黄河中游地区城镇化与城市生态韧性协调发展时空演化及影响因素

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2026.029

干旱区地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (9): 1890-1900.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2026.029 cstr: 32274.14.ALG2026029

黄河中游地区城镇化与城市生态韧性协调发展时空演化及影响因素

赵瑞东¹^,²(), 刘海猛³(), 郭文炯¹^,², 张晨皓¹

¹ 太原师范学院地理科学学院，山西晋中 030619
² 汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室，山西晋中 030619
³ 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，北京 100101

收稿日期:2026-01-13 修回日期:2026-02-09 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-07
通讯作者: 刘海猛（1989-），男，博士，副研究员，主要从事城市地理与人地关系研究. E-mail: liuhm@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:赵瑞东（1991-），男，博士，讲师，主要从事城市地理与规划研究. E-mail: zhaordgeo2015@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42301236);山西省基础研究计划项目(202303021212252)

Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of coupling coordination between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the middle reach of the Yellow River Basin

ZHAO Ruidong¹^,²(), LIU Haimeng³(), GUO Wenjiong¹^,², ZHANG Chenhao¹

¹ School of Geography Science, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China
² Shanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology Security in Fenhe River Basin, Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi, China
³ Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2026-01-13 Revised:2026-02-09 Published:2026-09-25 Online:2026-09-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

快速城镇化是影响黄河流域城市生态安全及韧性的重要因素，运用耦合协调模型测算并分析2010—2022年黄河中游城镇化与城市生态韧性协调水平的时空格局演化，探究各子系统对整体协调度的影响，进而为黄河流域城市生态安全研究提供参考。结果表明：（1）近12 a间黄河中游城市的城镇化水平总体呈现“核心-边缘”的空间差异，时间上呈现上升趋势；生态韧性水平呈现反向的“核心-边缘”特征，整体呈略下降趋势。（2）黄河中游地区城镇化与城市生态韧性的耦合协调度呈现由“基本协调”向“中度失调”下滑的发展特征，空间上由“核心-边缘”逐步转变为“集聚连片”的分布格局。（3）黄河中游地区城镇化的人口、经济和空间子系统以及生态韧性的防御、适应和恢复性子系统在协调影响中都起着阻滞作用，人口、空间、防御性和恢复性子系统影响的贡献明显减弱，而适应性子系统的影响作用逐渐增强。（4）受生态本底条件、区域优势、行政等级等影响，黄河中游地区城镇化与城市生态韧性协调水平的不均衡特征明显。

关键词: 城镇化, 城市生态韧性, 协调发展, 影响因素, 黄河中游

Abstract:

Rapid urbanization is a crucial factor in urban ecological security and resilience in the Yellow River Basin of China. This study employed a coupled coordination model to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of the coordinated development between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the middle reaches of the Yellow River from 2010 to 2022, explore the effects of each subsystem on the overall degree of coordination, and provide reference data for research on urban ecological security in the Yellow River Basin. The results indicate that: (1) Over the past 12 a, the urbanization level of cities in the middle reaches of the Yellow River generally exhibited a distinct “core-edge” spatial disparity with an upward trend over time; the ecological resilience level displayed an inverse “core-periphery” characteristic and had a gradual downward trend. (2) The degree of coordination between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the middle reaches of the Yellow River showed a declining trend from “basic coordination” to “moderate imbalance”, while the spatial distribution pattern gradually shifted from a “core-edge” to a “clustered contiguous” structure. (3) The population, economic, and spatial subsystems of urbanization in the middle reaches of the Yellow River and the defense, adaptability, and recovery subsystems of ecological resilience collectively hindered the overall coupling coordination. Over time, the contributions of the population, spatial, defense, and recovery subsystems significantly weakened, whereas the influence of the adaptability subsystem gradually increased. (4) Due to such factors as the ecological baseline conditions, regional advantages, and administrative hierarchy, the level of coordination between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the middle reaches of the Yellow River exhibits pronounced unevenness.

