土地利用功能变化与农户响应研究进展

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2019.02.18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： LUCC是表达土地系统的主要方法之一，但仅利用LUCC已不能完整理解土地系统的变化，而通过土地利用功能变化的研究加深对土地系统的认识已成为国内外学者的共识。目前，探讨和分析宏观土地利用功能变化与微观主体行为间的相互影响机制，已成为土地利用功能变化研究急需解决的问题。本文从土地利用功能表达与变化研究、土地利用功能变化的微观响应机制等两个方面，对土地利用功能变化与农户响应的研究进展进行归纳与总结，结论如下：（1）需进一步完善土地利用功能类型的表达方式和方法，使其在表达宏观土地利用功能分异规律的同时，亦能表达微观主体土地利用行为的信息；（2）还需借鉴土地利用决策和多模型整合的理论与方法对土地利用功能及其微观响应进行模拟。同时，指出发展土地利用功能变化下农户响应的有限理性决策模型，探索多模型整合的方式与方法就成为今后研究的重要任务。它对于认识和理解该宏观土地利用功能变化下微观主体的响应，进而引导农户土地利用行为，具有十分重要的理论和现实意义。

关键词: 土地利用功能类型, 微观主体, 农户土地利用行为, 模拟

Abstract: Land use cover/change (LUCC) is one of the main methods to represent the land use function. There is an emerging consensus among scholars that land use system cannot be fully understood by the LUCC alone, and land use function should be paid more attention in the future. It becomes urgent to discuss and understand the interaction mechanism between the macro land use function pattern and the micro behavior of the land use agent. In this paper, two issues, namely the representation of land use function and the farmers’ respond under the change of the land use function are explored and illustrated. Several conclusions can be drawn as follows: (1) the method of representing the land use function should be improved, the information of the macro pattern of the land use function and the micro stakeholders’ land use behavior should be included. (2) The models to simulate the land use function may be established using the theory and method of decision-making and the integration of the land use models at different levels. The future research will be the construction of the limited rational decision-make model about the farmers’ response under the change of land use function and the exploration of ways and methods of multi-model integration. It is vital in both theory and practice to understand the response of farmers to the change of macro land use function, and to guide farmers’ land use behavior.

Key words: the categories of the land use function, micro agent, land use behavior of farmers, simulation

梁小英 , 段宁, 刘康. 土地利用功能变化与农户响应研究进展[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(2): 385-491.

LIANG Xiao-ying, DUAN Ning, LIU Kang. Research review on the land use function change and the farmers’ response[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(2): 385-491.

