基于DEA-Malmquist指数模型的旅游交通业绿色发展效率测度与评价——以兰州市为例

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.553

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旅游交通业绿色发展不仅是推进旅游高质量发展的新突破口，更是生态文明建设的重要体现。基于此，以西部重要交通枢纽城市兰州市为案例地，运用熵值法、数据包络分析-曼奎斯特（DEA-Malmquist）指数模型对2014—2023年旅游交通业绿色发展效率进行测度评价。结果表明：（1）从时空演化方面来看，时间上，兰州市旅游交通业环境成本综合指数呈下降态势，绿色发展效率有所提升，整体发展向好；空间上，兰州市主城区旅游交通业绿色发展效率呈现安宁区>西固区>七里河区>城关区的分布格局。（2）从曼奎斯特（Malmquist）指数分解结果来看，兰州市旅游交通业全要素生产率总体缓慢增长，其中城关区增幅最小，七里河区增幅最大。研究结果可为优化兰州市旅游交通业绿色发展及促进区域生态环境保护提供一定参考。

关键词: 绿色发展效率, 旅游交通业, DEA-Malmquist指数模型, 兰州市

Abstract:

Green development in tourism transportation industry represents both a new breakthrough for the advancement of high-quality tourism development and a significant embodiment of ecological civilization construction. Accordingly, this study takes the Lanzhou City, a critical transportation hub city in western China, as a case study, employing the entropy weight method and the DEA-Malmquist index model to measure and evaluate the green development efficiency of the tourism transportation industry of Lanzhou from 2014 to 2023. The following findings were obtained: (1) In terms of spatiotemporal evolution, temporally, the comprehensive environmental cost index of Lanzhou’s tourism transportation industry demonstrates a downward trajectory, which is accompanied by enhanced green development efficiency and a generally positive development trend. In a spatial sense, the green development efficiency of tourism transportation industry in Lanzhou’s main urban areas follows a distribution pattern in which Anning District displays the highest efficiency, followed sequentially by Xigu District, Qilihe District, and Chengguan District. (2) Using the Malmquist index decomposition results, the total factor productivity of Lanzhou’s tourism transportation industry experienced slow overall growth, with Chengguan District registering the least growth and Qilihe District achieving the most. The research results can provide a reference for optimizing the green development of the tourism transportation industry in Lanzhou City and promoting regional ecological protection.

Key words: green development efficiency, tourism transportation industry, DEA-Malmquist index model, Lanzhou City

刘丹琪, 杨阿莉, 辜友骞. 基于DEA-Malmquist指数模型的旅游交通业绿色发展效率测度与评价——以兰州市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025, 48(11): 2062-2071.

LIU Danqi, YANG Ali, GU Youqian. Measurement and evaluation of green development efficiency of tourism transportation industry based on the DEA-Malmquist index model: A case of Lanzhou City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(11): 2062-2071.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 32

