Livelihood capital and livelihood strategies of the farmer household in the exceptional poverty regions of Qinling-Daba mountainous area:A case of Shangluo City

Expand
  • 1 School of Geography And Tourism,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China;  (2 College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Northwest University,Xi’an 710127,Shaanxi,China; 3 School of Architectural and Artistic Design,Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo 454000,Henan,China

Received date: 2019-07-24

  Revised date: 2019-11-07

  Online published: 2020-01-05

Abstract

To study the sustainable livelihood is significant for poverty alleviation and the development of rural area. Based on the sustainable livelihood framework, 484 farmer householders were investigated in Shangluo City of Qinling-Daba mountainous area, Shaanxi Province, China. The survey data was used to analyze household livelihood capital between different groups by constructing the indexes system of households livelihood assets, then the impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood strategies as well as their coupling coordinative degree were discussed using the Multinomial Logit regression model and the livelihood capital coupling coordinative degree model respectively. The results showed as follows: (1) The livelihood strategies of rural households were obviously different. According to the proportion of non-agricultural income, there were four types of household livelihoods, namely, exclusively employed by others (Type A),employed by others most of the time (Type B),work part time for others (Type C) and 100% doing the farm work (Type D). (2) In the survey samples, the livelihood capital of farmers was limited and unbalanced, which presented the characteristics of relatively high financial capital and social capital and relatively low natural capital and human resources capital. Among the non-poor households, the total livelihood capital of the Type C was the highest (0.451), followed by the Type B (0.393) and the Type A (0.382), the Type D (0.215) was the lowest. While among the poor households, the Type B (0.348) was the highest, followed by the Type A (0.345) and the Type C (0.342),the Type D (0.184) was the lowest. (3) The impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood strategy choice of non-poor households and poor households was different. For the non-poor households, the per capita cultivated land, the per capita forest land area, the cultivated land quality, vocational skill level, political resources and the employment network had a positive effect on the transformation from the Type A to the Type B and the Type C, but per capita household income and male labor ratio had a negative effect. The per capita household income and vocational skill level had a negative effect on the transformation from the Type A to the Type D. For the poor households, the transformation from the Type A to the Type B, Type C and Type D was positively impacted by the per capita cultivated land, the per capita forest land area and political resources, and the per capita household income, labor education level, vocational skill level and communication expenditure were negative factors.(4) If lining the coupling coordinative degree of non-poor households' livelihood capital up in order, from the largest to the smallest we have the list as follows: the Type C (0.114),the Type B (0.106),the Type A (0.103),and the Type D (0.045).Similarly for the coupling coordinative degree of poor households livelihood capital we have the list as follows: the Type C (0.095),the Type A (0.094),the Type B (0.092) and the Type D (0.086).This study could provide useful information for the optimization of livelihood strategies and effective poverty alleviation.

Cite this article

LIU Qian, ZHANG Jian, HE Yan-bing, YANG Xin-jun . Livelihood capital and livelihood strategies of the farmer household in the exceptional poverty regions of Qinling-Daba mountainous area:A case of Shangluo City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020 , 43(1) : 237 -247 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.01.27

