新疆焉耆盆地农田耗水有效性评价

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.405

干旱区地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 730-741.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.405

新疆焉耆盆地农田耗水有效性评价

杨一飞^1,²(),杨鹏年^1,²(),汪昌树³,寇鑫⁴,谭翻^1,²,徐杰^1,²,王翠^1,²

1.新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆水利工程安全与水灾害防治重点实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐 830052
3.长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司，湖北武汉 841314
4.焉耆县水利局，新疆焉耆 841199

收稿日期:2022-08-19 修回日期:2022-10-11 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-06-05
通讯作者: 杨鹏年（1966-），男，博士，教授，主要从事水文及水资源研究. E-mail: ypn10@163.com
作者简介:杨一飞（1998-），男，硕士研究生，主要从事水文及水资源研究. E-mail: yangyf21@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金-新疆联合基金(U2003105);新疆维吾尔自治区塔里木河流域管理局项目(TGJJG-2020KYXM0002)

Effectiveness evaluation of water consumption in agricultural land of Yanqi Basin, Xinjiang

YANG Yifei^1,²(),YANG Pengnian^1,²(),WANG Changshu³,KOU Xin⁴,TAN Fan^1,²,XU Jie^1,²,WANG Cui^1,²

1. College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, Xinjang, China
2. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy Engineering Safety and Water Disaster Prevention, Urumqi 830052, Xinjang, China
3. Changjiang Survey, Planning, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan 841314, Hubei, China
4. Yanqi County Water Conservancy Bureau, Yanqi 841199, Xinjiang, China

Received:2022-08-19 Revised:2022-10-11 Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

西北干旱地区受监测资料匮乏等因素，难以实现区域尺度的水资源消耗效用评价。使用MODIS遥感数据驱动混合双源梯形蒸散发模型（HTEM），对焉耆盆地陆面蒸散发的时空过程进行了连续模拟，并对灌区耗水量进行有效性评价。结果表明：（1） 2013—2020年焉耆盆地灌区多年平均蒸散发为624.4 mm，其中作物生育期4—10月蒸散发占全年的89.6%。（2）焉耆盆地灌区植被蒸腾与土壤蒸发多年平均分别为508.9 mm和115.5 mm，各占总蒸散发的81.5%和18.5%。（3）焉耆盆地灌区多年平均蒸散发耗水量13.82×10⁸m³，其中高效、中效和低效耗水分别占总耗水量的81.5%、5.6%和12.9%，且耗水有效性与植被覆盖度密切相关。在区域尺度以时空连续的方式揭示了焉耆盆地灌区蒸散发水分消耗的有效性，可为干旱区水资源管控提供可靠的理论依据。

关键词: 蒸散发, HTEM模型, 耗水有效性, 焉耆盆地

Abstract:

It is difficult to evaluate the water resource consumption effectiveness at a regional scale in the arid northwest due to the lack of monitoring information and other factors. This paper uses the MODIS remote sensing data to drive a hybrid dual-source trapezoidal evapotranspiration model (HTEM), to continuously simulate the spatiotemporal processes of land surface evapotranspiration in the Yanqi Basin of Xinjiang, China, and to evaluate the effectiveness of water consumption in irrigation areas. The following results were obtained: (1) The multiyear average evapotranspiration in the irrigation area of Yanqi Basin from 2013 to 2020 is 624.4 mm, of which the evapotranspiration from April to October during the crop fertility period accounts for 89.6% of the year. (2) The multiyear average of vegetation evapotranspiration and soil evaporation in the irrigation area is 508.9 mm and 115.5 mm, respectively, accounting for 81.5% and 18.5% of the total evapotranspiration. (3) The multiyear average evapotranspiration water consumption in the irrigation area was 13.82×10⁸ m³, of which high-, medium-, and low-efficiency water consumption accounted for 81.5%, 5.6% and 12.9% of the total water consumption, respectively, and the effectiveness of water consumption was closely related to the vegetation cover. This study reveals the effectiveness of evapotranspiration water consumption in irrigation areas on a regional scale with a spatiotemporal continuum, which can provide a reliable theoretical basis for water resource control in arid zones.

