收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 429-439.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.291 cstr: 32274.14.ALG2025291

• 新质生产力赋能旅游高质量发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国旅游新质生产力发展时空演化特征与驱动因素

刘法建(), 梁婉欣, 黄超群(), 李松渊, 张博涵   

  1. 安徽大学商学院,安徽 合肥 230601
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-22 修回日期:2025-07-01 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 黄超群(2000-),男,博士研究生,主要从事旅游可持续发展等方面的研究. E-mail: 13095520657@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘法建(1982-),男,博士,教授,主要从事区域旅游发展、乡村旅游、旅游创新创业等方面的研究. E-mail: 12027@ahu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42071196)

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and driving factors of tourism new quality productivity development in China

LIU Fajian(), LIANG Wanxin, HUANG Chaoqun(), LI Songyuan, ZHANG Bohan   

  1. School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui, China
  • Received:2025-05-22 Revised:2025-07-01 Published:2026-03-25 Online:2026-03-24

摘要:

加快发展旅游新质生产力是实现旅游业高质量发展的有效路径。基于2011—2023年中国30个省(自治区、直辖市)(除西藏和港澳台以外)的面板数据,从旅游高科技、旅游高效能、旅游高质量和旅游绿色化4个维度构建旅游新质生产力发展水平测度指标,运用综合评价法、Dagum基尼系数法及动态定性比较分析(QCA)法分析其时空特征与驱动机制。结果显示:(1)2011—2023年全国各省(自治区、直辖市)旅游新质生产力发展水平呈增长趋势,但区域间不均衡显著,东部地区领先,中部地区次之,西部和东北地区滞后。(2)“十二五”到“十四五”前期,东部、中部、西部及东北地区的旅游新质生产力发展差距不断缩小,但区域内差异仍显著。(3)经济发展水平、技术进步程度是旅游新质生产力发展水平的主要影响因素,形成经济-市场-政策驱动在内的多种驱动模式。研究结果为各区域提高旅游新质生产力发展水平、实现高质量发展提供实践指导。

关键词: 旅游新质生产力, 发展水平, 驱动因素, 动态QCA

Abstract:

Accelerating the development of tourism new quality productivity is an effective pathway to achieve high-quality growth in the tourism industry. Based on panel data from 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities)(excluding Xizang, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) in China from 2011 to 2023, this study constructs an evaluation index system for the development level of tourism new quality productivity from four dimensions: high technology, high efficiency, high-quality, and green sustainability, using a comprehensive evaluation method, the Dagum Gini coefficient, and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis to explore the spatiotemporal characteristics and driving mechanisms. The results reveal that (1) The development level of tourism new quality productivity exhibited an overall growing trend across provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2011 to 2023, but with significant regional disparities, that is, the eastern region led, followed by the central region, whereas the western and northeastern regions lagged behind. (2) From the “12th Five-Year Plan” to the early stage of the “14th Five-Year Plan”, the development gap in tourism new quality productivity among the eastern, central, western, and northeastern regions narrowed continuously, although intra-regional differences remained pronounced. (3) Economic developmental level and technological advancement were identified as major influencing factors in the development of tourism new quality productivity, forming multiple driving patterns, including economic-market-and-policy drivers. The findings provide practical guidance for enhancing the development of tourism new quality productivity across regions and achieving high-quality development.

Key words: tourism new quality productivity, development level, driving factors, dynamic QCA