耕地撂荒的文献计量分析：脉络和展望

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.417

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于Web of Science（SCI）和知网（CNKI）数据库中以耕地撂荒为研究主题的文献数据，借助CiteSpace软件对1990—2021年耕地撂荒领域的研究论文进行数据挖掘和定量分析（数据更新时间为2022年3月20日），对国内外耕地撂荒领域的论文数量、引文数量、主要作者、相关学术期刊和关键词进行系统梳理和对比研究，进而探讨中国耕地撂荒未来的研究方向。结果表明：（1）在过去近32 a，关于耕地撂荒的论文数量有所增加，国内外学者对耕地撂荒的关注不尽相同，国内外耕地撂荒研究发展历程存在差异，各阶段的研究重点不尽相同。（2）耕地撂荒、撂荒地、土地利用、景观、碳汇、土壤退化是近年来耕地撂荒领域的高频关键词。（3）国内耕地撂荒领域的研究热点主要集中在耕地撂荒的形成原因、影响因素等研究方向，国外的研究更多是研究群落多样性和农田景观动态等方面。（4）国内外学者的研究大多集中于小尺度上耕地撂荒的成因、机制、影响、建议等方面，在大尺度上的研究较少，就遥感、大数据、网络数据模拟、动态监测等方面的研究仍然缺乏。本研究建议以后的研究应基于全球视野，进一步系统深入地探索耕地撂荒内容、成因、演变机理和影响，同时充分利用人工智能技术检测和获取耕地撂荒的时空动态，尝试林草一体化高质量发展等农业模式，以便为治理撂荒制定合理、有效的措施。

关键词: 耕地撂荒, CiteSpace, 可视化, 治理, 复耕

Abstract:

Based on the literature in the databases of the Web of Science (SCI) and CNKI, CiteSpace is used to conduct data mining and quantitative analysis of the research papers in farmland abandonment from 1990 to 2021 (data updating time: March 20, 2022). The number of papers and citations, main authors, relevant academic journals, and keywords regarding cultivated land abandonment in China and abroad are systematically sorted out and studied comparatively. The future research direction of cultivated land abandonment in China is then discussed. The following results were obtained: (1) The number of papers regarding cultivated land abandonment has increased in the past 32 years. Scholars in China and abroad pay different attention to the field. There are differences in the development of the research on cultivated land abandonment in China and abroad, and the research focus of each stage is different. (2) Abandoned cultivated land, abandoned land, land use, landscape, carbon sink, and soil degradation are high-frequency keywords of cultivated land abandonment in recent years. (3) The research hot spots of the field in China mainly focus on the causes and influencing factors of cultivated land abandonment, while foreign research is more focused on community diversity and farmland landscape dynamics. (4) The research of Chinese and foreign scholars mostly focus on the causes, mechanism, impacts, and suggestions of farmland abandonment on a small scale, and there are few large-scale studies, including those on remote sensing, big data, network data simulation, and dynamic monitoring, among others. This study suggests that future research should be based on a global perspective. In addition, this study explores the content, causes, evolution mechanism, and impact of cultivated land abandonment systematically. Meanwhile, it should make full use of AI technology to detect and obtain the temporal and spatial dynamics of cultivated land abandonment and try to adopt the agricultural models such as the high-quality development of forest-grass integration to formulate reasonable and effective measures to deal with farmland abandonment.

Key words: farmland abandonment, CiteSpace, visualization, management, second ploughing

王新友,王玉娇. 耕地撂荒的文献计量分析：脉络和展望[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(5): 804-813.

