Arid Land Geography ›› 2021, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1612-1622.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.06.10
• Earth Surface Process • Previous Articles Next Articles
Paruke WUSIMANJIANG1,2(),HAO Jinmin1,2(),WANG Nan1,2,SHI Yunyang1,2,ZHANG Jinyi1,2,Ayituerxun SHAMUXI3
Received:
2021-01-06
Revised:
2021-04-01
Online:
2021-11-25
Published:
2021-12-03
Contact:
Jinmin HAO
E-mail:B20203210942@cau.edu.cn;jmhao@cau.edu.cn
Paruke WUSIMANJIANG,HAO Jinmin,WANG Nan,SHI Yunyang,ZHANG Jinyi,Ayituerxun SHAMUXI. Land use transformation based on production-living-ecological functions and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in Yuli County[J].Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(6): 1612-1622.
Tab. 1
Land use function classification and eco-environmental quality correction index in Yuli County"
土地利用主导功能分类 | 土地利用分类系统二级地类 | 生态环境质量指数 | |
---|---|---|---|
一级地类 | 二级地类 | ||
生产用地 | 农业生产用地 | 旱地 | 0.28 |
生态用地 | 林地生态用地 | 林地、灌木林地、疏林地、其他林地 | 0.73 |
牧草生态用地 | 高、中、低覆盖度草地 | 0.53 | |
水域生态用地 | 河渠、湖泊、水库、冰川、永久积雪地 | 0.62 | |
湿地生态用地 | 沼泽、河口、人工湿地 | 0.63 | |
其他生态用地 | 沙地、戈壁、盐碱地、裸土地等 | 0.03 | |
生活用地 | 城镇生活用地 | 城镇建设用地 | 0.20 |
Tab. 2
Areas and changes of land use function types in different periods of Yuli County /hm2"
土地利用类型 | 面积 | 净增减变化 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993年 | 2001年 | 2009年 | 2017年 | 1993—2001年 | 2001—2009年 | 2009—2017年 | 1993—2017年 | |
农业生产用地 | 31212.99 | 71775.00 | 82428.03 | 143399.97 | 40562.01 | 10653.03 | 60971.94 | 112186.98 |
林地生态用地 | 66060.36 | 30654.36 | 53335.35 | 19886.49 | -35406.00 | 22680.99 | -33448.86 | -46173.87 |
牧草生态用地 | 385006.32 | 239157.36 | 321794.01 | 301686.84 | -145848.96 | 82636.65 | -20107.17 | -83319.48 |
水域生态用地 | 21832.38 | 24399.18 | 10746.18 | 24660.45 | 2566.80 | -13653.00 | 13914.27 | 2828.07 |
湿地生态用地 | 28203.84 | 46998.81 | 12791.97 | 72930.51 | 18794.97 | -34206.84 | 60138.54 | 44726.67 |
其他生态用地 | 5438478.87 | 5557225.55 | 5488996.77 | 5410834.29 | 118746.68 | -68228.78 | -78162.48 | -27644.58 |
城镇生活用地 | 149.94 | 743.04 | 852.48 | 2212.83 | 593.10 | 109.44 | 1360.35 | 2062.89 |
Tab. 3
Transfer matrix of land use function in different periods of Yuli County /hm2"
1993—2001年 | 2001—2009年 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | Ⅶ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | Ⅶ | |
Ⅰ | 27599.58 | 704.88 | 2089.80 | 56.61 | 17.73 | 209.88 | 534.51 | 52754.67 | 6480.63 | 10362.51 | 51.39 | 224.37 | 317.43 | 1584.00 |
Ⅱ | 7145.28 | 9388.71 | 30468.60 | 51.66 | 1362.33 | 7915.86 | 9727.92 | 3166.56 | 4830.66 | 16902.72 | 29.16 | 174.42 | 795.33 | 4755.51 |
Ⅲ | 31123.53 | 16982.91 | 130443.66 | 409.59 | 3164.67 | 12946.68 | 189934.65 | 15053.04 | 19248.48 | 124330.14 | 252.63 | 1436.49 | 3741.75 | 75094.83 |
Ⅳ | 3.24 | 1.08 | 20.88 | 93.15 | 22.95 | 7.56 | 1.89 | 63.90 | 71.37 | 62.55 | 360.81 | 0.54 | 0.36 | 183.51 |
Ⅴ | 258.21 | 341.73 | 3668.22 | 3.15 | 10443.42 | 5076.00 | 2041.47 | 136.89 | 1870.83 | 11399.40 | 28.62 | 3704.04 | 1854.99 | 5404.41 |
Ⅵ | 889.65 | 1486.44 | 10793.79 | 5.76 | 3537.27 | 8471.70 | 3019.23 | 1230.48 | 6608.16 | 24430.23 | 26.73 | 2137.23 | 1954.80 | 10611.18 |
Ⅶ | 4755.51 | 1748.61 | 61672.41 | 123.12 | 5850.81 | 12371.13 | 5351957.82 | 10022.49 | 14225.22 | 134306.10 | 103.14 | 3069.09 | 4127.22 | 5391362.79 |
2009—2017年 | 1993—2017年 | |||||||||||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | Ⅶ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | Ⅵ | Ⅶ | |
Ⅰ | 67403.70 | 2221.56 | 10027.71 | 390.87 | 69.21 | 468.72 | 1825.47 | 24823.71 | 1209.33 | 4116.78 | 440.82 | 22.77 | 105.03 | 492.14 |
