流域乡村聚落发展潜能评测及分区振兴路径——以汾河流域为例

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.258

Abstract

Abstract:

Settlements are the concentrated expression of man-land relationship in rural area. Exploration of the development potential and development path of rural settlements is essential to the sustainable development of rural economy. Based on the theory of rural regional system and modern rural development characteristics, this study evaluated the development potential of rural settlements, formulated zoning schemes, and analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of these schemes to explore the path of rural revitalization by taking Fenhe River Basin, Shanxi Province, China as an example. The research results show that: (1) The evaluation system was constructed by considering 11107 rural settlement patches as study objects to reveal the development potential of rural settlement from the aspects of natural environment, resources endowment, ecological protection, socio-economic level, and city driving. (2) The development potential showed a great difference, and its distribution was unbalanced in the Fenhe River Basin. The development potential of the middle and lower reaches were higher than that of the upper reaches, and the development potential of the middle valley basin was higher than that of the mountains and hills of the east and west. (3) The rural settlements were categorized into 5 first-class zones and 12 second-class zones that exhibited obvious characteristics and differences in development potential, development advantage, and development path. The results of this study contributed to the promotion and implementation of the rural revitalization strategy in the Fenhe River Basin and other similar areas.

Key words: rural revitalization, rural regional system, rural settlement, development path, Fenhe River Basin

HOU Zhihua,CUI Xiaoqi,FAN Xiaoxia. Partitioning paths for development potential of rural settlements in watershed: Take Fenhe River Basin as an example[J].Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(4): 649-657.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Development potential zoning of natural settlements and its rural revitalization path in rural regions of Fenhe River Basin"

一级区	二级子区	聚落数量/个	聚落面积/km²	平均V_j	因子	发展路径
流域北部自然条件约束区	汾河源头内外综合制约型低潜能区	740	23.49	0.1935	气温^-、地形^-、耕地^-、社会经济^-、城市外驱^-	加强汾河源头生态建设，乡村聚落适度集聚，因地制宜发展生态农业、特色农业、休闲旅游产业
	芦芽山、云中山气候-地形制约型较低潜能区	947	76.64	0.2459	气温^-，旅游⁺
	汾河上游河谷气温制约型中潜能区	46	13.92	0.3314	气温^-、矿产^-，水体⁺、旅游⁺
流域西侧吕梁山生态可持续约束区	吕梁山北段气候-地形制约型较低潜能区	501	31.97	0.2571	气候^-、地形^-、耕地^-，林地⁺	生态优先，山水林田湖草村统筹规划，积极推进产业生态化和生态产业化
	灵霍峡谷及其两侧生态制约型较低潜能区	1156	129.89	0.2465	生态^-、矿产^-，土壤⁺
	吕梁山南段生态制约型低潜能区	905	58.39	0.2289	生态^-、地形^-，林地⁺、土壤⁺
流域东侧太行-太岳山生态可持续约束区	太行山中段生态制约型低潜能区	972	54.58	0.2403	生态^-、耕地^-，矿产⁺、林地⁺	重点开展生态保护和生态修复，积极发展特色林产业和生态型立体农业
流域东侧太行-太岳山生态可持续约束区	太岳山生态制约型较低潜能区	782	58.22	0.2428	生态^-，林地⁺	重点开展生态保护和生态修复，积极发展特色林产业和生态型立体农业
流域中部晋中盆地及周边内外综合驱动发展区	太原市区南北城郊外驱力主导型高潜能区	455	149.88	0.5000	降水^-、旅游^-，城市外驱⁺、社会经济⁺、地形⁺	大力推进农业生产现代化、产业化、信息化，打造乡村全面振兴区域样板
	晋中盆地南部内生力主导型中高潜能区	876	356.15	0.4580	降水^-、土壤^-，地形⁺、耕地⁺、矿产⁺、社会经济⁺
	晋中盆地周边丘陵-带中潜能区	981	267.28	0.3384	降水^-、旅游^-
流域南部临汾盆地及周边内生主导发展区	汾河下游两侧内生力主导型高潜能区	514	217.98	0.4797	地形⁺、耕地⁺、社会经济⁺	加快构建现代农业产业体系，促进乡村产业多元化、市场化，强化与外援系统的相互促进和共建共享
	临汾盆地南部自然条件优越型中高潜能区	1172	354.23	0.4236	地形⁺、耕地⁺、旅游⁺
	临汾盆地周边丘陵-带中低潜能区	1060	188.26	0.3020	耕地⁺

