毛乌素沙地样品扫描电镜的矿物定量分析

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.11

干旱区地理 ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1505-1513.doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.06.11

毛乌素沙地样品扫描电镜的矿物定量分析

崔颖颖，周亚利，陈国祥，黄春长，庞奖励，羊俊敏，闫雪娇

陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院，陕西西安 710062

收稿日期:2019-12-24 修回日期:2020-04-01 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-11-25
通讯作者: 周亚利（1971-），女，陕西西安人，副教授，从事气候变化与环境演变.
作者简介:崔颖颖（1994-），女，河南焦作人，硕士研究生，从事沉积物物源分析研究. E-mail: yingyingcui94@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（4207112，41371209，41771110，41971116）；中国博士后特别资助项目（2012T50795）；中国博士后基金项目（2011M501443）

Mineral quantitative analysis of Mu Us Sandy Land with QEMSCAN

CUI Ying-ying, ZHOU Ya-li, CHEN Guo-xiang, HUANG Chun-chang, PANG Jiang-Li, YANG Jun-min, YAN Xue-jiao

School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, Shaanxi, China

Received:2019-12-24 Revised:2020-04-01 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 矿物定量分析实验用捷克 FEI 公司生产的 MLA650F 型矿物解离分析仪，采用 MLA 原样法和 MLA 重矿法分别对毛乌素沙地西南和东南地区典型沙样的矿物组成以及含量进行分析，结果表明：MLA650F 仪器测量结果的重复性好，精确度高，测得的矿物种类比光学显微镜更丰富，但不能如同光学显微镜一样直接提供矿物最原始的颜色、形状、透明度、光泽、表面断口等特征。虽然扫描电镜与光学显微镜测得的单个矿物含量和矿物分析指标存在一定差异，但矿物含量变化趋势基本一致，均得到毛乌素沙地主要轻矿物以石英-长石为主，重矿物以角闪石-石榴子石为主的结论。此外，扫描电镜与光学显微镜对同一样品的矿物分析指标变化趋势基本一致，其中 MLA 原样法与光学显微镜的 Q/TF 和 ATi 指标同化学风化指标 CIA 结果一致，均表明毛乌素沙地西南地区风化作用较东南地区强。虽然扫描电镜与光学显微镜均能反应沉积物的沉积环境，但在实际工作中，要注意所使用的数据应建立在同一测量系统内，不同实验室或实验方法测得的实验数据在引用时要慎重。

关键词: 扫描电镜, 矿物分析, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract: The quantitative analysis of mineral experiments with Czech FEI company MLA650F mineral liberation analyzer, use the MLA original sample method and MLA heavy mineral method to analyze the mineral composition in the southwest and southeast of Mu Us Sandy Land in Shaanxi Province and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Results show that MLA650F have good repeatability and high accuracy, and the mineral types measured are richer than those measured using the optical microscope. However, unlike the optical microscope, it cannot directly provide the original color, shape, transparency, luster, surface fracture, and other characteristics of the mineral. Although the individual mineral content and the mineral analysis index measured by QEMSCAN and optical microscope have some differences, the mineral change trend is basically the same. It is concluded that the main light minerals in Mu Us Sandy Land are quartz-feldspar and the heavy minerals are hornblende-garnet. In addition, QEMSCAN and optical microscope show similar change trend of mineral analysis indexes of the same sample. The original sample method of MLA is consistent with the Q/TF and ATi indexes of the optical microscope and with the CIA indexes of chemical weathering. Results showed that the weathering in the southwest of Mu Us Sandy Land was stronger than that in the southeast. Although both QEMSCAN and optical microscope can reflect the sedimentary environment, in practice, it should be noted that the data used should be established in the same measurement system, and the experimental data measured by different laboratories or experimental methods should be carefully quoted.

Key words: QEMSCAN, mineral analysis, Mu Us Sandy Land

崔颖颖, 周亚利, 陈国祥, 黄春长, 庞奖励, 羊俊敏, 闫雪娇. 毛乌素沙地样品扫描电镜的矿物定量分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(6): 1505-1513.

CUI Ying-ying, ZHOU Ya-li, CHEN Guo-xiang, HUANG Chun-chang, PANG Jiang-Li, YANG Jun-min, YAN Xue-jiao. Mineral quantitative analysis of Mu Us Sandy Land with QEMSCAN[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(6): 1505-1513.

