基于POI数据的内蒙古公共文化设施空间结构与影响因素

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.225

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

科学规划公共文化设施布局对于完善公共文化服务体系、满足人民群众对高质量精神生活的需求至为关键。基于POI数据和ArcGIS 10.8软件平台，运用数理统计、最近邻指数、核密度估计和地理探测器等手段，多尺度揭示内蒙古公共文化设施的空间结构及其影响因素。结果表明：（1）全域尺度上，公共文化设施数量分布不均且差距突出，各类公共文化设施分布呈集聚性，密度分布以“阿拉善左旗-扎赉特旗”为界呈现南部密度高、北部密度低的特征。（2）地区尺度上，蒙西、蒙中、蒙东均为集聚分布，且非均衡性突出，蒙中地区公共文化设施数量和密度显著超过蒙东地区和蒙西地区。（3）盟市尺度上，设施数量相差悬殊，“呼包鄂”集聚特征显著，乌海市、乌兰察布市和巴彦淖尔市集聚特征次之，赤峰市、通辽市和兴安盟的集聚程度稍低，锡林郭勒盟和呼伦贝尔市的集聚程度更弱，阿拉善盟则以零星点缀的形式分布。（4）内蒙古公共文化设施空间结构是经济、文化、社会、自然多因素交互作用、协同推进的结果，各因素交互作用产生了“1+1>2”的非线性增强或双因子增强效应。

关键词: 公共文化设施, POI数据, 空间结构, 内蒙古

Abstract:

Scientific planning of public cultural facility layouts is essential for enhancing public cultural service systems and addressing the population’s demand for a high-quality spiritual life. Utilizing point-of-interest (POI) data and the ArcGIS 10.8 software platform, this study employs methods such as mathematical statistics, nearest neighbor index, kernel density estimation, and geographical detectors to analyze the spatial structure and influencing factors of public cultural facilities in Inner Mongolia of China across multiple scales. The results indicate the following: (1) At the provincial scale, public cultural facilities are unevenly distributed, exhibiting significant gaps and clustering patterns across various facility types. High-density areas are concentrated in the south, while low-density areas dominate the north, with the “Alagxa Left Banner-Jalaid Banner” line serving as a demarcation. (2) At the regional scale, distributions in west, central, and east Mongolia are clustered, displaying pronounced inequities. Central Mongolia surpasses east and west Mongolia significantly in the number and density of public cultural facilities. (3) At the league and city scale, facility numbers vary markedly, with the “Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos” region demonstrating a high degree of clustering, followed by Wuhai, Ulanqab, and Bayannur cities. Clustering diminishes slightly in Chifeng City, Tongliao City, and Hinggan League and is even weaker in Xilin Gol League and Hulun Buir City. Alagxa League displays a scattered distribution. (4) The spatial structure of public cultural facilities in Inner Mongolia arises from the synergistic interactions of economic, cultural, social, and natural factors. These interactions generate nonlinear enhancement or dual-factor enhancement effects, producing outcomes where “1+1>2”.

Key words: public cultural facilities, POI data, spatial structure, Inner Mongolia

于亚娟. 基于POI数据的内蒙古公共文化设施空间结构与影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025, 48(3): 528-538.

YU Yajuan. Spatial structure and influencing factors of public cultural facilities in Inner Mongolia based on POI data[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(3): 528-538.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

