塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘3种荒漠植物光合特性的比较

干旱区地理 ›› 2012, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (01): 171-176.

塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘3种荒漠植物光合特性的比较

朱军涛¹,²,³，李向义¹,³，张希明¹,³，林丽莎¹,³，杨尚功¹,³

1中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所，荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐830011； 2中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室，北京100101； 3中国科学院策勒荒漠草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站，新疆策勒848300

收稿日期:2011-07-15 修回日期:2011-09-10 出版日期:2012-01-25
通讯作者: 朱军涛
作者简介:朱军涛(1981-),男,山东威海人，博士,主要从事植物生理生态学研究
基金资助:
国家科技支撑项目 (2009BAC54B03) ；新疆科技计划项目（200933125）；国家重点基础研究发展计划资助（2009CB421303）；国家自然科学基金青年基金（41101056）；中国博士后科学基金（20110490571）

Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics of three species growing at the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert

ZHU Juntao¹,²,³,LI Xiangyi¹,³,ZHANG Ximing¹,³,LIN Lisha¹,³,YANG Shanggong¹,³

1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology,Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Urumqi 830011,Xinjiang, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China; 3 Cele National Station of Observation & Research For Desert-grass Land Ecosystem in Xinjiang,Cele 848300,Xinjiang,China

Received:2011-07-15 Revised:2011-09-10 Online:2012-01-25
Contact: ZHU Juntao

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在2008年6、7和8月中旬，以塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘固氮植物骆驼刺（[WTBX]Alhagi sparsifolia[WTBZ] Shap.）和非固氮植物柽柳（[WTBX]Tamarix ramosissima[WTBZ] Ledeb.）、花花柴（[WTBX]Karelinia caspica[WTBZ] Less.）为研究对象，研究了两种类型植物的净光合速率、光响应、CO2响应模型参数、叶绿素和叶氮含量等。结果表明：固氮与非固氮植物净光合速率日变化趋势，6月和7月均为双峰曲线，8月为单峰曲线；3个月光合速率平均值花花柴＞柽柳＞骆驼刺，即非固氮植物具有更高的净光合速率。最大净光合速率（[WTBX]P[WTBZ]max）、表观量子效率（AQY）、CO2饱和点（CSP）和暗呼吸速率（[WTBX]R[WTBZ]day）,非固氮植物＞固氮植物，且差异达到显著（[WTBX]P[WTBZ]<0.05）；羧化效率（[WTBX]V[WTBZ]cmax）和电子传递速率（[WTBX]J[WTBZ]max）,柽柳和骆驼刺差异不显著（[WTBX]P[WTBZ]＞0.05）；光饱和点（LSP）和补偿点（LCP）、CO2补偿点（CCP），固氮植物＞非固氮植物，且差异达到显著（[WTBX]P[WTBZ]<0.05）；叶绿素和叶氮含量，固氮植物＞非固氮植物，且差异均达显著水平（[WTBX]P[WTBZ]<0.05）。通过双因素相关性分析，骆驼刺的[WTBX]P[WTBZ]max与Chl、叶氮含量之间无显著的相关性，柽柳和花花柴的[WTBX]P[WTBZ]max与Chl之间也无显著的相关性，柽柳的[WTBX]P[WTBZ]max与叶氮含量呈一定的负相关，而花花柴的[WTBX]P[WTBZ]max与叶氮含量呈一定的正相关。尽管固氮植物叶氮含量较高，但光合速率表现为非固氮植物高于固氮植物，这说明叶片中高的叶氮含量并不一定引起高的光合速率。

