基于主体功能区视角下新疆民生质量的区域差异及影响因素

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 主体功能区定位决定区域的发展方向和重点，各类型区逐步实现公共服务均等化，民生质量发展表现出一定的区域差异。本文基于新疆主体功能区规划和民生发展实际状况构建民生质量评价指标体系，运用熵值法计算2005 年和2014 年各主体功能类型区的民生质量，并结合差异贡献率动态分析各类型区民生差异的影响因素。结果表明：（1）各类型区民生质量存在显著差异，重点开发区最优，重点生态功能区最低；尤其是收入与消费、文化与教育和生态与环境方面水平差距日益拉大。（2）各类型区民生质量发展侧重点各有不同，在文化与教育方面呈现水平共同下滑趋势。（3）各因素对于影响类型区民生质量差异的作用效果不同，收入、消费、交通设施、信息化、医疗卫生和生态平衡水平等成为拉大民生差距的主要因素。（4）收入消费水平和交通设施水平对拉大类型区民生质量差距的强度最为突出，生态平衡水平和信息化水平对拉大差距的程度逐渐加强，社会保障水平和教育水平对缩小差距的作用最强。基于上述分析，对缩小新疆主体功能区民生发展差距，保障基本公共服务均等化提出相应对策建议。

关键词: 主体功能区, 民生质量, 区域差异, 熵值法, 新疆

Abstract: Different functional positions in functional zones lead to the differences in development directions and focuses,and the quality of life also shows differences. Based on the main functional zoning planning program and the actual situation of life development in Xinjiang,the evaluation index system about the quality of life was constructed with 5 sub-systems including income and consumption,living and trips,culture and education, safety and security,and ecologic and environment. Then,the quality of life in 87 counties in Xinjiang was calculated in 2005 and in 2014,and the influencing factors of the differences among different counties were discussed. The results show as follows:(1)There were differences of quality of life among different functional zones. The comprehensive quality of life in the key development zones was the best,and its gap with the other functional areas was becoming bigger over time.(2)Different functional zones showed differences in development directions and focuses:the residential and travel quality in the Key development zones enhanced the fastest, the safety and security quality in the major agricultural production regions increased obviously,and the residential and travel quality in the key ecological functional zones enhanced the most.(3)The effects of different factors on the quality of life in the affected area were different. Income level,consumption level,traffic infrastructure level,information level,medical level and ecological greening level became the pull force to enlarge the gap of quality of life in different zones.(4)Income level of consumption and transportation travel conditions were the dominant factors. However,the influencing factors in the major function zones were changing,where the income level of consumption to the information level and ecological environment level became more and more important.( 5)The influences of social security and education level on the differences were less. Based on the above analysis,the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to narrow the gap among functional areas. Limitation development zone should narrow the income gap by accelerating the transformation of the pattern of economic development and making development more coordinated and industries more competitive. By increasing the efficiency of urbanization and focusing more invested funds of infrastructure in the limitation development zones,travel conditions in limitation development zones will be improved. Limitation development zone on ecological should ensure steady improvement of the quality of life by adhering to the main function of development and exploring the ecology long-term mechanism of compensation which is not to develop economy at the cost of destroying and pollute the ecology. What's more,the proportion of aiding funds to education in Xinjiang should be increased,and the poverty alleviation work should pay more attention to education and strengthen bilingual and skills training to lift the limit cultural and educational level in the restricted functional zones.

Key words: major function zoning, the quality of life, the spatial differences, Entropy method, Xinjiang

中图分类号:

F061.5

呼梦霞, 杜宏茹, 张小雷, 杨晶, 张璐. 基于主体功能区视角下新疆民生质量的区域差异及影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(3): 655-663.

HU Meng-xia, DU Hong-ru, ZHANG Xiao-lei, YANG Jing, ZHANG Lu. Regional differences and influencing factors of the quality of Xinjiang people's livelihood based on the major function zones[J]. , 2017, 40(3): 655-663.

参考文献

[1] 民生统计研究课题组.北京市民生统计指标体系建设研究[J]. 数据,2010,(7):60-62.[Research Group on statistics of people's livelihood. Study on the construction of statistical index system of the people's livelihood in Beijing[J]. Data,2010,(7): 60-62.]

[2] 潘祖光.“生活质量”研究的进展和趋势[J]. 浙江社会科学, 1994,(6):73-76.[PAN Zuguang. Progress and trend of the research on the quality of life[J]．Zhejiang Social Science,1994, (6):73-76．]

[3] GALBRAITH J K. The affluent society[M]. Houghton Mifflin, 1976.

[4] HAQ R,ZIA U. Multidimensional wellbeing:an index of quality of life in a developing economy[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2013,114(3):997-1012.

[5] MYERS D. Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1988,54(3):347-358.

