青藏铁路沿线滑坡泥石流灾害风险分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以多重风险评估方法为基础, 运用自然灾害风险研究的理论和风险评估模型, 结合青藏铁路沿线历史灾害数据、地图数据、气象数据以及实地调查数据等, 建立了滑坡、泥石流灾害历史致险性和潜在致险性的分析方法, 构建了以2014年青藏铁路沿线数据为基础的物理暴露、应灾能力和脆弱性分析指标体系. 通过对相关24项指标体系综合分析计算, 得出青藏铁路沿线滑坡、泥石流灾害综合风险图. 结果显示: 青藏铁路沿线滑坡、泥石流灾害高危险区有5个区段, 西格段西宁-湟源路段、关角山隧道附近以及格拉段的拉萨河谷路段滑坡、泥石流灾害风险最高; 当雄-羊八井、安多-那曲路段以及唐古拉山-温泉路段属于中等风险; 青藏铁路全线较低风险的路段有3段, 分别是青海湖盆地的海晏-天峻路段、柴达木盆地的锡铁山-南山口路段、青南高原的昆仑山口-清水河路段, 说明格拉段自然灾害风险大于西格段, 西格段滑坡和泥石流分布比较集中, 威胁路段较短, 而格拉段滑坡和泥石流分布较为分散, 威胁线路较长, 其风险高于西格段. 总体来看, 青藏铁路沿线滑坡、泥石流集中分布在山区路段, 高原面、盆地、宽谷路段线程长、区域广, 绝大多数路段基本没有滑坡、泥石流等灾害威胁. 从分析过程和结果来看, 笔者认为青藏铁路沿线滑坡、泥石流灾害的致险性与风险的分析结果能较好的吻合, 说明在青藏铁路沿线滑坡、泥石流风险评估的结果中, 致险性占主导因素. 从总体分布情况来看, 地势平坦的地方均处于低风险区, 说明沿线地形因素是滑坡、泥石流灾害的关键要素之一.

关键词: 青藏铁路, 滑坡、泥石流, 风险

Abstract: Landslide and debris flow are considered the third nature disasters in the world. Qinghai-Tibet railway is of high risk, so it is very important and necessary to assess the risk of landslide and debris flow disaster accurately and objectively for avoiding harm from disasters. Based on the theory of natural disaster risk research and risk assessment model, selecting 24 landslide and debris flow disasters along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway and historical disaster data, map data, meteorological data and field survey data along the Qinghai-Tibet railway, and by using the method of Multi-risk assessment, this paper established an analysis method for historical risks and potential risk of the landslide and debris flow, built an analysis index system for physical exposure, vulnerability and disaster response capacity based on the data of Qinghai-Tibet railway in 2014, and worked out a comprehensive risk map about landslide and debris flow disasters along Qinghai-Tibet railway. Results show that the high-risk group of landslide and debris flow disasters along Qinghai-Tibet railway has five sections. Therein, in section of Xining-Golmud, Xining-Huangyuan, near the tunnel of Guan-Jiao Mount and Lhasa Valley, the landslides and debris flows risk are the highest; in section of Damxung-Yangbajing, Anduo-Naqu and Tanggula Mount-Hot Springs, the landslides and debris flows risk are in middle level; the landslide and debris flow risk in the rest sections are low, which include three sections as section of HaiYan-Tianjun in Qinghai Lake Basin, Mountain of Xitie-Nanshankou road in Qaidam Basin and Kunlun Pass Qingshui River in Southern Qinghai Plateau. It indicates that the natural disaster risk in Golmud-Lhasa section is greater than that in the west, the landslide and debris flow distribution in west section is concentrated and the threat section is shorter, while the landslide and debris flow distribution is relative dispersed in Golmud-Lhasa section and the threat section is longer. Overall, landslide and debris flow mainly distributed in mountain sections; for the Plateau, basin, wide valley sections, there is almost no landslides and debris flow disasters because of their long thread and wide area. The risk is consistent with the risk causing, indicating that the risk causing is the dominant factor in risk assessment of landslide and debris flow. Besides, judging from the overall distribution, all flat areas are in low-risk areas, showing that terrain is another key factor in risk assessment of landslide and debris flow.

Key words: Qinghai-Tibet railway, landslides and debris flow, risk

中图分类号:

费杜秋, 刘峰贵, 周强, 陈琼, 吴林. 青藏铁路沿线滑坡泥石流灾害风险分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(2): 345-352.

FEI Du-qiu, LIU Feng-gui, ZHOU Qiang, CHEN Qiong, WU Lin. Risk analysis of landslide and debris flow disasters along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway[J]. , 2016, 39(2): 345-352.

参考文献

[1] LEE S, RYU J, MIN K. Development and application of landslides susceptibility analysis techniques using Geographic Information System(GIS)[R]. IEEE, 2000: 319-321.