参考文献 48

[1]	VERBURG P H, STEEG J, VELDKAMP A, et al. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(3): 1327-1335.<br />
[2]	REENBERG A. Global land science: From land use analysis to land system analysis[C]// 2nd GLP Open Science Meeting, Berlin, 2014.<br />
[3]	唐华俊, 吴文斌, 余强毅, 等. 农业土地系统研究及其关键科学问题[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(5): 900-910. [TANG Huajun, WU Wenbin, YU Qiangyi, et al. Key research priorities for agricultural land system studies[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(5): 900-910.]<br />
[4]	樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 339-350. [FAN Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.]<br />
[5]	国务院. 国务院关于印发全国主体功能区规划的通知[G]. 国发[2010]46号, 2010. [The State Council of China. The information of the major function oriented zoning issued by The State Council of China[G]. [2010] No.46, 2010.]<br />
[6]	李芬, 甄霖, 黄河清, 等. 土地利用功能变化与利益相关者受偿意愿及经济补偿研究——以鄱阳湖生态脆弱区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(4): 580-589. [LI Fen, ZHEN Lin, HUANG Heqin, et al. Impacts of land use functional change on WTA and economic compensation for core stakeholders: A case studyin Poyang lake[J]. Resources Science, 2009, 31(4): 580-589.]<br />
[7]	高永年, 高俊峰, 许妍. 太湖流域水生态功能区土地利用变化的景观生态风险效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(7): 1088-1096.[GAO Yongnian, GAO Junfeng, XU Yan. Response of landscape ecological risk to land use change in level I aquatic eco-functional regions in Taihu lake watershed[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(7): 1088-1096.]<br />
[8]	甄霖, 魏云洁, 谢高地, 等. 中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(24): 6749-6761. [ZHEN Lin, WEI Yunjie, XIE Gaodi, et al. Regional analysis of dynamic land use functions in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(24): 6749-6761.]<br />
[9]	唐华俊, 吴文斌, 杨鹏, 等. 土地利用/土地覆被变化(LUCC) 模型研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 456-468. [TANG Huajun, WU Wenbin, YANG Peng, et al. Recent progresses of land use and land cover change(LUCC) models[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 456-468.]<br />
[10]	李德一, 张树文, 吕学军, 等. 主体功能区情景下的土地系统变化模拟[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2011, 27(3): 50-53.[LI Deyi, ZHANG Shuwen, LV Xuejun, et al. Land system change modeling in main functional-oriented zoning scenarios[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2011, 27(3):50-53.]<br />
[11]	ERB K H. How a socio-ecological metabolism approach can help to advance our understanding of changes in land-use intensity[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 76(100): 8-14.<br />
[12]	COSTANZA R, ARGE R D, GROOT R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. <br />
[13]	STAAL S J. Transregional analysis of crop-livestock systems: Understanding intensification and evolution across three continents, Ecoregional Fund[R]. The Netherlands Final program report, 2005. <br />
[14]	ELLIS E C, RAMANKUTTY N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2008, 6(8): 439-447.<br />
[15]	胡忠秀, 周忠学. 西安市绿地生态系统服务功能测算及其空间格局研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(3): 553-560. [HU Zhongxiu, ZHOU Zhongxue. Ecosystem services evalution and its spatial pattern analysis of unban green land in Xi'an City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(3): 553-560.]<br />
[16]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746. [XIE Gaodi, ZHANG Caixia, ZHANG Changsun, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.]<br />
[17]	陈秉谱, 常兆丰, 乔娟. 退耕还林和荒山禁牧的相对生态价值的估算——以甘肃省靖远县永新乡为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(6): 1144-1152. [CHEN Bingpu, CHANG Zhaofeng, QIAO Juan. Estimation of relative ecological value of returning farmland to forest & mountain enclosure: A case of Yongxin Township of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(6): 1144-1152.]<br />
[18]	刘沛, 段建南, 王伟, 等. 土地利用系统功能分类与评价体系研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 36(1): 113-118. [LIU Pei, DUAN Jiannan, WANG Wei, et al. Study on systems of the land-use system functional classification and evaluation[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 2010, 36(1): 113-118.]<br />
[19]	李德一, 张树文, 吕学军, 等. 基于栅格的土地利用功能变化监测方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(8): 1297-1305.[LI Deyi, ZHANG Shuwen, LV Xuejun, et al. Changing detection method of land use functions based on geographical grid[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(8): 1297-1305.]<br />
[20]	梁小英, 顾铮鸣, 雷敏, 等. 土地利用功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究——以陕西省蓝田县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(7): 1127-1135. [LIANG Xiaoying, GU Zhengming, LEI Min, et al. The Differences between land use function and land use to reflecting the change of land use system and their impacts on landscape pattern: A case study of Lantian county in Shaanxi province, China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(7): 1127-1135.]<br />
[21]	易湘生, 王静爱, 岳耀杰. 基于沙区土地利用功能分类的土地利用变化与模式研究——以陕北榆阳沙区为例[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 44(4): 439-443. [YI Xiangsheng, WANG Jing'ai, YUE Yaojie. LUCC and land use pattern based on a functional desert land classification system: A case study for Yuyang desert in Northern Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2008, 44(4): 439-443.]<br />
[22]	彭建, 刘志聪, 刘焱序. 农业多功能性评价研究进展[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2014, 35(6): 1-8. [ PENG Jian, LIU Zhicong, LIU Yanxu. Research progress on assessing multi-functionality of agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2014, 35(6): 1-8.]<br />
[23]	彭建, 王仰麟, 张源. 滇西北生态脆弱区土地利用变化及其生态效应——以云南省永胜县为例[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 629-638. [PENG Jian, WANG Yanglin, ZHANG Yuan. Land use change and its ecological effect in the ecotone of Northwest of Yunnan Province, China: A case study of Yongsheng County[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(4): 629-638.<br />
[24]	WILLEMEN L, VELDKAMP A, VERBURG P H, et al. A multi-scale modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 100: 86-95.<br />
