河西走廊西段戈壁灌木群落多样性及其分布格局研究

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.12

干旱区地理 ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1514-1522.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.12

河西走廊西段戈壁灌木群落多样性及其分布格局研究

董雪 ^1,5，李永华 ^2,3,4，辛智鸣 ^1,5，段瑞兵 ^1,5，姚斌 ²，包岩峰 ²，黄雅茹 ^1,5，张正国²

1 中国林业科学研究院沙漠林业实验中心，内蒙古磴口 015200；2 中国林业科学研究院荒漠化研究所，北京 100091；3 库姆塔格荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站，甘肃敦煌 736200；4 甘肃敦煌荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站，甘肃敦煌 736200；5 内蒙古磴口荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站，内蒙古磴口 015200

收稿日期:2019-08-05 修回日期:2020-05-20 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-11-25
通讯作者: 李永华（1978-），男，北京人，博士，副研究员，主要从事干旱区植物性状与适应性.
作者简介:董雪（1986-），女，内蒙古巴彦淖尔市人，硕士，工程师，主要从事荒漠化防治方面的研究. E-mail: dongxue98765@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“荒漠生态质量监测技术集成与应用示范”（2017YFC503804-4）；科技基础资源调查专项“河西走廊西段荒漠主要植物群落调查”（2017FY100203-1）；国家自然科学基金“极干旱区洪水驱动的植物分布格局与生存策略”（41671049）

Gobi shrub species diversity and its distribution pattern in west Hexi Corridor

DONG Xue^1,5, LI Yong-hua^2,3,4, XIN Zhi-ming^1,5, DUAN Rui-bing^1,5, YAO Bin², BAO Yan-feng², HUANG Ya-ru^1,5, ZHANG Zheng-guo²

1 Experimental Center of Desert Forestry, CAF, Dengkou, 015200, Inner Mongolia, China; 2 Institute of Desertification Studies, CAF, Beijing 100091, China; 3 National Forestry Bureaus Kumtage Desert Ecosystem Location Research Station, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China; 4 State Forestry Administration Dunhuang Desert Ecosystem Location Research Station, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China; 5 State Forestry Administration Dengkou Desert Ecosystem Location Research Station, Dengkou 015200, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2019-08-05 Revised:2020-05-20 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过野外样方调查河西走廊西段荒漠戈壁典型灌木群落多样性状况，研究探讨了 8 种典型灌木群落物种多样性的空间分布格局及其与地理因子的关系，对荒漠戈壁植物群落的多样性的保护和可持续发展具有重要意义。结果表明：(1) 8 个典型灌木群落 Shannon-Wiener 指数、Simpson 指数、Margalef 指数和 Pielou 指数从高到低为：盐爪爪群落>麻黄群落>合头草群落>红砂群落>梭梭群落>泡泡刺群落>多枝柽柳群落>沙拐枣群落；波动范围分别为 0.314 ~ 1.355、0.179 ~ 0.666、0.334 ~ 1.222 和 0.051 ~ 0.218，说明荒漠戈壁灌木群落物种多样性指数偏低，群落结构简单，物种组成稀少。(2) 不同灌木群落内物种数越多，群落间 Jaccard 相似性系数越大。大部分灌木群落类型间 Jac? card 相似性在 0.20 ~ 0.60 之间，群落间相似水平较低，群落相对稳定。(3) 随着海拔的升高，Margalef 指数、Pielou 指数和 Shannon-Wiener 指数均呈先增加后降低的单峰型分布格局，最大值出现在海拔 2 000 m，且与海拔显著相关（P<0.05）；在经度梯度上，从东到西，Margalef 指数、Pielou 指数和 Shan? non-Wiener 指数呈递增格局，但与经度无显著相关性（P>0.05）；在纬度梯度上，从南到北，Margalef 指数、Pielou 指数和 Shannon-Wiener 指数呈显著递增趋势（P<0.05）。总体上，荒漠戈壁灌木群落物种多样性呈现出明显的垂直（海拔）和纬度地带性分布格局。

