限制开发生态区农户生态补偿参与意愿及其影响因素——以宁夏盐池县为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以宁夏盐池县为例，基于前期宁夏限制开发生态区主体功能细分方案，利用农户调查数据，采用Logistic回归模型分析了农户生态补偿的参与意愿及影响因素。结论包括：（1）农户对生态补偿政策的满意度较高，不同类型区农户对政策的满意度有明显差异。（2）农户对政策的认知不高，弱限制开发区农户对生态补偿政策的认知最高，中限制开发区、禁止开发区农户的认知水平次之，强限制开发区农户的认知水平最低。（3）农户生态补偿的参与意愿较高，各类型区在空间上具有明显差异。（4）前期政策满意度、人均耕地面积、人均草地面积、羊只存栏量、户主年龄、农户家庭收入情况、非农收入比重等指标对农户参与生态补偿政策的意愿有显著影响。其中，先期政策满意度、农户家庭收入情况、非农收入比重等指标具有正向作用，其他指标具有负向作用。

关键词: 生态补偿, 意愿, 影响因素, 盐池县

Abstract: Ecological compensation represents a positive approach to protect the ecosystem, which has become an important tool in defining the global environment and development policy. As an ecologically fragile area, the development-restricted ecological zones are mainly responsible for ecological functions, and the activities that contradict ecological protection functions are limited. Therefore, the ecological compensation policy is applied in those zones with the intention to inspire and encourage the farmers in the zones to participate in the ecological environment protection and construction. It is of great significance to fully understand the farmers' participation willingness and its influencing factors to ensure a successful implementation of ecological compensation projects. Taking Yanchi County of Ningxia Province, China as an example, this study used the Logistic regression model to analyze the farmers' participation willingness and its influencing factors in the ecological compensation services applied in the development-restricted ecological area, based on the main function subdivision results of the development-restricted ecological zones in Ningxia and the household survey data. The main conclusions are as follows:(1)In general the farmers' satisfaction on the ecological compensation policy was high with an obvious regional difference based on different types of ecological zones. The satisfaction achieved the highest in the development-strongly-restricted zone, the lowest in the development-prohibited zone. The satisfaction had its medium value in the development-restricted zone and the development-weakly-restricted zone;(2)the farmers' cognizance of the policy was generally not high. 51.98% of the farmers had the knowledge about the policy and 28.31% of the farmers heard of the ecological compensation policy, without knowing the specific content of the policy, and 19.71% of the farmers do not understand it at all. In all types of zones, farmers in the developmentweakly-restricted zone had the highest cognizance level, followed by those in the development-restricted zone and those in the development-prohibited zone, and the farmers in the development-strongly-restricted zone had the lowest cognizance level;(3) the farmers' participation willingness was generally high with 73.12% of the farmers who responded positively to the ecological compensation policy willing to continue to participate in the new round of grazing grass ecological engineering, and 26.88% farmers who believed that the implementation of ecological compensation had a larger impact on its negative side, not willing to continue to participate. The farmers' willingness to participate in the program hit the highest in the development-strongly-restricted zone and the lowest in the development-prohibited zone. For the rest two zones, the willingness was in the middle. The farmer's willingness to participate in the program and his satisfaction on the previous policy were closely related;(4) the farmers' satisfaction on the previous policy, the arable land per capita, per capita grassland area, sheep stocks, age of householder, household income, the proportion of non-agricultural income have a significant impact on the willingness of farmers to participate in the ecological compensation policy. The satisfaction on previous policy, family income, the proportion of non-agricultural income had the positive effect, while other factors had the negative effect.

Key words: payments for environmental services, participation, factor analysis, Yanchi County

中图分类号:

F062.2

杨美玲, 朱志玲, 任凯丽. 限制开发生态区农户生态补偿参与意愿及其影响因素——以宁夏盐池县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(3): 634-642.

YANG Mei-ling, ZHU Zhi-ling, REN Kai-li. Farmers' participation and influencing factors in payments for environmental services in limited developing ecological zones: A case of Yanchi County in Ningxia Province[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(3): 634-642.