[2] GREGORY C, JOHN C. DAVIS. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA[J]. Engineering Geology, 2003, 69: 331-343.

[3] FORSTER Alan. The assessment of landslide hazard potential as a guide to land use and planning in the south Wales Coalfield[J]. National Museum ofWales, 2005, 24: 81-87.

[4] WOOTEN, RICHARD M. Landslide hazards and landslide hazard mapping in North Carolina[J]. Geological Society of Ameriea, 2006, 38(3): 28.

[5] 乔建平, 王萌, 石莉莉. 区域滑坡风险评估中的风险区划与概率分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2012, (2): 51-56.[QIAO Jianping, WANG Meng, SHI Lili. Risk zoning and probability analysis of regional landslide risk assessment[J]. Journal of natural disasters, 2012, (2): 51-56.

[6] 方一平, 秦大河, 丁永建. 球风险和脆弱性评估方法及其尺度转换的局限性[J]. 干旱区地理, 2009, 32(3): 319-320.[FANG Yiping, QIN Dahe, DING Yongjian. Global main approaches of risk and vulnerability assessment and implementation in scale transformation[J]. Arid Land Geogarphy, 2009, 32(3): 319-320.]

[7] 王治华. 青藏公路和铁路沿线的滑坡研究[J]. 现代地质, 2003, 17(4): 355-362.[WANG Zhihua. Active tectonics and its secondary disasters along Qinghai-Tibet Line[J]. Geoscience, 2003, 17(4): 355-362.]

[8] 苏桂武, 高庆华. 自然灾害风险的分析要素[J]. 地学前缘, 2003, 10(1): 272-279.[SU Guiwu, GAO Qinghua. The elements for analyzing natural disasterrisk[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2003, 10(1): 272-279.]

[9] 黄崇福. 风险分析基本方法探讨[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2011, 20 (5): 1-10.[HUANG Chongfu. Discussion on basic methods for risk analysis[J]. Journal of natural disasters, 2011, 20(5): 1-10.]

[10] 吴珍汉, 胡道功, 吴中海, 等. 青藏高原中段活动断层及诱发地质灾害[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005: 1-385.[WU Zhen han, HU Daogong, WU Zhonghai, et al. Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in the middle of active faults and Geologic Hazards[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2005: 1-385.

[11] 王治华, 吕杰堂, 刘琼, 等. 青、甘、川、滇藏公路、铁路沿线地区地质环境遥感调查[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004: 56-76.[WANG Zhihua, LV Jietang, LIU Qiong, et al. Geological remote sensing investigation along highway and railroad in Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan, Yunnan[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004: 56-76.

[12] 王治华. 青藏交通线的地质环境及地质灾害[J]. 地学前沿, 2007, 14(6): 31-37.[WANG Zhihua. Geological environment and remote sensing center for land resources[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2007, 14(6): 31-37.]

[13] GREIVING S. Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards: a new methodology[R]//SCHMIDT-THOMé P, ed. Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of European regions. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 42, 2006: 75-82.

[14] 中国气象灾害大典编委会. 中国气象灾害大典(青海卷)[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2007: 26-164.[Compilation Committee of Chinese meteorological disasters books. Chinese meteorological disasters books: Qinghai[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2007: 26-164.

[15] 中国气象灾害大典编委会. 中国气象灾害大典(西藏卷)[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2008: 26-164.[Compilation Committee of Chinese meteorological disasters books. Chinese meteorological disasters books: Tibet[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2008: 26-164.]

[16] 青海自然灾害编篡委员会. 青海自然灾害[M]. 西宁: 青海人民出版社, 2003: 58-478.[Compilation Committee of Qinghai natural disasters. Qinghai natural disasters[M]. Xining: Qinghai People's Publishing House, 2003: 58-478.]

[17] 青海省地方志编纂委员会. 青海省志铁路交通志[M]. 北京: 中华书局出版社, 2000: 168-210.[Compilation Committee of Qinghai Chorography. Qinghai province chorography: railway chorography[M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2000: 168-210.

[18] 铁道第一勘察设计院．《青藏线格尔木-拉萨段环境影响评价大纲》[R]. 2001.[FSDI. Environental impact assessment outline of Golmud-Lhasa section along the Qinghai-Tibet railway[R]. 2001.]

[19] 沈渭寿, 张慧, 邹长新. 青藏铁路生态影响预测与评价[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2005: 1-10.[SHEN Weishou, ZHANG Hui, ZOU Changxin. The impact of ecological prediction and evaluation in Qinghai-Tibet Railway[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2005: 1-10.]

[20] 中国科学院计算机网络信息中心国际科学数据镜像网站 (http: //www.gscloud.cn). 30 m, DEM[DB], 2009.[The Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China international scientific data mirror sites(http: //www. gscloud.cn). 30 m, DEM[DB], 2009.]