Tab. 4

Fig. 4

References 29

[1]	中共中央国务院关于全面推进乡村振兴加快农业农村现代化的意见[N]. 人民日报, 2021-02-22(001).
	[Opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on comprehensively promoting rural revitalization and accelerating agricultural and rural modernization[N]. People’s Daily, 2021-02-22(001).]
[2]	刘彦随, 龙花楼, 李裕瑞. 全球乡城关系新认知与人文地理学研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12): 2869-2884. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202112001
	[Liu Yansui, Long Hualou, Li Yurui. Human geography research based on the new thinking of global rural-urban relationship[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(12): 2869-2884.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202112001
[3]	李小建, 胡雪瑶, 史焱文, 等. 乡村振兴下的聚落研究——来自经济地理学视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 3-14. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.001
	[Li Xiaojian, Hu Xueyao, Shi Yanwen, et al. The role of rural settlements in rural revitalization: Perspective of economic geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 3-14.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.001
[4]	Christaller W. Central places in southern Germany (translated by Baskin C W)[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
[5]	Rosenqvist O. Deconstruction and hermeneutical space as keys to understanding the rural[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2020, 75: 132-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.015
[6]	黄万状, 石培基. 河湟地区乡村聚落位序累积规模模型的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1489-1503. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106012
	[Huang Wanzhuang, Shi Peiji. An empirical study on rank cumulative size model of rural settlements in the Hehuang area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1489-1503.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106012
[7]	Philip L, Williams F. Remote rural home based businesses and digital inequalities: Understanding needs and expectations in a digitally underserved community[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 68: 306-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.011
[8]	Rijswijk K, Klerkx L, Bacco M, et al. Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 85: 79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003
[9]	刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
	[Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[10]	李智, 刘劲松. 冀南平原典型农业村落转型特征及成长机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 939-954. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104011
	[Li Zhi, Liu Jinsong. Transformation characteristics and development mechanism of typical agricultural settlement in southern Hebei Plain since reform and opening-up[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 939-954.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202104011
[11]	何杰, 金晓斌, 梁鑫源, 等. 城乡融合背景下淮海经济区乡村发展潜力——以苏北地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1940-1957. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200814
	[He Jie, Jin Xiaobin, Liang Xinyuan, et al. Research of rural system development potential in Huaihai Economic Zone: A case study of northern Jiangsu Province under the background of urban-rural integration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1940-1957.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200814
[12]	黄晶, 薛东前, 马蓓蓓, 等. 干旱绿洲农业区村庄多功能特征与类型划分研究——以临泽县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(2): 606-617.
	[Huang Jing, Xue Dongqian, Ma Beibei, et al. Multi-functional characteristics and type division of county villages: A case of Linze County in arid oasis agricultural area[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(2): 606-617.]
[13]	谭雪兰, 于思远, 陈婉铃, 等. 长株潭地区乡村功能评价及地域分异特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(8): 1203-1210. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.08.010
	[Tan Xuelan, Yu Siyuan, Chen Wanling, et al. Evaluation of rural function and spatial division in Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomerations[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 1203-1210.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.08.010
[14]	苏思信, 王永生, 刘彦随. 京津冀地区乡村发展格局演化规律与发展路径[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(8): 2171-2183. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020210900
	[Su Sixin, Wang Yongsheng, Liu Yansui. Evolution patterns and development paths of rural areas in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(8): 2171-2183.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020210900
[15]	曹智, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞, 等. 中国专业村镇空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1647-1666. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008007
	[Cao Zhi, Liu Yansui, Li Yurui, et al. Spatial pattern and its influencing factors of specialized villages and towns in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1647-1666.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008007
[16]	屠爽爽, 龙花楼. 乡村聚落空间重构的理论解析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 509-517. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.002
	[Tu Shuangshuang, Long Hualou. Process and driving factors of rural restructuring in typical villages[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 509-517.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.002
[17]	张海燕, 樊江文, 黄麟, 等. 中国自然资源综合区划理论研究与技术方案[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(10): 1870-1882. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.10.05
	[Zhang Haiyan, Fan Jiangwen, Huang Lin, et al. Theories and technical methods for the comprehensive regionalization of natural resources in China[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(10): 1870-1882.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.10.05
[18]	严长清, 陈江龙, 段学军. 基于自然生态约束的滨湖城市土地利用分区——以无锡市区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(6): 925-931.
	[Yan Changqing, Chen Jianglong, Duan Xuejun. Land use zoning in urban lakeshore areas based on natural and ecological restrictions: A case study of Wuxi City[J]. Resources Science, 2008, 30(6): 925-931.]
[19]	辛宇, 林耿, 林元城. 数字技术力量下的乡村重构[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(7): 1300-1311. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.07.013
	[Xin Yu, Lin Geng, Lin Yuancheng. Rural reconstruction under the impact of digital technology[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(7): 1300-1311.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.07.013
[20]	李玉恒, 阎佳玉, 刘彦随. 基于乡村弹性的乡村振兴理论认知与路径研究[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 2001-2010. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004
	[Li Yuheng, Yan Jiayu, Liu Yansui. The cognition and path analysis of rural revitalization theory based on rural resilience[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10): 2001-2010.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201910004
[21]	孔宇, 甄峰, 张姗琪. 智能技术影响下的城市空间研究进展与思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(6): 1068-1081. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.06.010
	[Kong Yu, Zhen Feng, Zhang Shanqi. Research progress and prospect of urban space under the influence of smart technology[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(6): 1068-1081.] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.06.010
[22]	史利江, 刘敏, 李艳萍, 等. 汾河流域县域经济差异的时空格局演变及驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2361-2378. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190785
	[Shi Lijiang, Liu Min, Li Yanping, et al. The spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of economic difference at county level in Fenhe River Basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(10): 2361-2378.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190785
[23]	李春梅. 文旅产业中民营经济促进人的全面发展的理论分析——基于山西高质量转型发展的背景[J]. 经济问题, 2021(12): 16-21, 88.
	[Li Chunmei. A theoretical analysis of the private economy promoting people’s all-round development in the cultural tourism industry: Based on the background of high-quality transformation and development of Shanxi Province[J]. On Economic Problems, 2021(12): 16-21, 88.]
[24]	应苏辰, 鲍捷, 王浚沣, 等. 生态约束背景下的乡村重构过程与驱动因素研究——以黄山市歙县深渡镇绵潭村为例[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2020, 15(4): 59-69.
	[Ying Suchen, Bao Jie, Wang Junfeng, et al. Process and driving factors of rural reconstruction under ecological constraints: A case from Miantan Village, Shendu Town, Shexian County, Huangshan City[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2020, 15(4): 59-69.]
[25]	陈琼, 张镱锂, 刘峰贵, 等. 黄河流域河源区土地利用变化及其影响研究综述[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(3): 446-459. doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.03.04
	[Chen Qiong, Zhang Yili, Liu Fenggui, et al. A review of land use change and its influence in the source region of Yellow River[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 446-459.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.03.04
[26]	杨智威, 陈颖彪, 吴志峰, 等. 粤港澳大湾区城市热岛空间格局及影响因子多元建模[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1154-1166. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.06.14
	[Yang Zhiwei, Chen Yingbiao, Wu Zhifeng, et al. Spatial pattern of urban heat island and multivariate modeling of impact factors in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1154-1166.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.06.14
[27]	薛冰, 李京忠, 肖骁, 等. 基于兴趣点(POI)大数据的人地关系研究综述: 理论、方法与应用[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2019, 35(6): 51-60.
	[Xue Bing, Li Jingzhong, et al. Overview of man-land relationship research based on POI data: Theory, method and application[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2019, 35(6): 51-60.]
[28]	侯志华, 刘敏, 樊晓霞, 等. 汾河流域城乡聚落体系发展潜能测度及空间模式探究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 1978-1989. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.12.004
	[Hou Zhihua, Liu Min, Fan Xiaoxia, et al. Development potential and spatial pattern of urban-rural settlement system in the Fenhe River Basin[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 1978-1989.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.12.004
[29]	傅德胜, 周辰. 基于密度的改进K均值算法及实现[J]. 计算机应用, 2011, 31(2): 432-434. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2011.00432
	[Fu Desheng, Zhou Chen. Improved K-means algorithm and its implementation based on density[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2011, 31(2): 432-434.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2011.00432

