内蒙古沿边地区生态旅游绿道选线研究——以陈巴尔虎旗为例

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.639

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为促进内蒙古沿边地区生态资源优势向经济优势的转化，以陈巴尔虎旗为研究对象，通过构建最小累积阻力（MCR）模型得出阻力面、绿道建设关键区域与潜在线路，针对其生态资源待整合、沿边景观未开发利用、开放空间缺少联系等问题，对数据进行分析和修正，确定连接关系、辐射范围及空间结构等组织形式，遴选出最优路径，最终得出陈巴尔虎旗生态旅游绿道线路规划方案。研究发现：（1）当前陈巴尔虎旗的综合成本面阻力等级呈“东南高、西北低”的格局，地势平坦、交通便利、生态资源丰富的区域更适宜建设绿道。（2）在获取最低成本路径的基础上，选择距离水系、资源点近的线路能够提升绿道吸引力和使用率，依托现有道路体系进行绿道线路建设能够降低建设难度、减少对生态系统的破坏，更符合使用者的行为习惯。（3）环状布局能够提升资源的连接度，在组织分散的生态旅游资源的同时向周围辐射，从而带动全域旅游发展。对生态旅游资源及资源线路进行梳理及分析，宏观上生成“一纵、两带、一环”的生态旅游绿道选线方案，进而提出沿边地区生态旅游绿道选线机制，为生态旅游资源的整合及绿道选线提供了现实路径。

关键词: 内蒙古沿边地区, 生态旅游, 绿道选线, 最小累积阻力模型, 陈巴尔虎旗

Abstract:

To facilitate the transformation of ecological resource advantages into economic benefits in the border areas of Inner Mongolia, China, this study focuses on Chen Barag Banner (County) and employs the minimum cumulative resistance model (MCR) to identify resistance surfaces, key areas, and potential routes for greenway construction. Addressing the challenges associated with integrating ecological resources, underdeveloped and unused landscapes along the border, and the lack of connectivity in open spaces, the study conducts an analysis and revision of data to determine organizational forms, such as connection relationships, radiation ranges, and spatial structures. An optimal path is then selected, leading to the development of a planning scheme for the Chen Barag Banner ecotourism greenway route. The findings reveal that: (1) The comprehensive resistance of Chen Barag Banner’s cost surface is currently high in the southeast and low in the northwest. Areas characterized by flat terrain, convenient transportation, and abundant ecological resources are more suitable for greenway construction. (2) By selecting routes that are proximate to river systems and resource points while optimizing for the lowest cost path, the attractiveness and utilization rate of greenways can be enhanced. Constructing greenway lines along existing road systems reduces construction complexity, minimizes ecosystem disruption, and aligns with user behavior patterns. (3) Implementing a ring layout improves resource connectivity by organizing dispersed ecotourism resources and extending their influence to surrounding areas, thereby fostering regional tourism development. Through the systematic analysis of ecotourism resources and potential routes, the study proposes a macro-level ecotourism greenway route selection scheme described as “one vertical, two belts, and one ring.” This approach establishes a mechanism for greenway route selection in border areas, offering a practical pathway for the integration of ecotourism resources and the development of greenway routes.

Key words: Inner Mongolia border area, ecotourism, greenway route selection, minimum cumulative resistance model, Chen Barag Banner

林墨飞, 矫红运, 李珍. 内蒙古沿边地区生态旅游绿道选线研究——以陈巴尔虎旗为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(11): 1970-1980.

LIN Mofei, JIAO Hongyun, LI Zhen. Ecotourism greenway route selection in Inner Mongolia border area: A case of Chen Barag Banner[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(11): 1970-1980.

