草甸草原降水特征与土壤水分对降水脉动响应——以呼伦贝尔草原额尔古纳市为例

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.094

干旱区地理 ›› 2022, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1881-1889.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.094

草甸草原降水特征与土壤水分对降水脉动响应——以呼伦贝尔草原额尔古纳市为例

张存厚¹(),段晓凤¹,杨丽萍¹,越昆¹,张立²()

1.内蒙古自治区生态与农业气象中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010051
2.内蒙古自治区气象信息中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010051

收稿日期:2022-03-10 修回日期:2022-06-21 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2023-02-01
通讯作者: 张立（1982-），男，硕士，高级工程师，主要从事数据挖掘与应用方面研究. E-mail: beht@foxmail.com
作者简介:张存厚（1977-），男，博士，正高级工程师，主要从事草地生态和灾害评估等方面研究. E-mail: zhangcunhou2004@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2021GG0020);内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2019MS04006)

Characteristics of precipitation and response of soil moisture to precipitation pulse in meadow steppe: A case of Ergun City in Hulunbuir steppe

ZHANG Cunhou¹(),DUAN Xiaofeng¹,YANG Liping¹,YUE Kun¹,ZHANG Li²()

1. Centre of Ecology and Agricultural Meteorology, Inner Mongolia Weather Bureau, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, China
2. Meteorological Information Centre, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Weather Bureau, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2022-03-10 Revised:2022-06-21 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2023-02-01
Contact: Li ZHANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用额尔古纳牧业气象试验站降水量与土壤水分数据，通过降水与土壤水分动态变化及转化过程分析，确定土壤水分响应的降水临界值与不同降水级别引起土壤水分响应的概率，构建了降水过程量与土壤水分增量函数关系。结果表明：（1）研究区降水量呈“先降后升”变化趋势，年内降水量呈单峰型分布。（2）研究区以无降水天气为主，降水又以小降水事件占主导，大降水事件发生频次低、过程降水量大，小降水事件则相反。（3）可以引起研究区0~50 cm各层土壤水分响应的降水临界值分别为8.1 mm、10.1 mm、19.0 mm、27.9 mm和31.6 mm，小雨仅能引起0~10 cm土壤水分响应的概率为28.6%，中雨不能引起40~50 cm土壤水分的响应。（4）降水量与0~10 cm和10~20 cm土壤水分达到最大值时的滞后时间呈现出极显著负相关关系，与20~30 cm呈显著负相关关系，0~30 cm各层土壤水分达到最大值时的滞后时间与降水量符合幂函数关系。（5）降水量和0~50 cm土壤水分增量均呈现出极显著正相关关系，降水量与0~10 cm和10~20 cm土壤水分增量符合线性关系，与20~30 cm、30~40 cm和40~50 cm土壤水分增量符合多项式关系。检验结果表明，构建的函数模型可以较好地模拟研究区0~30 cm各层水分增量。研究结果为地方政府抗旱减灾提供了科学依据。

关键词: 土壤水分, 降水事件, 脉动响应, 临界值, 时滞效应, 草甸草原

Abstract:

The regulation of structure and function in an ecosystem is largely affected by soil moisture, and the grassland ecosystem is more sensitive to soil moisture than other ecosystems. The change of soil moisture is determined by precipitation, so how does precipitation affect grassland soil moisture? What is the response law to the precipitation of grassland soil moisture? These are the key problems in the benign development of grassland ecosystems. However, there have been few reports on the response of soil moisture to precipitation in the meadow steppe in north China. To reveal the characteristics of precipitation and the response of soil moisture to precipitation pulse, the Hulunbuir meadow steppe was taken as the research object, dynamic change, transformation process of precipitation, and soil moisture were analyzed. The influence characteristics of different scale precipitation processes on soil water were explored and the critical values of rainfall, which could cause each layer of soil moisture (0-50 cm) of the meadow steppe were determined based on the data of precipitation and soil moisture from Ergun Animal Husbandry Meteorology Experiment Station. The relationship models between precipitation and soil water increment were established to invert soil water content, which could significantly reduce the spatial uncertainty of refined drought assessment and provide a scientific basis for local government to fight drought and reduce the disaster. The response regularity of soil moisture to precipitation pulse at different depths was revealed in the meadow steppe. The results showed that (1) the precipitation showed a trend of “decreasing first and then rising”, and the annual precipitation showed a single-peak distribution. (2) The weather was dominated by no precipitation, and the precipitation was dominated by small-precipitation events in a meadow steppe. The heavy precipitation events were characterized by low occurrence frequency and large precipitation, whereas the small-precipitation events were the opposite. (3) The critical values of precipitation that can cause the response of 0-50 cm soil moisture were 8.1 mm, 10.1 mm, 19.0 mm, 27.9 mm, and 31.6 mm, respectively. The probability of light rain only causing 0-10 cm soil moisture response was 28.6%, whereas moderate rain could not cause 40-50 cm soil moisture response. (4) Precipitation was extreme significantly negatively correlated with the lag time when soil moisture reached the maximum value in 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm, and was significantly negatively correlated with the lag time when soil moisture reached the maximum value in 20-30 cm. The lag time of soil moisture reaching the maximum value in each layer of 0-30 cm accords with the power function relationship with precipitation. (5) There was a significant positive correlation between precipitation and soil moisture increments of 0-50 cm. Precipitation was linear with soil moisture increments of 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm, and polynomial with soil moisture increment of 20-30 cm, 30-40 cm, and 40-50 cm. The model test results showed that the simulation effect of soil moisture increment models in each layer of 0-30 cm was better.