Ⅱ | 13206.96 | 5590.89 | 18588.51 | 310.14 | 1628.55 | 5792.13 | 8149.50 | 16261.74 | 4328.37 | 28276.02 | 110.52 | 1758.24 | 8455.95 | 6823.08 |
Ⅲ | 40457.16 | 10174.86 | 174075.93 | 90.18 | 10787.13 | 40138.20 | 45717.93 | 65996.28 | 8844.75 | 173019.87 | 781.74 | 5695.56 | 27221.49 | 103061.52 |
Ⅳ | 85.32 | 8.82 | 120.06 | 600.03 | 11.97 | 16.92 | 9.36 | 3.42 | 3.78 | 9.81 | 113.22 | 1.35 | 9.27 | 9.90 |
Ⅴ | 714.69 | 179.28 | 1019.79 | 7.83 | 3436.92 | 2601.72 | 2771.55 | 1278.90 | 701.37 | 4346.64 | 9.90 | 7179.75 | 7157.88 | 1110.78 |
Ⅵ | 1913.85 | 340.20 | 3888.45 | 6.30 | 1556.91 | 2690.37 | 2388.15 | 3306.42 | 1318.68 | 10532.79 | 24.84 | 2914.29 | 8131.77 | 1967.31 |
Ⅶ | 19568.88 | 1353.06 | 93726.09 | 806.58 | 7133.13 | 21130.02 | 5344410.78 | 31680.09 | 3462.39 | 81144.63 | 731.79 | 7051.86 | 21756.69 | 5291811.18 |
Tab. 4
Ecological environmental quality index and contribution rate of each land use function type in Yuli County"
土地利用 类型 | 1993年 | 2001年 | 2009年 | 2017年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV | 贡献率/% | EV | 贡献率/% | EV | 贡献率/% | EV | 贡献率/% | |
Ⅰ | 0.00146 | 1.91 | 0.00337 | 5.28 | 0.00387 | 5.61 | 0.00672 | 9.16 |
Ⅱ | 0.00808 | 10.59 | 0.00375 | 5.88 | 0.00652 | 9.45 | 0.00243 | 3.31 |
Ⅲ | 0.03417 | 44.79 | 0.02123 | 33.29 | 0.02856 | 41.37 | 0.02676 | 36.46 |
Ⅳ | 0.00001 | 0.01 | 0.00002 | 0.03 | 0.00003 | 0.04 | 0.00007 | 0.10 |
Ⅴ | 0.00227 | 2.98 | 0.00253 | 3.97 | 0.00112 | 1.62 | 0.00256 | 3.49 |
Ⅵ | 0.00298 | 3.91 | 0.00496 | 7.78 | 0.00135 | 1.96 | 0.00769 | 10.48 |
Ⅶ | 0.02732 | 35.81 | 0.02792 | 43.78 | 0.02758 | 39.95 | 0.02716 | 37.01 |
Tab. 5
Transformation and contribution rate of main land use functions affecting eco-environmental quality during different periods in Yuli County"
模式 | 1993—2001年 | 2001—2009年 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
用地功能转型 | 指数变化 | 贡献率/% | 用地功能转型 | 指数变化 | 贡献率/% | |
导致生态 环境改善 | Ⅶ—Ⅲ | 0.00516 | 61.36 | Ⅶ—Ⅲ | 0.01125 | 70.98 |
Ⅶ—Ⅵ | 0.00124 | 14.74 | Ⅲ—Ⅱ | 0.00064 | 4.04 | |
Ⅶ—Ⅴ | 0.00058 | 6.90 | Ⅰ—Ⅱ | 0.00049 | 3.09 | |
Ⅲ—Ⅱ | 0.00057 | 6.78 | Ⅰ—Ⅲ | 0.00043 | 2.71 | |
Ⅲ—Ⅵ | 0.00022 | 2.62 | Ⅶ—Ⅰ | 0.00042 | 2.65 | |
总计 | 0.00777 | 92.40 | 总计 | 0.01323 | 83.47 | |
导致生态 环境恶化 | Ⅲ—Ⅶ | -0.01590 | 76.04 | Ⅲ—Ⅶ | -0.00629 | 59.23 |
Ⅲ—Ⅰ | -0.00130 | 6.22 | Ⅵ—Ⅶ | -0.00107 | 10.08 | |
Ⅱ—Ⅶ | -0.00114 | 5.45 | Ⅲ—Ⅰ | -0.00063 | 5.93 | |
Ⅱ—Ⅲ | -0.00102 | 4.88 | Ⅱ—Ⅲ | -0.00057 | 5.37 | |
Ⅱ—Ⅰ | -0.00054 | 2.58 | Ⅱ—Ⅶ | -0.00056 | 5.27 | |
总计 | -0.01990 | 95.17 | 总计 | -0.00912 | 85.88 | |
模式 | 2009—2017年 | 1993—2017年 | ||||
用地功能转型 | 指数变化 | 贡献率/% | 用地功能转型 | 指数变化 | 贡献率/% | |
导致生态 环境改善 | Ⅶ—Ⅲ | 0.00784 | 58.25 | Ⅶ—Ⅲ | 0.00679 | 55.98 |
Ⅶ—Ⅵ | 0.00212 | 15.75 | Ⅶ—Ⅵ | 0.00218 | 17.97 | |
Ⅶ—Ⅰ | 0.00082 | 6.09 | Ⅶ—Ⅰ | 0.00133 | 10.96 | |
Ⅶ—Ⅴ | 0.00070 | 5.20 | Ⅶ—Ⅴ | 0.00070 | 5.77 | |
Ⅲ—Ⅵ | 0.00067 | 4.98 | Ⅶ—Ⅱ | 0.00041 | 3.38 | |
总计 | 0.01215 | 90.27 | 总计 | 0.01141 | 94.06 | |
导致生态 环境恶化 | Ⅲ—Ⅶ | -0.00383 | 42.18 | Ⅲ—Ⅶ | -0.00862 | 54.28 |
Ⅲ—Ⅰ | -0.00169 | 18.61 | Ⅲ—Ⅰ | -0.00276 | 17.38 | |
Ⅱ—Ⅰ | -0.00099 | 10.90 | Ⅱ—Ⅰ | -0.00122 | 7.68 | |
Ⅱ—Ⅶ | -0.00095 | 10.46 | Ⅱ—Ⅲ | -0.00095 | 5.98 | |
Ⅱ—Ⅲ | -0.00062 | 6.83 | Ⅱ—Ⅶ | -0.00080 | 5.04 | |
总计 | -0.00808 | 88.98 | 总计 | -0.01435 | 90.36 |
[1] |
黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3):378-391.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014 |
[ Huang Jinchuan, Lin Haoxi, Qi Xiaoxiao. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3):378-391. ]
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014 |
|
[2] |
李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1):49-65.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004 |
[ Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1):49-65. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004 |
|
[3] | Grainger A. National land use morphology[J]. Geography, 1995, 80(3):235-245. |
[4] | 龙花楼. 土地利用转型——土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1):87-90. |
[ Long Hualou. Land use transition: A new integrated approach of land use/cover change study[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2003, 19(1):87-90. ] | |
[5] | 高星, 刘泽伟, 李晨曦, 等. 基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7113-7122. |
[ Gao Xing, Liu Zewei, Li Chenxi, et al. Land use function transformation in the Xiong’an New Area based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20):7113-7122. ] | |
[6] |
杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等. 基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应——以长江三角洲核心区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1):97-106.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.011 |
[ Yang Qingke, Duan Xuejun, Wang Lei, et al. Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(1):97-106. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.011 |
|
[7] | 田培, 龚雨薇, 朱占亮, 等. 三峡水库坝区生态屏障区近25年土地利用变化评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):78-85. |
[ Tian Pei, Gong Yuwei, Zhu Zhanliang, et al. Evaluation of land use change in the ecological barrier zone of the dam area of the Three Gorges Reservoir in recent 25 years[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(2):78-85. ] | |
[8] | 张帅, 汪洋, 夏婷婷, 等. 塔里木河生态输水条件下土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(3):739-749. |
[ Zhang Shuai, Wang Yang, Xia Tingting, et al. Effects of land use/cover change on ecosystem service value under the ecological water conveyance of Tarim River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3):739-749. ] | |
[9] | 马新萍, 韩申山, 王磊, 等. 大西安地区土地利用类型时空演变分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2):499-507. |
[ Ma Xinping, Han Shenshan, Wang Lei, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of land use types in the greater Xi’an area[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(2):499-507. ] | |
[10] | 王宁, 杨光, 韩雪莹, 等. 内蒙古1990—2018年土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):244-250. |
[ Wang Ning, Yang Guang, Han Xueying, et al. Land use change and ecosystem service value in Inner Mongolia from 1990 to 2018[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(5):244-250. ] | |
[11] | 王权, 李阳兵, 黄娟, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区土地利用转型过程对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3):192-198. |
[ Wang Quan, Li Yangbing, Huang Juan, et al. Effect of land use transformation process on ecosystem service value in Karst trough valley area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3):192-198. ] | |
[12] |
龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9):1607-1618.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201509001 |
[ Long Hualou. Land use transition and land management[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(9):1607-1618. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201509001 |
|
[13] | 陈龙, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 基于主导功能的江苏省土地利用转型特征与驱动力[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2):155-162. |
[ Chen Long, Zhou Shenglu, Zhou Bingbing, et al. Characteristics and driving forces of regional land use transition based on the leading function classification: A case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(2):155-162. ] | |
[14] |
宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3):471-487.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201703009 |
[ Song Xiaoqing. Discussion on land use transition research framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3):471-487. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201703009 |
|
[15] | 陈会, 李阳兵, 盛佳利. 基于土地利用变化的贵州坝子土地利用功能演变研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24):9325-9338. |
[ Chen Hui, Li Yangbing, Sheng Jiali. Study on the evolution of land use function of basins based on land use change in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(24):9325-9338. ] | |
[16] | 田俊峰, 王彬燕, 王士君. 东北地区土地利用转型特征测度与机制探索[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(9):184-195. |
[ Tian Junfeng, Wang Binyan, Wang Shijun. Land use transition in northeast China: Features measurement and mechanism exploration[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(9):184-195. ] | |
[17] |
胡守庚, 童陆亿, 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型潜力及其评价的理论框架[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6):1367-1377.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180421 |
[ Hu Shougeng, Tong Luyi, Long Hualou. Land use transition potential and itsassessment framework[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(6):1367-1377. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180421 |
|
[18] | 张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 等. 1995—2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4):689-706. |
[ Zhang Xiaolin, Jin Xiaobin, Fan Yeting, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination status of the land use function transition in Jiangsu Province from 1995 to 2015[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4):689-706. ] | |
[19] | 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(7):1-6. |
[ Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang. Land use transition and rural vitalization[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(7):1-6. ] | |
[20] | 帕茹克·吾斯曼江, 阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 刘新平, 等. 尉犁县土地利用/覆被变化的区域生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3):325-330, 338. |
[ Wusimanjiang Paruke, Shamuxi Ayituerxun, Liu Xinping, et al. Change of regional ecosystem service value in the region with land use/cover change in Yuli County[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3):325-330, 338. ] | |
[21] | 张鹏飞, 古丽·加帕尔, 包安明, 等. 塔里木河流域近期综合治理工程生态成效评估[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(1):156-164. |
[ Zhang Pengfei, Jiapaer Guli, Bao Anming, et al. Ecological effects evaluation for short term planning of the Tarim River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2017, 40(1):156-164. ] | |
[22] | 梁小英, 段宁, 刘康. 土地利用功能变化与农户响应研究进展[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(2):385-391. |
[ Liang Xiaoying, Duan Ning, Liu Kang. Research review on the land use function change and the farmers’response[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(2):385-391. ] | |
[23] | 焦露, 薛哲进, 尹剑, 等. “三生空间”视角下喀斯特地区土地利用转型的生态环境效应——以贵州省为例[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(4):206-212. |
[ Jiao Lu, Xue Zhejin, Yin Jian, et al. Eco-environmental effects of land use transition in Karst area based on the view of“ecological-production-living spaces”: Taking Guizhou Province as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(4):206-212. ] | |
[24] |