图/表 14

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

表3

表4

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 35

[1]	陈田, 虞虎, 王甫园. 迈向可持续目标的中国生态旅游发展研究[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2021, 11(1): 78-94. doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20210001
	[Chen Tian, Yu Hu, Wang Fuyuan. Research on ecotourism development in China: Moving towards the goal of sustainability[J]. Ecotourism, 2021, 11(1): 78-94.]
[2]	钟林生, 马向远, 曾瑜皙. 中国生态旅游研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(6): 679-690. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.06.002
	[Zhong Linsheng, Ma Xiangyuan, Zeng Yuxi. Progresses and prospects of ecotourism research in China[J]. Progress in Georeaphy, 2016, 35(6): 679-690.]
[3]	胡剑双, 戴菲. 中国绿道研究进展[J]. 中国园林, 2010, 26(12): 88-93.
	[Hu Jianshuang, Dai Fei. Progresses of greenways research in China[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2010, 26(12): 88-93.]
[4]	林墨飞, 王慧娴. 辽吉沿边地区生态旅游绿道规划研究[J]. 城市建筑, 2022, 19(15): 6-8, 29.
	[Lin Mofei, Wang Huixian. Study on ecotourism greenway planning in the border areas of Liaoning and Jilin Province[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2022, 19(15): 6-8, 29.]
[5]	Little C E. Greenways for American[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1991, 57(3): 387-388.
[6]	Fábos J G. Greenway planning in the United States: Its origins and recent case studies[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68(2-3): 321-342.
[7]	Searns R M. The evolution of greenways as an adaptive urban landscape form[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 33(1-3): 65-80.
[8]	Little C E. Greenways for America[M]. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1995.
[9]	Ahern J. Greenways as a planning strategy[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 33(1): 131-155.
[10]	Bischoff A. Greenways as vehicles for expression[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 33(94): 317-325.
[11]	Yabes R, Shetter K, Schneeman J. Urban waterways: Changing historical uses and users in a southwestern desert city[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997(39): 167-185.
[12]	Jang M, Kang C D. Urban greenway and compact land use development: A multilevel assessment in Seoul, South Korea[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 143: 160-172.
[13]	Hunter R F, Cleland C, Cleary A, et al. Environmental health wellbeing social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis[J]. Environment International, 2019, 130: 104923, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923.
[14]	Miller W, Collins M G, Steiner F R, et al. An approach for greenway suitability analysis[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 42(2): 91-105.
[15]	Teng M J, Wu C G, Zhou Z X, et al. Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: A framework integrating priorities and a least-cost path model[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 103(1): 1-14.
[16]	Drielsma M J, Else F, Murray E, et al. Assessing collaborative, privately managed biodiversity conservation derived from an offsets program: Lessons from the southern mallee of New South Wales, Australia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 59: 59-70.
[17]	Julien C, James M. Landscape typology and ecological connectivity assessment to inform greenway design[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651(2): 3241-3252.
[18]	何昉. 中国绿道规划设计研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2018.
	[He Fang. Study on greenway planning and design in China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2018.]
[19]	董晓峰, 梁颖, 侯波, 等. 基于资源环境评价系统构建的京津冀城市群绿道选线研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(12): 118-127, 2.
	[Dong Xiaofeng, Liang Ying, Hou Bo, et al. Research on greenway route selection mathod of urban agglomeration based on resource and environment assessment system: Taking Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration as an example[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(12): 118-127, 2.]
[20]	王海珍, 张利权. 基于GIS景观格局和网络分析法的厦门本岛生态网络规划[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(1): 144-152. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0019
	[Wang Haizhen, Zhang Liquan. A GIS, landscape pattern and network analysis based planning of ecological networks for Xiamen Island[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(1): 144-152.] doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0019
[21]	黄浦江. 城市绿道网络识别、评价与优化[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2014.
	[Huang Pujiang. Identification, assessment and optimizationg of greenway networks in urban area[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2014.]
[22]	李海龙. 基于最小累积阻力模型的川西高原绿道游径系统线路规划方法研究——以康定市为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(11): 58-64.
	[Li Hailong. Western Sichuan Plateau greenway trails system planning method based on MCR model[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(11): 58-64.]
[23]	刘铮, 王世福, 赵楠楠. 全球绿道运动中的中国实践: 理念思辨与理论展望[J]. 南方建筑, 2017(4): 23-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2017.04.023
	[Liu Zheng, Wang Shifu, Zhao Nannan. The localized practice of greenway: Ideal speculation and theoretical prospect[J]. South Architecture, 2017(4): 23-29.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2017.04.023
[24]	姚朋, 孙一豪, 奚秋蕙, 等. 耦合多元价值的生态风景道规划研究——以乌兰察布四横交通带风景道为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(4): 101-106.
	[Yao Peng, Sun Yihao, Xi Qiuhui, et al. Research on ecological scenic byways planning coupled with multiple values: Taking Ulanqab four horizontal traffic belt as an example[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(4): 101-106.]
[25]	丁纯璐, 马健霄, 朱宁. 基于层次分析法的城市绿道综合评价研究[J]. 森林工程, 2020, 36(2): 81-90.
	[Ding Chunlu, Ma Jianxiao, Zhu Ning. Research on comprehensive evaluation of urban greenway based on AHP[J]. Forest Engineering, 2020, 36(2): 81-90.]
[26]	李红, 刘伟平. 沿边地区开放平台及其经济效率时空演化分析[J]. 区域经济评论, 2023, 6: 102-110.
	[Li Hong, Liu Weiping. Analysis of the spatiotemporal evolution of open platforms and economic efficiency in border areas[J]. Regional Economic Review, 2023, 6: 102-110.]
[27]	汪德根, 陆林, 陈田, 等. 我国边境省区入境客源市场结构及开发战略研究——以内蒙古自治区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2004, 27(4): 615-621.
	[Wang Degen, Lu Lin, Chen Tian, et al. Structure of the overseas tourist market and the development strategy in the frontier provinces and autonomous regions in China: A case study in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2004, 27(4): 615-621.]
[28]	杨蕾. 呼伦贝尔市旅游业发展中存在的问题及对策研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
	[Yang Lei. Research on the problems and countermeasures in the development of tourism in Hulunbeier City[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015.]
[29]	邓晓娟, 李晶, 殷守强, 等. 陈巴尔虎旗土地生态状况评价及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(11): 162-172.
	[Deng Xiaojuan, Li Jing, Yin Shouqiang, et al. Evaluation of land ecological conditions and analysis of influencing factors in Chen Barag Banner[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(11): 162-172.]
[30]	周盼, 吴雪飞, 陶丹凤, 等. 基于多重目标的绿道选线规划研究——以草原丝绸之路(元上都至元中都段)文化线路为例[J]. 规划师, 2014, 30(8): 121-126.
	[Zhou Pan, Wu Xuefei, Tao Danfeng, et al. Multi-objectives green corridor planning: The Prairie Silk Road case[J]. Planners, 2014, 30(8): 121-126.]
[31]	汪民, 贾建玲, 张俊磊. 基于适宜性评价的厦门市海沧区绿道选线规划[J]. 华中建筑, 2015, 33(10): 83-89.
	[Wang Min, Jia Jianling, Zhang Junlei. Greenway site selection in Haicang District of Xiamen based on suitability assessment[J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2015, 33(10): 83-89.]
[32]	李洪庆, 杨瑀, 张俊红. 雅鲁藏布江山南宽谷流域生态安全格局构建[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1503-1513. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.551
	[Li Hongqing, Yang Yu, Zhang Junhong. Construction of ecological security pattern in Shannan Wide Valley Basin of Yarlung Zangbo River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1503-1513.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.551
[33]	李伊彤, 荣丽华, 李文龙, 等. 生态重要性视角下东北林区县域生态安全格局研究——以呼伦贝尔市阿荣旗为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1615-1625. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.577
	[Li Yitong, Rong Lihua, Li Wenlong, et al. Ecological security pattern at county level in northeast forest area of China from the perspective of ecological importance: A case of Arun Banner in Hulun Buir City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(5): 1615-1625.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.577
[34]	张玮. 基于最小累积阻力模型的绿道选线研究[D]. 太原: 山西农业大学, 2017.
	[Zhang Wei. Study of greenway site selection based on minimum cumulative resistance model with Wutai greenway for example[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017.]
[35]	Knaapen J P, Scheffer M, Harms B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1992, 23(1): 1-16.

