	[ Wang Hong, Shi Peiji. Coordination degree of urbanization and land water resources benefits of Wuwei City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(5):963-969. ]
[8]	王化齐, 蔡焕杰, 张鑫. 石羊河下游民勤绿洲恢复地下水位生态需水量研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(1):44-49.
	[ Wang Huaqi, Cai Huanjie, Zhang Xin. Ecological water demand for restoration of groundwater level in Minqin Oasis in lower reach of Shiyang River[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 26(1):44-49. ]
[9]	徐先英, 丁国栋, 孙保平, 等. 内陆河下游民勤绿洲主要防风固沙植被生态需水量研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(3):144-148.
	[ Xu Xianying, Ding Guodong, Sun Baoping, et al. Ecological water requirement of major sand shifting control forests in Minqin Oasis of lower reaches of inland river[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(3):144-148. ]
[10]	汪新波, 粟晓玲. 基于T-S模糊神经网络的民勤地下水水质综合评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(1):188-192, 198.
	[ Wang Xinbo, Su Xiaoling. Comprehensive assessment of groundwater quality in Minqin Basin based on T-S Fuzzy Neural Network[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(1):188-192, 198. ]
[11]	杨怀德, 冯起, 黄珊, 等. 民勤绿洲水资源调度的生态环境效应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(7):68-73.
	[ Yang Huaide, Feng Qi, Huang Shan, et al. Environmental effects of surface water reallocation in Minqin Oasis[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(7):68-73. ]
[12]	柳菲, 陈沛源, 于海超, 等. 民勤绿洲不同土地利用类型下土壤水盐的空间分布特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2):406-414.
	[ Liu Fei, Chen Peiyuan, Yu Haichao, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil water and salt under different land use types in Minqin Oasis[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2):406-414. ]
[13]	马倩倩, 董博, 许旺旺, 等. 干旱区耕地质量等级评价及土壤养分与盐渍化的分析研究--以民勤绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(2):514-524.
	[ Ma Qianqian, Dong Bo, Xu Wangwang, et al. Evaluation of cultivated land quality and analysis of soil nutrients and salinization in arid areas: Taking Minqin Oasis as an example[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(2):514-524. ]
[14]	俄有浩, 严平, 仲生年, 等. 民勤沙井子地区地下水动态研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 1997, 17(1):72-78.
	[ E Youhao, Yan Ping, Zhong Shengnian, et al. Research on groundwater dynamics in Shajingzi area of Minqin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 1997, 17(1):72-78. ]
[15]	刘文杰, 苏永中, 杨荣, 等. 民勤地下水水化学特征和矿化度的时空变化[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(10):2911-2917.
	[ Liu Wenjie, Su Yongzhong, Yang Rong, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and spatial-temporal variation of mineralization for the groundwater in Minqin Oasis[J]. China Journal of Environmental Science, 2009, 30(10):2911-2917. ]
[16]	宋冬梅, 肖笃宁, 马明国, 等. 民勤湖区地下水资源时空变化对灌区景观生态安全的影响研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(10):1815-1820.
	[ Song Dongmei, Xiao Duning, Ma Mingguo, et al. Impact of groundwater resource temporal-spatial change in Minqin Oasis on ecological security of irrigation region landscape[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(10):1815-1820. ]
[17]	马金辉, 韩金华, 张艳林. 近10 a来民勤盆地地下水埋深的空间异质性分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(1):1-7.
	[ Ma Jinhui, Han Jinhua, Zhang Yanlin. Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of groundwater depth in Minqin Basin in recent 10 years[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(1):1-7. ]
[18]	李大鸣, 孙仲谋, 张弘强, 等. 唐山市古冶区地下水数学模型研究及应用[J]. 中国给水排水, 2019, 35(19):72-76.
	[ Li Daming, Sun Zhongmou, Zhang Hongqiang, et al. Application of groundwater mathematical model for Guye District, Tangshan City[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2019, 35(19):72-76. ]
[19]	孟春丽, 王闯, 魏雅琴. 2013 年中牟县地下水动态及水量平衡分析[J]. 河南水利与南水北调, 2014(14):9-10.
	[ Meng Chunli, Wang Chuang, Wei Yaqin. Groundwater dynamics and water balance analysis in Zhongmu County in 2013[J]. Water Resources & South to North Water Diversion, 2014(14):9-10. ]
[20]	代俊宁. 滹沱河冲洪积扇地下水回灌研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2014.
	[ Dai Junning. The study on groundwater recharge programs in alluvial fan of Hutuo River[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2014. ]
[21]	周文. 鄯善县南盆地地下水动力场演化规律研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2014, 12(3):169-172.
	[ Zhou Wen. Study on evolution law of groundwater’s dynamic field in south basin of Shanshan[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2014, 12(3):169-172. ]
[22]	韩志国. 地下水蓄变量计算方法的探讨[J]. 治淮, 2008(11):21-22.
	[ Han Zhiguo. Discussion on calculation method of groundwater storage variable[J]. Harnessing the Huaihe River, 2008(11):21-22. ]
[23]	袁健, 马小雷, 金鹏飞, 等. 基于泰森多边形法的地下水平均水位计算[J]. 地下水, 2016, 38(3):29-30, 35.
	[ Yuan Jian, Ma Xiaolei, Jin Pengfei, et al. Calculation of average groundwater level based on Thiessen polygon method[J]. Ground Water, 2016, 38(3):29-30, 35. ]
[24]	甘肃省水文水资源局. 甘肃省地下水超采区评价报告[R]. 兰州: 甘肃省水文水资源局, 2014.
	[Gansu Provincial Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau. Evaluation report on groundwater over-exploitation area in Gansu Province[R]. Lanzhou: Gansu Provincial Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau, 2014. ]
[25]	赵明瑞, 彭祥荣, 徐天军, 等. 石羊河流域综合治理以来民勤绿洲生态变化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(30):106-111.
	[ Zhao Mingrui, Peng Xiangrong, Xu Tianjun, et al. Ecological changes of Minqin Oasis since comprehensive management of the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(30):106-111. ]
[26]	王晓玮. 我国西北超采区地下水水量-水位双控指标确定研究--以民勤盆地为例[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2017.
	[ Wang Xiaowei. Study on the dual control of groundwater abstraction amount and table in groundwater over-exploitation zones in northwest China: A case study in Minqin Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2017. ]
[27]	李俊晓, 李朝奎, 殷智慧. 基于ArcGIS的克里金插值方法及其应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2013(9):87-90, 97.
	[ Li Xiaojun, Li Chaokui, Yin Zhihui. Kriging interpolation method based on ArcGIS and its application[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2013(9):87-90, 97. ]
[28]	甘雨. 民勤盆地地下水压采方案及监测井网优化研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2017.
	[ Gan Yu. The study on groundwater reducing mining scheme and optimization of monitoring well network in Minqin Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2017. ]
[29]	柳菲. 民勤绿洲土壤水盐特征及其与地下水的关系[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.
	[ Liu Fei. Characteristics of soil water and salt and its relationship with groundwater in Minqin Oasis[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. ]

