宁夏限制开发区地域功能评价及空间分异

干旱区地理 ›› 2016, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 428-434.

宁夏限制开发区地域功能评价及空间分异

刘自强¹, 李静², 吴涛³

1 北方民族大学经济学院, 宁夏银川 750021;
2 北方民族大学管理学院, 宁夏银川 750021;
3 宁夏建设职业技术学院管理工程系, 宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2015-11-10 修回日期:2016-01-24 出版日期:2016-03-25
作者简介:刘自强(1978-), 男, 博士, 副教授, 研究方向: 农业与乡村发展. Email: nxlzq891@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金项目(12XJC790001); 国家民委经济管理重点实验室项目资助

Territorial functionality evaluation and spatial differentiation of restricted development zones in Ningxia

LIU Zi-qiang¹, LI Jing², WU Tao³

1 Institute of Economics, Beifang Universities of Nationalizes, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China;
2 Institute of Management, Beifang Universities of Nationalizes, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China;
3 Department of Management engineering, Ningxia Construction Vocational and Technical College, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China

Received:2015-11-10 Revised:2016-01-24 Online:2016-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从生态保育、粮食安全维护、人口承载、文化传承和经济发展5个方面构建了限制开发区地域功能评价指标体系, 并以宁夏为例, 在加权求和测算各功能指数的基础上, 利用ESDA法分析了空间特征. 研究表明: 2013年宁夏限制开发区各县地域功能存在显著的空间差异性和空间集聚现象, 地域多功能性的强弱势与农业发展基础、区位条件、资源禀赋、生态环境等因素具有较强的关联性.

关键词: 限制开发区, 地域功能, ESDA, 宁夏

Abstract: Quantitative evaluation on territorial functionality plays an important role in the recognition of territorial dominant function and formulation of regional development policy. But the current research focused on development mechanisms and policies of restricted development zone lacks further quantitative identification for territorial functionality. Therefore, further refine the territorial functional attributes of restricted development zone is very important for further clarifying its main functions. The paper taking 18 counties of Ningxia Province as the research objects and choosing 13 main indicators, this paper constructed an index system from ecological conservation, food security maintenance, population carrying, cultural heritage and economic development function. Then the strengths and weaknesses of territorial functionality were explored by using the Linear Weighted Method, and the spatial characteristics were analyzed with ESDA. Result show that the territorial functionality index in 18 counties has significant differences in 2013, ranging from 0.012 to 0.327. The Moran index of territorial multi-functionality indexes is 0.0179, reflecting that the distribution of territorial multi-functionality has significant geographical spatial agglomeration, which is high related with four main factors including agricultural development condition, location, natural environment and natural resources. Specifically, (1)ecological conservation- oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in the Liupanshan covered by a large number of forest; food security maintenance-oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in the Yellow River Irrigation area with good conditions for agricultural development; population carrying-oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in northern areas with better conditions for economic development; cultural heritage-oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in the areas along Yellow River and Liupanshan; and economic development-oriented functional areas are mainly distributed in northern areas with better conditions for economic development and southern areas where are the ecological migration zone.(2)Overall, the counties with strong index of territorial functionality are concentrated in Yellow River Irrigation and Liupanshan, but the other counties with weak index of territorial functionality are concentrated in central arid region.

Key words: restricted development zone, territorial functionality, ESDA, Ningxia

中图分类号:

TU982.243

刘自强, 李静, 吴涛. 宁夏限制开发区地域功能评价及空间分异[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(2): 428-434.

LIU Zi-qiang, LI Jing, WU Tao. Territorial functionality evaluation and spatial differentiation of restricted development zones in Ningxia[J]. , 2016, 39(2): 428-434.

参考文献

[1] 樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62 (4): 339-350.[FAN Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China[J]. Acta Geographical Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.]

[2] 陆大道, 樊杰. 2050: 中国的区域发展[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.[LU Dadao, FAN Jie. Regional development in China in 2050[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.]

