2000—2021年图木舒克市生态环境质量动态监测与评价

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.425

干旱区地理 ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 465-473.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.425

2000—2021年图木舒克市生态环境质量动态监测与评价

王剑¹(), 管瑶¹(), 贺兴宏¹^,², 代云豪³, 陈艺伟¹, 王育强¹, 李会文¹, 范德宝¹

1.塔里木大学水利与建筑工程学院，新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.塔里木大学南疆岩土工程研究中心，新疆阿拉尔 843300
3.北川羌族自治县公路运输管理所，四川绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2023-08-14 修回日期:2023-09-15 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-03-29
通讯作者: 管瑶（1975-），女，博士，教授，主要从事水生态保护及水资源高效利用研究. E-mail: guanyao1206@163.com
作者简介:王剑（1999-），男，硕士研究生，主要从事遥感监测与生态保护研究. E-mail: wangjian991010@163.com
基金资助:
兵团重点产业创新发展支撑计划项目(2021DB017);中国农业大学塔里木大学联合基金项目(2019TC157)

Dynamic monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment quality in Tumshuk City from 2000 to 2021

WANG Jian¹(), GUAN Yao¹(), HE Xinghong¹^,², DAI Yunhao³, CHEN Yiwei¹, WANG Yuqiang¹, LI Huiwen¹, FAN Debao¹

1. College of Water Conservancy and Architecture Engineering, Tarim University, Aral 843300, Xinjiang, China
2. South Xinjiang Geotechnical Engineering Research Center, Tarim University, Aral 843300, Xinjiang, China
3. Beichuan Qiang Autonomous County Highway Transportation Administrative Office, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, China

Received:2023-08-14 Revised:2023-09-15 Published:2024-03-25 Online:2024-03-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为客观评价新疆图木舒克市驱动因素对其生态环境质量的影响，选取图木舒克市2000、2011年和2021年3期Landsat影像数据，耦合归一化植被指数（NDVI）、土壤湿度（WET）、干度（NDSI）、地表温度（LST）4个指标，分析主成分构建遥感生态指数（RSEI），结合研究区自然因素和社会经济因素，对图木舒克市近22 a来生态环境质量进行动态监测与评价。结果表明：（1）图木舒克市近22 a来RSEI均值从0.406升至0.476，生态环境质量变好面积远大于变差面积，改善区域主要分布在研究区中部、东南、西北地区，近22 a生态环境质量得到有效改善。（2）通过对图木舒克市驱动因素进行分析，当地生态环境质量受人口、国内生产总值（GDP）、耕地面积、气候等因素影响，在驱动因素中社会经济因素对当地生态环境质量有显著影响。（3）通过构建RSEI并分析其驱动因素对生态环境质量的影响，可以高效、准确地对当地生态环境质量进行动态监测与客观评价。

关键词: 图木舒克市, 遥感生态指数, 生态环境质量, 驱动因素, 动态监测

Abstract:

To objectively evaluate the impact of driving factors on the ecological environment quality of Tumshuk City, Xinjiang, China, this study selects Landsat image data from three periods, 2000, 2011, and 2021. This data was coupled with normalized difference vegetation index, soil moisture, dryness index, and land surface temperature indicators. It analyzed principal components to construct a remote sensing ecology index (RSEI), combined natural and socioeconomic factors in the study area, and dynamically monitored and evaluated the ecological environment quality of Tumshuk City in the past 22 years. The results showed the following: (1) In the past 22 years, the average RSEI of Tumshuk City increased from 0.406 to 0.476, and the area with improved ecological environment quality was far greater in size than the area with deterioration. The improved areas were mainly distributed in the study area's central, southeast, and northwest regions, and their ecological environment quality has been effectively improved in the past 22 years. (2) By analyzing the driving factors of Tumshuk City, it was observed that the local ecological environment quality was influenced by factors such as population, gross domestic product, arable land area, and climate. Among the driving factors, socioeconomic factors had a notable impact on the local ecological environment quality. (3) By constructing RSEI and analyzing its driving factors on the impact of ecological environment quality, dynamic monitoring and objective evaluation of local ecological environment quality can be efficiently and accurately conducted.