Asabere S B, Acheampong R A, Ashiagbor G, et al. Urbanization, land use transformation and spatio-environmental impacts: Analyses of trends and implications in major metropolitan regions of Ghana[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 96, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2020.104707.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2020.104707 |
[25] | 苑韶峰, 唐奕钰, 申屠楚宁. 土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应——基于长江经济带127个地级市的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9):174-181. |
[ Yuan Shaofeng, Tang Yiyu, Shentu Chuning. Spatiotemporal change of land-use transformation and its eco-environmental response: A case of 127 counties in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(9):174-181. ] | |
[26] |
田俊峰, 王彬燕, 程利莎, 等. 政策主导下的区域土地利用转型过程与机制——以中国东北地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4):805-821.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190257 |
[ Tian Junfeng, Wang Binyan, Cheng Lisha, et al. The process and mechanism of regional land use transition guided by policy: A case study of northeast China[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(4):805-821. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190257 |
|
[27] | 许凤娇, 吕晓, 陈昌玲. 山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9):1554-1567. |
[ Xu Fengjiao, Lü Xiao, Chen Changlin. Spatial-temporal pattern of urban-rural construction land transition in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(9):1554-1567. ] | |
[28] |
刘永强, 龙花楼, 李加林. 长江中游经济带土地利用转型及其生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(5):1009-1022.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201805012 |
[ Liu Yongqiang, Long Hualou, Li Jialin. Study on the land use transition and its cross-sensitivity of ecological service function in the middle of Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(5):1009-1022. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201805012 |
|
[29] | 戈大专, 龙花楼, 屠爽爽, 等. 黄淮海地区土地利用转型与粮食产量耦合关系研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2017, 34(4):319-327. |
[ Ge Dazhuan, Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang, et al. Coupling relationship between land use transitions and grain yield in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2017, 34(4):319-327. ] | |
[30] | 陈万旭, 李江风, 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间的空间关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5):1036-1048. |
[ Chen Wanxu, Li Jiangfeng, Ran Duan. On the spatial relationship between land use transition and urbanization in the middle Yangtze River urban cluster[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5):1036-1048. ] | |
[31] |
刘永强, 廖柳文, 龙花楼, 等. 土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析——以湖南省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(4):691-700.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201504008 |
[ Liu Yongqiang, Liao Liuwen, Long Hualou, et al. Effects of land use transitions on ecosystem services value: A case study of Hunan Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(4):691-700. ]
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201504008 |
|
[32] |
吕立刚, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12):1442-1449.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.012.1442 |
[ Lü Ligang, Zhou Shenglu, Zhou Bingbing, et al. Land use transformation and its eco-environmental response in process of the regional development: A case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(12):1442-1449. ]
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.012.1442 |
[1] | REN Xiao, MU Gui-jin, XU Li-shuai, LIN Yong-chong, ZHAO Xue. Characteristics of artificial oasis expansion in south Traim Basin from 2000 to 2013 [J]. , 2015, 38(5): 1022-1030. |
|