Farmers’ willingness and behavior in managing and protecting the fallow land based on SEM: A case study of Xingtai, Hebei

Expand
  • 1 School of Geographical Science, Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China; 2 Green Low Carbon Development Research Institute,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China

Received date: 2019-04-24

  Revised date: 2019-10-27

  Online published: 2020-01-05

Abstract

Cultivated land is the most important resource for agricultural production development. Along with the rapid urbanization process recently, cultivated land resources in China are faced with many problems such as quantity reduction, quality decline, and ecological degradation, which means the protection and utilization methods of cultivated land need to be transformed. The implementation of land fallowing is an important means to maintain soil quality and restore soil fertility. As the direct user of cultivated land, farmers are an important subject of fallow management. Identifying the influencing factors of farmers’ willingness and behavior on fallow management and protection is of great significance for promoting the implementation of fallowing system. In this paper, a structural equation model (SEM) was set up using the sample of 12 villages of 2 towns in Xingtai, Hebei Province, China, including 4 latent variables (household characteristics, family characteristics, cognitive characteristics, awareness of the utilization of cultivated land factors).Apart from above 4 latent variables, there were another 2 latent variables (represent farmers willingness and behavior) and 12 observable variables (age of farmer, the Communist Party membership, village cadre status, number of family members, number of non-agricultural employments of family, family income, farmland protection responsibilities in farms mind, satisfaction degree of fallow policy, understanding degree of fallow land management and protection technology, farmland area, grain planting proportion, land fragmentation).This SEM was used to analyze the farmers willingness and behavior of the management and protection of fallow land. There are three main findings. First, economic compensation is an important factor for farmers choice on managing and protecting fallow land. Specifically, 26.44% of the farmers were willing to manage the fallow land without economic compensation, while 53.55% of the farmers are willing to manage fallow land with economic compensation. Second, cognitive consciousness has most important impact on willingness and behavior of the fallow land management and protection. For the farmers management and protection willingness, family characteristics, cognitive consciousness, status of farmland has a significant impact. For farmers management and protection behavior, farmers characteristics, family characteristics and cognitive awareness have a significant impact. Finally, the index variables including the Communist Party membership, village cadre status, number of family members, farmland protection responsibilities in farms mind, satisfaction degree of fallow policy, understanding degree of fallow land management-protected technology, farmland area, and grain planting proportion have a positive impact on fallow land management and protection willingness and behavior. The index variables including age of farmer, number of non-agricultural employments of family, family income, land fragmentation have a negative influence on the willingness and behavior. Based on the main findings, there are serval policy implications. First, broadening the propaganda approaches of land fallowing policy and land management and protection policy is significant to promote farmers choice of management and protection on fallowing cultivated land. Second, to foster enthusiasm of farmers spontaneous management and protection of fallowing land, it is fundamentally important to give enough compensation for them. Finally, it is also of significance to strengthen farmers training on the management and protection of fallow land and dig out new approaches for managing fallowing land in the future.

Cite this article

YANG Ren-hao, YANG Qing-yuan, YIN Wen, LI Yuan-qing . Farmers’ willingness and behavior in managing and protecting the fallow land based on SEM: A case study of Xingtai, Hebei[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020 , 43(1) : 260 -270 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.01.29