Key words: Tumshuk City, remote sensing ecology index, ecological environment quality, driving factors, dynamic monitor

王剑, 管瑶, 贺兴宏, 代云豪, 陈艺伟, 王育强, 李会文, 范德宝. 2000—2021年图木舒克市生态环境质量动态监测与评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 465-473.

WANG Jian, GUAN Yao, HE Xinghong, DAI Yunhao, CHEN Yiwei, WANG Yuqiang, LI Huiwen, FAN Debao. Dynamic monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment quality in Tumshuk City from 2000 to 2021[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(3): 465-473.

图/表 12

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

图3

表4

表5

表6

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 31

[1]	新疆生产建设兵团年鉴编辑委员会. 兵团年鉴[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆生产建设兵团年鉴社, 2020.
	[Editorial Committee of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Yearbook. Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps yearbook[M]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Yearbook Society, 2020.]
[2]	HJ192-2015. 生态环境状况评价技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2015.
	[HJ192-2015. Technical specification for ecological environment assessment[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2015.]
[3]	满卫东, 刘明月, 李晓燕, 等. 1990—2015年三江平原生态功能区生态功能状况评估[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(2): 136-141.
	[Man Weidong, Liu Mingyue, Li Xiaoyan, et al. Assessment on the dynamics of eco-environmental statuses from 1990 to 2015 in the ecological function zone of Sanjiang Plain[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(2): 136-141.]
[4]	赵国强, 陈立文, 穆佳, 等. 生态环境质量评价体系建设的探讨[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2018, 41(1): 1-11.
	[Zhao Guoqiang, Chen Liwen, Mu Jia, et al. Discussion on construction of ecological environment quality evaluation system[J]. Meteorological and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 41(1): 1-11.]
[5]	徐涵秋. 区域生态环境变化的遥感评价指数[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(5): 889-897.
	[Xu Hanqiu. A remote sensing index for assessment of regional ecological changes[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(5): 889-897.
[6]	Boori M S, Choudhary K, Paringer R, et al. Eco-environmental quality assessment based on pressure-state-response framework by remote sensing and GIS[J]. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 2021, 23(1): 100530, doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100530.
[7]	刘英, 朱蓉, 岳辉. 典型露天矿区生态环境遥感评价[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2021, 41(4): 682-691.
	[Liu Ying, Zhu Rong, Yue Hui. Remote sensing evaluation of ecological environment in typical open-pit mining areas[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2021, 41(4): 682-691.]
[8]	刘峰, 杨光, 韩雪莹, 等. 科尔沁沙地生态环境质量遥感动态监测——以奈曼旗为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(5): 244-249.
	[Liu Feng, Yang Guang, Han Xueying, et al. Dynamic monitoring of eco-environmental quality in Horqin Sandy Land by remote sensing: A case study of Naiman Banner[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(5): 244-249.]
[9]	张乃明, 陈冬花, 邢菲, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的新疆干旱区博乐市生态变化分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(1): 154-159.
	[Zhang Naiming, Chen Donghua, Xing Fei, et al. Ecological change analysis of Bole City in arid regions of Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region based on remote sensing ecological index[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(1): 154-159.]
[10]	柯丽娜, 徐佳慧, 王楠, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的滨海湿地生态质量变化评价——以辽东湾北部区为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1417-1424. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.07.014