关键词: 光合特性, 叶绿素含量, 叶氮含量, 固氮与非固氮植物, 塔克拉玛干沙漠

Abstract: Indigenous vegetation in the foreland of river oases at the extremely arid southern margin of the Taklimakan Desert in Xinjiang,NW China,is dominated by a few perennial phreatophytes,primarily [WTBX]Alhagi sparsifolia[WTBZ] Shap.,[WTBX]Tamarix ramosissima[WTBZ] Ledeb. and [WTBX]Karelinia caspica[WTBZ] Less. Water is well known as a limiting factor for plant growth in deserts,availability of nutrients has also been determined as a critical factor limiting plant growth in arid regions. Water source for plants is groundwater at the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert. So nutrients are the most important resource for plant growth in the same groundwater depth. When the soil N content or the nitrogen validity are low,plants with the ability to fix N2 might have an advantage and be capable of taking in more N than plants without this ability. Leaf N content correlates strongly with photosynthesis as most of the leaf N is allocated to photosynthesis. So some people considered that the nitrogen fixing plants might have higher Pmax than the nitrogen nonfixing ones living in the same habitat. However,in our previous research,we found that nitrogen nonfixing species had higher photosynthetica capacity. In order to answer this question,nitrogen fixing species A. sparsifolia and nitrogen nonfixing species K. caspica and T. ramosissima were compared in their typical habitat at the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert. The diurnal variations of net photosynthetic rate,indexs of light and CO2 to net photosynthetic rate (Pn),Chl content,leaf nitrogen content of nitrogen fixing and nonfixing species were investigated in June,July and August 2008. The results showed that from 08∶00 to 20∶00 the diurnal variations of Pn showed double peak curve both nitrogen fixing and nonfixing species in June and July. In August,the curve changed into a single peak. The order of average photosynthetic rate of three months: K. caspica＞T. ramosissima＞A. sparsifolia. It also showed that nitrogen nonfixing species had higher Pn than nitrogen fixing species. The maximum net photosynthetic rate (P max),apparent quantum requirement (AQY), CO2 saturation point ,dark respiration rate (Rday) of nitrogen nonfixing species were higher than nitrogen fixing species,the difference was significant (P0.05). The nitrogen fixing species had significantly higher light compensation point (LCP),light saturation point (LSP),CO2 compensation point (CCP),Chl content and leaf nitrogen content than nitrogen nonfixing species (P<0.05). Through correlative analysis,we found that there was no obviously relationship between nship between Pmax and Chl in K. caspica and T. ramosissima. Pmax of T. ramosissima was negatively correlated with leaf nitrogen content. But Pmax of K. caspica was positively correlated with leaf nitrogen content. In despite of higher leaf nitrogen content in nitrogen fixing species,nitrogen nonfixing species had higher photosynthetic capacity. The higher leaf nitrogen content not always bring higher photosynthetic rate in nitrogen fixing and nonfixing species.

Key words: photosynthetic characteristics, Chlorophyll content, leaf nitrogen content, nitrogen fixing and nonfixing species, Taklimakan Desert

中图分类号:

Q945.11

朱军涛,,，李向义,，张希明,，林丽莎,，杨尚功,. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘3种荒漠植物光合特性的比较[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(01): 171-176.

ZHU Juntao,,,LI Xiangyi,,ZHANG Ximing,,LIN Lisha,,YANG Shanggong,. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics of three species growing at the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert[J]. , 2012, 35(01): 171-176.

参考文献

〔1〕THOMAS F M,ARNDT S K,BRUELHEIDE H. Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a Central-Asian desert:presentation and first results〔J〕. Journal of Applied Botany,2000,74:212-219.

〔2〕NIU S L,JIANG G M,LI Y G,et al. Comparison of photosynthetic traits between two typical shrubs:legume and nonlegume in Hunshandak Sandland〔J〕. Photosynthetica,2003,41:111-116.

〔3〕EVANS J R. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants〔J〕. Oecologia,1989,78:9-19.

〔4〕ERLEY G S A,WIJAYA K A,ULAS A. Leaf senescence and N uptake parameters as selection traits for nitrogen efficiency of oilseed rape cultivars〔J〕. Physiologia Plantarum,2007,130:519-531.

〔5〕KAZDA M,SALZER J,REITER I. Photosynthetic capacity in relation to nitrogen in the canopy of a Quercus robur,Fraxinus angustifolia and Tilia cordata flood plain forest〔J〕. Tree Physiology,2000,20:2029-2037.

〔6〕JIANG G M,ZHU G J. Different patterns of gas exchange and photochemical efficiency in three desert shrub species under two natural temperatures and irradiances in Mu Us Sandy Area of China〔J〕. Photosynthetica,2001,39:257-262.

〔7〕REICH P B,WALTERS M B,ELLSWORTH D S,et al. Relationship of leaf dark respiration to leafnitrogen specific leaf area and leaf life span:a test across biomes and functional groups〔J〕. Oecologia,1998,114:471-482.

〔8〕夏训诚,李崇舜.关于沙漠化机制的研究〔J〕. 干旱区研究，1993，10(1)：1-14.

〔9〕李向义,林丽莎,赵强. 策勒绿洲外围不同地下水埋深下主要优势植物的分布和群落特征〔J〕. 干旱区地理,2009,32(6):906-911.

〔10〕戴声佩,张勃,王海军,等. 中国西北地区植被覆盖变化驱动因子分析〔J〕. 干旱区地理,2010,33(4):636-643.

〔11〕FARQUHAR G D,SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis〔J〕. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1982,11:191-210.

〔12〕KELLLOMAKI S,WANG K Y. Effects of elevated O3 and CO2 concentrations on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in Scots Pine〔J〕. Plant Cell and Environment,1997,20:995-1006.