Key words: soil moisture, precipitation events, pulse response, critical value, hysteresis effect, meadow steppe

张存厚, 段晓凤, 杨丽萍, 越昆, 张立. 草甸草原降水特征与土壤水分对降水脉动响应——以呼伦贝尔草原额尔古纳市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(6): 1881-1889.

ZHANG Cunhou, DUAN Xiaofeng, YANG Liping, YUE Kun, ZHANG Li. Characteristics of precipitation and response of soil moisture to precipitation pulse in meadow steppe: A case of Ergun City in Hulunbuir steppe[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(6): 1881-1889.

图/表 10

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

表4

图3

表5

图4

图5

参考文献 27

[1]	柴雯, 王根绪, 李元寿, 等. 长江源区不同植被覆盖下土壤水分对降水的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2008, 30(2): 329-337.
	[Chai Wen, Wang Genxu, Li Yuanshou, et al. Response of soil moisture under different vegetation coverage to precipitation in the headwaters of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2008, 30(2): 329-337.]
[2]	Hu J C, Cao W X, Zhang J B, et al. Quantifying responses of winter wheat physiological processes to soil water stress for use in growth simulation modeling[J]. Pedosphere, 2004, 14(4): 509, doi: 10.1007/s10705-004-4288-7. doi: 10.1007/s10705-004-4288-7
[3]	Pascual I, Azcona I, Morales F, et al. Photosynthetic response of pepper plants to wilt induced by Verticillium adhliae and soil water deficit[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2010, 167: 701, doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.12.012. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.12.012 pmid: 20172618
[4]	张淑勇, 夏江宝, 张光灿, 等. 黄河三角洲贝壳堤岛叶底珠叶片光合作用对CO₂浓度及土壤水分的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(8): 1937-1945.
	[Zhang Shuyong, Xia Jiangbao, Zhang Guangcan, et al. Photosynthetic responses to changes in CO₂ concentration and soil moisture in leaves of Securinega suffruticosa from shell ridge islands in the Yellow River Delta, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(8): 1937-1945.]
[5]	范凯凯, 李淑贞, 陈金强, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原土壤呼吸作用空间异质性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 205-211. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.01.025
	[Fan Kaikai, Li Shuzhen, Chen Jinqiang, et al. Spatial heterogeneity analysis of soil respiration in Hulunbuir grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 205-211.] doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.01.025
[6]	单立山, 李毅, 段雅楠, 等. 红砂幼苗根系形态特征和水分利用效率对土壤水分变化的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(6): 1198-1205.
	[Shan Lishan, Li Yi, Duan Ya’nan, et al. Response of root morphology and water use efficiency of Reaumuria soongorica to soil water change[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 1198-1205.]
[7]	Huxman T E, Snyder K A, Tissue D, et al. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semi-arid and arid ecosystems[J]. Oecologia, 2004, 141: 254-268. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1682-4
[8]	Fay P A, Blair J M, Smith M D, et al. Relative effects of precipitation variability and warming on tallgrass prairie ecosystem function[J]. Biogeo-sciences, 2011, 8: 3053-3068.
[9]	Knapp A K, Fay P A, Blair J M, et al. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland[J]. Science, 2002, 298: 2202-2205. doi: 10.1126/science.1076347 pmid: 12481139
[10]	Williams C A, Hanan N, Scholes R J, et al. Complexity in water and carbon dioxide fluxes following rain pulses in an African savanna[J]. Oecologia, 2009, 161: 469-480. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1405-y pmid: 19582479
[11]	Potts D L, Huxman T E, Cable J M, et al. Antecedent moisture and seasonal precipitation influence the response of canopy-scale carbon and water exchange to rainfall pulses in semi-arid grassland[J]. New Phytologist, 2006, 170: 849-860. pmid: 16684243
[12]	Chen S P, Lin G H, Huang J H, et al. Dependence of carbon sequestration on the differential responses of ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration to rain pulses in a semiarid steppe[J]. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15: 2450-2461. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01879.x