	[Ke Lina, Xu Jiahui, Wang Nan, et al. Evaluation of ecological quality of coastal wetland based on remote sensing ecological index: A case study of northern Liaodong Bay[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(7): 1417-1424.]
[11]	程志峰, 何祺胜. 基于RSEI的苏锡常城市群生态环境遥感评价[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(3): 531-539.
	[Cheng Zhifeng, He Qisheng. Remote sensing evaluation of the ecological environment of Su-Xi-Chang City group based on remote sensing ecological index (RSEI)[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2019, 34(3): 531-539.]
[12]	杭鑫, 罗晓春, 曹云, 等. 基于RSEI模型的生态质量评估及城镇化影响——以南京市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 219-229. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.030
	[Hang Xin, Luo Xiaochun, Cao Yun, et al. Ecological quality assessment and the impact of urbanization based on RSEl model for Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 219-229.]
[13]	任堃, 罗漫雅, 赵永华, 等. 西安市生态环境及城市发展质量评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2485-2492. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202209.024
	[Ren Kun, Luo Manya, Zhao Yonghua, et al. Evaluation of ecological environment and urban development quality in Xi'an City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(9): 2485-2492.]
[14]	李婧, 郝育红, 孙京敏, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的城市矿山生态环境时空变化评价[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(1): 17-22.
	[Li Jing, Hao Yuhong, Sun Jingmin, et al. Evaluation of ecological environment’ spatio-temporal variation in urban mine based on RSEI[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(1): 17-22.]
[15]	范德芹, 邱玥, 孙文彬, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的神府矿区生态环境评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2021(7): 23-28. doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0203
	[Fan Deqin, Qiu Yue, Sun Wenbin, et al. Evaluating ecological environment based on remote sensing ecological index in Shenfu mining area[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021(7): 23-28.] doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0203
[16]	李凤莹, 张饮江, 赵志淼, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的上海南汇东滩海岸带湿地生态格局变化评价[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2020, 29(5): 746-756.
	[Li Fengying, Zhang Yinjiang, Zhao Zhimiao, et al. Evaluation of ecological pattern change of Nanhui Dongtan wetland in Shanghai based on remote sensing ecological index[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2020, 29(5): 746-756.]
[17]	王丽春, 焦黎, 来风兵, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的新疆玛纳斯湖湿地生态变化评价[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(8): 2963-2972.
	[Wang Lichun, Jiao Li, Lai Fengbing, et al. Evaluation of ecological changes based on a remote sensing ecological index in a Manas Lake wetland, Xinjang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 2963-2972.]
[18]	周玄德, 郭华东, 杨胜天, 等. 干旱区绿洲城市生态环境时空变化特征分析——以克拉玛依市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(4): 1070-1082.
	[Zhou Xuande, Guo Huadong, Yang Shengtian, et al. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of oasis urban ecological environment in arid region: A case study of Karamay City[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(4): 1070-1082.]
[19]	排日海·合力力, 昝梅, 阿里木江·卡斯木. 乌鲁木齐市生态环境遥感评价及驱动因子分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1484-1496.
	[Helili Pairihai, Zan Mei, Kasim Alimujiang. Remote sensing evaluation of ecological environment in Urumqi City and analysis of driving factors[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5): 1484-1496.
[20]	李朋轩, 杨永崇, 王涛, 等. 新疆地区土地利用变化及其对生态环境质量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(8): 67-75.