阻力面	指标因子	分级标准	阻力值
生态条件	高程/m	411~586	1
		586~645	3
		645~733	5
		733~833	7
		833~1117	9
	坡度/(°)	<2.5	1
		2.5~8	3
		8~15	5
		15~25	7
		>25	9
	植被覆盖度/%	<85	1
		70~85	3
		50~70	5
		25~50	7
		>25	9
	土地利用类型	草地	1
		水、林地	3
		耕地	5
		建设用地	7
		裸地	9
	水系/m	50	1
		50~100	3
		100~250	5
		250~500	7
		500	9

阻力面	指标因子	分级标准	阻力值
游憩条件	一级资源点/m	<800	1
		800~1000	3
		1000~2100	5
		2100~3000	7
		>3000	9
	二级资源点/m	<500	1
		500~800	3
		800~1500	5
		1500~2100	7
		>2100	9
	一级道路/m	<500	1
		500~800	3
		800~1500	5
		1500~2100	7
		>2100	9
	二级道路/m	<300	1
		300~500	3
		500~1000	5
		1000~2100	7
		>2100	9

序号	名称	权重	等级
1	1732胡列也吐景区	13.6	1
2	莫日格勒旅游景区	12.8	1
3	呼伦贝尔大草原巴彦塔拉草原景区	12.7	1
4	呼和诺尔旅游景区	10.7	1
5	186彩带河	10.4	1
6	郭古道阿拉山	8.5	2
7	呼伦贝尔草甸草原	6.1	2
8	白音哈达草原景区	5.0	2
9	金帐汗旅游部落	3.9	2
10	天下草原蒙古魂游牧文化部落	2.8	2
11	一代天骄中电生态草原度假区	2.5	2
12	莫日根生态游	2.1	2
13	白音盟古乐旅游景区	2.0	2
14	八大关旅游景区	1.6	2
15	华德湖	1.6	2
16	爱琴岛	1.5	2
17	陈巴尔虎旗民族博物馆	1.0	2
18	巴尔虎狼岛	0.8	2

阻力面	权重	指标因子	权重
生态条件	0.6	高程	0.12
		坡度	0.20
		植被覆盖度	0.13
		土地利用类型	0.30
		水系	0.25
游憩条件	0.4	一级资源点	0.45
		二级资源点	0.25
		一级道路	0.10
		二级道路	0.20