[21] 王瑞平. 青海省地图(1∶2 480 000)[M]. 北京: 中国地图出版社, 2009.[WANG Ruiping. Map of Qinghai Province(1∶2 480 000)[M]. Beijing: SinoMaps Press, 2009.]

[22] 王瑞平. 西藏自治区地图(1∶2 090 000)[M]. 北京: 中国地图出版社, 2008.[WANG Ruiping. Map of Tibet Autonomous Region (1∶2 090 000)[M]. Beijing: SinoMaps Press, 2009.]

[23] 国家测绘地理信息局(http: //www.sbsm.gov.cn/). 1∶25万地图数据库[DB]. National administration of surveying, mapping and geoinformation(http: //www.sbsm.gov.cn/). 1∶250 000 map database[DB].

[24] 国家测绘地理信息局(http: //www.sbsm.gov.cn/). 1∶400 万地图数据库[DB]. National administration of surveying, mapping and geoinformation(http: //www.sbsm.gov.cn/).1∶4 000 000 map database[DB].

[25] 地球系统科学数据共享平台(www.geodata.cn). 1∶25 万地图数据库[DB]. Data sharing infrastructure of earth system science (www.geodata.cn). 1∶250 000 map database[DB].

[26] 地球系统科学数据共享平台(www.geodata.cn). 1∶400 万地图数据库[DB]. Data sharing infrastructure of earth system science (www.geodata.cn). 1∶4 000 000 map database[DB].

[27] 中国气象科学数据共享服务网(http: //cdc.cma.gov.cn). 中国地面气候月值数据集[DB]. 1951-2014.[China Meteorological Date Sharing Service System(http: //cdc.cma.gov.cn). Chinese surface climate data set monthly value[DB]. 1951-2014.

[28] 青海省统计局. 2014年青海省统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2015.[Qinghai Bureau of Statistics. 2014 Qinghai statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2015.]

[29] 西藏自治区统计局. 2014 年西藏自治区统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社. 2015.[Tibet autonomous region Bureau of Statistics. 2014 Tibet Autonomous Region statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2015.

[30] LIU Fenggui, MAO Xufeng, ZHANG Yili, et al. Risk analysis of snow disaster in the pastoral areas of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(3): 411-426.

[31] BIRK V, MANN J. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies[M]. New York: UNU Press, 2006: 26-45.

[32] 李鹤, 张平宇. 全球变化背景下脆弱性研究进展与应用展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(7): 920-929.[LI He, ZHANG Pingyu. Research progress and prospective applications of vulnerability approach under global change[J]. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(7): 920-929.]

[33] 滑坡防治工程勘察规范, DZ/T0218-2006[S], 2006: 1-13.[The standards on landslide prevention survey, DZ/T0218-2006[S], 2006: 1-13.]

[34] 张克存, 屈建军, 姚正毅, 等. 青藏铁路格拉段风沙危害及其防治[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(1): 74-78.[ZHANG Kecu, QU Jianjun, YAO Zhengyi, et al. Sand damage and its control along the Golha Section of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway[J]. Arid Land Geogarphy, 2014, 37(1): 74-78.]

[35] 哈斯巴根, 佟宝全. 农业地区人地系统脆弱性及其发展模式研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(3): 601-607.[HASIBAGEN, TONG Baoquan. Man-land system vulnerability and development model of agricultural regions[J]. Arid Land Geogarphy, 2014, 37(3): 601-607.

[36] 高庆华. 中国自然灾害风险与区域安全性分析[R], 2005: 10-15.[GAO Qinghua. Analyese on natural disaster risk and zonal safety in China[R], 2005: 10-15.]

[37] 焦方谦, 赵新生, 陈川. 证据权模型在泥石流灾害易发性评价中的应用[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(6): 1111-1124.[JIAO Fangqian, ZHAO Xinsheng, CHEN Chuan. Debris flow hazard susceptibility evaluation application with Weighted Evidences Model[J]. Arid Land Geogarphy, 2013, 36(6): 1111-1124.

[38] 刘峰贵. 青藏铁路沿线自然灾害风险区划[D]. 北京: 北京师范大学, 2010.[LIU Fenggui. Regionalization of natural disasters along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway[D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2010.]

[39] 刘希林, 尚志海. 自然灾害风险主要分析方法及其适用性述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11): 56-67.[LIU Xilin, SHANG Zhihai. Risk analysis methods of natural disasters and their applicability[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(11): 56-67.

[40] 葛全胜, 邹铭, 郑景云, 等. 中国自然灾害风险综合评估初步研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 184-185.[GE Quansheng, ZOU Ming, ZHENG Jingyun, et al. Integrated assessment of natural disaster risks in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 184-185.