关键词: 荒漠戈壁, 灌木群落, 物种多样性, 地理分布

Abstract: To elucidate the plant diversity of typical shrub communities species diversity in west of Hexi Corridor, Gansu Province, China, spatial distribution pattern of species diversity and its relationship with geographical factors were discussed in this paper via field sample survey. It is important for maintaining, self-improvement, scientific conservation, and managing the diversity of the gobi shrub communities. Results showed that: (1) Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, richness Margalef index, and evenness Pielou index of eight desert gobi shrub communities are calculated and compared. The order is Kalidium foliatum community>Ephedra przewalskii community> Sympegma regelii community>Reaumuria songarica community>Haloxylon ammodendron community>Nitraria sphaerocarpa community> Tamarix ramosissima community>Calligonum mongolicum community. The Shannon-Wiener, Simpson, Margalef, and Pielou fluctuation range of the indexes were 0.314-1.355, 0.179-0.666, 0.334-1.222, and 0.051-0.218. The species diversity indexes of gobi desert shrub communities were observed to be low. The structure and composition of the shrub communities were simple and rare. (2) More species in the community results in higher Jaccard similarity coefficient between communities. The Jaccard similarity between most shrub community types ranges from 0.20 to 0.60. Most Jaccard similarity levels between communities were low and the communities were relatively stable. (3) For the species diversity such as Margalef and Pielou, the Shannon-Wiener index showed an increasing and then decreasing trend, similar to the Unimodal pattern, where the maximum occurred at 2000 m of the elevational gradient. The correlation between species diversity and altitude were significant (P<0.05). The species density had a significant increasing trend from south to north (P<0.05), while it had a non-significant increasing trend from east to west (P>0.05). On the community scale, the species diversity of gobi desert shrub communities showed obvious vertical (altitude) and latitude zonal distribution pattern.

Key words: gobi desert , shrub communities, species diversity, geographical distribution

董雪, 李永华, 辛智鸣, 段瑞兵, 姚斌, 包岩峰, 黄雅茹, 张正国 . 河西走廊西段戈壁灌木群落多样性及其分布格局研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(6): 1514-1522.

DONG Xue, LI Yong-hua, XIN Zhi-ming, DUAN Rui-bing, YAO Bin, BAO Yan-feng, HUANG Ya-ru, ZHANG Zheng-guo. Gobi shrub species diversity and its distribution pattern in west Hexi Corridor[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(6): 1514-1522.

