乡村旅游涉入度、恢复性环境感知与重游意愿作用机制研究——一个中介与调节的混合模型

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.557

Abstract

Abstract:

In the context of rural tourism in Turpan City of Xinjiang, China, this paper explores the influences of tourism involvement, restorative environment perception, and tourist satisfaction on tourists’ intention to revisit, together with the related moderating effect of consumption expectation. The study adopts a structural equation model based on attention recovery theory, in which tourist satisfaction and restorative environment perception as the mediating variables and consumption expectation is the moderating variable. Through data collected through a questionnaire survey, 374 valid samples were obtained. The study found that (1) Tourism involvement had a significant positive impact on restorative environment perception, tourist satisfaction and revisit intention, among which the effect on restorative environment perception is the largest and the effect on tourist satisfaction is the least. (2) Restorative environment perception and tourist satisfaction had multiple chain mediating effects in the structure of “tourism involvement-revisit intention”. (3) The influence of tourism involvement and tourists’ satisfaction on revisiting intention was positively regulated by consumption expectation. The traditional mediation model understates the role of restorative environment perception and many previous studies on this factor have considered it an independent variable. Few studies, in contrast, have considered consumption expectation. To explore the impacts on tourists’ willingness to revisit, the present study innovatively applies restorative environment perception as a mediating variable in the chain mediation effect and applies consumption expectation as a moderating variable, thus providing broader guidance for the governance of scenic locations. The study’s results provide a theoretical basis and a practical reference for the management and development of rural tourism in Turpan City.

Key words: tourism involvement, tourist satisfaction, restorative environmental perception, consumption expectation, willingness to revisit

ZHOU Haiyan, YE Jianming. Mechanism of rural tourism involvement, restorative enviromental perception and revisiting intention: A mixed model of mediation and regulation[J].Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1567-1576.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Tab. 4