Key words: urbanization, urban ecological resilience, coordinated development, influencing factors, middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin

赵瑞东, 刘海猛, 郭文炯, 张晨皓. 黄河中游地区城镇化与城市生态韧性协调发展时空演化及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(9): 1890-1900.

ZHAO Ruidong, LIU Haimeng, GUO Wenjiong, ZHANG Chenhao. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of coupling coordination between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the middle reach of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2026, 49(9): 1890-1900.

图/表 9

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 29

[1]	Liu H M, Fang C L. China’s new program gives cities check-ups[J]. Nature Cities, 2025(2): 910-912.
[2]	刘海猛, 方创琳, 李咏红. 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1489-1507. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908001
	[Liu Haimeng, Fang Chuanglin, Li Yonghong. The coupled human and natural cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1489-1507.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908001
[3]	李苏, 刘浩南. 干旱区城市化与生态韧性耦合协调的时空格局演化分析——以宁夏为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(7): 1281-1290.
	[Li Su, Liu Haonan. Spatiotemporal pattern evolution of coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological resilience in arid region: A case of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(7): 1281-1290.]
[4]	刘海龙, 王改艳, 张鹏航, 等. 汾河流域新型城镇化与生态韧性耦合协调时空演变及协调影响力研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(3): 640-667. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20240309
	[Liu Hailong, Wang Gaiyan, Zhang Penghang, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and coordination influence of coupling coordination between new urbanization and ecological resilience in Fenhe River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(3): 640-667.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20240309
[5]	王少剑, 崔子恬, 林靖杰, 等. 珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 973-991. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
	[Wang Shaojian, Cui Zitian, Lin Jingjie, et al. Coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 973-991.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104013
[6]	赵瑞东, 方创琳, 刘海猛. 城市韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.10.011
	[Zhao Ruidong, Fang Chuanglin, Liu Haimeng. Progress and prospect of urban resilience research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.10.011
[7]	Liu H M, Lu J Y, Li X C, et al. Evaluating human-nature relationships at a grid scale in China, 2000-2020[J]. Habitat International, 2025, 156(2): 103282, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103282.
[8]	Samuelsson K, Giusti M, Peterson G D, et al. Impact of environment on people’s everyday experiences in Stockholm[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 171(3): 7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009
[9]	鲁钰雯, 翟国方, 施益军, 等. 荷兰空间规划中的韧性理念及其启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(1): 102-110, 117.
	[Lu Yuwen, Zhai Guofang, Shi Yijun, et al. Resilience within spatial planning in the Netherlands and its implications[J]. Urban Planning International, 2020, 35(1): 102-110, 117.]
[10]	Marta S, Amaya M R, David A, et al. Urban resilience through green infrastructure: A framework for policy analysis applied to Madrid, Spain[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2024, 241(1): 104923, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104923.
[11]	Paula B, Rita S B, Ana G. Assessment of the contribution of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) to urban resilience: Application to the case study of Porto[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2022, 175(2): 106489, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106489.
[12]	Sharifi A. Resilient urban forms: A macro-scale analysis[J]. Cities, 2019, 85(2): 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
[13]	Marta O, Susana P, Ramón E, et al. Land-use and spatial resilience changes in the Spanish olive socio-ecological landscape[J]. Applied Geography, 2020, 117(4): 102171, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102171.
[14]	孙阳, 张落成, 姚士谋. 基于社会生态系统视角的长三角地级城市韧性度评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 151-158.
	[Sun Yang, Zhang Luocheng, Yao Shimou. Evaluating resilience of prefecture cities in the Yangtze River Delta region from a socio-ecological perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 151-158.]
[15]	修春亮, 魏冶, 王绮. 基于“规模-密度-形态”的大连市城市韧性评估[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12): 2315-2328. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812004
	[Xiu Chunliang, Wei Ye, Wang Qi. Evaluation of urban resilience of Dalian City based on the perspective of “size-density-morphology”[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(12): 2315-2328.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201812004
