黄河流域新质生产力生态化水平测度与障碍因子

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.543

Abstract

Abstract:

Green productivity is a new type of productive force, and green development and ecological modernization are important for the construction of new types of productive forces. Based on the ecological thinking of productivity theory, a measurement index system for the ecological level of the new type of productive forces, including the ecological transformation of production subjects, labor materials, and labor objects, was constructed. Panel data from prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin of China from 2012 to 2021 were used to examine the ecological level of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin and its obstacle factors. The entropy method, Gini coefficient decomposition, and the obstacle degree model were used. The results indicate that: (1) The overall ecological level of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin is on the rise, and regional differences in ecological level of new quality productive forces are constantly increasing. The differences among upstream, midstream, and downstream show the greatest impact on overall regional differences. (2) The degree of the obstacle of the ecological transformation of production subjects is the highest and shows an increasing trend year by year, whereas the obstacle degree of the ecological transformation of labor materials and labor objects shows a decreasing trend. Emerging strategic industries have always been the main obstacle to the improvement of the ecological level of new quality productive forces. (3) The development of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin should attach importance to the ecological path, increase investment in scientific and technological innovation, strive to cultivate high-quality innovative talent, enhance workers’ ecological awareness and ecological technology innovation ability, accelerate the development of ecological strategic emerging industries, promote coordinated development between upstream, midstream, and downstream, and effectively promote the development of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: new quality productive forces, ecological, high-quality development, Yellow River Basin

PENG Wenying, ZHAO Shuang, SHAN Ziyi, CHEN Zeyu. Measurement and obstacle factors of ecological level of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin[J].Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1648-1659.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Tab. 2