数据类型	数据来源	数据说明
乡村自然聚落斑块	地理空间数据云Landsat8 OLI影像（http://www.gscloud.cn）	2019年，人机交互解译
DEM	地理空间数据云ASTER GDEM V2数据（http://www.gscloud.cn）	栅格数据，30 m
气象数据	中国地面累年值数据集（http://data.cma.cn）	1981—2010年
土壤有机质	中国土壤数据集（v1.1）（http://www.ncdc.ac.cn）	栅格数据，1000 m
土地利用/覆被类型	全球土地覆盖产品（FROM-GLC10）（http://data.ess.tsinghua.edu.cn）	2017年，栅格数据，10 m
道路交通	1:700000山西省地图[JS(2019)01-304]，Landsat8 OLI影像	2019年，矢量化、目视解译
矿产资源	《山西省能源地图集（2014版）》中山西省1:1650000矿产资源地图	2014年，矢量化
A级旅游景区	山西省文化和旅游厅官网发布的山西省A级景区名录（http://wlt.shanxi.gov.cn）	2020年，矢量化
POI兴趣点	北京大学开放研究数据平台高德地图兴趣点数据（https://opendata.pku.edu.cn）	2018年
市县行政边界	1:2000000山西省地图 [晋S(2020)005号]	2020年，矢量化