[3] 刘彦随, 徐刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.[LIU Yansui, LIU Yu, CHEN Yufu. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China[J]. Acta Geographical Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.]

[4] 龚宵侠. 推进主体功能区形成的区域补偿政策研究[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 37(4): 72-76.[GONG Xiaoxia. A study on regional compensation policy as formed through propelling primary function[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(social sciences), 2009, 37(4): 72-76.]

[5] 蔡云辉. 论限制开发区的经济突破发展[J]. 长白学刊, 2011, (1): 36-39.[CAI Yunhui. Study on the breakthrough in the development of economy in restricted development zone[J]. Changbai Journal, 2011, (1): 36-39.]

[6] 马海龙, 樊杰, 王传胜. 我国西部地区乡村坡地聚落迁移的过程与效应[J]. 经济地理, 2008, 28(3): 450-453.[MA Hailong, FAN Jie, WANG Chuansheng. The process and effections on the rural slope-type settlement migration in west of China[J]. Economic Geography, 2008, 28(3): 450-453.]

[7] 冯德显, 张莉, 杨瑞霞, 等. 基于人地关系理论的河南省主体功能区规划研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2008, 27(1): 1-5.[FENG Dexian, ZHANG Li, YANG Ruixia, et al. A study of planning the main functional regions based on the man-nature relationship theory of Henan Province[J]. Areal Research and Hand Development, 2008, 27(1): 1-5.]

[8] 袁锋, 吴映梅, 武友德, 等. 金沙江中上游限制开发区产业结构整合与战略定位研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2009, (5): 32-36.[YUAN Fen, WUYingmei, WUYoude, et al.Astudy on industrial structure integration and strategic orientation in the restricted development zone of the upper and middle reaches of Jinsha River[J]. Areal Research and Hand Development, 2009, (5): 32-36.]

[9] 冯翠月, 米文宝, 侯雪, 等. 基于西北地区主体功能区划的产业政策研究[J]. 经济地理, 2011, 30(11): 1841-1816.[FENG Cuiyue, MI Wenbao, HOU Xue, et al. Industrial policy based on principal functional regions in northwest of China[J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 30(11): 1841-1816.]

[10] HOLMES John. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2): 142-160.

[11] RÂMNICEANUA Irina, ACKRILL Robert. EU rural development policy in the new member states: promoting multifunctionality[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2007, 23(4): 416-429.

[12] 宁夏回族自治区人民政府. 宁夏主体功能区规划[R], 2012.[The People's Government of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of Ningxia. The principal function area division of Ningxia[R]. 2012.]

[13] 刘秀丽, 张勃, 昝国江, 等. 基于生态足迹的甘肃省耕地资源可持续利用与情景预测[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(1): 84-91.[LIU Xiuli, ZHANG Bo, ZAN Guojiang, et al. Sustainable use and scenario prediction of cultivated land in Gansu Province based on ecological footprint theory[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(1): 84-91.]

[14] 陈东景, 徐中民. 生态足迹理论在我国干旱区的应用与探讨 —— 以新疆为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2001, 24(4): 305-309.[CHEN Dongjing, XU Zhongmin. Application and Discussion of ecological footprint in arid areas of China: a case study in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2001, 24(4): 305-309.]

[15] 杜子璇, 李宁, 刘忠阳, 等. 层次分析法在下垫面因子影响沙尘暴危险度研究中的应用[J]. 干旱区地理, 2007, 30(2): 184-188.[DU Zixuan, LI Ning, LIU Zhongyang, et al. Application of analytic hierarchy process to dust storm risk assessment[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2007, 30(2): 184-188.]

[16] 张海峰, 白永平, 陈琼, 等. 基于ESDA-GIS的青海省区域经济空间差异研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2009, 32(3): 454-461.[ZHANG Haifeng, BAI Yongping, CHEN Qiong, et al. Regional economic disparities in Qinghai Province based on ESDA-GIS[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2009, 32(3): 454-461.]