表2

参考文献 40

[1]	邹胜男, 陈世香. 体制内委托经营: 公共文化服务设施治理机制创新[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019, 39(9): 48-54, 63.
	[Zou Shengnan, Chen Shixiang. Within-system entrusted management:An innovation of the governance mechanism of public cultural service facilities[J]. Library Tribune, 2019, 39(9): 48-54, 63. ]
[2]	Cooper L. Location allocation problems[J]. Operations Research, 1963, 11(3): 331-343.
[3]	Pham T H, Frans B, Nguyen N Q, et al. Urban form and accessibility to jobs[J]. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2011, 2(2): 265-285.
[4]	Chi G Q. The impacts of transport accessibility on population change across rural, suburban and urban areas: A case study of Wisconsin at sub-county levels[J]. Urban Studies, 2021, 49(1): 2711-2731.
[5]	Shannon G W, Bashshur R L. Accessibility to medical care among urban American Indians in a large metropolitan area[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1981, 13(8): 955-978.
[6]	Bach L. The problem of aggregation and distance for analyses of accessibility and access opportunity in location-allocation models[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1981, 13(8): 955-978.
[7]	Pacione M. Access to urban services: The case of secondary schools in Glasgow[J]. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 1989, 105(1): 12-18.
[8]	Talen E, Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1998, 30: 595-613.
[9]	Tsou K W, Hung Y T, Chang Y L. An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities[J]. Cities, 2005, 22(6): 424-435.
[10]	Taleai M, Sliuzas R, Flacke J. An integrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis[J]. Elsevier Ltd, 2014, 40: 56-69.
[11]	段成荣, 谭砢. 城市公共文化设施规划研究——宁波城市新区公共文化设施规划案例[J]. 人口研究, 2002(6): 55-62.
	[Duan Chengrong, Tan Ke. Research on urban public cultural facilities planning: A case study of the public cultural facilities planning in the New District of Ningbo City[J]. Population Research, 2002(6): 55-62. ]
[12]	孟华. 探求历史文化街区市政基础设施规划提升改造之路——以嘉定西大街改造区为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2016(3): 114-117.
	[Meng Hua. Explore the historical and cultural blocks of municipal infrastructure planning to enhance the transformation: A case study of Jiading West Main Street[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2016(3): 114-117. ]
[13]	刘玉宝, 李慧嘉. 客家传统村落的公共文化设施研究[J]. 包装工程, 2022, 43(2): 346-351.
	[Liu Yubao, Li Huijia. Public cultural facilities of Hakka traditional villages[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2022, 43(2): 346-351. ]
[14]	孟晓雪. 我国公共文化设施运营机制研究[J]. 图书馆学刊, 2021, 43(7): 46-49.
	[Meng Xiaoxue. Research on the operation mechanism of public cultural facilities in China[J]. Journal of Library Science, 2021, 43(7): 46-49. ]
[15]	李金珊, 徐越. 基层公共文化基础设施政策绩效及其制度因素探究——以浙江省农家书屋为例[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(5): 511-516, 538.
	[Li Jinsan, Xu Yue. Institutional factors for the policy performance of rural public cultural infrastructure: A case study of the rural libraries in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Northeast University (Social Science Edition), 2014, 16(5): 511-516, 538. ]
[16]	李锦兰, 杨小凤. 公众对公共文化服务体系认知现状的调查与分析[J]. 图书馆研究, 2015, 45(5): 111-115.
	[Li Jinlan, Yang Xiaofeng. A survey and analysis on the people’s awareness of public cultural service system[J]. Library Research, 2015, 45(5): 111-115. ]
[17]	夏雅琴, 江家慧. 公共设施与城市文化基因传承[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(10): 246-253.
	[Xia Yaqin, Jiang Jiahui. Public facilities and the inheritance of urban cultural genes[J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2021, 41(10): 246-253. ]
[18]	邵菁菁. 浅析美术馆建筑的选址与空间布局[J]. 中国博物馆, 2019(3): 125-130.
	[Shao Jingjing. A brief analysis of site selection and spatial layout of art museum buildings[J]. Chinese Museum, 2019(3): 125-130. ]
[19]	李细归, 肖鹏南, 吴清, 等. 中国公共图书馆时空格局演变及影响因素研究[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(1): 140-150.
	[Li Xigui, Xiao Pengnan, Wu Qing, et al. Research on influence factors and temporal-spatial evolution of publec library in China[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(1): 140-150. ]
[20]	谢秋逸, 常直杨. 江苏省公共文化设施空间结构及驱动因素——从数量统计到效能评价[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2023, 46(4): 50-59.
	[Xie Qiuyi, Chang Zhiyang. Spatial structure and driving factors of public cultural facilities in Jiangsu Province: From quantity statistics to efficiency evaluation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 46(4): 50-59. ]
[21]	赵诗童, 张文新. 北京市公共文化设施分布特征及可达性[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(6): 7-12.
	[Zhao Shitong, Zhang Wenxin. Characteristics of spatial-temporal evolution and accessibility of public cultural facilities in Beijing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(6): 7-12. ]
[22]	徐雯雯, 胡雪薇. 基于GIS和启发式算法的公共服务设施选址优化研究[C]// 中国城市规划学会. 人民城市, 规划赋能——2022中国城市规划年会论文集(07城市设计). 北京: 中国城市规划学会, 2023: 10.
	[Xu Wenwen, Hu Xuewei. Optimization research on public service facility location based on GIS and heuristic algorithms[C]// Urban Planning Society of China. People’s Cities, Planning Empowerment: Proceedings of the 2022 China Urban Planning Annual Conference (Session 07:Urban Design). Beijing: Urban Planning Society of China, 2023: 10. ]