Key words: evapotranspiration, hybrid dual-source trapezoidal evapotranspiration model (HTEM), water consumption effectiveness, Yanqi Basin

杨一飞, 杨鹏年, 汪昌树, 寇鑫, 谭翻, 徐杰, 王翠. 新疆焉耆盆地农田耗水有效性评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 730-741.

YANG Yifei, YANG Pengnian, WANG Changshu, KOU Xin, TAN Fan, XU Jie, WANG Cui. Effectiveness evaluation of water consumption in agricultural land of Yanqi Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 730-741.

图/表 12

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表3

图9

参考文献 39

[1]	周彦昭, 周剑, 李妍, 等. 利用SEBAL和改进的SEBAL模型估算黑河中游戈壁、绿洲的蒸散发[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(6): 1526-1537.
	[Zhou Yanzhao, Zhou Jian, Li Yan, et al. Simulating the evapotranspiration with SEBAL and modified SEBAL (M-SEBAL) models over the desert and oasis of the middle reaches of the Heihe River[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(6): 1526-1537. ]
[2]	涂晨雨, 贾绍凤, 朱文彬, 等. 柴达木盆地蒸散发遥感估算与耗水有效性评价研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5404-5415.
	[Tu Chenyu, Jia Shaofeng, Zhu Wenbin, et al. Remote sensing estimation of evapotranspiration and efficiency evaluation of water consumption in Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(13): 5404-5415. ]
[3]	李晴, 杨鹏年, 彭亮, 等. 基于MOD16数据的焉耆盆地蒸散量变化研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 351-358.
	[Li Qing, Yang Pengnian, Peng Liang, et al. Study of the variation trend of evapotranspiration in the Yanqi Basin based on MOD16 data[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2): 351-358. ]
[4]	王浩, 杨贵羽. 二元水循环条件下水资源管理理念的初步探索[J]. 自然杂志, 2010, 32(3): 130-133.
	[Wang Hao, Yang Guiyu. Preliminary study on new concept of water resources management under dualistic water cycle condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2010, 32(3): 130-133. ]
[5]	王浩, 杨贵羽, 贾仰文, 等. 基于区域ET结构的黄河流域土壤水资源消耗效用研究[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2007, 37(12): 1643-1652.
	[Wang Hao, Yang Guiyu, Jia Yangwen, et al. Research on soil water resources consumption utility in the Yellow River Basin based on regional ET structure[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2007, 37(12): 1643-1652. ]
[6]	吴炳方, 朱伟伟, 曾红伟, 等. 流域遥感: 内涵与挑战[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(5): 654-673.
	[Wu Bingfang, Zhu Weiwei, Zeng Hongwei, et al. Watershed remote sensing: Definition and prospective[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2020, 31(5): 654-673. ]
[7]	赵丽雯, 赵文智, 吉喜斌. 西北黑河中游荒漠绿洲农田作物蒸腾与土壤蒸发区分及作物耗水规律[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(4): 1114-1123.
	[Zhao Liwen, Zhao Wenzhi, Ji Xibin. Division between transpiration and evaporation, and crop water consumption over farmland within oases of the middlestream of Heihe River Basin, northwestern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(4): 1114-1123. ]
[8]	李晗, 陈晗, 黄津辉, 等. 区域遥感双源蒸散发模型研究进展[J]. 水资源保护, 2022, 38(4): 87-94.
	[Li Han, Chen Han, Huang Jinhui, et al. Research progress on dual-source evapotranspiration models based on regional remote sensing[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2022, 38(4): 87-94. ]
[9]	唐荣林, 王晟力, 姜亚珍, 等. 基于地表温度——植被指数三角/梯形特征空间的地表蒸散发遥感反演综述[J]. 遥感学报, 2021, 25(1): 65-82.
	[Tang Ronglin, Wang Shengli, Jiang Yazhen, et al. A review of retrieval of land surface evapotranspiration based on remotely sensed surface temperature versus vegetation index triangular/trapezoidal characteristic space[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2021, 25(1): 65-82. ]
[10]	尚松浩, 蒋磊, 杨雨亭. 基于遥感的农业用水效率评价方法研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(10): 81-92.
	[Shang Songhao, Jiang Lei, Yang Yuting. Research progress on evaluation methods of agricultural water use efficiency based on remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(10): 81-92. ]
[11]	杨雨亭, 尚松浩. 双源蒸散发模型估算潜在蒸散发量的对比[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(24): 85-91.
	[Yang Yuting, Shang Songhao. Comparison of dual-source evapotranspiration models in estimating potential evaporation and transpiration[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(24): 85-91. ]