	[Li Pengxuan, Yang Yongchong, Wang Tao, et al. Land use change and its impact on ecological environment quality in Xinjiang[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022(8): 67-75.]
[21]	李申浩. 全域旅游背景下图木舒克市城乡规划优化策略研究[D]. 武汉: 长江大学, 2021.
	[Li Shenhao. Study on planning optimization strategy of global tourism in Tumushuk City[D]. Wuhan: Yangtze University, 2021.]
[22]	代云豪, 管瑶, 刘孟琴, 等. 1990—2020年阿拉尔垦区生态环境质量动态监测与评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(2): 122-128.
	[Dai Yunhao, Guan Yao, Liu Mengqin, et al. Dynamic monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment quality in Alar reclamation area from 1990 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 122-128.]
[23]	何安良, 周江文. 基于RSEI模型的长沙市生态环境质量评价[J]. 江西科学, 2021, 39(2): 256-262.
	[He Anliang, Zhou Jiangwen. Evaluation of ecological environment quality in Changsha City based on RSEI model[J]. Jiangxi Science, 2021, 39(2): 256-262.]
[24]	孙桂凯, 王国帅, 魏义熊, 等. 基于改进遥感生态指数的岩溶山区生态质量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(2): 230-239.
	[Sun Guikai, Wang Guoshuai, Wei Yixiong, et al. Improvement of remote sensing ecological index in karst mountainous areas[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 230-239.]
[25]	程晨, 蔡喆, 闫维, 等. 基于Landsat TM/ETM⁺的天津城区及滨海新区热岛效应时空变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(10): 1727-1737. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.10.011
	[Cheng Chen, Cai Zhe, Yan Wei, et al. Study of temporal and spatial variation of urban heat island based on Landsat TM in central city and Binhai New Area of Tianjin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(10): 1727-1737.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.10.011
[26]	李妍, 张国钦, 吝涛, 等. 乡镇遥感生态指数时空变化及影响因子研究——以天津市蓟州区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(2): 474-486.
	[Li Yan, Zhang Guoqin, Lin Tao, et al. The spatiotemporal changes of remote sensing ecological index in towns and the influencing factors: A case study of Jizhou District, Tianjin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(2): 474-486.]
[27]	张娟, 文广超, 王恩营, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的焦作市生态环境动态监测与评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(6): 107-114.
	[Zhang Juan, Wen Guangchao, Wang Enying, et al. Dynamic monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment at Jiaozuo City based on remote sensing ecological index[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 107-114.]
[28]	白松. 1993—2019年图木舒克市植被覆盖度时空变化分析[J]. 陕西水利, 2021(6): 108-110.
	[Bai Song. Analysis of temporal and spatial changes of vegetation coverage in Tumshuk City from 1993 to 2019[J]. Shaanxi Water Resources, 2021(6): 108-110.]
[29]	如克亚·热合曼, 阿里木江·卡斯木, 哈力木拉提·阿布来提. 基于MSPA和MCR模型的图木舒克市生态安全格局构建[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(5): 229-237.
	[Reheman Rukeya, Kasim Alimujiang, Ablat Halmurat. Construction of ecological security patterm in Tumshuk City based on MSPA and MCR model[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 44(5): 229-237.] doi: 10.1021/es9021377
[30]	王瑾杰, 丁建丽, 张子鹏. 基于遥感生态指数的吐哈地区生态环境变化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1591-1603.
	[Wang Jinjie, Ding Jianli, Zhang Zipeng. Change of ecological environment in Turpan and Hami cities based on remote sensing ecology index[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(5): 1591-1603.]
[31]	代云豪, 管瑶, 张钦凯, 等. 阿拉尔垦区土壤盐渍化遥感监测及时空特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(4): 1176-1185.
	[Dai Yunhao, Guan Yao, Zhang Qinkai, et al. Remote sensing monitoring and temporal and spatial characteristics of soil salinization in Aral Reclamation Area[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(4): 1176-1185.]