[23]	王立平, 张直. 论乡村振兴背景下公共文化服务体系建设——以内蒙古自治区奈曼旗为例[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 4(4): 22-27.
	[Wang Liping, Zhang Zhi. On the construction of public cultural service system under the context of rural revitalization: Taking Naiman Banner Inner Mongolia as an example[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 4(4): 22-27. ]
[24]	于亚娟. 内蒙古公共文化服务设施空间分布及影响因素[J]. 边疆经济与文化, 2024(2): 11-14.
	[Yu Yajuan. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of public cultural service facilities in Inner Mongolia[J]. The Border Economy and Culture, 2024(2): 11-14. ]
[25]	宁静, 朱冉, 张馨元, 等. 内蒙古区县城市韧性评价与分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1217-1226. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.537
	[Ning Jing, Zhu Ran, Zhang Xinyuan, et al. Evaluation and analysis of urban resilience of districts and counties in Inner Mongolia[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(7): 1217-1226. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.537
[26]	王芳, 高晓路. 内蒙古县域经济空间格局演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 818-824. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.07.818
	[Wang Fang, Gao Xiaolu. Spatial pattern evolvement of the economy in Inner Mongolia at the county level[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(7): 818-824. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.07.818
[27]	中国政府网. 公共文化体育设施条例[EB/OL]. [2024-05-20]. https://www.gov.cn/test/2005-06/28/content_10719.htm.
	[China Government Website. Regulations on public cultural and sports facilities[EB/OL]. [2024-05-20]. https://www.gov.cn/test/2005-06/28/content_10719.htm. ]
[28]	Clark P J, Evans F C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations[J]. Ecology, 1954, 35: 445-453.
[29]	尹海伟, 孔繁花. 城市与区域规划空间分析实验教程[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2014: 200-201.
	[Yin Haiwei, Kong Fanhua. Lab manual for analysis in urban and regional planning[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2014: 200-201. ]
[30]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
	[Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
[31]	杨雨, 宋福铁, 张杰. 基于地理探测器的中国金融网络空间结构特征及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1524-1535. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.581
	[Yang Yu, Song Futie, Zhang Jie. Spatial structure characteristics and influencing factors of financial network of China based on geodetectors[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1524-1535. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.581
[32]	李国新. “十四五”时期公共图书馆高质量发展思考[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021, 41(1): 12-17.
	[Li Guoxin. Some reflections on the high-quality development for public libraries[J]. Library Tribune, 2021, 41(1): 12-17. ]
[33]	项琳. 国家文化惠民工程在全面建成小康社会中的成就、贡献与经验[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021, 41(12): 29-34.
	[Xiang Lin. Achievements, contribution and experience of China’s cultural projects designed to benefit the people[J]. Library Tribune, 2021, 41(12): 29-34. ]
[34]	李少惠, 张玉强. 文化多样性、经济增长对公共文化服务均等化的影响——基于空间计量模型的实证检验[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2020(1): 33-41.
	[Li Shaohui, Zhang Yuqiang. The impact of cultural diversity and economic growth on the equalization of public cultural services: An empirical test based on a spatial econometric model[J]. Research on Library Science, 2020(1): 33-41. ]
[35]	包思勤. 内蒙古在高质量发展中促进共同富裕的实践路径研究[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2022, 43(11): 186-192.
	[Bao Siqin. Research on the practical ways to promote common prosperity through high-quality development of Inner Mongolia[J]. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 2022, 43(11): 186-192. ]
[36]	腾讯网. 2022年内蒙古各市GDP和人均GDP, 鄂尔多斯突破5000亿[EB/OL].[2024-04-18]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20230228A07TO700.
	[Tencent News. 2022 GDP and per capita GDP of cities in Inner Mongolia, Ordos breaks through 500 billion[EB/OL].[2024-04-18]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20230228A07TO700. ]
[37]	张晓虹. 陕西文化区划及其机制分析[J]. 人文地理, 2000, 15(3): 17-21.
	[Zhang Xiaohong. Analysis of form reasons of Shaanxi cultural divisions[J]. Human Geography, 2000, 15(3): 17-21. ]
[38]	廖嘉妍, 张景秋. 基于POI数据的北京城市文化设施空间分布特征研究[J]. 北京联合大学学报, 2020, 34(1): 23-33.
	[Liao Jiayan, Zhang Jingqiu. Research on distribution characteristics of cultural facilities in Beijing based on POI data[J]. Journal of Beijing Union University, 2020, 34(1): 23-33. ]
[39]	张艺炜, 邓三鸿, 孔嘉, 等. 中国公共文化服务建设的时空分异与影响因素研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2021(6): 165-174, 183.
	[Zhang Yiwei, Deng Sanhong, Kong Jia, et al. Study on spatio-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of public cultural service construction in China[J]. Library Development, 2021(6): 165-174, 183. ]
[40]	吴浩然, 吴祁宗. 地方财政公共文化服务支出的效率评价——基于三阶段DEA窗口模型[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2017, 47(3): 74-83.
	[Wu Haoran, Wu Qizong. Efficenecy evaluation of the local fiscal public cultural service expenditure: Based on three stage DEA window model[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2017, 47(3): 74-83. ]