动态区	面积/km²	储变量/10⁸m³·a^-1	储变量模数/10⁴m³·km²·a^-1	开采量/10⁸m³·a^-1	开采模数/10⁵m³·km²·a^-1
灌溉入渗-开采型	1502.3	-0.43	-2.86	2.65	1.76
径流型	3183.2	-0.33	-1.04	0	0
合计	4685.5	-0.76		2.65

Dynamic characteristics of groundwater level and storage variables in Minqin from 1985 to 2016

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 29

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	JIANG Yuekun, SHI Pengjuan. Spatiotemporal evolution and its affecting factors of urban-rural income gap at the city-level scale in China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 147-157.
[2]	LI Shiyi, GUAN Quanli. Influence of farmers’ irrigation behavior goals on irrigation water efficiency: A case of Xayar County [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(1): 48-57.
[3]	YANG Yu, SONG Futie, ZHANG Jie. Spatial structure characteristics and influencing factors of financial network of China based on geodetectors [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1524-1535.
[4]	LI Jianhui, CHEN Lin, DANG Zheng. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of patriotic education bases in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1536-1544.
[5]	ZHANG Hao, HAN Zenglin, QIAO Guorong, WANG Hui, WANG Hongye, DUAN Ye. Patterns and influencing factors of tourism economic linkages between cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1344-1354.
[6]	BAI Yang,HU Jingxuan,CHEN Chunyan,LU Wen. Regional differences and influencing factors of efficiency of tourism aid for Xinjiang: Based on three-stage DEA and Tobit model [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1366-1375.
[7]	WU Haijuan, ZHENG Fang, YI Jieyan. Residential satisfaction and its influencing factors in ecological immigrant villages and towns [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(8): 1387-1396.
[8]	KONG Deming, HAO Lisha, XIA Siyou, LI Hongbo. Food security in the argo-pastoral ecotone of northern China from the perspective of grain yield [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 782-792.
[9]	LI Xinyu,WANG Jingpu,WANG Zhoulong. Research progress on aerodynamic roughness [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 407-417.
[10]	TIAN Xiaobo,HU Jing,JIA Yaoyan,ZHU Lei. Exploring the causes of spatial differentiation of tourism development level in the high-quality development stage: Empirical evidence of Yellow River Basin based on factor decomposition [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 460-470.
[11]	CHENG Jing,WANG Peng,CHEN Hongxiang,HAN Yonggui. Spatiotemporal evolution of habitat quality in the Weihe River Basin and its topographic gradient effects and influencing factors [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(3): 481-491.
[12]	GAO Yanzhe, Alatengtuya , TAN Na, Aorigele . Lake changes and their influence factors in the Mongolian Plateau from 2000 to 2020 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(2): 191-200.
[13]	JIANG Lu,LIU Yanjuan,SHI Xiaonan,DING Bowenpeng,CHEN Hongyu. Household energy consumption in urban communities in Qinghai Plateau based on material flow: A case of Xining City [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(2): 294-304.
[14]	XU Xiaoliang, HUANG Dan, LIU Xuyi, GUAN Jingyun. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of provincial tourism efficiency in China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(12): 2052-2060.
[15]	WU Zhixiang, ZHANG Zhibin, ZHAO Xuewei, CHEN Long, MA Xiaomin, CHAI Jiao. Spatiotemporal distribution pattern and influencing factors of A-level tourist attractions in northwestern China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(12): 2061-2073.