收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 656-668.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2025.774 cstr: 32274.14.ALG2025774

• 新质生产力赋能旅游高质量发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

新质生产力与文旅融合发展的协同演进及空间效应

王生霞(), 武芯如()   

  1. 兰州财经大学工商管理学院甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-28 修回日期:2025-12-19 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 武芯如(2002-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事旅游管理等方面的研究. E-mail: 19893162684@163.com
  • 作者简介:王生霞(1983-),女,博士,副教授,主要从事旅游地理等方面的研究. E-mail: wangshx@lzufe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省软科学专项项目(24JR4ZA079);甘肃省软科学专项项目(23JRZA421);甘肃省教育厅高校教师创新基金项目(2026A-087);甘肃省教育厅高校教师创新基金项目(2024A-071);甘肃省教育厅高校教师创新基金项目(2023A-070);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(23JRRA1187);兰州财经大学校级一般科研项目(Lzufe2024C-007)

Synergistic evolution and spatial effects of new quality productive forces and cultural-tourism integration

WANG Shengxia(), WU Xinru()   

  1. College of Business Administration, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
  • Received:2025-11-28 Revised:2025-12-19 Published:2026-04-25 Online:2026-04-28

摘要:

新质生产力与文旅融合的良性互动是推动区域发展协调与产业结构升级的重要路径。以2011—2023年中国30个省域为研究对象,综合运用哈肯模型、Dagum基尼系数及探索性空间分析方法,揭示了新质生产力与文旅融合协同演化的内在机制与时空分异。结果表明:(1) 新质生产力与文旅融合复合系统的协同值呈“培育期-临界跃迁期-高质量跃升期”三阶段演进特征。(2) 空间上,协同水平呈“东部>中部>西部”的梯度分布,并表现出显著的空间集聚,逐步形成“高-高”与“低-低”协同极并存的极化格局,区域联动与分化态势并存,且区域间差异是总体差异的主要来源。(3) 文旅融合子系统主导新质生产力与文旅融合复合系统协同演化过程,新质生产力在短期内对文旅融合存在微弱的挤出效应,而文旅融合对新质生产力提升表现出持续的驱动作用。为此,研究结果提出优化技术适配机制,实施区域差异化政策,加强跨区域协作等建议以提升复合系统整体协同水平。

关键词: 新质生产力, 文旅融合, 协同演进, 空间效应, 作用机制

Abstract:

The virtuous interaction between new-quality productive forces and cultural-tourism integration constitutes a key pathway for promoting coordinated regional development and facilitating in dustrial upgrading. To systematically uncover the intrinsic mechanisms and spatiotemporal differentiation of their co-evolution, this study analyzes data from 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2011 to 2023. It develops an evaluation framework for new-quality productive forces across four dimensions: Innovation-driven, digitally empowered, factor upgrading, and green efficiency. For cultural-tourism integration, an evaluation framework is established based on three dimensions: Foundational integration capacity, driving force for integration, and manifestations of integration. The Haken model is used to identify the order parameters and dynamic mechanisms of co-evolution, whereas the Dagum Gini coefficient, global Moran’s I, and kernel density estimation are applied to analyze regional disparities, spatial correlations, and dynamic evolution patterns of their synergistic levels. The findings reveal that (1) In the temporal dimension, the synergy value of the “new-quality productive forces-cultural-tourism integration” composite system follows a three-stage evolution pattern: Incubation phase→critical transition phase→high-quality leap phase. Overall synergy levels have continuously improved, with the central region’s synergy value exceeding that of the eastern region in 2023, highlighting the pivotal role of institutional innovation in overcoming path dependence. (2) Spatially, coordination levels display a gradient pattern of “east>central>west” with significant spatial clustering, resulting in a polarized pattern where “high-high” and “low-low” coordination poles coexist. Dagum decomposition shows that interregional differences are the primary source of overall variation, and the contribution of super-variable density has significantly increased since 2020, reflecting intensified interprovincial coordination disparities. (3) Mechanistically, cultural-tourism integration functions as the order parameter steering system evolution, continuously exerting traction on the development of new-quality productive forces. However, in the short term, new-quality productive forces exert a marginal crowding-out effect on cultural-tourism integration due to technology adaptation costs and resource displacement, indicating that the overall system is still undergoing a process of synergistic optimization. Based on these findings, this paper recommends strengthening the demand-driven role of cultural-tourism integration, improving adaptation mechanisms for new-type productive forces, implementing differentiated regional policies, and enhancing cross-regional collaboration and factor mobility. These measures aim to elevate the overall coordination level of the composite system and advance high-quality, coordinated regional development.

Key words: new quality productive forces, cultural-tourism integration, co-evolution, spatial effects, mechanism of action