参考文献

[1] 樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350.[FAN Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2007, 62(4):339-350.]
[2] 高国力. 如何认识我国主体功能区划及其内涵特征[J]. 中国发展观察,2007,(3):23-25.[GAO Guoli.How to understand major function oriented zoning and its connotation characteristics in China[J]. China Development Observation,2007,(3):23-25.]
[3] 孙久文. 主体功能区战略下的地区发展新思维[J]. 人民论坛, 2011,(17):8-11.[SUN Jiuwen. New ideation of regional development under the strategy of major function zoning[J]. People's Tribune, 2011,(17):8-11.]
[4] 樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(2):186-201.[FAN Jie. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2015, 70(2):186-201.]
[5] BREMER L L, FARLEY K A, LOPEZ-CARR D. What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program[J]. Land Use Policy,2014,36:122-133.
[6] DEMURGER S, PELLEITER A.Volunteer and satisfied? Rural households' participation in a payments for environmental services programme in Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015,116:25-33.
[7] MURADIAN R, CORBERA E, PASCUAL U, et al. Reconciling theory and practice:An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69:1202-1208.
[8] SHAPIRO-GARZA E. Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico's national payments for ecosystem services programs:Four sites of articulation and hybridization[J]. Geoforum,2013, 46:5-15.
[9] 赵雪雁,张丽,江进德,等. 生态补偿对农户生计的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 地理研究,2013,32(3):531-542.[ZHAO Xueyan,ZHANG Li,JIANG Jinde,et al. The impact of ecological compensation on the farmers' livelihood:A case study of Huanghe River water supply areas of Gannan[J]. Geographical Research, 2013,32(3):531-542.]
[10] BREMER L L, FARLEY K A, LOPEZ-CARR D. What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program[J]. Land Use Policy,2014,36:122-133.
[11] TORRES A B,MACMILLAN D C,SKUTSCH M,et al. Payments for ecosystem services and rural development:Landowners'preferences and potential participation in western Mexico[J]. Ecosystem Services,2013,6:72-81.
[12] MUDACA J D,TSUCHIYA T,YAMADA M,et al. Household participation in payments for ecosystem services:A case study from Mozambique[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2015, 55:21-27.
[13] SOUTHGATE D, WUNDER S. Paying for watershed services in Latin America:A review of current initiatives[J].Journal of Sustain Forest,2009,28:497-524.
[14] 赵雪雁,路慧玲,刘霜,等. 甘南黄河水源补给区生态补偿农户参与意愿分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(4):96-101.[ZHAO Xueyan,LU Huiling,LIU Shuang,et al. Analysis on farmers' willingness to participate in ecological compensation:A case of the Yellow River water supply area of Gannan[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment,2012,22(4):96-101.]
[15] 王昌海,崔丽娟,毛旭锋,等. 湿地保护区周边农户生态补偿意愿比较[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17):5345-5354.[WANG Changhai, CUI Lijuan, MAO Xufeng, et al. Comparative studies on the farmers' willingness to accept eco-compensation in wetlands nature reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(17):5345-5354.]
[16] 苏芳,尚海洋,聂华林. 农户参与生态补偿行为意愿影响因素分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(4):119-125.[SU Fang,SHANG Haiyang,NIE Hualin. Analysis of influencing factors to farming households' willingness to participate in ecological compensation[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2011,21(4):119-125.]
[17] 马爱慧,张安录. 选择实验法视角的耕地生态补偿意愿实证研究-基于湖北武汉市问卷调查[J]. 资源科学,2013,35(10):2061-2066.[MA Aihui,ZHANG Anlu. Cultivated land ecological compensation willingness based on choice periments[J]. Resources Science, 2013,35(10):2061-2066.]
[18] Theory and application of the main functional subdivision of limited development ecologicalzones[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016, 36(16):5058-5066.]
[19] 张晓东,刘湘南,赵志鹏,等. 农牧交错区生态环境质量遥感动态监测-以宁夏盐池为例[J]. 干旱区地理,2017,40(5):1070-1078.[ZHANG Xiaodong,LIU Xiangnan,ZHAO Zhipeng, et al. Dynamic monitoring of ecology and environment in the agropastral ecotone based on remote sensing:A case of Yanchi County in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J].Arid Land Georaphy, 2017,40(5):1070-1078.]
[20] 朱慧,张新焕,焦广辉,等. 三工河流域油料作物的农户种植意愿影响因素分析——基于Logistic模型和240户农户微观调查数据[J]. 自然资源学报,2012,27(3):372-381.[ZHU Hui, ZHANG Xinhuan, JIAO Guanghui, et al. Analysis on decisionmaking mechanism of farmer household in Sangong River Watershed on Logistic model[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(3):372-381.]
[21] 胡望舒,洪辉,周侃,等. 黄土丘陵区水平梯田与农民收入的关系及原因——以宁夏回族自治区固原市为例[J]. 干旱区地理,2013,36(3):536-544.[HU Wangshu,HONG Hui,ZHOU Kan,et al.Relationship of level terrace and farmers'income and its causes in Loess Hilly Region:A case study in Guyuan,Ningxia[J]. Arid Land Georaphy,2013,36(3):536-544.]
[22] 刘传明,李伯华,曾菊新. 主体功能区划若干问题探讨[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,41(4):627-631.[LIU Chuanming,LI Bohua,ZENG Juxin. Discussions on some key issues about regionalization of major development function[J]. Journal of Huazhong Normal University(Nat.Sci.), 2007, 41(4):627-631.]
[23] 危丽,杨先斌,刘燕. 农户参与意愿与退耕还林政策的可持续性[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2006,12(6):29-35.[WEI Li,YANG Xianbin,LIU Yan. Farmer's participation willingness and the sustainability of the grain-for-green project policy[J]. Joural of Chongqing University(social science edition), 2006,12(6):29-35.]
[24] 王一超,郝海广,张惠远,等. 自然保护区农户参与生态补偿的意愿及其影响因素[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(6):895-900.[WANG Yichao, HAO Haiguang, ZHANG Huiyuan,et al. Willingness of farm households in national nature reserves to participate in ecological compensation and its affecting factors[J]. Joural of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(6):895-900.]