WANG Xinyou,WANG Yujiao. Bibliometric analysis of cultivated land abandonment: Context and prospect[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(5): 804-813.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

表1

图8

表2

图9

图6

图7

表3

表4

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 27

[1]	Weissteiner C J, Boschetti M, Böttcher K, et al. Spatial explicit assessment of rural land abandonment in the Mediterranean area[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2011, 79(1-2): 20-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.07.009
[2]	Díaz G, Nahuelhual L, Echeverría C, et al. Drivers of land abandonment in southern Chile and implications for landscape planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, 99(3-4): 207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.005
[3]	李升发, 李秀彬. 耕地撂荒研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 370-389. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201603002
	[Li Shengfa, Li Xiubin. Progress and prospect on farmland abandonment[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 370-389. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201603002
[4]	张斌, 翟有龙, 徐邓耀, 等. 耕地抛荒的评价指标及应用研究初探[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2003, 24(5): 53-56.
	[Zhang Bin, Zhai Youlong, Xu Dengyao, et al. Initial approach on evaluation target and applying research of arable land wasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2003, 24(5): 53-56. ]
[5]	谭术魁. 耕地撂荒程度描述、可持续性评判指标体系及其模式[J]. 中国土地科学, 2003, 17(6): 3-8.
	[Tan Shukui. Extent description and index system of sustainability judgment and its pattern of cultivated land abandoning[J]. China Land Science, 2003, 17(6): 3-8. ]
[6]	李升发, 李秀彬. 中国山区耕地利用边际化表现及其机理[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 803-817. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805002
	[Li Shengfa, Li Xiubin. Economic characteristics and the mechanism of farmland marginalization in mountainous areas of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 803-817. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805002
[7]	Ramankutty N, Foley J A, Olejniczak N J. People on the land: Changes in global population and croplands during the 20^th century[J]. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 2002, 31(3): 251-257. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.3.251
[8]	陶泽涪, 王世清, 孙丕苓, 等. 中国北方农牧交错带耕地时空分异及驱动因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(1): 153-163.
	[Tao Zefu, Wang Shiqing, Sun Piling, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation and driving factors of cropland in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 153-163. ]
[9]	李亚丽, 杨粉莉, 杨联安, 等. 近40 a榆林市土地利用空间格局变化及影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(4): 1011-1021.
	[Li Yali, Yang Fenli, Yang Lian’an, et al. Spatial pattern changes and influencing factors of land use in Yulin City in the past 40 years[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(4): 1011-1021. ]
[10]	Macdonald D, Crabtree J R, Wiesinger G, et al. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 59(1): 47-69. doi: 10.1006/jema.1999.0335
[11]	张伟, 周亮, 孙东琪, 等. 干旱区生态移民空间迁移特征与生态影响——以甘肃省古浪县为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(2): 618-627.
	[Zhang Wei, Zhou Liang, Sun Dongqi, et al. Spatial migration characteristics and ecological impacts of ecological migrants in arid regions: A case of Gulang County, Gansu Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(2): 618-627. ]
[12]	Kamp J, Reinhard A, Frenzel M, et al. Farmland bird responses to land abandonment in western Siberia[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 268: 61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.009
[13]	Xin D, Xu D D, Miao Z, et al. Landslides and cropland abandonment in China’s mountainous areas: Spatial distribution, empirical analysis and policy implications[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(11): 1-14. doi: 10.3390/su10020001
[14]	Deng X, Zeng M, Xu D D, et al. Household health and cropland abandonment in rural China: Theoretical mechanism and empirical evidence[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(19): 3588, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193588
[15]	姚冠荣, 张传, 刘陶红, 等. 农地流转服务体系有助于抑制耕地撂荒吗?——来自丘陵山区的经验证据[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2022, 21(4): 442-452.
	[Yao Guanrong, Zhang Chuan, Liu Taohong, et al. Does the land transfer services network help to alleviate farmland abandonment: Empirical evidence from hilly and mountainous regions of China[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2022, 21(4): 442-452. ]
[16]	李勇, 何欢欢. 主产区粮食产量时空格局演变与影响因素[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(6): 216-224. doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.06.035
	[Li Yong, He Huanhuan. Spatial and temporal pattern evolution and influencing factors of grain yield in major grain producing areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 216-224. ] doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.06.035
[17]	项骁野, 王佑汉, 李谦, 等. 基于CiteSpace软件国内外撂荒地研究进展与述评[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(4): 670-681. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.04.012
	[Xiang Xiaoye, Wang Youhan, Li Qian, et al. Research progress and review of abandoned land based on CiteSpace[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(4): 670-681. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.04.012
[18]	王京, 魏子喻, 高长元. 创新生态系统研究的脉络与展望[J]. 科技与管理, 2021, 23(5): 49-62.
	[Wang Jing, Wei Ziyu, Gao Changyuan. Context and prospect of innovation ecosystem research[J]. Science and Technology and Management, 2021, 23(5): 49-62. ]
[19]	Clergeau P. The effect of birds on seed germination of fleshy-fruited plants in temperate farmland[J]. Acta Oecologica, 1992, 13(6): 679-686.
[20]	杨鲁. 农村改革应该突出规模经营[J]. 经济管理, 1990(4): 31-32.
	[Yang Lu. Rural reform should stress scale operation[J]. Business Management Journal, 1990(4): 31-32. ]
[21]	祝友胜. 武汉市耕地撂荒问题得到初步控制[J]. 统计与决策, 1993(5): 40-41.
	[Zhu Yousheng. The problem of farmland abandonment in Wuhan has been preliminarily controlled[J]. Statistics & Decision, 1993(5): 40-41. ]
[22]	刘成武, 李秀彬. 1980年以来中国农地利用变化的区域差异[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2): 139-145.
	[Liu Chengwu, Li Xiubin. Regional differences in the changes of the agricultural land use in China during 1980—2002[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(2): 139-145. ]
[23]	Zhang Chao, Liu Guobin, Xue Sha, et al. Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2016, 97: 40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.013
[24]	Baumann M, Kuemmerle T, Elbakidze M, et al. Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in western Ukraine[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28(3): 552-562. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003
[25]	Stoate C, Boatman N D, Borralho R J, et al. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, 63(4): 337-365. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0473 pmid: 11826719
[26]	Li S F, Li X B. Global understanding of farmland abandonment: A review and prospects[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(9): 1123-1150. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1426-0
[27]	冯红燕. 农户耕地抛荒的驱动因素研究——基于农户调查的计量分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011.
	[Feng Hongyan. Study on driving factors of cultivated land abandonment: A quantitative analysis based on household survey[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011. ]