[1]	刘雨婧, 唐健雄. 中国旅游业绿色发展效率时空演变特征及影响机理[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(3): 681-700. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220309
	[Liu Yujing, Tang Jianxiong. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing mechanism of green development efficiency of tourism industry in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(3): 681-700. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220309
[2]	Tang C C, Zheng Q Q, Qin N N. A review of research on green development in the tourism industry[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(5): 449-459. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.05.002
[3]	郇庆治. 习近平生态文明思想的科学体系研究[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2023(1): 16-25.
	[Huan Qingzhi. The scientific systematic study of Xi Jinping’s ecological civilization thought[J]. Marxism & Reality, 2023(1): 16-25. ]
[4]	谢晓如, 朱竑, 黄剑. 中国旅游业绿色发展的挑战与出路[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38 (11): 5-8.
	[Xie Xiaoru, Zhu Hong, Huang Jian. Challenges and solutions for the green development of China’s tourism industry[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2023, 38(11): 5-8. ]
[5]	Hu M J, Li Z J, Hou B. The influencing effect of tourism economy on green development efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(2): 1072,doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021072.
[6]	Chang K, Long Y, Yang J H, et al. Effects of subsidy and tax rebate policies on green firm research and development efficiency in China[J]. Energy, 2022, 25(8): 124-793.
[7]	Li W M, Cai Z Y, Jin L. A spatialtemporal analysis on green development in China’s Yellow River Basin: Model-based efficiency evaluation and influencing factors identification[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2023, 37(11): 4431-4444. doi: 10.1007/s00477-023-02516-y
[8]	段志坚. 旅游交通需求预测方法研究综述[J]. 交通科技与管理, 2021(18): 234-236.
	[Duan Zhijian. A review of research on methods for forecasting tourism transportation demand[J]. Transportation Science and Management, 2021(18): 234-236. ]
[9]	石彩霞, 贺小荣. “双碳”目标下黄河流域城市绿色发展效率测度及提升路径[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 528-538. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.371
	[Shi Caixia, He Xiaorong. Measurement and improvement path of urban green development efficiency in the Yellow River Basin under the “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” targets[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 528-538. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.371
[10]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 明庆忠, 等. 中国旅游交通碳排放格局及影响因素解析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2022, 38(2): 129-136.
	[Guo Xiangyang, Mu Xueqing, Ming Qingzhong, et al. Carbon emission pattern of China’s tourism transportation and its influencing factors[J]. Geography and GeoInformation Science, 2022, 38(2): 129-136. ]
[11]	Fang Z R, Gui W L, Han Z Z, et al. The efficiency evaluation and influencing factor analysis of regional green innovation: A refined dynamic network slacksbased measure approach[J]. Kybernetes, 2024, 53(6): 2153-2193. doi: 10.1108/K-03-2022-0420
[12]	Liu S H, Kuang J S, Ding D Z, et al. Low-carbon governance, fiscal decentralization, and enterprise green development: Evidence from China[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19(3): e0296490-e0296490, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296490.
[13]	睢党臣, 张扬, 孟望生. 黄河流域经济绿色发展效率测度及其空间分异研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(2): 116-119.
	[Sui Dangchen, Zhang Yang, Meng Wangsheng. Measurement and spatial differentiation of green development efficiency in the Yellow River Basin economy[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2023, 39(2): 116-119. ]
[14]	黄晶, 徐志超. 技术创新对绿色发展的空间效应与传导机制——基于长三角城市群的经验证据[J]. 工业技术经济, 2024, 43(2): 98-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2024.02.009
	[Huang Jing, Xu Zhichao. The spatial effect and transmission mechanism of technological innovation on green development: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Industrial Technology and Economy, 2024, 43(2): 98-105. ]
[15]	赵杨, 王京, 潘为华. 中国省域新型城镇化水平与绿色发展水平的区域特征及其影响机制[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(9): 1-9. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.09.001
	[Zhao Yang, Wang Jing, Pan Weihua. Regional characteristics and impact mechanisms of new urbanization and green development level in China at the provincial level[J]. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(9): 1-9. ] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.09.001
[16]	Feng Y L, Liu B Q, Yan Q, et al. Forecasting research on urban green development based on system dynamics: A case study of Hefei in China[J]. Systems, 2024, 12(4): 16-24. doi: 10.3390/systems12010016
