CollectHomepage AdvertisementContact usMessage

Arid Land Geography ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 47-55.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.259

• Climatology and Hydrology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction and validation of the R models for short-term solar irradiance forecasting

YAO Degui1(),LIU Weijia2(),HAN Yongxiang3,LI Zhe1,LIANG Yun1   

  1. 1. Electric Power Research Institute, Electric Power of Henan, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, China
    2. Hangzhou Meteorological Bureau, Hangzhou 310051, Zhejiang, China
    3. Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2022-06-01 Revised:2022-07-17 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-02-21

Abstract:

Improving the forecasting accuracy of solar irradiance, as an important safeguard ensuring the stability of grid operations, remains one of the challenging technical bottlenecks. This study constructs a short-time solar irradiance forecasting model (R model) based on the cloud relative radiative forcing ratio R derived by the ground-based solar irradiances from the relationship between clouds and radiation and then evaluates the forecasting accuracy of the R model using 16-year solar irradiance measurements at the Southern Great Plains Central Facility site in the United States. The results show that (1) the R model significantly outperforms the simple persistence model and exhibits a 2%-25% improvement relative to the advanced smart persistence model (also called cloud relative radiative forcing (RCRF) model herein) in the cloudy case. (2) For the overall validation with 2.9×105 individual cloudy cases in 8 categories over 16 years, the forecast accuracy of the R model is significantly better than that of the simple model and the RCRF model at lead times longer than 1 h. Compared with the RCRF model, the forecast performance of the R model is improved by 25% and 19% in global horizontal irradiance and direct normal irradiance, respectively, and the lead time is extended by 1.5 and 1 h. (3) The R model with higher forecast performance sets a higher standard for the benchmark model of short-term solar irradiance forecasting. Meanwhile, the R model only requires short-term ground-based radiation observations for forecasting, facilitating and providing new possibilities for photovoltaic power plants without concurrent meteorological measurements in short-term solar irradiance forecasting.

Key words: persistence model, short-term irradiance forecast, forecasting performance, photovoltaic power plant