Collect ｜ Homepage Advertisement ｜ Contact us ｜ Message
Adv. search

Arid Land Geography >

2021 , Vol. 44 >Issue 2: 565 - 573

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.02.27

Regional Development

Spatial selection of ecological compensation in key ecological functional areas of Xinjiang

Expand
  • 1. School of Economic and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China
    2. School of Public Policy and Management, Xinjiang University of Finance & Economics, Urumqi 830012, Xinjiang, China
    3. Xinjiang Police College, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China

Received date: 2020-03-03

  Revised date: 2020-10-26

  Online published: 2021-04-14

Fold

Abstract

Located in northwest China, 59 key eco-functional areas of Xinjiang occupy an area of 1.16 million square kilometers at national and provincial levels. By 2019, some of these eco-functional areas showed signs of ecological degradation because the environment is vulnerable and the concentration of economy and population is low, posing a grievous threat to the environmental security of Xinjiang and China as a whole. Therefore, a study of the ecological compensation in key eco-functional areas in Xinjiang is vital to the preservation and recovery of the environment and promotion of sustainable economic and social models in Xinjiang. Based on the principle of spatial selection of ecological compensation, the goal of this study was to identify and interpret the basic characteristics of the key eco-functional areas in Xinjiang from the perspective of regional category, the distribution of capital, and the ecological value of the resource. Quantitative methods of “benefit-cost ratio targeting” and “priority of ecological compensation” were used to analyze the priority scales of ecological compensation in Xinjiang. The results show that the priority of ecological compensation in Xinjiang is consistent with the allocation of transfer payment funds provided by the analysis of “priority of ecological compensation”. Due to neglect of environmental factors, the priority of ecological compensation was presented with an inadequate ecological transfer payment. In the “benefit-cost ratio targeting” analysis, without considering livelihood and environmental factors, the priority of ecological compensation in Xinjiang was inconsistent with the transfer payment. However, the latter analysis can still help us understand the spatial choice of ecological compensation area in the ensuing period. When allocating transfer payment funds, environmental and livelihood factors should balance the priority of ecological compensation and transfer payment funds and improve the efficiency of transfer payment funds so as to promote a sustainable and optimal ecological environment in Xinjiang.

Key words： ecological compensation; ecological functional areas; spatial selection; Xinjiang

Cite this article

SUN Yunfeng,QIU Wei,FAN Jingyun . Spatial selection of ecological compensation in key ecological functional areas of Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021 , 44(2) : 565 -573 . DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.02.27

References

[1] Moran D, Mc Vittie A, Allcroft D J, et al. Quantifying public preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: A comparison of methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,63(1):42-53.
[2] 刘桂环, 文一惠, 谢婧, 等. 完善国家主体功能区框架下生态保护补偿政策的思考[J]. 环境保护, 2015,43(23):39-42.
[2] [ Liu Guihuan, Wen Yihui, Xie Jing, et al. Thoughts on perfecting ecological protection compensation policy under the framework of national main functional areas[J]. Environmental Protection, 2015,43(23):39-42. ]
[3] 赖力, 黄贤金, 刘伟良. 生态补偿理论、方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(6):2870-2877.
[3] [ Lai Li, Huang Xianjin, Liu Weiliang. Research progress of ecological compensation theory and methods[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(6):2870-2877. ]
[4] 王金南, 庄国泰. 生态补偿机制与政策设计国际研究会论文集[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2006: 25-44.
[4] [ Wang Jinnan, Zhuang Guotai. Proceedings of the international society for ecological compensation mechanism and policy design[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2006: 25-44. ]
[5] 孔德帅. 区域生态补偿机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017: 39-70.
[5] [ Kong Deshuai. Research on regional eco-compensation mechanism[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2017: 39-70. ]
[6] Chomitz K M, Fonsonseca G A B, Alger K, et al. Viable reserve networks arise from individual landholder responses to conservation incentives[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(2):40.
[7] 赵雪雁. 生态补偿效率研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(6):1960-1969.
[7] [ Zhao Xueyan. Review on ecological compensation efficiency[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(6):1960-1969. ]
[8] 戴其文, 赵雪雁, 徐伟, 等. 生态补偿对象空间选择的研究进展及展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009,24(10):1772-1784.
[8] [ Dai Qiwen, Zhao Xueyan, Xu Wei, et al. Research progress and prospect of spatial selection of ecological compensation objects[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009,24(10):1772-1784. ]
[9] Babcock B A, Lakashminarayan P G, Wu J J, et al. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities[J]. Land Economics, 1997,73(3):325-339.
[10] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919.
[10] [ Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. A method of ecosystem service value based on expert knowledge[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919. ]
[11] 赵翠薇, 王世杰. 生态补偿效益、标准——国际经验及对我国的启示[J]. 地理研究, 2010,29(4):597-606.
[11] [ Zhao Cuiwei, Wang Shijie. Benefits and standards of ecological compensation: International experience and its enlightenment to China[J]. Geographical Research, 2010,29(4):597-606. ]
[12] 杨振, 雷军, 英成龙, 等. 新疆县域城镇化的综合测度及空间分异格局分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017,40(1):230-237.
[12] [ Yang Zhen, Lei Jun, Ying Chenglong, et al. Comprehensive measurement and spatial differentiation pattern analysis of the county urbanization in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2017,40(1):230-237. ]
[13] 呼梦霞, 杜宏茹, 张小雷, 等. 基于主体功能区视角下新疆民生质量的区域差异及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017,40(3):655-663.
[13] [ Hu Mengxia, Du Hongru, Zhang Xiaolei, et al. Regional differences and influencing factors of the quality of Xinjiang People’s livelihood based on the major function zones[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2017,40(3):655-663. ]
[14] 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 陈亚鹏. 科技支撑新疆塔里木河流域生态修复及可持续管理[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019,41(5):901-907.
[14] [ Chen Yaning, Li Weihong, Chen Yapeng. Science in supporting the ecological restoration and sustainable development of the Tarim River Basin[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019,41(5):901-907. ]
[15] Claassen R, Cattaneo A, Johansson R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U. S. experience in theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):737-752.
[16] 刘晋宏, 孔德帅, 靳乐山. 生态补偿区域的空间选择研究——以青海省国家重点生态功能区转移支付为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(1):53-62.
[16] [ Liu Jinhong, Kong Deshuai, Jin Leshan. Research on the spatial selection of ecological compensation areas: Using the transfer payment of national key ecological function areas of Qinghai Province as an example[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2019,39(1):53-62. ]
[17] 苏芳, 宋妮妮, 尚海洋. 生态服务付费存在的问题及生态工人机制探讨[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020,43(2):467-473.
[17] [ Su Fang, Song Nini, Shang Haiyang. Theoretical and practical problems in payments of ecoservice and discussion on the mechanism of ecoworkers[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020,43(2):467-473. ]
[18] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(8):1234-1254.
[18] [ Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Leiming, et al. Improvement of ecosystem service valuation method based on unit area value equivalent factor[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1234-1254. ]
[19] 张亚如, 张军民. 城镇化与经济发展的时空相互作用机制研究——以新疆为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020,43(3):839-848.
[19] [ Zhang Yaru, Zhang Junmin. Spatio-temporal interaction mechanism of urbanization and economic development: A case of Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020,43(3):839-848. ]
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