主成分	2000年		2011年		2021年
主成分	特征值	贡献率/%	特征值	贡献率/%	特征值	贡献率/%
PC1	0.0400	88.33	0.0227	91.30	0.0588	93.11
PC2	0.0034	7.60	0.0018	7.21	0.0036	5.77
PC3	0.0016	3.47	0.0002	0.89	0.0006	1.01
PC4	0.0003	0.60	0.0002	0.60	0.0001	0.11

RSEI等级	2000年		2011年		2021年
RSEI等级	面积 /km²	占比 /%	面积 /km²	占比 /%	面积 /km²	占比 /%
差	536.340	31.71	436.551	25.07	456.420	25.98
较差	364.723	21.56	317.865	18.26	371.561	21.15
中等	301.383	17.82	257.043	14.76	229.559	13.06
良	225.632	13.34	331.785	19.05	292.091	16.62
优	263.477	15.57	398.097	22.86	407.435	23.19

质量等级		2021年
质量等级		差	较差	中等	良	优
2000年	差	351.924	80.388	25.079	35.514	43.412
	较差	66.528	129.218	46.693	54.022	68.172
	中等	28.031	83.280	60.566	55.367	73.908
	良	55.150	32.990	49.969	57.990	78.440
	优	1.935	14.408	28.391	77.927	140.785

类别	变化级差	变化面积/km²	类面积/km²	占比/%
变差	-4	1.935	438.610	25.21
	-3	69.558	-	-
	-2	89.413	-	-
	-1	277.704	-	-
不变	0	0.000	740.483	42.55
变好	1	260.888	560.994	32.24
	2	153.008	-	-
	3	103.686	-	-
	4	43.412	-	-

驱动因素类型	驱动因素	数据来源
社会经济因素	人口	新疆生产建设兵团统计年鉴^[1]
	国内生产总值（GDP）
	种植业生产总值
	农业（农牧渔）生产总值
	农业种植面积
自然因素	年均气温	羲和能源大数据平台（https://www.xihe-energy.com）
自然因素	年降水量	羲和能源大数据平台（https://www.xihe-energy.com）

2000—2021年图木舒克市生态环境质量动态监测与评价

Dynamic monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment quality in Tumshuk City from 2000 to 2021

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	周成, 赵亚玲, 任敏敏, 靳轶婷, 吕丝丝. 黄河流域国家湿地公园时空分异、重心演化与驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 506-514.
[2]	王慧娴, 杨蓓, 杨宁君, 李璐瑶. 黄河流域旅游经济差异及关键驱动因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(3): 515-527.
[3]	任子健, 王江林, 徐贺年, 秦春. 祁连山地区过去500 a年代际旱涝事件演化及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(2): 214-227.
[4]	薛华柱, 袁茜, 董国涛, 姚楠, 张晴. 基于基线遥感生态指数的鄂尔多斯市生态质量分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(2): 248-259.
[5]	马振邦,王思鉴,李薇,吕鹏,郭晓东. 1986—2020年甘肃省六盘山片区贫困演变及启示[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(9): 1545-1555.
[6]	陈勉为, 冯丹, 张仕凯, 江雨, 张新兰. 基于RSEI和ANN-CA-Markov模型的伊宁市生态环境质量动态监测及预测研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(6): 911-921.
[7]	董建红, 张志斌, 刘奔腾, 张新红. “三生”空间视角下西北地区生态环境质量分异机制的地理探测[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(4): 515-526.
[8]	罗镕基, 王宏涛, 王成. 基于改进遥感生态指数的甘肃省古浪县生态质量评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(4): 539-549.
[9]	马文江, 白妙琴, 阿迪力·艾合买提, 张德平, 杨忠娜. “双碳”目标下新疆粮食绿色全要素生产率的时空分异及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 2029-2041.
[10]	卓静,胡皓,何慧娟,王智,杨承睿. 陕北黄土高原生态脆弱性时空变异及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(11): 1768-1777.
[11]	杨丽,付玉慧,王姣姣. “一带一路”沿线中国省份旅游信息流时空分布格局及驱动因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(10): 1714-1722.
[12]	王瑾杰,丁建丽,张子鹏. 基于遥感生态指数的吐哈地区生态环境变化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1591-1603.
[13]	陶泽涪,王世清,孙丕苓,李凯迪,田文,韩潇潇. 中国北方农牧交错带耕地时空分异及驱动因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(1): 153-163.
[14]	袁盼丽,汪传建,赵庆展,王学文,任媛媛,杨启原. 基于深度学习的寒旱区多时序影像土地利用及变化监测——以新疆莫索湾垦区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(6): 1717-1728.
[15]	周玄德,郭华东,杨胜天,孜比布拉·司马义,邓祖涛,梁滨. 干旱区绿洲城市生态环境时空变化特征分析——以克拉玛依市为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(4): 1070-1082.