[16]	欧阳晓, 陈键, 魏晓, 等. 长江中游城市群生态韧性时空分异格局与演化机理[J]. 地理学报, 2025, 80(6): 1572-1584. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202506009
	[Ouyang Xiao, Chen Jian, Wei Xiao, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and evolutionary mechanism of ecological resilience in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomeration[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2025, 80(6): 1572-1584.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202506009
[17]	Fang C L, Liu H M, Li G D. International progress and evaluation on interactive coupling effects between urbanization and the eco-environment[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(8): 1081-1116. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1317-9
[18]	王松茂, 牛金兰. 山东半岛城市群城市生态韧性的动态演化及障碍因子分析[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(8): 51-61. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.08.006
	[Wang Songmao, Niu Jinlan. Dynamic evolution and obstacle factors of urban ecological resilience in Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(8): 51-61.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.08.006
[19]	Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2): 137-151. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
[20]	李翅, 马鑫雨, 夏晴. 国内外韧性城市的研究对黄河滩区空间规划的启示[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(2): 54-61.
	[Li Chi, Ma Xinyu, Xia Qing. The study of resilient cities in domestic and overseas and the implications to the spatial planning of Yellow River floodplain area[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(2): 54-61.]
[21]	郭付友, 佟连军, 仇方道, 等. 黄河流域生态经济走廊绿色发展时空分异特征与影响因素识别[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(3): 726-739. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202103016
	[Guo Fuyou, Tong Lianjun, Qiu Fangdao, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics and influencing factors of green development in the eco-economic corridor of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(3): 726-739.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202103016
[22]	Zhao R D, Fang C L, Liu J, et al. The evaluation and obstacle analysis of urban resilience from the multidimensional perspective in Chinese cities[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 86(11): 104160, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160.
[23]	Cutter S, Barnes L, Berry M, et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18(4): 598-606. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
[24]	Nathwani J, Lu X L, Wu C Y, et al. Quantifying security and resilience of Chinese coastal urban ecosystems[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 672(7): 51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
[25]	彭文斌, 邝嫦娥, 李文意, 等. 长江中游城市群城市更新与生态韧性空间关联网络及影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2024, 44(11): 1936-1945. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.20240159
	[Peng Wenbin, Kuang Chang’e, Li Wenyi, et al. Spatial correlation network and impacts of urban renewal and ecological resilience in urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2024, 44(11): 1936-1945.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.20240159
[26]	赵建吉, 刘岩, 朱亚坤, 等. 黄河流域新型城镇化与生态环境耦合的时空格局及影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(1): 159-171. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.01.16
	[Zhao Jianji, Liu Yan, Zhu Yakun, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and influencing factors of the coupling and coordinated development of new urbanization and ecological environment in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 159-171.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.01.16
[27]	张明斗, 任衍婷, 周亮. 黄河流域城市生态韧性时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 445-454. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.381
	[Zhang Mingdou, Ren Yanting, Zhou Liang. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of urban ecological resilience in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 445-454.] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.381
[28]	赵宏波, 谷天顺, 孙东琪, 等. “三生”功能视角下黄河流域城市人居环境动态演变与机制[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(12): 2973-2999. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202312005
	[Zhao Hongbo, Gu Tianshun, Sun Dongqi, et al. Dynamic evolution and influencing mechanism of urban human settlements in the Yellow River Basin from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” function[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(12): 2973-2999.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202312005
[29]	冯雨雪, 李广东. 青藏高原城镇化与生态环境交互影响关系分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1386-1405. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202007005
	[Feng Yuxue, Li Guangdong. Interaction between urbanization and eco-environment in Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1386-1405.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202007005

