陕北洛河流域地貌演化阶段的定量分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据洛河流域地貌南北纵向区域分布规律,并参考张宗祜先生(1986)编制的"中国黄土高原地貌类型图",将洛河流域由南至北依次划分为洛川黄土塬区、甘泉一志丹黄土梁状(为主)丘陵沟壑区及吴起黄土峁状(为主)丘陵沟壑区3个地貌区。借助于GIS的空间分析功能,对洛河流域3种不同地貌绘制了Strahler曲线,采用高程积分法、信息熵法、侵蚀积分值法进行计算。结果表明:3种地貌区均属于壮年期地貌发育数量特征值范围,说明洛河流域总体的发育状态已经开始进入壮年期,但不同地貌分区的发育阶段不尽相同;洛河流域不同地貌的面积-高程积分曲线的S值大小排列顺序为:吴起黄土峁状(为主)丘陵沟壑区< 洛川黄土塬区< 甘泉一志丹黄土梁状(为主)丘陵沟壑区,与理论情况不相符。分析认为,这可能是由于近年来洛川黄土塬区侵蚀强度增加对洛川黄土塬区的地貌发育产生了一定的影响。

关键词: 洛河流域, 地貌演化, 面积-高程积分, 信息熵, 侵蚀积分, 定量分析

Abstract: It is generally acknowledged that the evolution trend of loess landform is from loess tableland to loess ridge,and then to loess hilly. But in fact,the formation and evolution of loess landform is much more complex. The study quantitatively determined the development stage of watershed landscape by using the method of hypsometric integral value,information entropy and integral value of erosion,which helped to understand the basic law of landscape development. First,according to the north-south longitudinal distribution regularities of loess geomorphy in Luohe drainage basin,and referring to "The landscape types map of Chinese Loess Plateau" compiled by Zhang Zonghu in 1986,the Luohe drainage basin was divided into three landform areas from south to north in turn,that is Luochuan loess tableland,Ganquan-Zhidan loess ridge area(mainly)and Wuqi loess hill area(mainly). Second,with the spatial analysis function of GIS,the paper drew the Strahler curves for 3 different landform areas and made a quantitative calculation on the hypsometric integral value,information entropy and integral value of erosion in Luohe drainage basin by using the DEM data of the study area. Results showed as follows:(1)The values of three kinds of landform areas all belong to the quantity characteristic value range of maturity stage,indicating that the overall development status of Luohe drainage basin has begun into the maturity stage. But the developmental stages of different geomorphic partition were not the same.(2)According to the topographic features of Luohe drainage basin from north to south,erosion cutting intensity and the current situation of development,the total topographic feature of study area from north to south is from complex to simple. Therefore, in theory,from upstream to downstream,the S value of area-altitude integral curve for different landform of study area should be increased gradually,that is,S(loess hill)< S(loess ridge)< S(loess tableland). This means that the geomorphology of study area in whole would be younger the farther it went downstream. But the actual calculating result showed that the size order of S value on area-altitude integral curve of different landform area was:Wuqi loess hill area(mainly)< Luochuan loess tableland area < Ganquan-Zhidan loess ridge area(mainly), which is not consistent with theoretical situation. This paper thinks that this may be caused by the increase of erosion intensity on Luochuan loess tableland in recent years. The increase of erosion rate in modern time has a certain influence on the landscape development of Luochuan loess tableland area.

Key words: Luohe drainage basin, geomorphologic evolution, hypsometric integral value, information entropy, integral value of erosion, quantitative analysis

中图分类号:

P931.6

郭娇, 王伟, 石建省. 陕北洛河流域地貌演化阶段的定量分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(6): 1161-1168.

GUO Jiao, WANG Wei, SHI Jian-sheng. A quantitative analysis of the stage of geomorphologic evolution in Luohe Drainage Basin,north of Shaanxi Province[J]. , 2015, 38(6): 1161-1168.

参考文献

[1] 杨松,巫锡勇,柴春阳.喇嘛溪流域地貌演化阶段的定量分析[J].路基工程, 2009, (1):36-38.[YANG Song, WU Xiyong, CHAI Chunyang. A quantitative analysis on the stage of geomorphologic evolution in Lamaxi Drainage Basin[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2009, (1):36-38.]

[2] 彭建,杨明德,梁虹.基于GIS的路南巴江喀斯特流域地貌演化定量研究[J].中国岩溶, 2002, 21(2):89-94.[PENG Jian, YANG Mingde, LIANG Hong. A quantitative study on Bajiang karst drainage basin in Lunan County, Yunan Province based on GIS[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2002, 21(2):89-94.]

[3] 励强,陆中臣,袁宝印.地貌发育阶段的定量研究[J].地理学报, 1990, 45(1):110-120.[LI Qiang, LU Zhongchen, YUAN Baoyin. Quantitative study of the stage of geomorphological evolution[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1990, 45(1):110-120.]

[4] STRAHLER A N. Hypsometric(area-altitude)analysis of erosional topography[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1952, 63:1117-1142.