References 20

[1]	人民日报社. 中央经济工作会议在北京举行[N]. 人民日报, 2023-12-13(001).
	[People’ s Daily. The central economic work conference was held in Beijing[N]. People’ s Daily, 2023-12-13(001).]
[2]	习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J]. 求是, 2024(11): 4-8.
	[Xi Jinping. Developing new productive forces is an endogenous requirement and a pivot of high-quality development[J]. Qiushi Journal, 2024(11): 4-8.]
[3]	周成, 赵亚玲, 张旭红, 等. 黄河流域城市生态韧性与效率时空演化特征及协调发展分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1514-1523. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.633
	[Zhou Cheng, Zhao Yaling, Zhang Xuhong, et al. Spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics and coordinated development of urban ecological resilience and efficiency in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 46(9): 1514-1523.]
[4]	李小建, 文玉钊, 李元征, 等. 黄河流域高质量发展: 人地协调与空间协调[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(4): 1-10. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.001
	[Li Xiaojian, Wen Yuzhao, Li Yuanzheng, et al. High-quality development of the Yellow River Basin from a perspective of economic geography: Man-land and spatial coordination[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4): 1-10.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.001
[5]	刘建华, 闫静, 王慧扬, 等. 黄河流域新质生产力水平的动态演进及障碍因子诊断[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(4): 1-7, 14.
	[Liu Jianhua, Yan Jing, Wang Huiyang, et al. The dynamic evolution of new quality productive forces level and diagnosis of obstacle factors in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Yellow River, 2024, 46(4): 1-7, 14.]
[6]	黄群慧, 盛方富. 新质生产力系统: 要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J]. 改革, 2024(2): 15-24.
	[Huang Qunhui, Sheng Fangfu. New productive forces system: Factor characteristics, structural bearing and functional orientation[J]. Reform, 2024(2): 15-24.]
[7]	赵峰, 季雷. 新质生产力的科学内涵、构成要素和制度保障机制[J]. 学习与探索, 2024(1): 92-101, 175.
	[Zhao Feng, Ji Lei. The scientific connotation, constituent elements, and institutional safeguards mechanisms of new quality productivity[J]. Study and Exploration, 2024(1): 92-101, 175.]
[8]	李政, 廖晓东. 发展“新质生产力”的理论、历史和现实“三重”逻辑[J]. 政治经济学评论, 2023, 14(6): 146-159.
	[Li Zheng, Liao Xiaodong. The theoretical, historical, and realistic “triple” logics of developing “new quality productivity”[J]. China Review of Political Economy, 2023, 14(6): 146-159.]
[9]	刘伟. 科学认识与切实发展新质生产力[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 4-11.
	[Liu Wei. Scientific understanding and practical development of new quality productivity[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2024, 59(3): 4-11.]
[10]	沈坤荣, 程果, 赵倩. 以新质生产力增强高质量发展新动能[J]. 学术研究, 2024(4): 87-93.
	[Shen Kunrong, Cheng Guo, Zhao Qian. To strengthen new driving forces for high-quality development by new-quality productivity[J]. Academic Research, 2024(4): 87-93.]
[11]	廖小明, 杨懿. 唯物史观视域下新质生产力的生态意涵探赜[J]. 理论与改革, 2024(5): 24-39, 161-162.
	[Liao Xiaoming, Yang Yi. Exploring the ecological connotation of new quality productive forces from the perspective of historical materialism[J]. Theory and Reform, 2024(5): 24-39, 161-162.]
[12]	李敦瑞. 新质生产力的生态意蕴和推进路向[J]. 山东师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 2024, 69(2): 92-103.
	[Li Dunrui. Ecological implications and pathway to promote new productive forces[J]. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 69(2): 92-103.]
[13]	朱富显, 李瑞雪, 徐晓莉, 等. 中国新质生产力指标构建与时空演进[J]. 工业技术经济, 2024, 43(3): 44-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2024.03.005
	[Zhu Fuxian, Li Ruixue, Xu Xiaoli, et al. Construction and spatiotemporal evolution of new productivity indicators of China[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2024, 43(3): 44-53.]
[14]	张哲, 李季刚, 汤努尔·哈力克. 中国新质生产力发展水平测度与时空演进[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(9): 18-23.
	[Zhang Zhe, Li Jigang, Halik Tangnur. Measurement and spatiotemporal evolution of the development level of China’s new quality productive[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2024, 40(9): 18-23.]
[15]	卢江, 郭子昂, 王煜萍. 新质生产力发展水平、区域差异与提升路径[J]. 重庆大学学报 (社会科学版), 2024, 30(3): 1-17.
	[Lu Jiang, Guo Ziang, Wang Yuping. Levels of development of new quality productivity, regional differences and paths to enhancement[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2024, 30(3): 1-17.]
[16]	韩文龙, 张瑞生, 赵峰. 新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(6): 5-25.
	[Han Wenlong, Zhang Ruisheng, Zhao Feng. The measurement of new quality productivity and new driving force of the Chinese economy[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(6): 5-25.]
[17]	中共中央宣传部. 习近平总书记系列重要讲话读本[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2016: 123.
	[Publicity Department of the CPC Central Committee. Reader of general secretary Xi Jinping’s series of important speeches[M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2016: 123.]
[18]	Dagum C. A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratio[J]. Empirical Economics, 1997, 22(4): 515-531.
[19]	李茜, 胡昊, 李名升, 等. 中国生态文明综合评价及环境、经济与社会协调发展研究[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7): 1444-1454.
	[Li Qian, Hu Hao, Li Mingsheng, et al. Ecological civilization evaluation and coordinated development between environment, economy and society[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7): 1444-1454.]
[20]	薛超凯, 陈凯华, 王全景, 等. 黄河流域产业发展现状、问题与对策建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(6): 971-984.
	[Xue Chaokai, Chen Kaihua, Wang Quanjing, et al. Current status, challenges, and policy recommendations for industrial development in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(6): 971-984.]

准则层	二级指标	表征指标	指标测度	权重	属性
生产主体生态化	高素质人才	受教育程度（X₁）	普通高等学校在校生数	0.1528	+
	高素质人才	知识密集型人员（X₂）	信息传输、软件和信息技术服务业与科学研究和技术服务业人数	0.1856	+
	生态意识	环保投入（X₃）	节能环保支出	0.0569	+
劳动资料生态化	能源利用生态化	能源节约利用（X₄）	单位GDP能源消耗量	0.0063	-
	设施先进性	数字基础设施（X₅）	互联网宽带接入用户数	0.0711	+
	科技创新性	数字化水平（X₆）	数字经济指数	0.0280	+
	科技创新性	绿色创新水平（X₇）	绿色专利授权总量	0.1889	+
劳动对象生态化	生态科技产业	战略性新兴产业（X₈）	人工智能企业数量	0.2584	+
	生态科技产业	产业结构高级化（X₉）	第三产业增加值/第二产业增加值	0.0328	+
	生态生产过程	绿色清洁生产（X₁₀）	工业固体废物综合利用率	0.0140	+
	生态环境	绿化情况（X₁₁）	建成区绿化覆盖率	0.0052	+