参考文献 37

[1]	叶万辉. 物种多样性与植物群落的维持机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2000, 8(1): 17- 24. [YE Wanhui. The maintenance mechanism of plant community and its species diversity[J]. Chinese Biodiversity, 2000, 8(1): 17-24. ]
[2]	高俊峰, 马克明, 冯宗伟. 景观组成、结构和梯度格局对植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(9): 1087-1094. [GAO Jun⁃ feng, MA Keming, FENG Zongwei. Effects of landscape composi⁃ tion, structure and gradient pattern on plant diversity[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(9): 1087-1094. ]
[3]	WEBB G E, SANDO W J, RAYMOND A. Mississippian coral lati⁃ tudinal diversity gradients (western interior United States): Testing the limits of high resolution diversity data[J]. Journal of Paleont, 1997, 71: 780-791.
[4]	BROWN J H, LOMOLINO M V. Biogeography[M]. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer, 1998.
[5]	WESCHE K, VONWEHRDEN H. Surveying southern Mongolia: Application of multivariate classification methods in drylands with low diversity and long floristic gradients[J]. Applied Vegetation Science, 2011, 14(4): 561-570.
[6]	王国宏. 祁连山北坡中段植物群落多样性的垂直分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2002, 10(1): 7-10. [WANG Guohong. Species diver⁃ sity of plant communities along an altitudinal gradient in the mid⁃ dle section of northern slopes of Qilian Mountains, Zhangye, Gan⁃ su, China[J]. Chinese Biodiversity, 2002, 10(1): 7-10. ]
[7]	MCCAIN C M. Elevational gradients in diversity of small mammals [J]. Ecology, 2005, 86: 366-372.
[8]	OOMEN M A, SHANKER K. Elevational species richness pat⁃ terns emerge from multiple local mechanisms in Himalayanwoody plants[J]. Ecology, 2005, 86: 3039-3047.
[9]	许佳, 祝晓瞳, 苑塏烨. 额河源流采金矿区不同恢复措施对矿区物种多样性和地上生物量的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(3): 581-589. [XU Jia, ZHU Xiaotong, YUAN Kaiye. Effects of differ⁃ ent restoration measures on species diversity and aboveground bio⁃ mass of the gold mining area in headwaters of the Ertix River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(3): 581-589. ]
[10]	LIU B. Vertical patterns in plant diversity and their relations with environmental factors on the southern slope of the Tianshan Moun⁃ tains (middle section) in Xinjiang (China) [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017, 14(4): 742-757.
[11]	KIKKAWA J, WILLIAMS E E. Altitude distribution of land birds in New Guinea[J]. Search, 1971, 2: 64-65.
[12]	TERBORGH J. Bird species diversity on an Andean elevation gra⁃ dient[J]. Ecology, 1977, 58: 1007-1019.
[13]	杨启池, 李亭亭, 汪正祥, 等. 鄂西北珍稀濒危植物及物种多样性空间尺度分析 [J]. 植物科学学报, 2019, 37(4): 464- 473. [YANG Qichi, LI Tingting, WANG Zhengxiang, et al. Spatial scale analysis of the species diversity and distribution of rare and endan⁃ gered plants in northwest Hubei, China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(4) : 464-473. ]
[14]	WILSON J B, SYKES M T. Some tests for niche limitation by ex⁃ amination of species diversity in the Dunedin area, New Zealand [J]. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1988, 26(2): 237-244.
[15]	QIAN H. Spatial pattern of vascular plant diversity in north Amer⁃ ica north of Mexico and its floristic relationship with Eurasia[J]. Annals of Botany, 1999, 91: 71-283.
[16]	CARDILLO M. Body size and latitudinal gradients in regional di⁃ versity of New World birds[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2002, 11: 59-65.
[17]	QIAN H, RICKLEFS R E. A latitudinal gradient in large-scale be⁃ ta diversity for vascular plants in north America[J]. Ecology Let⁃ ters, 2007, 10(8): 737-744.
[18]	CLARKE A. Is there a latitudinal diversity cline in the sea[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1992, 7: 286-287.
[19]	COATES M. A comparison of intertidal assemblages on exposed and sheltered tropical and temperate rocky shores[J]. Global Ecolo⁃ gy and Biogeography, 1998, 7: 115-125.
[20]	SUGIMOTO N, HARA Y, YUMIMOTO K, et al. Dust emission es⁃ timated with an assimilated dust transport model using lidarnet⁃ work data and vegetation growth in the gobi desert in Mongolia[J]. Sola, 2010, 6: 125-128.
[21]	何芳兰, 刘世增, 李昌龙, 等. 甘肃河西戈壁植物群落组成特征及其多样性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(4): 74-78. [HE Fanglan, LIU Shizeng, LI Changlong, et al. Study on composi⁃ tion and diversity of phytocoenosium in gobi region of Hexi, Gansu [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30 (4): 74-78. ]
[22]	陈鹏, 潘晓玲. 河西走廊地区植物的区系特征[J]. 植物研究, 2001, 21(1): 24-30. [CHEN Peng, PAN Xiaoling. The floristic char⁃ acteristics in the area of the Hexi Corridor[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2001, 21(1): 24-30. ]
[23]	夏延国, 宁宇, 李景文, 等. 中国黑戈壁地区植物区系及其物种多样性研究 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(9): 1906- 1915. [XIA Yanguo, NING Yu, LI Jingwen, et al. Plant species diversity and floral characters in the Black Gobi Desert of China[J]. Acta Botani⁃ ca Sinica, 2013, 33(9): 1906-1915. ]
[24]	王健铭, 董芳宇, 巴海·那斯拉, 等. 中国黑戈壁植物多样性分布格局及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(12): 3488- 3498. [WANG Jianming, DONG Fangyu, NASINA Bahai, et al. Plant dis⁃ tribution patterns and the factors influencing plant diversity in the Black Gobi Desert of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36 (12): 3488-3498. ]
[25]	马斌, 周志宇, 张莉丽, 等. 阿拉善左旗植物物种多样性空间分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(12): 6099-6106. [MA Bin, ZHOU Zhiyu, ZHANG Lili, et al. The spatial distribution characteristics of plant diversity in Alex Left Banner[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(12): 6099-6106. ]
[26]	张佩, 袁国富, 庄伟, 等. 黑河中游荒漠绿洲过渡带多枝柽柳对地下水位变化的生理生态响应与适应[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31 (22): 6677- 6687. [ZHANG Pei, YUAN Guofu, ZHUANG Wei, et al. Ecophysiological responses and adaptation of Tamarix ramosis⁃ sima to changes in groundwater depth in the Heihe River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(22): 6677-6687. ]
[27]	张锦春, 王继和, 赵明, 等. 库姆塔格沙漠南缘荒漠植物群落多样性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 375-382. [ZHANG Jin⁃ chun, WANG Jihe, ZHAO Ming, et al. Plant community and spe⁃ cies diversity in the south fringe of Kumtag Desert[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(3): 375-382. ]
[28]	张林静, 岳明, 张远东, 等. 新疆阜康绿洲荒漠过渡带植物群落物种多样性特征[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(3): 329-334. [ZHANG Linjing, YUE Ming, ZHANG Yuandong, et al. Characteristics of plant community species diversity of oasis desert ecotone in Fu⁃ kang, Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23(3): 329- 334. ]
[29]	李新荣, 何明珠, 贾荣亮. 黑河中下游荒漠区植物多样性分布对土壤水分变化的响应[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(7): 685-691. [LI Xinrong, HE Mingzhu, JIA Rongliang. The response of desert plant species diversity to the changes in soil water content in the⁃ middle-lower reaches of the Heihe River[J]. Advances in Earth Sci⁃ ence, 2008, 23(7): 685-691. ]
[30]	中国黑戈壁地区生态本底科学考察队. 中国黑戈壁研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. [China Black Gobi Region Ecological Background Research Team. Black Gobi studies in China[M]. Bei⁃ jing: Science Press, 2014. ]
[31]	王庆锁, 冯宗炜, 罗菊春. 河北北部、内蒙古东部森林-草原交错带生物多样性研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(2): 141-146. [WANG Qingsuo, FENG Zongwei, LUO Juchun. Biodiversity of a forest- steppe ecotone in northern Hebei Province and eastern In⁃ ner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2000, 24(2): 141-146. ]
[32]	闻志彬, 冯缨. 新疆猪毛菜属植物多样性及其地理分布特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1): 185- 192. [WEN Zhibin, FENG Ying. Biodiversity and geographical distribution of the genus Salsola L. in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(1): 185-192. ]
[33]	王蕾, 罗磊, 刘鹏, 等. 塔里木河中下游水分干扰对胡杨林群落物种多样性的影响 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(6): 1275- 1281. [WANG Lei, LUO Lei, LIU Peng. Biodiversity of Populus euphrati⁃ ca communities under water disturbance in middle and lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2016, 39(6): 1275-1281. ]
[34]	张钦弟, 卫伟, 陈利顶, 等. 黄土高原草地土壤水分和物种多样性沿降水梯度的分布格局 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1351-1362. [ZHANG Qindi, WEI Wei, CHEN Liding, et al. Spa⁃ tial variation of soil moisture and species diversity patterns along a precipitation gradient in the grasslands of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(8): 1351-1362. ]
[35]	唐志尧, 方精云. 植物物种多样性的垂直分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2004, (1): 20-28. [TANG Zhiyao, FANG Jingyun. A review on the elevational patterns of plant species diversity[J]. Chinese Bio⁃ diversity, 2004, (1): 20-28. ]
[36]	WHITTAKER R J, WILLIS K J, FIELD R. Scale and species rich⁃ ness: Towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity [J]. Journal of Biogeography, 2001, 28: 453-470.
[37]	GODFRAY H C J, LAWTON J H. Scale and species richness num⁃ bers[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2001, 16: 400-404.