[12]	Sun S K, Li C, Wang Y B, et al. Evaluation of the mechanisms and performances of major satellite-based evapotranspiration models in northwest China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 291: 108056, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108056. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108056
[13]	Moletto-Lobos I, Mattar C, Barichivich J. Performance of satellite-based evapotranspiration models in temperate pastures of southern Chile[J]. Water, 2020, 12(12): 3587, doi: 10.3390/w12123587. doi: 10.3390/w12123587
[14]	Allen R G, Tasumi M, Trezza R. Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)-Model[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2007, 133(4): 380-394. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:4(380)
[15]	Norman J M, Kustas W P, Humes K S. Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1995, 77(3-4): 263-293. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02265-Y
[16]	Sánchez J M, Kustas W P, Caselles V, et al. Modelling surface energy fluxes over maize using a two-source patch model and radiometric soil and canopy temperature observations[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(3): 1130-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.018
[17]	Long D, Singh V P. A two-source trapezoid model for evapotranspiration (TTME) from satellite imagery[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 121: 370-388. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.015
[18]	Yang Y, T, Shang Y S H. A hybrid dual-source scheme and trapezoid framework-based evapotranspiration model (HTEM) using satellite images: Algorithm and model test[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013, 118(5): 2284-2300. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50259
[19]	刘馨井雨, 韩旭东, 张晓春, 等. 基于SEBAL模型和环境卫星的区域蒸散发量及灌溉水利用系数估算研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(8): 136-144.
	[Liu Xinjingyu, Han Xudong, Zhang Xiaochun, et al. Using SEBAL model and HJ satellite data to calculate regional evapotranspiration and irrigation water use efficiency[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(8): 136-144. ]
[20]	宋佳. 开都-孔雀河流域天然植被蒸散发遥感反演及生态需水研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2019.
	[Song Jia. Remote sensing retrieval of natural vegetation evapotranspiration and ecological water requirement in Kaidu-Kongqi River Basin[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2019. ]
[21]	蒋磊, 尚松浩, 杨雨亭, 等. 基于遥感蒸散发的区域作物估产方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(14): 90-97.
	[Jiang Lei, Shang Songhao, Yang Yuting, et al. Method of regional crop yield estimation based on remote sensing evapotranspiration model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(14): 90-97. ]
[22]	Yang Y T, Long D, Guan H, et al. Comparison of three dual-source remote sensing evapotranspiration models during the MUSOEXE-12 campaign: Revisit of model physics[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(5): 3145-3165. doi: 10.1002/2014WR015619
[23]	Yang Y T. Evapotranspiration over heterogeneous vegetated surfaces[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2015.
[24]	Yu B, Shang S H, Zhu W B, et al. Mapping daily evapotranspiration over a large irrigation district from MODIS data using a novel hybrid dual-source coupling model[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 276: 107612, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.011. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.011
[25]	Yu B, Shang S H. Estimating growing season evapotranspiration and transpiration of major crops over a large irrigation district from HJ-1A/1B data using a remote sensing: Based dual source evapotranspiration model[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(5): 865, doi: 10.3390/rs12050865. doi: 10.3390/rs12050865
[26]	Xu T, Liu S, Xu L, et al. Temporal upscaling and reconstruction of thermal remotely sensed instantaneous evapotranspiration[J]. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(3): 3400-3425. doi: 10.3390/rs70303400
