滴灌梯形迷宫滴头水力性能多目标优化

干旱区地理 ›› 2016, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 600-606.

滴灌梯形迷宫滴头水力性能多目标优化

刘春景^1,2, 唐敦兵², 王雷³, 赵泽¹

1 蚌埠学院机械与车辆工程系, 安徽蚌埠 233030;
2 南京航空航天大学机电学院, 江苏南京 210016;
3 安徽工程大学机械与汽车工程学院, 安徽芜湖 241000

收稿日期:2015-12-26 修回日期:2016-02-11 出版日期:2016-05-25
作者简介:刘春景,博士后,教授,主要从事现代机械设计理论与方法研究.Email:liusun7575@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51175262);安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1308085ME65)

Multi output optimization of the hydraulic performance for drip irrigation trapezoidal labyrinth channel of emitter

LIU Chun-jing^1,2, TANG Dun-bing², WANG Lei³, ZHAO Ze¹

1 Department of Mechanical & Vehicle Engineering, College of Bengbu, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China;
2 College of Mechanical & Electronic Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China;
3 School of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, Anhui Ploytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui China

Received:2015-12-26 Revised:2016-02-11 Online:2016-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 滴灌技术是农业可持续发展的重要途径,但提高滴灌滴头水力性能的存在诸多难题,滴灌滴头水力性能优化是滴灌技术不断发展的需要。流量系数和流态指数是决定滴头水力性能的两个主要参数,如何提高滴头的水力性能已成为近年来的研究热点,大量研究只是对滴头水力性能进行了单目标分析,滴头水力性能优化涉及到流量系数和流态指数与滴头流道结构参数变量之间的权衡,因此流量系数和流态指数同步优化解决方案显得非常重要。提出基于流量系数和流态指数为目标函数的滴灌滴头水力性能多性能指标(MCPI)优化方法,将田口方法和模糊逻辑相结合,测试和优化滴头水力性能。结果表明,流道宽度、流道深度、流道转角和流道单元数对MCPI影响极显著,它们对MCPI贡献率超过85%,与此同时流量系数和流态指数分别改善了7.91%和6.75%,优化后的流量系数k=0.128、流态指数x=0.506。以最优因素水平组合W₁L₁D₃θ₂N₃做滴头水力性能试验,实际测得的流量系数k=0.126、流态指数x=0.504,与优化推理值符合较好。

关键词: 滴灌, 水力性能, 田口方法, 模糊逻辑, 多目标优化

Abstract: The proposal of drip irrigation technique to enhance irrigation efficiency is the key problem for sustainable development of agriculture, but it is very challenging because of the inherent fluctuations of the hydraulic performance of drip emitter (HPDE). Flux coefficient and flow index are the two critical factors attributing to the hydraulic performance of drip emitter. A lot of researches have carried out study on the hydraulic performance of drip emitter only based on single objective optimization of HPDE, however, simultaneous optimization solutions on the multiple characteristic performance indices (MCPI) and the corresponding effects on HPDE still remain underexplored. Based on MCPI, HPDE with labyrinth channels was optimized by combining the Taguchi method and fuzzy logic. The analysis results of variance for MCPI show that factors including width, depth, angles and unit numbers had significant effects on MCPI, accounting for over 85% of total variations of MCPI. The optimal factor combination can be determined as W₁L₁D₃θ₂N₃. Compared with the 1st time optimized result, MCPI of the optimal condition was improved by 8.04%, meanwhile, the flux coefficient of 0.128 and flow index of 0.506 were improved by 7.91% and 6.75%, respectively. Finally, the experimental tests based on factor combination of W₁L₁D₃θ₂N₃ was conducted to investigate the optimal mechanism, which showed that the flux coefficient was 0.126 and the flow index was 0.504, indicating that MCPI was a promising processing method for HPDE.

Key words: drip irrigation, hydraulic performance, Taguchi method, fuzzy logic, multi output optimization

中图分类号:

TP183

刘春景, 唐敦兵, 王雷, 赵泽. 滴灌梯形迷宫滴头水力性能多目标优化[J]. 干旱区地理, 2016, 39(3): 600-606.

LIU Chun-jing, TANG Dun-bing, WANG Lei, ZHAO Ze. Multi output optimization of the hydraulic performance for drip irrigation trapezoidal labyrinth channel of emitter[J]. , 2016, 39(3): 600-606.

参考文献

[1] 山仑,康绍忠,吴普特. 中国节水农业[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005.[SHAN Lun,KANG Shaozhong,WU Pute. Water-saving agriculture of China[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2005.]

[2] 姚振宪,何松林. 滴灌设备与滴灌系统规划设计[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1999.[YAO Zhenxian,HE Songlin. Drip irrigation equipment and drip irrigation system layout[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press,1999.]

[3] 童新,刘廷玺,杨大文,等. 半干旱沙地-草甸区水面蒸发模拟及其影响因子辨识[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(1):10-17.[TONG Xin,LIU Tingxi,YANG Dawen,et al. Simulating evaporation from a water surface for the sand-meadow ecotone of the semiarid region in North China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015,38(1):10-17.]