[5] 陆中臣,贾绍凤.流域地貌系统[M].大连:大连出版社, 1991: 313-325.[LU Zhongchen, JIA Shaofeng. Geomorphology system of drainage basin[M]. Dalian:Dalian Press, 1991:313-325.]

[6] 桑广书,陈雄,陈小宁,等.黄土丘陵地貌形成模式与地貌演变[J].干旱区地理, 2007, 30(3):375-380.[SANG Guangshu, CHEN Xiong, CHEN Xiaoning, et al. Formation model and geomorphic evolution of loess hilly landforms[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2007, 30(3):375-380.]

[7] 程彦培,石建省,杨振京,等.古地形对黄土区岩土侵蚀趋势的控制作用[J].干旱区地理, 2010, 33(3):334-339.[CHENG Yanpei, SHI Jiangsheng, YANG Zhenjing, et al. Control of ancient landform on rock-soil erosion in loess area[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2010, 33(3):334-339.]

[8] 姚文波,侯甬坚,高松凡.唐以来方家沟流域地貌的演变与复原[J].干旱区地理, 2010, 33(4):509-517.[YAO Wenbo, HOU Yongjian, GAO Songfan. Geomorphologic changes and restoration of Fangjiagou drainage area from early Tang Dynasty[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2010, 33(4):509-517.]

[9] 张宗祜.中国黄土高原地貌类型图(1:500000)[M].北京:地质出版社, 1986.[ZHANG Zonghu. The landscape types map of Chinese Loess Plateau(1:500000)[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1986.]

[10] 尹国康.流域地貌系统[M].南京:南京大学出版社, 1991:210-212.[YIN Guokang. Geomorphology system of drainage basin[M]. Nanjing:Nanjing University Press, 1991:210-212.]

[11] 张敬春,李川川,张梅,等.格尔木河流域面积-高程积分值的地貌学分析[J].山地学报, 2011, 29(3):257-268.[ZHANG Jingchun, LI Chuanchuan, ZHANG Mei, et al. Geomorphologic analysis of the Golmud River drainage basin based on hypsometric integral value[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 29(3): 257-268.]

[12] 姜鲁光,张祖陆.鲁中南山地流域地貌的高程-面积分析[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 18(1):63-66.[JIANG Luguang, ZHANG Zulu. Altitude-area analysis on the drainage landform in the Luzhongnan mountainous region[J]. Journal of Shandong Normal University(Natural Science), 2003, 18(1): 63-66.]

[13] 徐建华,艾南山.浅析地貌演化过程的人类活动[J].干旱区地理, 1989, 12(4):32-36.[XU Jianhua, AI Nanshan. Preliminary analysis of human activity of geomorphological evolutionary process[J]. Arid Land Geography, 1989, 12(4):32-36.]

[14] 艾南山.侵蚀流域系统的信息熵[J].水土保持学报, 1987, 1(2):1-8.[AI Nanshan. Comentropy in erosional drainage-system[J]. Journal of Soil andWater Conservation, 1987, 1(2):1-8.]

[15] 信忠保,许炯心,马元旭.黄土高原面积-高程分析及其侵蚀地貌学意义[J].山地学报, 2008, 26(3):356-363.[XIN Zhongbao, XU Jiongxin, MA Yuanxu. Hypsometric integral analysis and its sediment yield implications in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2008, 26(3):356-363.]

[16] 祝士杰,汤国安,李发源,等.基于DEM的黄土高原面积高程积分研究[J].地理学报, 2013, 68(7):921-932.[ZHU Shijie, TANG Guoan, LI Fayuan, et al. Spatial variation of hypsometric integral in the Loess Plateau based on DEM[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(7):921-932.]

[17] 武春龙,李壁成,雷会珠.小流域侵蚀地貌演化的计量分析[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1997, 3(4):55-61.[WU Chunlong, LI Bicheng, LEI Huizhu. Quantitative analysis of eroded landform evolution in small watershed[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil andWater Conservation, 1997, 3(4):55-61.]

[18] 翟秀敏,鹿化煜,李郎平,等.不同时间尺度洛川塬地貌演化与侵蚀量估算[J].第四纪研究, 2012, 32(5):839-848.[ZHAI Xiumin, LU Huayu, LI Langping, et al. Landscape evolution and erosion of Luochuan tableland(central Chinese Loess Plateau) at different time scales[J]. Quanternary Sciences, 2012, 32(5): 839-848.]

[19] 桑广书,甘枝茂,岳大鹏.元代以来黄土塬区沟谷发育与土壤侵蚀[J].干旱区地理, 2003, 26(4):355-360.[SANG Guangshu, GAN Zhimao, YUE Dapeng. Gully development and soil erosion in the Loess Yuan region since Yuan Dynasty[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2003, 26(4):355-360.]

[20] 杜娟,赵景波.陕西关中全新世以来黄土塬区土壤侵蚀研究[J].干旱区地理, 2004, 27(4):535-539.[DU Juan, ZHAO Jingbo. Study on soil erosion on the loess highlands in the Guanzhong Plain, Shaanxi Province since the Holocene epoch[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2004, 27(4):535-539.]