Fig. 2

Tab. 5

References 26

[1]	张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳. 我国乡村旅游公共服务多元系统协同水平时空演化及其作用机制分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(1): 298-309.
	[Zhang Xincheng, Gao Nan, Wang Linyan. Spatiotemporal evolution and function of the coordination level of the multi-system of rural tourism public service in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 298-309.]
[2]	冶建明, 贺明阳, 袁家梁, 等. 乡村旅游动机、旅游涉入与游后行为作用机制研究——以吐鲁番为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(7): 203-208.
	[Ye Jianming, He Mingyang, Yuan Jialiang, et al. Mechanism of rural tourism motivation, tourism involvement and post-travel behavior intention: A case of Turpan[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(7): 203-208.]
[3]	崔彤彤, 姜洪涛, 汪恒言. 参与者满意度对乡村地区户外音乐节重游意愿时效性的影响研究——以太湖迷笛音乐节为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2022(5): 119-125.
	[Cui Tongtong, Jiang Hongtao, Wang Hengyan. The influence of festival-goers’ satisfaction on revisit intention over time of outdoor music festival in rural area: A case study of Taihu Midi Music Festival[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2022(5): 119-125.]
[4]	陈钢华, 奚望. 旅游度假区游客恢复性环境感知对满意度与游后行为意向的影响——以广东南昆山为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2018, 32(4): 17-30.
	[Chen Ganghua, Xi Wang. The impact of visitors’ perceived destination restorative qualities on satisfaction and post-tour behavioral intentions: A case study of Nankunshan[J]. Tourism Science, 2018, 32(4): 17-30.]
[5]	李东, 王玉清, 由亚男, 等. 旅游涉入度、目的地形象与重游意愿: 一个被调节的中介作用模型[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(5): 871-881.
	[Li Dong, Wang Yuqing, You Ya’nan, et al. Mechanism of rural tourism motivation, tourism involvement and post-travel behavior intention: A case of Turpan[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 56(5): 871-881.]
[6]	Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 50-53.
[7]	Havitz M, Dimanche F. Leisure involvement revisited conceptual conundrums and measurement advances[J]. Journal of Leisure Research, 1997, 29: 245-278. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1997.11949796
[8]	黄杰. 自然旅游地旅游者恢复性环境感知、满意度与行为意向研究——喀纳斯案例[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2019.
	[Huang Jie. Examining the structural relationships of tourists’ perceived restorative qualities, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in natural-based tourist destination: A empirical study of Kanas[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2019.]
[9]	李如友, 石张宇. 游客价值共创行为对旅游满意度的影响机制——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(8): 201-208.
	[Li Ruyou, Shi Zhangyu. Effects of tourist value co-creation behavior on tourist satisfaction: A moderated mediation model[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(8): 201-208.]
[10]	周学军, 吕鸿江. 游客涉入情境下网红旅游目的地形象与游客忠诚的关系研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(1): 192-200.
	[Zhou Xuejun, Lü Hongjiang. Relationship between the image of internet-famous tourist destinations and tourist loyalty in the context of tourist involvement[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(1): 192-200.]
[11]	黄杰, 黄安民, 杨飞飞, 等. 旅游者恢复性环境感知与游后行为意向——影响机制和边界条件[J]. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(2): 31-45.
	[Huang Jie, Huang Anmin, Yang Feifei, et al. Tourists’ perceived restorative qualities and post-visit behavioral intention: The mechanism and boundary condition[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(2): 31-45.]
[12]	刘丹, 陈志钢. 户外音乐节对旅游地形象的影响探究——基于游客涉入度和满意度[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(2): 228-232.
	[Liu Dan, Chen Zhigang. Effects of outdoor music festival on destination image: Based on tourist involvement and satisfaction[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2017, 33(2): 228-232.]
[13]	柴成. 虚拟品牌社群互动、品牌涉入度与消费者购买意愿关系分析[J]. 商业经济研究, 2020(12): 74-77.
	[Cai Cheng. An analysis of the relationship among virtual brand community interaction, brand involvement and consumer purchase intention[J]. Journal of Commercial Economics, 2020(12): 74-77.]
[14]	Kyoung S L, Jee-Won K, Jae Y K. The effect of wine tourist motivation on revisit intention: Focused on moderation effect of wine involvement[J]. Korean Journal of Hospitality & Tourism, 2020, 29(5): 37-51.
[15]	王镇宁, 骆培聪. 城市居民自驾游动机、涉入及行为意向关系研究——以厦门市居民为调查对象[J]. 台湾农业探索, 2019(4): 25-31.
	[Wang Zhenning, Luo Peicong. Study on the relationship among motivation, involvement and behavioral intenion of urban residents in self-driving travel: Taking Xiamen residents as survey objects[J]. Taiwan Agricultural Research, 2019(4): 25-31.]
[16]	田彩云, 裴正兵. 文化遗产地游客感知价值、满意与忠诚的关系研究——基于北京圆明园的实证分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(2): 203-208.
	[Tian Caiyun, Pei Zhengbing. Study on the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty of tourists in cultural heritage sites[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(2): 203-208.]
[17]	方淑苗, 方帆. 乡村旅游感知价值对重游意愿的影响研究——地方依恋和游客满意度的链式多重中介作用[J]. 四川旅游学院学报, 2022(1): 79-85.
	[Fang Shumiao, Fang Fan. The impact of perceived value of rural tourism on revisit intention: Multiple mediating effects of place attachment and tourist satisfaction[J]. Journal of Sichuan Tourism University, 2022(1): 79-85.]
[18]	石巧玲, 薛发彪, 陈钦. 森林公园游客重游意愿影响因素实证研究——以福建省莆田市九龙谷国家森林公园为例[J]. 林业经济, 2021, 43(8): 50-61.
	[Shi Qiaoling, Xue Fabiao, Chen Qin. An empirical study on the influencing factors of tourists’ revisit intention in forest park: Taking Jiulonggu National Forest Park in Putian City, Fujian Province as an example[J]. Forestry Economics, 2021, 43(8): 50-61.]
[19]	杨帆, 冯娟, 谢双玉, 等. 游客满意度对目的地重游意愿的影响研究——以武汉市5A级景区为例[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 56(1): 116-126.
	[Yang Fan, Feng Juan, Xie Shuangyu, et al. A study on the evaluation of tourist satisfaction and its influence on the intention to revisit desination: Taking 5A scenic spots in Wuhan as examples[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 56(1): 116-126.]
[20]	奚望, 陈钢华, 胡宪洋. 旅游度假区游客地方依恋对心理恢复的影响研究——环境恢复性感知的中介作用[J]. 旅游科学, 2021, 35(3): 79-99.
	[Xi Wang, Chen Ganghua, Hu Xianyang. A study of the impact of vacationers’ place attachment and mental restoration: The mediating role of perceived destination restorative qualities[J]. Tourism Science, 2021, 35(3): 79-99.]
[21]	White M P, Pahl S, Ashbullby K, et al. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2013, 35: 40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002
[22]	郭永锐, 张捷, 卢韶婧, 等. 旅游者恢复性环境感知的结构模型和感知差异[J]. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(2): 93-102.
	[Guo Yongrui, Zhang Jie, Lu Shaojing, et al. The difference and structural model of tourist’s perceived restorative environment[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014, 29(2): 93-102.]
[23]	Chen G, Huang S, Zhang D. Understanding Chinese vacationers’ perceived destination restorative qualities: Cross-cultural validation of the perceived destination restorative qualities scale[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2017, 34(8): 1115-1127.
[24]	Lehto X, Kirillova K, Li H, et al. A cross-cultural validation of the perceived destination restorative qualities scale: The Chinese perspective[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2017, 22(3): 329-343. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2016.1250794
[25]	崔翰林. 湿地旅游者环境恢复性感知、满意度对重游意愿的影响研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2021.
	[Cui Hanlin. Study on the influence of wetland tourists’ environmental restoration perception and satisfaction on revisit intention[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University, 2021.]
[26]	黄红媛, 杨剑, 刘宁宁. 实用价值取向对全民健身消费行为的影响: 消费预期和让渡价值多重中介效应[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2021, 44(3): 96-104.
	[Huang Hongyuan, Yang Jian, Liu Ningning. The influence of utilitarianism on national fitness consumer behavior: The multiple mediating effects of consumer expectations and delivered value[J]. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 2021, 44(3): 96-104.]