[6] ROBERT J R. Quality of life and city competiveness[J]. Urban Studies,1999,36(5):969-985.

[7] MASSAM B H. Quality of life:public planning and private living[J]. Progress in Planning,2002,58(3):141-227.

[8] YAMAMOTO T. Quality of life:policy concept and reality[J]. Japanese Journal of Political Science,2014,15(2):163-182.

[9] 张小雷,杜宏茹. 中国干旱区城镇化发展现状及新型城镇化路径选择[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2013,28(1):46-53.[ZHANG Xiaolei,DU Hongru. New type of urbanization in arid zone of China:regional characteristics and strategic choice of sustainable development path[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Science, 2013,28(1):46-53.]

[10] 张明军,孙美平,姚晓军,等. 宝天高速公路牛背至天水段沿线居民生活质量[J]. 干旱区地理,2007,30(5):779-783.[ZHANG Mingjun,SUN Meiping,YAO Xiaolong,et al. Total economic value assessment of the eco-environment protection along Baotian highway[J]. Arid Land Geography,2007,30(5): 779-783.]

[11] 王哲野,程叶青,马靖,等. 东北地区城市民生质量测度与空间分析[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(2):190-196.[WANG Zheye, CHENGYeqing,MA Jing,et al. Measurement and spatial analysis of quality of life measurement life of urban residents in northeast China of China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2015,35 (2):190-196.]

[12] 曾文,张小林,向梨丽,等. 江苏省县域城市生活质量的空间格局及其经济学解析[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(7):28-35.[ZENG Wen,ZHANG Xiaolin,XIANG Lili,et al. The spatial pattern of quality of urban life in Jiangsu province on county scale and its economic mechanism[J]. Economic Geography,2014,34(7): 28-35.]

[13] 盛蕾. 旅游与民生问题研究综述[J]. 地域研究与开发,2014,33 (3):85-89.[SHENG Lei.A Review of studies on tourism and welfare[J]. Areal Research and development,2014,33(3):85- 89.]

[14] 林南,卢汉龙. 社会指标与生活质量的结构模型探讨[J].中国社会科学,1989,(4):75-97.[LIN Nan,LU Hanlong. Discussion on the structural model of social indicators and quality of life[J]. Social Science in China,1989(4):75-97.]

[15] 石天戈,张小雷,杜宏茹,等. 天山北坡经济带固定资产投资特征及其对城镇集聚的影响[J]. 干旱区地理,2013,36(1):176- 185.[SHI Tiange,ZHANG Xiaolei,DU Hongru,et al. Characteristics of fixed asset investment and influence to urban agglomeration in the economic belt on the northern slope of tianshan mountains[J]. Arid Land Geography,2013,36(1):176-185.]

[16] 汪菲,杨德刚,张新焕,等. 新疆县域经济格局及其内部差异演化和机理分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2014,37(4):820-830.[WANG Fei,YANG Degang,ZHANG Xinhuan,et al. Spatial pattern and internal differences evolvement of economy in Xinjiang at the county level[J]. Arid Land Geography,2014,37(4):820-830.]

[17] 宋亚君,高志刚,韩延,等. 新疆区域经济增长中的全要素生产率的实证分析——基于非参数Malmquist 指数方法[J]. 干旱区地理,2012,35(3):503-508.[SONG Yajun,GAO Zhigang, HAN Yan,et al. Empirical analysis of total factor productivity of Xinjiang:a nonparametric malmquist index approach[J]. Arid Land Geography,2012,35(3):503-508.]

[18] 景军,张永福,安方舟. 新疆县域农林牧渔业空间差异分析 ——基于ESDA 与GIS 方法[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(4): 821-832.[JING Jun,ZHANG Yongfu,AN Fangzhou. Difference analysis of agriculture forestry animal husbandry and fishery spatial pattern in Xinjiang at the county level:based on ESDA and GIS methods[J]. Arid Land Geography,2015,38(4):821- 832.]

[19] 樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(2): 186-201.[FAN Jie. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China[J]. ActaGeographicaSinica,2015,70(2):186-201.]

[20] 王铮,孙翊. 中国主体功能区协调发展与产业结构演化[J].地理科学,2013,33(6):641-648.[WANG Zheng,SUN Yu. Simulation on regional coordination and industrial structure a structure evolution oriented to the main functional areas of China evolution China[J]. ScientiaGeographicaSinica,2013,33(6): 641-648.]

[21] 刘正桥,王良健. 国家主体功能区战略背景下东北地区城市经济增长的动力与路径——基于城市暂住人口视角[J]. 地理研究,2013,32(4):683-690.[LIU Zhengqiao,WANG Liangjian. The impetus and path of economic growth for cities in northeast China under the background of major function zones:From the perspective of urban transient population[J]. Geographical Research, 2013,32(4):683-690.]