[13]	赵文智, 刘鹄. 干旱、半干旱环境降水脉动对生态系统的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1): 243-249. pmid: 21548315
	[Zhao Wenzhi, Liu Hao. Precipitation pulses and ecosystem responses in arid and semiarid regions: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(1): 243-249.] pmid: 21548315
[14]	Knapp A K, Smith M D. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production[J]. Science, 2001, 291: 481-484. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5503.481 pmid: 11161201
[15]	Blair J M. Fire, N availability, and plant response in grasslands: A test of the transient maxima hypothesis[J]. Ecology, 1997, 78: 2359-2368. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2359:FNAAPR]2.0.CO;2
[16]	张存厚, 王明玖, 张立, 等. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原地上净初级生产力对气候变化响应的模拟[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 41-50.
	[Zhang Cunhou, Wang Mingjiu, Zhang Li, et al. Response of meadow steppe ANPP to cilmate change in Hulunbeier, Inner Mongolia: A simulation study[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinia, 2013, 22(3): 41-50.]
[17]	张存厚, 杨丽萍, 越昆, 等. 锡林郭勒典型草原土壤水分对降水过程的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(8): 133-139.
	[Zhang Cunhou, Yang Liping, Yue Kun, et al. Response of soil moisture to precipitation process in Xilingol typical grassland[J]. Journal of Arid Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(8): 133-139.]
[18]	GB/T28592-2012. 中华人民共和国国家标准: 降水量等级[S]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012.
	[GB/T28592-2012. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Grade of precipitation[S]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012.]
[19]	樊婷, 张存厚, 张德广, 等. 内蒙古自治区达茂旗荒漠草原土壤水分对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(1): 72-77.
	[Fan Ting, Zhang Cunhou, Zhang Deguang, et al. Effect of precipitation patterns on soil moisture of desert steppes in Damao County, Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulleitin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(1): 72-77.]
[20]	何志斌, 赵文智. 半干旱地区流动沙地土壤湿度变异及其对降水的依赖[J]. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(4): 359-362.
	[He Zhibin, Zhao Wenzhi. Variability of soil moisture of shifting sandy land and its dependence on precipitation in semi-arid region[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2002, 22(4): 359-362.]
[21]	Beatley J C. Phenological events and their environmental triggers in Mojave Desert ecosystems[J]. Ecology, 1974, 55: 856-863. doi: 10.2307/1934421
[22]	Austin A T, Yahdjian L, Stark J M, et al. Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems[J]. Oecologia, 2004, 141: 221-235. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1519-1 pmid: 14986096
[23]	Bachman S, Heisler-White J L, Pendall E, et al. Elevated carbon dioxide alters impacts of precipitation pulses on ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration in a semi-arid grassland[J]. Oecologia, 2010, 162: 791-802. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1511-x pmid: 19943173
[24]	Schwinning S, Osvaldo E S. Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems[J]. Oecologia, 2004, 141: 211-220. pmid: 15034778
[25]	Sala O E, Lauenroth W K. Small rainfall events: An ecological role in semiarid regions[J]. Oecologia, 1982, 53: 301-304. doi: 10.1007/BF00389004 pmid: 28311731
[26]	刘冰, 赵文志, 常学向, 等. 黑河流域荒漠区土壤水分对降水脉动响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(3): 716-722.
	[Liu Bing, Zhao Wenzhi, Chang Xuexiang, et al. Response of soil moisture to rainfall pulse in desert region of the Heihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2011, 31(3): 716-722.]
[27]	原鹏飞, 丁国栋, 王炜炜, 等. 毛乌素沙地降雨入渗和蒸发特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(4): 23-27.
	[Yuan Pengfei, Ding Guodong, Wang Weiwei, et al. Characteristics of rainwater infiltration and evaporation in Mu Us Sandland[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 6(4): 23-27.]