变量		题项	参数显著性估计			标准化载荷	组合信度	平均方差抽取量
变量		题项	P值	标准误	Z值	标准化载荷	组合信度	平均方差抽取量
恢复性环境感知	兼容性	CP1	-	-	-	0.812	0.961	0.621
		CP2	***	0.054	18.710	0.816
		CP3	***	0.054	17.919	0.791
	迷人	FA1	***	0.052	16.906	0.759
		FA2	***	0.055	16.975	0.762
		FA3	***	0.053	18.386	0.806
	新奇	NO1	***	0.056	18.693	0.815
		NO2	***	0.054	17.841	0.789
		NO3	***	0.056	17.981	0.793
	逃逸	ES1	***	0.052	17.711	0.785
		ES2	***	0.055	18.110	0.797
		ES3	***	0.054	17.693	0.784
	一致性	CO1	***	0.053	17.795	0.788
		CO2	***	0.053	16.968	0.761
		CO3	***	0.058	16.837	0.757
旅游涉入度		TI1	-	-	-	0.848	0.949	0.699
		TI2	***	0.046	20.973	0.844
		TI3	***	0.046	21.237	0.850
		TI4	***	0.048	20.042	0.822
		TI5	***	0.045	19.798	0.816
		TI6	***	0.046	18.859	0.792
		TI7	***	0.047	21.282	0.851
		TI8	***	0.047	21.765	0.862
游客满意度		TS1	-	-	-	0.781	0.833	0.625
		TS2	***	0.062	16.041	0.825
		TS3	***	0.070	14.840	0.764
重游意愿		RI1	-	-	-	0.698	0.862	0.558
		RI2	***	0.080	13.769	0.777
		RI3	***	0.069	14.810	0.843
		RI4	***	0.081	13.436	0.756
		RI5	***	0.079	11.550	0.644
消费预期		CE1	-	-	-	0.932	0.941	0.842
		CE2	***	0.033	31.431	0.928
		CE3	***	0.035	28.416	0.893