References

[1]田富强.产量红线与耕地红线耦合研究[J].干旱区地理,2017,40(3):640-646.[TIAN Fuqiang.Coupling of yield red-line and cultivated land red-line[J].Arid Land Geography,2017,40(3):640-646.] [2]江娟丽,杨庆媛,阎建忠.耕地休耕的研究进展与现实借鉴[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2017,39(1):165-171.[JIANG Juanli,YANG Qingyuan,YAN Jianzhong.Research progress and realistic role for reference in farmland fallowing[J].Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition) 2017,39(1):165-171.] [3]张全景,欧名豪,王万茂.中国土地用途管制制度的耕地保护绩效及其区域差异研究[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(9):10-15.[ZHANG Quanjing,OU Minghao,WANG Wanmao.Study of cultivated land preservation performance of land use control system and its regional differences in China[J].China Land Science,2008,22(9):10-15.] [4]KASHIAN R,SKIDMORE M.Preserving agricultural land via property assessment policy and the willingness to pay for land preservation[J].Economic Development Quarterly:The Journal of American Economic Revitalization,2002,16(1):75-87. [5]ANDROKOVICH R,DESJARDINS I,TARZWELL G,et al.Land preservation in British Columbia:An empirical analysis of the factors underlying public support and willingness to pay[J].Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics,2008,40(3):999-1013. [6]GREINER R.Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts[J].Agricultural Systems,2015,137:154-165. [7]CHRISTENSEN T,PEDERSEN A B,NIELSEN H O,et al.Determinants of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones:A choice experiment study[J].Ecological Economics,2011,70(8):1558-1564 [8]望晓东,魏玲.耕地生态价值支付意愿的影响因素实证研究——基于武汉市的实地调查[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):121-124.[WANG Xiaodong,WEI Ling.A research on influencing factors of willingness to pay for ecosystem services of cultivated land:Base on field investigation in Wuhan City[J].Ecological Economy,2015,31(8):121-124.] [9]马爱慧,张安录.选择实验法视角的耕地生态补偿意愿实证研究——基于湖北武汉市问卷调查[J].资源科学,2013,35(10):2061-2066.[MA Aihui,ZHANG Anlu.Cultivated land ecological compensation willingness based on choice experiments[J].Resources Science,2013,35(10):2061-2066.] [10]杨美玲,朱志玲,任凯丽.限制开发生态区农户生态补偿参与意愿及其影响因素——以宁夏盐池县为例[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(3):202-210.[YANG Meiling,ZHU Zhiling,REN Kaili.Farmers’ participation and influencing factors in payments for environmental services in limited developing ecological zones:A case of Yanchi County in Ningxia Province[J].Arid Land Geography.2018,41(3):202-210.] [11]王喜,梁流涛,陈常优.不同类型农户参与耕地保护意愿差异分析——以河南省传统农区周口市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(8):52-56.[WANG Xi,LIANG Liutao,CHEN Changyou.The willingness of cultivated land protection for different households[J].Journal of Arid Land Resource and Environment.2015,29(8):52-56.] [12]陈志刚,黄贤金,卢艳霞,等.农户耕地保护补偿意愿及其影响机理研究[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(6):20-25.[CHEN Zhigang,HUANG Xianjin.LU Yanxia,et al.The willingness to accept of farm households for preserving farmland and its driving mechanism[J].China Land Science,2009,23(6):20-25.] [13]陈美球,邓爱珍,周丙娟,等.资源禀赋对农户耕地保护意愿的实证分析[J].农村经济,2007,(6):28-31.[CHEN Meiqiu,DENG Aizhen,ZHOU Bingjuan,et al.An empirical analysis of the resource endowment’s willingness to protect farmers’ cultivated Land[J].Rural Economy,2007,(6):28-31.] [14]李广东,邱道持,王利平,等.生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响——渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(4):504-515.[LI Guangdong,QIU Daochi,WANG Liping,et al.Impacts of difference among livelihood assets on the choice of economic compensation pattern for farmer households’ farmland protection in Chongqing City[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2012,67(4):504-515.] [15]李海燕,蔡银莺.生计资本对农户参与耕地保护意愿的影响——以成都市永安镇、金桥镇,崇州市江源镇为例[J].冰川冻土,2015,37(2):545-554.[LI Haiyan,CAI Yinying.The influence of livelihood capital on intention of protecting cultivated land of farmers:A case study in the three towns in Chengdu area[J].Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2015,37(2):545-554.] [16]周小平,席炎龙,钟玲.农户耕地保护意愿影响因素研究[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(1):164-169.