〔13〕陈敏,陈亚宁,李卫红,等. 不同地下水埋深柽柳、芦苇的生理响应〔J〕. 干旱区地理,2009,32(1):72-80.

〔14〕王伟华,张希明,闫海龙,等. 盐水处理对沙拐枣气体交换特征、光合色素和可溶性糖含量的影响〔J〕. 干旱区地理,2009,32(4):597-603.

〔15〕LICHTENTHALER H K,WELLBURN A R. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents〔J〕. Biochemical Society Transactions,1983,603:591-592.

〔16〕黄红英，窦新永，孙蓓育，等. 两种不同生态型麻疯树夏季光合特性的比较〔J〕. 生态学报,2009,29(6):2861-2867.

〔17〕BAUER H,MARTHA P,KIRCHER-HEISS B. The CO2 compensation point of C3 plants-a reexamination.Ⅱ.Intraspecific vaiability〔J〕. Z Pflanzen-physiology,1983,109:143-154.

〔18〕曹昀,王国祥,张聃. 干旱对芦苇幼苗生长和叶绿素荧光的影响〔J〕. 干旱区地理,2008,31(6):862-869.

〔19〕SHARKEY T D. Photosynthesis in intake leaves of C3 plants:physics,physiology and rate limitations〔J〕. Botanical Review,1985,51:53-105.

〔20〕YEOH H H,WEE Y C,WATSON L. Leaf protein contents and amino acid patterns of dicotyledonous plants〔J〕. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,1992,20:657-663.

〔21〕FOULDS W. Nutrient concentrations of foliage and soil in South-western Australia〔J〕. New Phytologist,1993,125:529-546.

〔22〕MCKEY D. Legumes and nitrogen:the evolutionary ecology of a nitrogen-demanding lifestyle〔M〕 //SPRENT J J,MCKEY D,eds. Advances in legume systematics,vol 5:the nitrogen factors. Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew,1994:211-228.

[1]	陈京平, 余子莹, 杨帆, 王蜜, 胡涵, 丁璇, 高鑫, 王鑫. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地沙尘暴对新月形沙丘表面粒度变化的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(12): 1995-2004.
[2]	唐敏,张峰,师庆东. 克里雅河尾闾绿洲浅层地下水位埋深变化特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(1): 80-88.
[3]	张峰,夏倩倩,迪丽拜尔·吐尔孙,刘建宗. 克里雅河尾闾圆沙三角洲古河道剖面所记录全新世古绿洲环境变化[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(1): 178-187.
[4]	孙小雲, 房彦杰, 赵景峰, 何清, 周杰. 塔克拉玛干沙漠输沙势时空分布特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1): 38-47.
[5]	马玉芬, 潘红林, 张海亮, 刘军建, 李曼, 杜鹃. 大气红外探测器(AIRS)资料在塔克拉玛干沙漠的适用性检验与评估[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(5): 908-922.
[6]	翟浩明, 石晶. 塔克拉玛干沙漠边缘地区生态林业效益分析与发展路径研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(2): 462-468.
[7]	赵战成, 丁国峰, 艾尔肯. 塔克拉玛干沙漠东部边缘降雨日变化[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(6): 1182-1185.
[8]	赵战成, 丁国峰, 艾尔肯. 塔克拉玛干沙漠东部边缘降雨日变化[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(6): 1182-1185.
[9]	赵元杰, 车高红, 刘辉, 曾佳, 夏训诚. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘红柳沙包有机质碳氮含量与气候环境变化[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(3): 461-467.
[10]	王会提, 曾凡江, 张波, 李尝君, 高欢欢, 鲁建荣. 不同种植方式下柽柳光合生理参数光响应特性研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(4): 753-762.
[11]	房彦杰，赵景峰，郭永平，李生宇，何清，韩鑫. FRYBERGER输沙势计算方法及其估算值偏差分析——以塔克拉玛干沙漠为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(1): 95-102.
[12]	曾佳，郭峰，赵灿，孙增英，赵元杰. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘小绿洲近50 a来气候变化特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(5): 948-957.
[13]	王宁波，李生宇，王海峰，徐新文，贾文茹，张忠良，田野. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地垄间地上覆沙丘形态的空间变化特征及其成因[J]. 干旱区地理, 2014, 37(1): 89-96.
[14]	彭守兰，曾凡江，刘波，张利刚，罗维成，宋聪，Stefan K.Arndt，彭慧清. 极端干旱条件下策勒绿洲引种植物水分生理特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(3): 457-466.
[15]	严坤，李生宇，雷加强，王海峰，孙聪，严风硕，李春. 沙漠腹地人工绿地地表能量交换特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(3): 433-440.