[17]	Yang L, Ma Z X, Yin J, et al. The evolution and determinants of Chinese interprovincial green development efficiency: An MCSEDEATobitbased perspective[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(18): 53904-53919. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25894-w
[18]	Chen Z, Deng T H. Investigating and improving the ecological efficiency of urban agglomeration based on the SuperSBM model[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(54): 115628-115645. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30502-y
[19]	胡志毅. 基于DEAMalmquist模型的中国旅行社业发展效率特征分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(5): 23-30.
	[Hu Zhiyi. An analysis of the efficiency characteristics of the travel agency industry of China based on a DEAMalmquist model[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2015, 30(5): 23-30. ]
[20]	方应波. 我国绿色发展评价指标体系研究综述——基于文献计量与社会网络分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(18): 73-79.
	[Fang Yingbo. Review on the evaluation index system of green development in China: Based on bibliometrics and social network analysis[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(18): 73-79. ]
[21]	郝淑双, 朱喜安. 中国区域绿色发展水平影响因素的空间计量[J]. 经济经纬, 2019, 36(1): 10-17.
	[Hao Shushuang, Zhu Xi’an. Spatial econometrics for influencing factors of regional green development of China[J]. Economic Survey, 2019, 36(1): 10-17. ]
[22]	张宇果. 城市群绿色发展效率及影响因素研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.
	[Zhang Yuguo. The green development efficiency and influencing factors research of urban agglomeration[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019. ]
[23]	傅春, 欧阳欢蕤, 赵雪茹. 基于DEA及Malmquist指数模型的江西省绿色发展效率测度与评价[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(6): 51-57, 172.
	[Fu Chun, Ouyang Huanrui, Zhao Xueru. Measurement and evaluation on green development efficiency of Jiangxi Province based on DEA and Malmquist index model[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(6): 51-57, 172. ]
[24]	孟望生, 刘华桢, 张扬. 黄河流域七大城市群绿色发展效率测度及特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 846-856. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.401
	[Meng Wangsheng, Liu Huazhen, Zhang Yang. Measurement and characterization of green development efficiency in seven urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 846-856. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.401
[25]	鹿晨昱, 黄萍, 张彤, 等. 甘肃省绿色发展效率时空演化与驱动因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(2): 305-315. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2022.176
	[Lu Chenyu, Huang Ping, Zhang Tong, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of the green development efficiency in Gansu Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(2): 305-315. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2022.176
[26]	余焕, 雷敏, 马金晶, 等. 基于绿色GDP和生态效率的区域可持续发展研究——以陕西省为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(2): 284-293. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2022.182
	[Yu Huan, Lei Min, Ma Jinjing, et al. Regional sustainable development based on green GDP and ecological efficiency: A case of Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(2): 284-293. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2022.182
[27]	凌娟. “绿色发展”国内外研究综述[J]. 中国市场, 2023(3): 55-57.
	[Ling Juan. A review of domestic and international research on “green development”[J]. China Market, 2023(3): 55-57. ]
[28]	赵国甫, 赵家辉. 绿色发展研究综述[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2022, 42(11): 4-6, 10.
	[Zhao Guofu, Zhao Jiahui. A review of research on green development[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 2022, 42(11): 4-6, 10. ]
[29]	李晋红, 朱学昱. 基于DEA-Malmquist指数模型的绿色发展效率测度与评价——以甘肃省为例[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(8): 184-191.
	[Li Jinhong, Zhu Xueyu. Measurement and evaluati-on of green development efficiency based on DEA-Malmquist index model: Taking Gansu Province as an example[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 61(8): 184-191. ]
[30]	Anselin L, Gallo J. Interpolation of air quality measures in hedonic house price models: Spatial aspects[J]. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2006, 1(1): 31-52. doi: 10.1080/17421770600661337
[31]	Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[32]	Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in industrialized countries[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(12): 66-83.

指标	一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	单位	属性
投入	劳动投入	人力资源储备	年末从业人员数量	10⁴人	+
	科技投入	科技事业费用支出	环保技术研发、合作交流支出	10⁴元	+
	科技投入	科技事业费用支出	绿色出行技术推广支出	10⁴元	+
	资源投入	资源投入综合指数	总用水量	10⁴ m³	+
			总用电量	10⁴ kWh	+
			石油、燃油、石油液化气供应量	10⁴ bbl	-
	资本投入	资本存量	固定资产投资额	10⁴元	+
产出	绿色GDP	经济效益	GDP	10⁴元	+
		环境成本综合指数	交通废气排放量	10⁴ t	-
			交通噪音产出量	10⁴ dB	-
			交通固体废弃物排放量	10⁴ t	-

地区	综合技术效率	纯技术效率	规模效率	规模报酬
城关区	0.2917	0.3077	0.9480	规模报酬递增
七里河区	0.5181	0.5343	0.9696	规模报酬递增
西固区	0.7939	1.0000	0.7939	规模报酬不变
安宁区	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	规模报酬不变
兰州市	0.1673	1.0000	0.1673	规模报酬不变