[27]	Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56[M]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 1998.
[28]	Bastiaanssen W G M, Ahmad M D, Chemin Y. Satellite surveillance of evaporative depletion across the Indus Basin[J]. Water Resources Research, 2002, 38(12): 9-1-9-9, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000386. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000386
[29]	潘子豪, 杨胜天, 娄和震, 等. 缺测站干旱流域生态输水遥感监测与农业节水效益分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(3): 774-785.
	[Pan Zihao, Yang Shengtian, Lou Hezhen, et al. Remote sensing monitoring of ecological water conveyance and benefits evaluation of agricultural water-saving in arid basin without observation station[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(3): 774-785. ]
[30]	张圆, 贾贞贞, 刘绍民, 等. 遥感估算地表蒸散发真实性检验研究进展[J]. 遥感学报, 2020, 24(8): 975-999.
	[Zhang Yuan, Jia Zhenzhen, Liu Shaomin, et al. Advances in validation of remotely sensed land surface evapotranspiration[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2020, 24(8): 975-999. ]
[31]	李旭亮, 杨礼箫, 胥学峰, 等. 基于SEBAL模型的西北农牧交错带生长季蒸散发估算及变化特征分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(7): 2175-2185.
	[Li Xuliang, Yang Lixiao, Xu Xuefeng, et al. Analysis of evapotranspiration pattern by SEBAL model during the growing season in the agro-pastoral ecotone in northwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(7): 2175-2185. ]
[32]	宁亚洲, 张福平, 冯起, 等. 基于SEBAL模型的疏勒河流域蒸散发估算与灌溉效率评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 928-938.
	[Ning Yazhou, Zhang Fuping, Feng Qi, et al. Estimation of evapotranspiration in Shule River Basin based on SEBAL model and evaluation on irrigation efficiency[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(4): 928-938. ]
[33]	钟新才. 博斯腾湖水面蒸发量初步估算[J]. 干旱区地理, 1988, 11(4): 39-44.
	[Zhong Xincai. Primary evaluation of water surface evaporation in Bosten Lake[J]. Arid Land Geography, 1988, 11(4): 39-44. ]
[34]	卢诗卉, 赵红莉, 蒋云钟, 等. 基于多源遥感数据和水量平衡原理的灌溉用水量分析[J]. 水利学报, 2021, 52(9): 1126-1135.
	[Lu Shihui, Zhao Hongli, Jiang Yunzhong, et al. Analysis of irrigation water based on multi-source remote sensing data and water balance principle[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2021, 52(9): 1126-1135. ]
[35]	李晴. 基于遥感蒸散量的焉耆盆地农田水量平衡方程建立及应用[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
	[Li Qing. Establishment and application of farmland water balance equation based on remote sensing evapotranspiration in Yanqi Basin[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. ]
[36]	余欣, 杨汉波, 吕华芳, 等. 基于广义蒸发互补理论的塔里木河流域绿洲实际蒸散发变化及其归因分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(6): 1-9.
	[Yu Xin, Yang Hanbo, Lü Huafang, et al. Generalized evapotranspiration-complementarity theory-based analysis on variation of actual evapotranspiration in oases of Tarim River Basin and its attribution[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2020, 51(6): 1-9. ]
[37]	张瀚, 杨鹏年, 汪昌树, 等. 干旱区不同冬灌定额对土壤水盐分布的影响研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35(11): 42-46.
	[Zhang Han, Yang Pengnian, Wang Changshu, et al. Effect of winter irrigation amount on soil moisture and salt distribution in arid area[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2016, 35(11): 42-46. ]
[38]	刘函如, 冯进平, 刘洪光. 周期性冬灌对新疆膜下滴灌棉田盐分和经济效益的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(6): 194-201.
	[Liu Hanru, Feng Jinping, Liu Hongguang. Effect of periodic winter irrigation on salinity and economic benefit of cotton field under mulched drip irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(6): 194-201. ]
[39]	杨强军, 范燕敏, 耿庆龙, 等. 焉耆盆地耕地土壤盐分时空变化特征研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2020, 43(5): 385-390.
	[Yang Qiangjun, Fan Yanmin, Geng Qinglong, et al. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of soil salinity in cultivated land of Yanqi Basin[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2020, 43(5): 385-390. ]