作者	H指数	G指数	每篇文献的平均引用次数	开始发文年份
Li XB	23	31	62.65	2006
Liu GB	7	11	56.36	2005
Xin LJ	6	10	20.00	2013
Deng L	7	9	33.00	2013
Shangguan ZP	7	9	32.44	2013
Xue S	7	9	51.44	2011
Song W	4	7	15.71	2016
Wang YH	4	7	9.29	2013
Wang YK	4	6	9.33	2018

期刊	影响力	侧重点
地理学报	75.38	农地利用、集约度、播种面积、区域差异、耕地撂荒、耕地边际化、土地利用变化、研究进展、耕作条件、驱动因子、耕地利用边际化、农业劳动力成本、山区、时空特征等
环境科学	34.12	土地利用方式、团聚体、土壤有机碳、活性有机碳、撂荒地、酶化学计量、微生物养分限制、植被恢复等
农业工程学报	32.31	遥感、提取、耕地撂荒、土地利用、验证、图斑、数据、信息获取等
地理研究	31.04	生态恢复、生态系统反服务、影响因素、农地边际化等
水土保持学报	28.99	石漠化耕地、地块尺度、时序分析、时空演化、土壤风蚀、风沙流结构、土壤养分、土壤容重、土壤退化指数等

期刊	影响力	侧重点
Land Use Policy	72.27	农业用地、行为驱动因素、逻辑分析、土地利用变化、土地利用建模、土地利用理论等
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment	57.89	有机农业、鸟类多样性、异质景观、原生森林、岩溶临界带、自然恢复、碳通量、水通量、农业集约化、可耕地栖息地等
Journal of Environmental Management	41.54	土壤细菌、土壤真菌、土壤酶、耕地生态学、生物多样性气候变化、共同农业政策、生态系统服务、草地、多功能性等
Earth-Science Reviews	38.74	气候变化、气象和水文干旱、土地利用变化、土地覆盖、积雪、河势、地中海地区等
Journal of Applied Ecology	35.43	农业用地、生物多样性聚集或过度分散、社区集会、群落生态学、土地利用变化、鸟类多样性、社区组成、次生林再生等