准则层	指标层	指标代码	指标极性	一级权重	二级权重
自然条件	1981—2010年多年平均气温/℃	N₁	+	0.210	0.166
	1981—2010年多年平均降水量/mm	N₂	+		0.165
	平均海拔/m	N₃	-		0.167
	15°以下坡度面积占比/%	N₄	+		0.167
	地表破碎度	N₅	-		0.168
	土壤有机质含量/g·kg^-1	N₆	+		0.167
资源禀赋	水体面积占比/%	R₁	+	0.210	0.139
	农田面积占比/%	R₂	+		0.209
	林地面积占比/%	R₃	+		0.211
	距矿产资源欧氏距离/km	R₄	-		0.220
	距A级景区级别权重欧氏距离/km	R₅	-		0.220
生态约束	生态安全重要区域^①面积占比/%	E	-	0.199	1.000
社会经济水平	非渗透地面面积占比/%	S₁	+	0.192	0.339
	路网密度/km·km^-2	S₂	+		0.376
	POI兴趣点密度/个·km^-2	S₃	+		0.285
城市外驱	城市空间场能指数^②	C	+	0.189	1.000

潜能级别	潜能值	面积/km²	分布	特征
低潜能区	D_i≤0.22	9135.00	流域北端及东西两侧山地区	受先天自然环境和生态保护需求的严重制约，聚落分布相对分散、孤立
较低潜能区	0.22<D_i≤0.28	14364.64	两大盆地东西两侧和上游河谷两侧的广泛丘陵山区	自然环境复杂，社会经济基础较差，乡村聚落自我发展能力较弱，也缺乏有效的外动力
中潜能区	0.28<D_i≤0.37	6606.50	上游河谷，中部两大盆地周边及盆地间的灵霍峡谷一带	乡村发展受多种因素交叉影响且优劣并存
较高潜能区	0.37<D_i≤0.46	5678.77	晋中盆地西部、南部和临汾盆地的南部	乡村发展先天条件较好，自身优势明显，但外驱动力不足，发展模式较为落后
高潜能区	D_i>0.46	4463.61	两盆地的各大市县周边区域	自然条件得天独厚，区位优势明显，乡村社会经济基础良好，中心城区辐射作用突出

Partitioning paths for development potential of rural settlements in watershed: Take Fenhe River Basin as an example

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 29

Related Articles 9

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Tianyu,HUI Yi’an,RUI Panpan,SHI Ying. Morphological types division and its formation of dispersed rural settlements based on Alpha Shape: A case of Long Town, Mizhi County [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(3): 946-954.
[2]	ZHANG Wei,ZHOU Liang,SUN Dongqi,HU Fengning. Spatial migration characteristics and ecological impacts of ecological migrants in arid regions: A case of Gulang County, Gansu Province [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(2): 618-627.
[3]	HUANG Jing,XUE Dongqian,MA Beibei,SONG Yongyong. Multi-functional characteristics and type division of county villages: A case of Linze County in arid oasis agricultural area [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(2): 606-617.
[4]	LI Jin,WEN Qi,YANG Xiao. Rural revitalization path based on the resources and environment carrying capacity in arid area: A case of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 287-297.
[5]	ZHANG Hui-ting, MA Li-gang, WANG Hong-wei, WANG Zheng-wei, GAO Yi-bo, FAN Ying. Characteristics and regional integration development of rural settlements in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(6): 1667-1678.
[6]	LIU Xiang-yun, WANG Hong-wei, YANG Sheng-tian, HE Zhen-zhen, WANG Yuan-yuan, WANG Pan. Spatial pattern and driving force of oasis rural settlements in Ebinur Basin [J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(4): 859-866.
[7]	WANG Deng, JIAN Sheng-qi, HU Cai-hong. Impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff in Fenhe River Basin [J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(1): 25-31.
[8]	WU Chong, ZHANG Wen, XIANG Yuan-lin, TIAN Da-rui. Distribution of rural settlements in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi Province from the perspective of fractal theory:a case of the Wuding River Basin [J]. , 2017, 40(6): 1307-1316.
[9]	ZHAI Hao-ming, SHI Jing. Ecological forestry eficiency analysis and development path of edge area of Taklimakan Desert [J]. , 2017, 40(2): 462-468.