数据名称	时间分辨率	空间分辨率	数据来源	数据类型
MODIS数据	逐日	250 m	美国国家航空航天局（NASA）	MOD09GA、MOD09GQ和MOD11A1
DEM数据	-	30 m	中国科学院地理空间数据云	GDEMV2数字高程数据
气象资料	逐日	站点	中国气象科学数据中心中国地面气候资料数据集	焉耆县气象站气温、风速、湿度、降水量和蒸发量等数据
土地利用数据	逐年	30 m	中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所	一级分类数据
引水量数据	逐年	-	塔里木河流域巴音郭楞蒙古自治州管理局	区域引水量、出流量等数据

产品名称	时间分辨率/d	空间分辨率/m	波段	波段效果	轨道序列号
MOD09GA	1	500	1~7	地表反射率	h23v04、h24v04
MOD09GQ	1	250	1~2	地表反射率	h23v04、h24v04
MOD11A1	1	1000	1	地表温度	h23v04、h24v04

年份	高效耗水	中效耗水	低效耗水	总量
2013	11.35	0.74	1.98	14.07
2014	9.98	0.72	2.10	12.81
2015	10.99	0.75	1.77	13.51
2016	11.47	0.79	1.67	13.93
2017	11.27	0.73	1.42	13.42
2018	11.54	0.86	1.92	14.32
2019	11.89	0.89	1.78	14.56
2020	11.64	0.69	1.66	13.98
平均	11.27	0.77	1.79	13.82

新疆焉耆盆地农田耗水有效性评价

Effectiveness evaluation of water consumption in agricultural land of Yanqi Basin, Xinjiang

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	高晓宇, 郝海超, 张雪琪, 陈亚宁. 中国西北干旱区植被水分利用效率变化对气象要素的响应——以新疆为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(7): 1111-1120.
[2]	魏涛, 王云权. 基于PML-V2数据集的中国蒸散发时空动态特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(6): 857-867.
[3]	何旭刚, 买买提·沙吾提, 盛艳芳, 李荣鹏. 基于GEE平台渭库绿洲棉花水分生产率遥感估算[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(10): 1632-1642.
[4]	梅静, 孙美平, 李霖. 基于SWH模型的青藏高原高寒草甸蒸散发及其组分变化分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(6): 1740-1751.
[5]	谷佳贺,薛华柱,董国涛,周利娟,李静茹,党素珍,李尚志. 黄河流域NDVI/土地利用对蒸散发时空变化的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(1): 158-167.
[6]	张璐, 朱仲元, 张圣微, 王慧敏, 王飞, 席小康. 近59 a锡林河流域潜在蒸散发及地表干湿状况变化趋势分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 997-1003.
[7]	宁亚洲, 张福平, 冯起, 魏永芬, 李玲, 刘洁遥, 曾攀儒. 基于SEBAL模型的疏勒河流域蒸散发估算与灌溉效率评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 928-938.
[8]	赵建婷, 王艳君, 苏布达, 陶辉, 姜彤. 印度河流域气温、降水、蒸发及干旱变化特征 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2): 349-359.
[9]	韩飞飞, 闫俊杰, 郭斌. 阿勒泰地区植被覆盖度及ET对气温变化的响应[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(6): 1436-1444.
[10]	钟巧，焦黎，李稚，焦伟，陈亚宁. 博斯腾湖流域潜在蒸散发时空演变及归因分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(1): 103-112.
[11]	张晓玉, 范亚云, 热孜宛古丽·麦麦提依明, 何学敏, 陈丽华, 巴音达拉, 其其克, 杨建军. 基于SEBS模型的干旱区流域蒸散发估算探究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(3): 508-517.
[12]	董晴晴, 占车生, 王会肖, 王飞宇, 朱明承, 牛存稳. 2000年以来的渭河流域实际蒸散发时空格局分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(2): 327-335.
[13]	贺广均, 冯学智, 肖鹏峰, 李虎, 余涛, 叶李灶. 一种基于植被指数-地表温度特征空间的蒸散指数[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(5): 887-899.
[14]	李超凡，罗格平，李均力，范彬彬，韩其飞，白洁. 近20 a中亚净初级生产力与实际蒸散发特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(6): 919-927.
[15]	张晓琳，熊立华，林琳，龙海峰. 五种潜在蒸散发公式在汉江流域的应用[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(02): 229-237.