收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 1868-1878.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2023.061

• 生物与土壤 • 上一篇    下一篇

乌鲁木齐市核心城区绿地土壤重金属累积特征及生态风险

梁樑1(),郭晓淞1,陈汉杰1,徐皓帆1,周衍波1,谢邵文1,2,3(),杨芬4,韦朝阳4   

  1. 1.佛山科学技术学院,广东 佛山 528000
    2.岭南现代农业科学与技术广东省实验室,广东 广州 510642
    3.广东省科学院生态环境与土壤研究所/华南土壤污染控制与修复国家地方联合工程研究中心/广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室,广东 广州 510650
    4.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-15 修回日期:2023-07-21 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-05
  • 通讯作者: 谢邵文(1990-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事流域面源污染控制和重金属环境风险评价研究. E-mail: xiesw09@163.com
  • 作者简介:梁樑(1997-),男,本科在读,主要从事土壤重金属环境风险评价研究. E-mail: liangliang18y@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省基础与应用基础研究基金粤佛联合基金项目(2022A1515110930);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金粤佛联合基金项目(2022A1515110718);岭南现代农业科学与技术广东省实验室科研项目(NZ2021026);第三次新疆综合科学考察天山北坡土地开发调查与生态环境效应评估项目(2022xjkk0902);佛山市生态固碳工程技术研究中心项目资助

Accumulation characteristics and ecological risks of heavy metals in green land soils in core urban area of Urumqi City

LIANG Liang1(),GUO Xiaosong1,CHEN Hanjie1,XU Haofan1,ZHOU Yanbo1,XIE Shaowen1,2,3(),YANG Fen4,WEI Chaoyang4   

  1. 1. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China
    2. Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
    3. National-Regional Joint Engineering Research Center for Soil Pollution Control and Remediation in South China/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-environmental Pollution Control and Management/Institute of Eco-Environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China
    4. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2023-02-15 Revised:2023-07-21 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-05

摘要:

随着城市扩张和工业化进程的加快,我国大型城市核心城区土壤已遭受不同程度的重金属污染。以乌鲁木齐市核心城区典型城市公园绿地和交通枢纽绿地为对象,系统探究土壤中6种重金属(Cd、Cr、Cu、Pb、Zn和Ni)的累积特征和生态风险。结果表明:(1) 交通枢纽绿地土壤重金属含量均高于城市公园绿地土壤。相较于乌鲁木齐市土壤背景值,城市公园绿地土壤重金属为轻度污染,而交通枢纽绿地土壤重金属为中度污染。(2) 不同行政区城市公园绿地土壤重金属综合污染指数为:头屯河区(2.85)>水磨沟区(2.13)>天山区(1.91)>新市区(1.85)>米东区(1.23),而交通枢纽绿地土壤重金属综合污染指数为:米东区(4.17)>沙依巴克区(3.24)>新市区(2.84)>水磨沟区(2.70)>头屯河区(2.50)>天山区(2.37)。(3) 不同行政区城市公园绿地土壤重金属的潜在生态风险指数为:水磨沟区(101.68)>头屯河区(98.83)>新市区(88.56)>天山区(73.43)>米东区(58.24),而交通枢纽绿地土壤重金属的潜在生态风险指数为:米东区(177.60)>水磨沟区(131.75)>沙依巴克区(120.25)>新市区(105.76)>头屯河区(105.63)>天山区(82.12)。城市公园绿地土壤综合污染指数和潜在生态风险指数最大的分别为头屯河区和水磨沟区,而城市交通枢纽绿地土壤的综合污染指数和潜在生态风险指数最大的均是米东区。(4) 在空间分布特征上,城市公园绿地土壤高值区总体上以岛状分布在中心城区,而交通枢纽绿地土壤除Ni外,高值区以岛状分布在米东区的西南部和沙依巴克区的东部。工业企业的显著集聚、密集的交通干线和较高的人口密度成为影响不同行政区内土壤重金属污染程度差异的主要因素。

关键词: 土壤重金属, 城市公园, 交通枢纽, 环境风险, 乌鲁木齐市

Abstract:

Owing to rapid urban expansion and industrialization in China, the core urban areas of large cities have suffered from varying degrees of heavy metal pollution in the soil. Herein, the accumulation characteristics and ecological risks of six heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, and Ni) in the soils of two distinct urban land types (urban park and transportation hub green lands) within the core urban areas of Urumqi City were systematically studied. The study yielded multiple key results: (1) Soil heavy metal concentrations in the green land soils of transportation hubs were higher than urban parks. Compared with the soil background values of heavy metals in Urumqi City, urban park green land of the core urban area exhibited light pollution, while the green land in transportation hubs demonstrated moderate pollution. (2) The comprehensive pollution index for soil heavy metals within urban park green land varied among different administrative regions, with Toutunhe District (2.85) showing the highest level, followed by Shuimogou District (2.13), Tianshan District (1.91), Xinshi District (1.85), and Midong District (1.23). Conversely, for green land in transportation hubs, the comprehensive pollution index of soil heavy metals differed across administrative regions, with Midong District (4.17) being the most heavily affected, followed by Sayibak District (3.24), Xinshi District (2.84), Shuimogou District (2.70), Tuotunhe District (2.50), and Tianshan District (2.37). (3) Regarding the potential ecological risk index for heavy metals in green soil of urban parks, the rankings among different administrative regions were as follows: Shuimogou District (101.68) >Toutunhe District (98.83) >Xinshi District (88.56) >Tianshan District (73.43) >Midong District (58.24). In addition, for transportation hubs green land, the potential ecological risk index of heavy metals for each administrative region exhibited regional disparities, with Midong District (177.60) being the most adversely affected, followed by Shuimogou District (131.75), Sayibak District (120.25), Xinshi District (105.76), Toutunhe District (105.63), and Tianshan District (82.12). The largest comprehensive pollution index and potential ecological risk index for urban park green land were observed in the Toutunhe and Shuimogou Districts, respectively, while the largest values for urban transportation hubs green land were documented in Midong District. (4) Spatial distribution characteristics revealed that high-value urban park green land was generally distributed in the central urban area, resembling islands of green amidst the urban landscape. Conversely, high-value heavy metal pollution of green land in transportation hubs was distributed in an island shape in the southwestern region of Midong District and the eastern part of Sayibak District, except for Ni. This study identifies key factors affecting the varying degrees of soil heavy metal pollution in different administrative regions, including the concentration of industrial enterprises, dense transportation arteries, and high population density. This study potentially provides a scientific basis and reference for the protection of the soil ecological environment in the core urban area.

Key words: soil heavy metals, urban park, transportation hub, environmental risk, Urumqi City