[25]	PARACCHINI M L, PACINI C, JONES M L M, et al. An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11(1): 71-80.<br />
[26]	刘超, 许月卿, 孙丕苓, 等. 土地利用多功能性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(9): 1087-1099. [LIU Chao, XU Yueqing, SUN Peiling, et al. Progress and prospects of multi-functionality of land use research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(9): 1087-1099.]<br />
[27]	BENJAMIN K, BOUCHARD A, DOMON G. Abandoned farmlands as components of rural landscapes: An analysis of perceptions and representations[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 83(4): 228-244.<br />
[28]	张红姣. 土地流转和失地农民社会保障的相互关系研究[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2010, 31: 53-54. [ZHANG Hongjiao. Study on the relationship between land circulation and social security of land-lost farmers[J]. Economic Research Guide, 2007, 31: 53-54 ]<br />
[29]	张雪靓, 孔祥斌, 王洪雨, 等. 区域耕地社会保障功能替代程度及其差异研究[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(8): 1555-1566. [ZHANG Xueliang, KONG Xiangbin, WANG Hongyu, et al. Regional substitution of farmland social insurance function[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(8): 1555-1566.]<br />
[30]	HANNES J K, ARANKA P, KATHARINA H, et al. Confronting international research topics with stakeholders on multifunctional land use: The case of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. iForest-Biogeosciences & Forestry, 2014, 7(6): 403-413.<br />
[31]	施园园, 赵华甫, 郧文聚, 等. 北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(2): 247-257. [SHI Yuanyuan, ZHAO Huapu, YUN Wenju, et al. Analysis on spatial differentiation of arable land multifunction and socio-economic coordination model in Beijing[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(2): 247-257.]<br />
[32]	CALLO-CONCHA D, DENICH M. A participatory framework to assess multifunctional land-use systems with multicriteria and multivariate analyses: A case study on agrobiodiversity of agroforestry systems in Tomé Açú, Brazil[J]. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 2014, 1(1): 40-50.<br />
[33]	苗建青, 谢世友, 袁道先, 等. 基于农户—生态经济模型的耕地石漠化人文成因研究——以重庆市南川区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(6): 967-979. [MIAO Jianqing, XIE Shiyou, YUAN Daoxian, et al. An application of bio-economic household model to analysis of the cause for karst rock desertification in Southwest China[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(6): 967-979.]<br />
[34]	刘勤. 土地流转的社会风险: 皖中宋村调查[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(29): 16557-16559. [LIU Qin. Social risk of land transfer: Investigation on song village in middle Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(29): 16557-16559.]<br />
[35]	ROUNSEVELLA M D A, PEDROLI G B M, ERB K H, et al. Challenges for land system science[J]. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(4): 899-910.<br />
[36]	COSTANZA R, RUTH M. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus[J]. Environmental Management, 1998, 22(2): 183-195.<br />
[37]	VERBURG P H, VELDKAMP A, FRESCO L O. Simulation of changes in the spatial pattern of land use in China[J]. Applied Geography, 1999, 19(3): 211-233.<br />
[38]	PURNOMO H, GUILLERMO G A, PRABHU R. Developing multi-stakeholder forest management scenarios: A multi-agent system simulation approach applied in Indonesia[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2005, 77(4): 475-491.<br />
[39]	黎夏, 叶嘉安, 刘小平, 等. 地理模拟系统: 元胞自动机与多智能体[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007. [LI Xia, YE Jia'an, LIU Xiaoping, et al. Geographical simulation system: Cellular automata and multi-agent system[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007.]<br />
[40]	LIGTENBERG A, MONICA W. A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 72(1): 43-55.<br />
[41]	王艳妮, 陈海, 宋世雄, 等. 基于CR-BDI模型的农户作物种植行为模拟——以陕西省米脂县姜兴庄为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(10): 1258-1268. [WANG Yanni, CHEN Hai, SONG Shixiong, et al. Simulation of households' planting behavior based on a CR-BDI model: Case study of Jiangxingzhuang Village of Mizhi County in Shaanxi Province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(10): 1258- 1268.]<br />
[42]	宋世雄, 梁小英, 梅亚军, 等. 基于CBDI的农户耕地撂荒行为模型构建及模拟研究——以陕西省米脂县冯阳坬村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11): 1926-1937. [Song Shixiong, Liang Xiaoying, Mei Yajun, et al. Modeling and simulating land abandonment behavior of farmer households based on the CBDI: A case study of Fengyanggua Village in Mizhi County of Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(11): 1926-1937.]<br />
[43]	陈海, 杨维鸽, 梁小英, 等. 基于Multi-Agent System的多尺度土地利变化模型的构建及模拟[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(8): 1519-1527. [CHEN Hai, YANG Weige, LIANG Xiaoying, et al. Multi-scale modeling of land use based on the MAS from field to village: A case study for Mengcha Village of Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(8): 1519-1527.]<br />
[44]	FEOLA G, BINDER C R. Towards an improved understanding of farmers’ behavior: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(12): 2323-2333.<br />
[45]	CASTELLA J C, KAM S P, DANG D Q, et al. Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam[J]. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(3): 531-545.<br />
[46]	WASHINGTONOTTOMBRE C, PIJANOWSKI B, CAMPBELL D, et al. Using a role-playing game to inform the development of land-use models for the study of a complex socio-ecological system[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2010, 103(3): 117-126.<br />
[47]	STEPHEN J, WALSH S J, GEORGE P, et al. Design of an agent-based model to examine population-environment interactions in Nang Rong District, Thailand[J]. Applied Geography, 2013, 39(1): 183-198.<br />
[48]	FEOLA G, BINDER C R. Identifying and investigating pesticide application types to promote a more sustainable pesticide use: The case of smallholders in Boyacá, Colombia[J]. Crop Protection, 2010, 29(6): 612-622.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

446

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	0	0	0	446

From	Others	local

Times	257	189
Rate	58%	42%

Abstract

269

From	Others	local

Times	267	2
Rate	99%	1%

Cited

Shared