收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 235-244.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.138 cstr: 32274.14.ALG2025138

• 新质生产力赋能旅游高质量发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河流域冰雪旅游目的地可达性及影响因素研究

陈宇(), 岳游松()   

  1. 天津体育学院体育文化研究中心,天津 301617
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-13 修回日期:2025-06-13 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-02-27
  • 通讯作者: 岳游松(1975-),男,博士,教授,主要从事体育文化等方面的研究. E-mail: yueyousong@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈宇(1995-),男,博士研究生,主要从事体育旅游等方面的研究. E-mail: cy19952013@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家哲学社会科学基金项目(20ATY001)

Accessibility and influencing factors of ice and snow tourism destinations in the Yellow River Basin

CHEN Yu(), YUE Yousong()   

  1. Culture Research Center of Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin 301617, China
  • Received:2025-03-13 Revised:2025-06-13 Published:2026-02-25 Online:2026-02-27

摘要:

冰雪旅游正成为区域经济与文化振兴的关键动力之一。综合运用可达性测度方法、冷热点分析、地理探测器等方法,测算了黄河流域冰雪旅游目的地的可达性,并分析了其空间分布特征及影响因素。研究发现:(1) 黄河流域冰雪旅游目的地在空间分布上呈现“东密西疏、集群分布”的特征,下游地区数量最多,上游地区最少;省域层面山东、山西和河南3省较多,市域层面济南、郑州、青岛数量较多。(2) 黄河流域冰雪旅游目的地可达性呈现“下游便捷、中游适中、上游受限”的空间格局,旅游体验型的数量占优,但可达性偏弱。(3) 黄河流域冰雪旅游目的地可达性热点区和次热点区主要分布在山东和河南北部城市;冷点区和次冷点区主要分布在上游和中游地区的城市。(4) 黄河流域冰雪旅游目的地可达性受社会、经济和生态三维因素的综合作用,其中公路里程、城市化率和年均降雪量是主要影响因素。研究结果为优化黄河流域冰雪旅游资源配置及区域协调发展提供了科学参考。

关键词: 冰雪旅游, 目的地, 可达性, 体育旅游, 黄河流域

Abstract:

Ice and snow tourism has emerged as a crucial driving force for regional economic and cultural revitalization. This study employs accessibility measurement, hotspot analysis, and geographic detectors to evaluate the accessibility of ice and snow tourism destinations in the Yellow River Basin. We also examine their spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors. The main findings show that: (1) Ice and snow tourism destinations in the Yellow River Basin exhibit an uneven spatial distribution characterized by a “dense east and sparse west” pattern. Moreover, clustering tendencies are apparent, wherein the downstream region contains the highest number of destinations, whereas the upstream region has the fewest. At the provincial scale, Shandong, Shanxi, and Henan have relatively more destinations, and at the municipal scale, Jinan, Zhengzhou, and Qingdao lead in the number of destinations. (2) Accessibility to ice and snow tourism destinations in the Yellow River Basin reveals a spatial gradient, described as “convenient in the downstream, moderate in the midstream, and restricted in the upstream areas”. The experiential tourism destinations dominate numerically; however, their overall accessibility remains relatively weak. (3) Hotspots and subhotspots of accessibility to ice and snow tourism destinations in the Yellow River Basin are concentrated in cities within Shandong and northern Henan. In contrast, cold spots and subcold spots mainly occur in cities located within the upstream and midstream regions. (4) A combination of social, economic, and ecological factors jointly influences accessibility to ice and snow tourism destinations in the Yellow River Basin. Specifically, road mileage, urbanization rate, and annual average snowfall comprise the primary determinants. These findings provide a scientific reference for optimizing resource allocation and promoting coordinated regional development in the Yellow River Basin’s ice and snow tourism sector.

Key words: ice and snow tourism, destination, accessibility, sports tourism, Yellow River Basin