河西走廊西段戈壁灌木群落多样性及其分布格局研究

Gobi shrub species diversity and its distribution pattern in west Hexi Corridor

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 37

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郭方君, 马全林, 张锦春, 李得禄, 袁宏波, 陈芳, 魏林源, 张德魁. 石羊河流域荒漠区植被类型、分布和数量特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(11): 1848-1857.
[2]	白慧,尹丽颖,苏辉明,高峰,穆玉琴,张芸芸,童玉平,徐文轩,,曹秋梅,,杨维康,,徐峰. 利用红外相机监测新疆天池博格达峰自然保护区鸟兽资源[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(3): 847-859.
[3]	马剑,刘贤德,何晓玲,王顺利,贺永岩,武秀荣,赵晶忠,马雪娥. 祁连山典型灌丛群落结构特征及其多样性研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(5): 1427-1437.
[4]	张杰, 张旸, 赵振勇, 李敏. 中国飞蝗（Locusta migratoria）灾害地理分布模拟及其生物气候因子分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(3): 590-598.
[5]	许佳, 祝晓瞳, 苑塏烨. 额河源流采金矿区不同恢复措施对矿区物种多样性和地上生物量的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(3): 581-589.
[6]	刘美, 吴世新, 潘伯荣, 王丹. 中国沙冬青属植物的地理分布及生境特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(2): 380-387.
[7]	何学敏，吕光辉，秦璐，Akhmetkaliyeva MAKSAT ，刘昊奇，张雪妮. 土库曼斯坦物种多样性及其与中国新疆的比较[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(4): 623-630.
[8]	吾玛尔·阿布力孜，胡红英，马合木提·哈力克，艾尼瓦尔·吐米尔. 吉尔吉斯斯坦西南部两栖爬行动物物种多样性[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(4): 591-600.
[9]	王旭，马禹. 新疆中尺度对流系统的地理分布和生命史[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(6): 857-863.
[10]	冯缨,段士民,牟书勇,赵莉,赵兴华. 新疆荒漠地区C4植物的生态分布与区系分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(01): 145-153.