变量	恢复性环境感知	旅游涉入度	游客满意度	重游意愿	消费预期
恢复性环境感知	0.788
旅游涉入度	0.547^**	0.836
游客满意度	0.605^**	0.431^**	0.791
重游意愿	0.620^**	0.551^**	0.836^**	0.747
消费预期	0.603^**	0.592^**	0.387^**	0.401^**	0.918

研究假设	路径关系	非标准化路径系数	标准化路径系数	标准误	Z值	P值	假设检验
H1	旅游涉入度→游客满意度	0.139	0.138	0.051	2.740	***	成立
H2	旅游涉入度→重游意愿	0.194	0.214	0.035	5.490	***	成立
H3	游客满意度→重游意愿	0.498	0.553	0.036	14.014	***	成立
H4	旅游涉入度→恢复性环境感知	0.501	0.525	0.042	11.927	***	成立
H5	恢复性环境感知→游客满意度	0.496	0.470	0.053	9.302	***	成立
H6	恢复性环境感知→重游意愿	0.149	0.157	0.041	3.664	***	成立

效应类型	路径	效应值	系数衍生值		Bootstrap 5000次抽取 95%置信区间		相对效应占比/%
效应类型	路径	效应值	标准误	P值	LLCI	ULCI	相对效应占比/%
直接效应	旅游涉入度→重游意愿	0.194	0.036	0.000	0.124	0.264	41.90
间接效应	旅游涉入度→恢复性环境感知→重游意愿	0.075	0.029	0.010	0.027	0.139	16.20
	旅游涉入度→游客满意度→重游意愿	0.070	0.029	0.015	0.021	0.132	15.12
	旅游涉入度→恢复性环境感知→游客满意度→重游意愿	0.124	0.024	0.000	0.090	0.184	26.78
总效应	旅游涉入度→重游意愿	0.463	0.040	0.000	0.383	0.541	100.00

因变量	自变量	B值	标准误	T值	P值	95%置信区间		β值
因变量	自变量	B值	标准误	T值	P值	LLCI	ULCI	β值
重游意愿	常数	2.074	0.036	57.126	0.000^**	2.0027	2.1455	-
	旅游涉入度	0.323	0.057	5.633	0.000^**	0.2102	0.4357	0.356
	消费预期	0.058	0.041	1.408	0.160	-0.0231	0.1396	0.078
	旅游涉入度×消费预期	0.108	0.041	2.662	0.008^**	0.0282	0.1877	0.163
	R²=0.276，F=48.336，P<0.001；ΔR²=0.014，ΔF=7.088，P=0.008
重游意愿	常数	2.089	0.026	80.639	0.000^**	2.0382	2.1401	-
	游客满意度	0.571	0.034	16.656	0.000^**	0.5035	0.6383	0.634
	消费预期	0.067	0.029	2.338	0.020^*	0.0106	0.1227	0.089
	游客满意度×消费预期	0.118	0.026	4.492	0.000^**	0.0663	0.1696	0.169
	R²=0.558，F=155.712，P<0.001；ΔR²=0.024，ΔF=20.179，P<0.001

Mechanism of rural tourism involvement, restorative enviromental perception and revisiting intention: A mixed model of mediation and regulation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 26

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0