系统层	准则层	指标层	指标解释	权重	属性
城镇化发展指数	人口城镇化	常住城镇人口占比/%	城市化发展水平	0.0980	+
		城镇人口规模/10⁴人	城镇常住人口规模	0.1121	+
		城镇人口密度/人·km^-2	人口分布的疏密程度	0.0968	+
	经济城镇化	人均GDP/元·人^-1	经济发展水平	0.0969	+
		第二、三产业占比/%	城市产业结构	0.0983	+
		经济密度/10⁴元·km^-2	城市经济效应水平	0.0987	+
	空间城镇化	人均建成区面积/m²·人^-1	人均城市用地大小	0.1414	+
		城市建设用地面积占比/%	城市土地利用程度	0.1422	+
		城市建设用地扩张速率/%	城市土地空间开发速度	0.1176	+
城市生态韧性指数	生态抵抗力	人均水资源量/m³·人^-1	城市水资源承载力	0.1019	+
		植被覆盖指数	城市生态本底水平	0.0821	+
		人均城市建设空间面积/m²·人^-1	城市土地承载条件	0.1634	+
	生态适应力	城市污水集中处理率/%	城市水处理管理水平	0.0618	+
		工业固废综合利用率/%	工业固废循环利用水平	0.1212	+
		城市生活垃圾无害化处理率/%	城市环境卫生水平	0.1026	+
	生态恢复力	区域内水土保持率/%	区域自然生态恢复状况	0.1244	+
		城市建成区绿地率/%	城市环境质量水平	0.1143	+
		节能环保支出占地方财政支出比/%	城市环境污染治理投入	0.1283	+

黄河中游地区城镇化与城市生态韧性协调发展时空演化及影响因素

Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of coupling coordination between urbanization and urban ecological resilience in the middle reach of the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	聂承静, 李雅迪, 刘方田, 韩芳, 高星. 长城沿线生境质量与城镇化时空耦合协调及驱动因子研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(8): 1587-1600.
[2]	赵静, 王永瑜, 史小英. 基于MGWR模型的中国人均碳足迹时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(8): 1601-1613.
[3]	罗庆, 臧永婷, 王云龙, 王山冰, 刘乐. 黄河流域乡镇人口分布格局的演变特征及其驱动机制[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(8): 1711-1723.
[4]	张登科, 张彦洪, 张鹏举, 张万光. 2000—2022年庆阳市土地利用与植被覆盖时空变化及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(7): 1395-1404.
[5]	宁雅萱, 尹豪, 李金诺. 中国北方农牧交错带中段新型城镇化与农业生态系统服务耦合分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(7): 1457-1469.
[6]	何嘉欣, 李海洋. 中国就业质量的区域差异、动态演进及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(7): 1520-1529.
[7]	吕宛青, 宋志高, 肖钊富. 中国新型城镇化与旅游业高质量发展耦合协调、障碍诊断及驱动因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(5): 1063-1073.
[8]	耿甜伟, 韩晚星, 林菲, 李振环. 陕西省固碳服务供需关系时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(5): 939-948.
[9]	陈文宣, 陈钰, 王生隆. 黄河流域农业碳排放时空演化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(4): 713-726.
[10]	张佳静, 王晓峰, 周潮伟, 周继涛, 白娟. 黄河“几字弯”土地退化中性评估及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(4): 856-867.
[11]	周灵敏, 伊木然·库鲁万, 玉素甫江·如素力, 吴海智, 娜扎开提·尼加提. 中国西北干旱区大型湖泊湖冰物候时空差异及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(3): 484-495.
[12]	屠正伟, 张沛, 张中华. 银川都市圈乡村“三生空间”冲突格局演变特征及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(3): 594-606.
[13]	张嘉伟, 裴婷婷, 陈英, 谢保鹏. 大食物观下甘肃省粮食和重要农产品供给安全评价及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(3): 619-630.
[14]	魏丽蓉, 程占红, 石烨, 张玉尧, 王紫彦, 牛莉芹. 黄河流域旅游生态安全的演化特征和影响因素分析——基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(2): 245-254.
[15]	刘昊, 李福莲, 汪圣. 中国居家社区养老与机构养老耦合协调格局及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2026, 49(2): 381-392.