分布类型	平均最近邻指数	Z得分	P值
博物馆	0.3702	-165.9097	0.0000
科技馆	0.6472	-4.0501	0.0001
美术馆	0.4980	-7.4396	0.0000
群艺馆	0.6206	-3.5555	0.0004
图书馆	0.3613	-16.2089	0.0000
文化宫	0.3770	-15.0279	0.0000
文化馆	0.4556	-14.9133	0.0000
展览馆	0.4148	-11.7946	0.0000
总数	0.1980	-47.7341	0.0000

分析框架	具体指标	指标释义	q值	解释力排序
经济	GDP（X₁）	表征经济规模和增长情况	0.71^***	1
	第三产业GDP占比（X₂）	表征经济结构和发展水平	0.25^***	9
	人均可支配收入（X₃）	表征居民消费能力	0.31^***	8
	公共预算收入（X₄）	表征政府财政收入状况	0.59^***	3
	夜间灯光数据（X₅）	表征经济活跃程度	0.41^***	6
社会	年末户籍人口（X₆）	表征人口规模	0.18^**	12
	公路里程（X₇）	表征交通基础设施情况	0.23^***	10
	行政区面积（X₈）	表征行政区划大小	0.08^*	15
	城镇化率（X₉）	表征社会发展程度	0.19^***	11
文化	中小学校数（X₁₀）	表征全民教育程度	0.34^***	7
	影剧院数（X₁₁）	表征文化产业的发展状况	0.55^***	4
	文体娱乐业就业人数（X₁₂）	表征文化活力和多样性	0.68^***	2
	平均受教育年限（X₁₃）	表征教育发展水平	0.41^***	5
自然	建成区绿化覆盖率（X₁₄）	表征居民生活环境质量	0.16^***	13
	PM_2.5（X₁₅）	表征空气污染水平	0.14^**	14
	污水处理率（X₁₆）	表征居民生活环境质量	0.08	-
	平均降水量（X₁₇）	表征人居环境气候条件	0.03	-