References

[1]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中华人民共和国2017年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].[2018-08-28].http:∥www.stats.gov.cn.[State Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China.National Economic and Social Development Statistics Bulletin of the People’s Republic of China 2017[EB/OL].[2018-08-28],http:∥www.stats.gov.cn] [2]刘彦随,周扬,刘继来.中国农村贫困化地域分异特征及其精准扶贫策略[J].中国科学院院刊,2016,31(3):269-278.[LIU Yangsui,ZHOU Yang,LIU Jilai.Regional differentiation characteristics of rural poverty and targeted poverty alleviation strategy in China[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2016,31(3):269-278.] [3]何仁伟,李光勤,刘邵权,等.可持续生计视角下中国农村贫困治理研究综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(11):69-85.[HE Renwei,LI Guangqin,LIU Shaoquan,et al.A literature review of China’s rural poverty governance from the perspective of sustainable livelihood[J].China Population,Resources and environment,2017,27(11):69-85.] [4]BEBBINGTON A.Capitals and capabilities:A framework for analyzing peasant viability,rural livelihoods and poverty[J].World Development,1999,27(12):2021-2044. [5]Department for International Development (DFID).Better livelihoods for poor people:The role of agriculture[M].London:Department for International Development,2002. [6]SHARP K.Measuring destitution:Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in the analysis of survey data[R].Brighton: IDS working paper,217,2003. [7]YAN J Z,WU Y Y,ZHANG Y L,et al.Livelihood diversification of farmers and nomads of eastern transect in Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2010,20(5):757-770. [8]李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济,2007,(4):32-39.[LI Xiaoyun,DONG Qiang,RAO Xiaolong,et al.Application of farmers’ vulnerability analysis method and its localization[J].China Rural Economy,2007,(4):32-39.] [9]杨云彦,赵锋.可持续生计分析框架下农户生计资本的调查与分析——以南水北调(中线)工程库区为例[J].农业经济问题,2009,(3):58-64.[YANG Yunyan,ZHAO Feng.Study and analysis of farmers’ livable capital under the framework of sustainable livelihood analysis:Taking South-to-North water transfer project (middle line) as an example[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2009,(3):58-64.] [10]何仁伟,刘邵权,陈国阶,等.中国农户可持续生计研究进展及趋向[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(4):657-670.[HE Renwei,LIU Shaoquan,CHEN Guojie,et al.Research progress and tendency of sustainable livelihoods for peasant household in China[J].Progress in Geography,2013,32(4):657-670.] [11]FANG Y P,FAN J,SHEN M Y,et al.Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River,China[J].Ecological Indicators,2014,38:225-235. [12]赵雪雁,李巍,杨培涛,等.生计资本对甘南高原农牧民生计活动的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(4):111-118.[ZHAO Xueyan ,LI Wei,YANG Peitao,et al.Impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood activities of farmers and herdsmen on Gannan Plateau[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2011,21(4):111-118.] [13]苏芳,蒲欣冬,徐中民,等.生计资本与生计策略关系研究——以张掖市甘州区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(6):119-125.[SU Fang,PU Xindong,XU Zhongmin,et al.Analysis about the relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategies: Take Ganzhou in Zhangye City as a example[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2009,19(6):119-125.] [14]DAVIS J,LOPER-CARR D.Migration,remittances and smallholder decision-making: Implications for land use and livelihood change in Central America[J].Land Use Policy,2014,36:319-329. [15]JANSEN P,PENDER J,DAMON A,et al.Policies for sustainable development in the hillside areas of Honduras:A quantitative livelihoods approach[J].Agricultural Economics,2006,34(2):141-153. [16]LI G,FANG C,QIU D,et al.Impact of farmer households’ livelihood assets on their options of economic compensation patterns for cultivated land protection[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2014,24(2):331-348. [17]PRETTY J,WARD H.Social capital and the environment[J].World Development,2001,29(2):209-227. [18]DE B A,ROZELLE S.Migration and Household Investment in Rural China[J].China Economic Review,2008,(19):320-335. [19]吴孔森,杨新军,尹莎.环境变化影响下农户生计选择与可持续性研究——以民勤绿洲社区为例[J].经济地理,2016,36(9):141-149.[WU Kongsen,YANG Xinjun,YIN Sha.The livelihood choice of farmers and sustainability under the influence of environmental change:A case study of Minqin Oasis community[J].Economic Geography,2016,36(9):141-149] [20]徐爽,胡业翠.农户生计资本与生计稳定性耦合协调分析——以广西金桥村移民安置区为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):142-148.[XU Shuang,HU Yecui.Coupling coordination analysis of capital and livelihood stability of farmers:A case study of the resettlement area of Jinqiao village in Guangxi[J].Economic Geography,2018,38(3):142-148.] [21]BERG M.Household income strategies and natural disasters: Dynamic livelihoods in rural Nicaragua[J].Ecological Economics,2010,69(3):592-602. [22]TIAN Q,GUO L,ZHENG L.Urbanization and rural livelihoods:A case study from Jiangxi Province,China[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2016,47:577-587. [23]何昭丽,米雪,喻凯睿,等.农户生计资本与旅游生计策略关系研究——以西北A区为例[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,39(6):61-68.[HE Zhaoli,MI Xue,YU Kairui,et al.The relationship between peasants’ livelihood capital and tourism livelihood strategy:A case study canducted in area A of northwest China[J].Journal of Guangxi University for nationalities (Philosophy And Social Science Edition),2017,39(6):61-68] [24]任国平,刘黎明,付永虎,等.基于 GWR模型的都市城郊村域农户生计资本空间差异分析——以上海市青浦区为例[J].资源科学,2016,38(8):1594-1608.[REN Guoping,LIU Liming,FU Yonghu,et al.Spatial differentiation of rural household livelihood capital in metropolitan suburbs based on GWR model:A case study of Qingpu District in Shanghai[J].Resources Science,2016,38(8):1594-1608] [25]SOLTANI A,ANGELSEN A,EID T,et al.Poverty,sustainability,and household livelihood strategies in Zagros,Iran[J].Ecological Economics,2012,79(4):60-70. [26]蔡志海.汶川地震灾区贫困村农户生计资本分析[J].中国农村经济,2010,(12):55-67.[CAI Zhihai.Analysis on the livelihoods assets of poverty villages farmers in the earthquake disaster area of Wenchuan[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2010,(12):55-67.] [27]NIELSEN Φ,RAYAMAJHI S,UBERHUAGA P,et al.Quantifying rural livelihood strategies in developing countries using an activity choice approach[J].Agricultural Economics,2013,44(1):57-71. [28]WANG C,ZHANG Y,YANG Y,et al.Assessment of sustainable livelihoods of different farmers in hilly red soil erosion areas of southern China[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,64:123-131.
Outlines

/