参考文献 19

[1]	赵红格, 刘池洋. 物源分析方法及研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2003, 21(3): 409- 415. [ZHAO Hongge, LIU Chiyang. Approaches and prospects of provenance analysis[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(3): 409-415. ]
[2]	姜在兴. 沉积学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003: 46-54. [JI⁃ ANG Zaixing. Sedimentology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003: 46-54. ]
[3]	高文华, 高抒, 王丹丹, 等. 废黄河沉积记录中来自不同河流物质的信息——基于重矿物与地球化学元素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(12): 1631-1639. [GAO Wenhua, GAO Shu, WANG Dan⁃ dan, et al. Sediment source information of different catchments in the sedimentary records of the abandoned Yellow River: Heavy mineral and geochemical analysis[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(12): 1631-1639. ]
[4]	宋天锐. 重砂矿物分选及鉴定[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987: 16- 123. [SONG Tianrui. Identification of heavy placer minerals[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 1987: 16-123. ]
[5]	SEVERIN K P. Energy dispersive spectrometry of common rock forming minerals[M]. Netherland: Springer, 2007: 1-2.
[6]	董治宝. 库姆塔格沙漠风沙地貌[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 100- 112. [DONG Zhibao. Sand and wind in the Kumtag Desert [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 100-112. ]
[7]	马冀, 岳乐平, 杨利荣, 等. 毛乌素沙漠东南缘全新世剖面光释光年代及古气候意义 [J]. 第四纪研究, 2011, 31(1): 120- 129. [MA Ji, YUE Leping, YANG Lirong, et al. OSL dating of Holocene sequence and palaeoclimate change record in southeastern margin of Mu Us Desert, north China[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2011, 31 (1): 120-129. ]
[8]	王陇, 高广磊, 张英, 等. 毛乌素沙地风沙土粒径分布特征及其影响因素 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(5): 1003- 1010. [WANG Long, GAO Guanglei, ZHANG Ying, et al. Particle size distribu⁃ tion of aeolian soils in the Mu Us Sandy Land and the influence factors[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2019, 42(5): 1003-1010. ]
[9]	杨思全, 王薇. 毛乌素沙地土地沙漠化评价[J]. 干旱区地理, 2010, 33(2): 258-262. [YANG Siquan, WANG Wei. Evaluation of desertification in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2010, 33(2): 258-262. ]
[10]	LANCASTER N. The Namib sand sea: Dunes forms, processes and sediments[M]. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1989.
[11]	马收先, 孟庆任, 曲永强. 轻矿物物源分析研究进展[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(2): 597- 608. [MA Shouxian, MENG Qingren, QU Yongqiang. Development on provenance analysis of light minerals [J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(2): 597-608. ]
[12]	王昆山, 石学法, 姜晓黎. 南黄海沉积物的来源及分区: 来自轻矿物的证据[J]. 科学通报, 2001(S1): 26-31. [WANG Kunshan, SHI Xuefa, JIANG Xiaoli. Sources and provinces of sediments in South Yellow Sea: Evidence from light minerals[J]. Chinese Sci⁃ ence Bulletin, 2001(S1): 26-31. ]
[13]	王秋良, 胡思辉, 李长安. 周老镇钻孔砾石层重矿物特征及地质意义[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(4): 878-884. [WANG Qiuliang, HU Sihui, LI Chan’an. Heavy mineral characteristics of gravel layers in the Zhoulao Town borehole[J]. Geology in China, 2009, 36(4): 878-884. ]
[14]	MORTON A C. HALLSWORTH C R. Identifying provenance-spe⁃ cific features of detrital heavy mineral assemblages in sandstones [J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1994, 90(3-4): 241-256.
[15]	HUBERT JF. A zircon-tourmaline-rutile maturity index and the in⁃ terdependence of the composition of heavy mineral assemblages with the gross composition and texture of sandstones[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1962, 32(3): 440-450.
[16]	MORTON A C, HALLSWORTH C R, BAHLBURG H, et al. Pro⁃ cesses controlling the composition of heavy mineral assemblages in sandstones[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1999, 124(1-4): 3-29.
[17]	NESBITT H W, YOUNG G M. Early proterozoic climates and platemotions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites[J]. Nature, 1982, 299(21): 715-717.
[18]	NESBIT H W, YOUNG G M. Formation and diagenesis of weather⁃ ing profiles[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1989, 97(2): 129-147.
[19]	秦作栋, 翟颖倩, 杨永刚, 等. 汾河源区不同景观带表土粒度与地球化学元素组成分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(1): 62-69. [QIN Zuodong, ZHAI Yingqian, YANG Yonggang , et al. Topsoil particle size and geochemical elements in the different landscape zone in Fenhe River headwater catchment[J]. Arid Land Geogra⁃ phy, 2017, 40(1): 62-69. ]

毛乌素沙地样品扫描电镜的矿物定量分析

Mineral quantitative analysis of Mu Us Sandy Land with QEMSCAN

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	贺军奇,魏燕,高万德,陈云飞,马延东,刘秀花. 毛乌素沙地东南缘植被NDVI时空变化及其对气候因子的响应[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5): 1523-1533.
[2]	卢卓瑜,崔建新,张晓虹,李鹏. 清至民国毛乌素沙地佟哈拉克泊复原及演变研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(4): 1083-1092.
[3]	王陇, 高广磊, 张英, 丁国栋, 赵媛媛, 彭玏. 毛乌素沙地风沙土粒径分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(5): 1003-1010.
[4]	张佩云, 王凯, 王戈飞, 梁枥文, 张世强. 毛乌素沙地中部地表水体1999-2015时空动态变化特征及驱动分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(3): 633-639.
[5]	闫峰，吴波. 近40 a毛乌素沙地荒漠化过程研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(6): 987-996.