[4] 杨金虎,张强,王劲松,等. 近60年来中国西南春季持续性干旱异常特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(3):215-222.[YANG Jinhu,ZHANG Qiang,WANG Jinsong,et al. Spring persistent droughts anomaly characteristics of over the southwest China in recent 60 years[J]. Arid Land Geography,2015,38(3):215-222.]

[5] 窦凯歌,王永东,雷加强,等. 咸水滴灌下塔里木沙漠公路防护林土壤盐分分布特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(3):576-584.[DOU Kaige,WANG Yongdong,LEI Jiaqiang,et al. Salt distribution characteristics of Taklimakan Desert highway shelterbelt under saline water drip-irrigation[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015,38(3):576-584.]

[6] 王卫华,王全九,刘建军,等. 膜下滴灌湿润体交汇区土壤水盐运移特征田间实验研究[J]. 干旱区地理,2011,34(4):558-564.[WANG Weihua,WANG Quanjiu,LIU Jianjun,et al. Field experimental study of soil water-salt transport characteristics in the interference area of wetted volume under the mulched drip irrigation[J]. Arid Land Geography,2011,34(4):558-564.]

[7] 孟桂祥,张鸣远,赵万华,等. 滴灌滴头内流场的数值模拟及流道优化设计[J]. 西安交通大学学报,2004,38(9):920-924.[MENG Guixiang,ZHANG Mingyuan,ZHAO Wanhua,et al. Numerical flow simulation and optimum channel design of drip irrigation emitter[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University,2004, 38(9):920-924.]

[8] LI J C,QI F,LI F R,et al. A bidirectional model for simulating soil water flow and salt transport under mulched drip irrigation with saline water[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2014, 146:24-33.

[9] SOULIS K X,ELMALOGLOU S,DERCAS N. Investigating the effects of soil moisture sensors positioning and accuracy on soil moisture based drip irrigation scheduling systems[J]. AgriculturalWater Management,2015,148:258-268.

[10] GARB Y,FRIEDLANDER L. From transfer to translation:Using systemic understandings of technology to understand drip irrigation uptake[J]. Agricultural Systems,2014,128:13-24.

[11] 张俊,赵万华,醋强一,等. 基于计算流体动力学的迷宫型灌水器流量预测[J]. 机械工程学报,2007,43(4):159-162.[ZHANG Jun,ZHAO Wanhua,CU Qiangyi,et al. Prediction for discharges of labyrinth-channel emitters based on computational fluid dynamics[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2007, 43(24):159-162.]

[12] WEI Q,SHI Y,DONG W,et al. Study on hydraulic performance of drip emitters by computational fluid dynamics[J]. AgriculturalWater Management,2006,84:130-136.

[13] PALAU-SALVADOR G,ARVIZA-VALVERDE J,BRALTS V F. Hydraulic flow behavior through an in-line emitter labyrinth using CFD techniques[C]. ASAE Meeting Paper No.042252, ASAE,St. Joseph,MH,2004.

[14] ZHANG J,ZHAO W,WEI Z,et al. Numerical and experimental study on hydraulic performance of emitters with arc labyrinth channels[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2007, 56:120-129.

[15] ZHANG J,ZHAO W,TANG Y,et al. Anti-clogging performance evaluation and parameterized design of emitters with labyrinth channels[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010,74:59-65.

[16] 李永欣,李光永,邱象玉,等. 迷宫滴头水力特性的计算流体动力学模拟[J]. 农业工程学报,2005,21(3):12-16.[LI Yongxin, LI Guangyong,QIU Xiangyu,et al. Modeling of hydraulic characteristics through labyrinth emitter in drip irrigation using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2005,21(3):12-16.]

[17] LI Y,YANG P,REN S,et al. Hydraulic characterizations of tortuous flow in path drip irrigation emitter[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2006,18:449-457.

[18] SOUZA W J,SINOBASi L R,SANCHEZ R,et al. Prototype emitter for use in subsurface drip irrigation:manufacturing,hydraulic evaluation and experimental analyses[J]. Biosystems Engineering,2014,128:41-51.

[19] GB/T 17187-2009农业灌溉设备滴头和滴灌管技术规范和试验方法[S].[GB/T 17187-2009 Agricultural irrigation equipment Emitters and emitting pipe Specification and test methods[S].]

[20] 李云开,杨培岭,任树梅,等. 滴灌灌水器迷宫式流道内部流体流动特性分析与试验研究[J]. 水利学报,2005,36(7):886-890.[LI Yunkai,YANG Peiling,REN Shumei,et al. Experimental study on flow characteristics in labyrinth path emitters[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2005,36(7):886-890.]

[21] SUN J H,HSUEH B R. Optical design and multi-objective optimization with fuzzy method for miniature zoom optics[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering,2011,49:962-971.

[22] PEDRYCZ W. Why triangular membership functions?[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1994,64:21-30.