土壤深度/cm	土壤容重/g·m^-3	田间持水量/%	凋萎湿度/%	土壤质地
0~10	1.13	32.9	8.9	壤土
10~20	1.12	30.4	10.2	壤土
20~30	1.18	30.2	7.7	壤土
30~40	1.13	32.8	7.7	黏土
40~50	1.18	29.1	6.9	黏土

降水过程	降水量区间范围/mm
降水过程	0.1~1.9	2.0~4.9	5.0~9.9	10.0~19.9	>20.0
降水事件/次	338	90	33	31	9
降水日数/d	555	167	78	59	41
降水量/mm	-	472.3	572.7	809.6	1160.8
降水事件占比/%	67.5	18.0	6.6	6.2	1.8
降水日数占比/%	61.7	18.6	8.7	6.6	4.6
降水量占比/%	10.4	14.0	17.0	24.1	34.5

降水级别	土壤深度/cm					样本量/个
降水级别	0~10	10~20	20~30	30~40	40~50	样本量/个
小雨/%	28.6					57
中雨/%	82.4	29.4	5.9	2.9		34
大雨/%	100.0	77.3	54.5	31.8	27.3	22
暴雨/%	100.0	88.9	88.9	77.8	66.7	9
降水量临界值/mm	8.1	10.1	19.0	27.9	31.6	72

因子	滞后时间
因子	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	20~30 cm	30~40 cm	40~50 cm
降水量	-0.756^**	-0.678^**	-0.665^*	-0.645	-0.740
有效降水强度	-0.409^*	-0.351	-0.488	-0.092	0.193
0~10 cm土壤水分初始值	-0.565^**	-0.652^**	-0.058	-0.232	-0.407
0~10 cm土壤水分最大值	-0.599^**	-0.651^**	-0.382^*	-0.378	-0.275
10~20 cm土壤水分初始值		-0.614^**	-0.108	-0.230	-0.556^*
10~20 cm土壤水分最大值		-0.707^**	-0.396^*	-0.424	-0.644^**
20~30 cm土壤水分初始值			-0.139^*	-0.294	-0.545^*
20~30 cm土壤水分最大值			-0.633^**	-0.587^*	-0.643^**

土壤深度/cm	函数关系	决定系数（R²）	相关系数（r）	样本量
0~10	y=1.0274x+4.6937	0.5260	0.700^**	68
10~20	y=1.2581x-9.4871	0.7234	0.830^**	57
20~30	y=0.0127x²+0.3734x-1.2844	0.5714	0.720^**	30
30~40	y=0.0375x²-1.2821x+16.248	0.6796	0.730^**	16
40~50	y=0.0094x²+0.0111x-0.1193	0.4823	0.676^**	15

草甸草原降水特征与土壤水分对降水脉动响应——以呼伦贝尔草原额尔古纳市为例

Characteristics of precipitation and response of soil moisture to precipitation pulse in meadow steppe: A case of Ergun City in Hulunbuir steppe

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	温欣, 尚海丽, 黄显武, 李建伟, 李依临, 杨宏宇. 不同沉陷应力区土壤水分和溶质运移的模拟试验[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1481-1492.
[2]	于晓燕, 汪星, 吕雯, 高元亢, 王永强, 王雁超. 黄土丘陵区带状柠条锦鸡儿林地深层土壤干化及根系分布[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 753-762.
[3]	孙琰蕙,张定海,张志山. 腾格里沙漠不同类型沙丘土壤水分含量与地形-植被因子关系研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1570-1578.
[4]	朱家龙,周智彬,王立生,吕平,姜咏雪. 免灌人工梭梭林生长与土壤水分变化的耦合关系[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1579-1590.
[5]	宝乐尔其木格. 1960—2020年内蒙古荒漠草原连续无降水日变化特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(1): 46-56.
[6]	李翠娜,刘天琦,吴东丽. 自动土壤水分观测资料异常数据检测方法[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(4): 1093-1103.
[7]	姚雪玲,杨国靖,王帅,郭秀江. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同深度土壤水分对降雨的响应及其稳定性[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(2): 507-513.
[8]	郑博文, 胡顺军, 周智彬, 王泽锋, 李传金. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘风沙土土壤水分特征与毛管水最大上升高度[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 1059-1066.
[9]	韩姣姣，段旭，赵洋毅. 金沙江干热河谷不同植被坡面土壤水分时空分布特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(1): 121-129.
[10]	曹昀, 纪欣圣, 国志昌, 吴海英. 土壤水分含量对虉草幼苗保护酶与渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(4): 780-785.
[11]	刘璐, 蒋进, 宋春武. 不同防护措施对梭梭幼苗生长和土壤水分的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(3): 564-571.
[12]	蔡亮红, 丁建丽. 基于改进植被指数土壤水分遥感反演[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(6): 1248-1255.
[13]	王顺利, 王荣新, 敬文茂, 赵维俊, 牛赟, 马剑, 朱红. 祁连山干旱山地草地生物量对水分条件的响应[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(4): 772-779.
[14]	梁丰, 刘丹丹, 王婉昭, 张富荣, 于芳健. 1961-2013年东北地区夏季极端降水事件变化特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(3): 565-572.
[15]	张禹舜, 贾文雄, 刘亚荣, 赵珍, 陈京华, 王洁. 近11a来祁连山净初级生产力对气候因子的响应[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(1): 77-85.