收藏设为首页 广告服务联系我们在线留言

干旱区地理 ›› 2013, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 897-905.

• 生态与环境演变 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于公共价值的沙漠化治理政策绩效评价研究

樊胜岳,徐均,陈玉玲,徐裕财   

  1. 中央民族大学经济学院, 北京    100081
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-02 修回日期:2013-02-27 出版日期:2013-09-25
  • 作者简介:樊胜岳(1962-),男,山东郯城人,中央民族大学经济学院教授,经济学博士,博士生导师,主要从事资源环境经济学与区域经济发展方面的研究 Email:syfanac@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目《制度因素对沙漠化影响的定量分析》(41071353)资助

Performance evaluation of desertification control policies based on public value

FAN Sheng-yue,XU Jun,CHEN Yu-ling,XU Yu-cai   

  1. School  of  Economics  in  Minzu  University, Beijing  100081, China
  • Received:2012-12-02 Revised:2013-02-27 Online:2013-09-25

摘要: 首先从分析沙漠化的物理机制入手,将生态建设政策对沙漠化的作用以政策指数PIX来表示,分解为空间广度[PSS]和时间强度[PEF]两个变量,PIX=(PSS+PEF)/2,定量计算政策指数与沙漠化变化的相关性。其次以公共价值为基本框架,构建沙漠化治理政策的执行过程+生态效果的绩效评价体系,从政策过程的“公平性”、对“合作生产”主体的尊重性、政府部门管理的“效率性”、生态效果的“可持续性”、政策对沙漠化变化的相关性等方面提取指标因子,定量评价沙漠化治理政策的绩效。以宁夏盐池县草地禁牧政策为例进行研究。结果表明:禁牧政策与沙漠化面积减少显著相关,草地禁牧政策公共价值绩效得分0.378 3,效果较差。因此,提出的基于公共价值的沙漠化治理政策绩效评价指标和模型都是可行的。

关键词: 生态政策, 公共价值, 绩效评价, 沙漠化

Abstract: Since the end of the 20th century,large-scale ecological construction policies has been implemented in China and the subsequent performance evaluation of the policies is an important issue which is worthy of deeper inquiry. The current performance evaluation of ecological construction policies rarely involves the government,farmers and other behavior subjects in relation to their course of action regarding the eco-construction process,even it is unable to explain the crucial issues such as whether ecological construction process is fair,how governance efficiency is and whether the ecological result is sustainable. Firstly,this paper starts from analyzing the physical mechanisms of desertification,it offers a word of policy index [PIX] and with which to indicate the effect that ecological construction policies have had on desertification,then the policy index is decomposed into two variables,which are spatial span PSS and time intensity PEFPIX=(PSS+PEF)/2. Taking the grassland grazing prohibition policy in Yanchi County of Ningxia as an example to calculate the relevant coefficient of the grass grazing prohibition policy and desertification change and a score was obtained with -0.746,indicating that it has got through the significant α=0.01 inspection and the grassland grazing prohibition policy and the desertification area reduction related significantly. Secondly the project takes the public value as a basic framework to build a system which combines the execution process of desertification control policy and the performance evaluation of the ecological effects,then a quantitative evaluation was made on the performance of the desertification control policy through extracting the index factors from some aspects such as the “fairness” of the policy process,respect for the subject of “co-production”,the management “efficiency” of the government departments,the “sustainability” of ecological effects and the relevance of ecological policy on desertification change and so on. By using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to calculate the weight of each index factor,the quantitatively measured results were obtained,knowing that the grassland grazing prohibition policy in Yanchi County,Ningxia Province,China has poor effect with public value performance score of 0.378 3. Seen from the desertification control effect,the grass grazing prohibition policy has achieved the ecological goals of controlling desertification,but it does not consider the farmers’ ecological compensation and participation will,so it not only damaged the enthusiasm of farmers and herdsmen in the ecological construction but also brought serious challenges on the sustainability of grazing prohibition results. It is evident that the desertification control policy is a good policy only when it runs on the limited track with public value and plays a significant role in the desertification control. The performance evaluation indexes and models of the desertification control policy based on public value offered in this project are of great significance and feasible. This paper will provide a new and scientific method for the performance evaluation of ecological construction policy and a new attempt to incorporate the ecological construction policy into the government performance management system. It also provides a value case to evaluate the performance of government’s ecological construction policies from the perspective of public value on the project level.

Key words: ecological policy, public value, performance evaluation, desertification

中图分类号: 

  • F062.2