年份	区域	障碍因子（障碍度/%）
年份	区域	第1障碍因子	第2障碍因子	第3障碍因子	第4障碍因子	第5障碍因子
2012	上游	X₈（26.92）	X₇（19.65）	X₂（18.83）	X₁（15.26）	X₅（7.26）
	中游	X₈（27.64）	X₇（19.99）	X₂（18.45）	X₁（15.15）	X₅（7.06）
	下游	X₈（27.74）	X₇（19.91）	X₂（19.32）	X₁（15.00）	X₅（6.86）
2018	上游	X₈（27.48）	X₇（19.82）	X₂（18.56）	X₁（15.58）	X₅（6.99）
	中游	X₈（28.24）	X₇（19.94）	X₂（18.53）	X₁（15.49）	X₅（6.53）
	下游	X₈（28.70）	X₂（19.82）	X₇（19.59）	X₁（15.35）	X₅（5.98）
2019	上游	X₈（27.35）	X₇（19.76）	X₂（19.03）	X₁（15.54）	X₅（6.91）
	中游	X₈（28.29）	X₇（20.20）	X₂（18.63）	X₁（15.35）	X₅（6.45）
	下游	X₈（28.80）	X₇（19.82）	X₂（19.79）	X₁（15.43）	X₃（5.84）
2020	上游	X₈（27.37）	X₇（19.66）	X₂（19.10）	X₁（15.58）	X₅（6.82）
	中游	X₈（27.68）	X₇（19.82）	X₂（19.23）	X₁（15.72）	X₅（6.32）
	下游	X₈（28.73）	X₂（19.81）	X₇（19.07）	X₁（15.61）	X₃（6.25）
2021	上游	X₈（27.15）	X₇（19.45）	X₂（19.25）	X₁（15.66）	X₅（6.78）
	中游	X₈（25.97）	X₂（19.13）	X₇（18.81）	X₁（17.06）	X₃（6.93）
	下游	X₈（27.63）	X₂（20.81）	X₇（18.05）	X₁（16.26）	X₃（6.84）

Measurement and obstacle factors of ecological level of new quality productive forces in the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 20

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	TIAN Xiaobo. Measurement and spatial pattern characteristics of tourism high-quality development level of urbans in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(9): 1660-1671.
[2]	LI Hui, YAO Xilong. Water-saving potential of hydrogen production from renewable energy in Yellow River Basin from the perspective of water footprint [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1353-1362.
[3]	ZHONG Jiawei, ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Mingyue. How does agricultural socialization service affect grain eco-efficiency: A case study of 71 prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1385-1395.
[4]	XU Jing, YANG Bin. Coupling coordination of new urbanization and ecological security and spatial-temporal non-stationarity of its driving factors in Gansu Province [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1432-1444.
[5]	MIN Xue, WU Yeli, ZHANG Ying, DING Guodong, YANG Zhiheng. Soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics of typical artificial vegetation in Qingshuihe County, Inner Mongolia [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1492-1501.
[6]	ZHANG Xinhan, ZHAO Wenting, JIAO Juying, MA Xiaowu, YANG Bo, LING Qi. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of extreme precipitation events on the Loess Plateau from 1960 to 2023 [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1153-1166.
[7]	CHENG Peng, PENG Haiyang, HOU Dingrong, SUN Mingdong, SONG Xiaowei. Spatial pattern and evolution trend of agricultural grey water footprint intensity in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1185-1197.
[8]	XU Mingjing, DUAN Baoling, FENG Qiang, LYU Meng. Ecological services and their trade-offs/synergistic relationships in multi-scenario simulations: A case of the Shanxi section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1206-1219.
[9]	SHI Zhuoda, YANG Hongwei. Measurement and influencing factors of high-quality development of tourism economy: A case of Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1233-1242.
[10]	LUO Xiaomei, WEN Qi, SHI Linna, WU Xinyan, AN Fengping, WANG Zhenting. Identification of county shrinkage and its driving factors in agro-pastoral zone of north China from a multidimensional perspective [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(7): 1267-1278.
[11]	REN Shiqi, WANG Yongyu. Measurement and spatial convergence of green development level of prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1031-1042.
[12]	WEI Jianfei, YUAN Youran, LI Qiang, DONG Peipei, LIU Jiurong. Spatio-temporal variation and obstacle factors of territorial spatial efficiency in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1055-1066.
[13]	NIE Hanyu, ZHANG Yanhui, LI Hui, ZHENG Yaomin. Spatio-temporal evolution and multi-scale barrier factor analysis of tourism ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1089-1102.
[14]	LI Zhi, SU Yang, SHU Qin. Static-dynamic matching of ecosystem service supply and demand and ecological management zoning in northwest China [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1115-1126.
[15]	XIE Yu, XUE Xuandeng. Digital economy empowers green development welfare: Empirical evidence based on resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(6): 1127-1139.