[ZHOU Xiaoping,XI Yanlong,ZHONG Ling.Study on the influence factors of farmers’ willingness to protect cultivated land[J].Areal Research and Development[J].2017,36(1):164-169.] [17]郝海广,李秀彬,田玉军,等.农牧交错区农户耕地流转及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(8):302-307.[HAO Haiguan,LI Xiubing,TIAN Yujun,et al.Farmland use right transfer and its driving factors in agro-pastoral interlaced region[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2010,26(8):302-307.] [18]翟辉,杨庆媛,焦庆东,等.农户土地流转行为影响因素分析——以重庆市为例[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,36(2):175-181.[ZHAI Hui,YANG Qingyuan,JIAO Qingdong,et al.Analysis of factors influencing farmers behavior about rural land transfer[J].Journal of Southwest Normal University (Natural Science Edition),2011,36(2):175-181.] [19]钟涨宝,汪萍.农地流转过程中的农户行为分析——湖北、浙江等地的农户问卷调查[J].中国农村观察,2003,(6):55-64.[ZHONG Zhangbao,WANG Ping.Analysis of farmers’ behavior in the process of farmland transfer:A survey of farmers in Hubei and Zhejiang[J].China Rural Survey,2003,(6):55-64.] [20]吴九兴,杨钢桥.农地整理项目后期管护.农民投资意愿及额度[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(2):205-212.[WU Jiuxing,YANG Gangqiao.Farmers’ willingness of investment and credit in agricultural land consolidation project post-management and maintenance[J].Resources and Environmental in the Yangtze Basin,2014,23(2):205-212.] [21]王发荣.土地整治项目后期管护措施探讨[J].中国土地,2013,(1):34-35.[WANG Farong.Discussion of management and maintenance of land consolidation project[J].China Land,2013,(1):34-35.] [22]汪文雄,杨钢桥,李进涛.农地整理项目后期管护效率的影响因素实证研究[J].资源科学,2010,32(6):1169-1176.[WANG Wenxiong,YANG Gangqiao,LI Jintao.An empirical analysis of factors influencing the efficiency of the final management and maintenance of rural land consolidation[J].Resource Science,2010,32(6):1169-1176.] [23]蔡荣.管护效果及投资意愿:小型农田水利设施合作供给困境分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(4):78-86.[CAI Rong.Maintaining effect and funding willingness:Empirical analysis on collective supply willingness of farmland irrigation canals in rural community[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition),2015,(4):78-86.] [24]赵微.基于制度构成理论的农地整理建后管护的农民愿意研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(9):89-96.[ZHAO Wei.Farmers’ willingness of supervising and maintaining land consolidation based on institution structure theory[J].China Land Science,2015,29(9):89-96.] [25]汪文雄,杨钢桥,李进涛.农户参与农地整理项目后期管护意愿的影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(3):42-47.[WANG Wenxiong,YANG Gangqiao,LI Jintao.Empirical analysis on the factors that influence the willingness of farmer households to participate in the final management and maintenance in later stages of land consolidation projects[J].China Land Science,2010,24(3):42-47.] [26]李佩恩,杨庆媛,范垚,等.基于SEM的农村居民点整治中农户意愿影响因素——潼南县中渡村实证[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):162-169.[LI Pei’en,YANG Qingyuan,FAN Yao,et al.Influence factors of farmers’ willingness in rural residential land consolidation based on SEM:An empirical study of Zhongdu village,Tongnan County[J].Economic Geography,2016,36(3):162-169.] [27]李超显,彭福清,陈鹤.流域生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素分析——以湘江流域长沙段为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(4):132-137.[LI Chaoxian,PENG Fuqing,CHEN He.Analysis of the influencing factors for willingness to pay of payment for ecosystem service of river basin:A case of Changsha reach of Xiangjiang River[J].Economic Geography,2012,32(4):132-137.] [28]王岩,杨俊孝.西部地区农村劳动力转移对农用地流转意愿的影响——以新疆玛纳斯为例[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(2):411-419.[WANG Yan,YANG Junxiao.Impact of rural labor migration behavior on farmers’ willingness of farmland transfer in western China:A case of Manas in Xinjiang[J].Arid Land Geography,2015,38(2):411-419.] [29]吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:176-202.[WU Minglong.Structural equation model:Operations and applications of AMOS[M].Chongqing:Chongqing University Press,2009:176-202.] [30]易丹辉.结构方程模型:方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:80-97.[YI Danhui.Structural equation model:Methods and applications[M].Bejing:China Renmin University Press,2008:80-97.]
Outlines

/